On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote: > On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 20:24 +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 05:52:28PM +0000, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > > This is the part I am not comfortable with. I do not think the > > > delegates have the powers to decide when enough progress has been made > > > to violate a foundation document in our release. Just like an > > > individual developer does not have a right to decide to violate the > > > DFSG in their work, I think the release team, which prepares the > > > release, can do so unilaterally either (I did not vote for Bush). > > > > And you're comfortable with ftp-master ruling DFSG-iness through NEW > > then ? I don't really see the difference. > > I can't speak for Manoj, but for my own part, I have not seen any > evidence that ftp-master is letting things through NEW which are in > clear violation of the DFSG, so it doesn't come up.
Every kernel upload changing the ABI goes through NEW. Your lack of knowledge of Debian processes sucks (that means: you annoy us (at least me) with your stance and the fanatic way you defend it in public, please stop this and come back to more constructive discussions). Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog Le best-seller français mis à jour pour Debian Etch : http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
