On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 10:26:00PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> Do you have any suggestions yourself of things that you'd like a DPL
> to do to raise visibility?
As long as the regular "bits" are actually posted, I'm fine with it.
Additionally, it may be a good idea to have regular "IRC confere
On Sat, 2008-03-15 at 00:41 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Oh, and we need a way to deal with the structural problem of questions
> > which get posed to tech-ctte and simply never answered at all. Suppose
> > the tech-ctte fails to answer a question in, oh, three months, the
> > entire members
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 11:35:18AM +0100, Nacho Barrientos Arias wrote:
> If you get elected, what will you do to prevent people from waiting
> for weeks (and usually for months) to see their account created after
> DAM approval?
I would like to extend this question to "what will you do to improve
Hello,
If you get elected, what will you do to prevent people from waiting
for weeks (and usually for months) to see their account created after
DAM approval?
Good luck and thanks for your attention!
--
bye,
- Nacho
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 10:59:06PM -0400, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Would you support a resolution which said that if a tech-ctte member
> failed to contribute, or failed to vote for, say, any two questions,
> they would be replaceable at the discretion of the DPL?
I wouldn't. I don't think t
5 matches
Mail list logo
