Hi,
On Thu, 28 Jun 2007, gregor herrmann wrote:
> Or is it an additional requirement, i.e. "if $person is a DM _and_
> $package listing her as an uploader has 'DM-Upload: yes' set, then
> $person may upload $package"?
Yes.
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog
Premier livre français sur Debian GNU/Linux
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 22:51:04 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 12:03:22 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
>
> > and once Anthony has
> > fixed the proposal so that a DM doesn't automatically get upload rights
> > on all packages where he's currently listed as Maintainer/Uploader
On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 12:03:22 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> and once Anthony has
> fixed the proposal so that a DM doesn't automatically get upload rights
> on all packages where he's currently listed as Maintainer/Uploader (via
> the mandatory "DM-Upload: yes" field that only a DD can add),
I t
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 06:32:34AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Well, effectively the DM /could/ sponsor uploads of their own package by
> using -m, though that seems unnecessarily convoluted to me anyway.
At that point the difference between "sponsoring an upload" and "applying
a patch someone
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 12:18:31PM +, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 27/06/07 at 12:41 +0100, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > 5) The intial policy for the use of the Debian Maintainer keyring with the
> >Debian archive will be to accept uploads signed by a key in that keyring
> >provided:
> > [..
I second the proposal quoted below.
> Debian Maintainers Proposal
>
> The Debian Project endorses the concept of "Debian Maintainers" with
> limited access, and resolves that:
>
> 1) A new keyring will be created, called the "Debian maintainers keyring".
>It will be initially maint
Hi,
On 27/06/07 at 12:41 +0100, Anthony Towns wrote:
> 5) The intial policy for the use of the Debian Maintainer keyring with the
>Debian archive will be to accept uploads signed by a key in that keyring
>provided:
>
> [...]
>
> * the Maintainer: field of the uploaded .changes file
On 27/06/07 at 21:42 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
>
> > On 26/06/07 at 16:57 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> >> Anthony Towns wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 02:35:56PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> >> >> Someone with access to the real keyrings would be
> >> >>
On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 12:41:35PM +0100, Anthony Towns wrote:
I second the proposal quoted below.
> Debian Maintainers Proposal
>
> The Debian Project endorses the concept of "Debian Maintainers" with
> limited access, and resolves that:
>
> 1) A new keyring will be created, called t
On Thu, 28 Jun 2007, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 09:38:34AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > On Wed, 27 Jun 2007, Fabian Fagerholm wrote:
> > > Perhaps the most proper way to make changes to the contributor classes
> > > would be to first amend the constitution, creating a new
On Thu, Jun 28, 2007 at 09:38:34AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Jun 2007, Fabian Fagerholm wrote:
> > Perhaps the most proper way to make changes to the contributor classes
> > would be to first amend the constitution, creating a new class, and only
> > then issue a GR outlining how t
On Wed, 27 Jun 2007, Fabian Fagerholm wrote:
> Perhaps the most proper way to make changes to the contributor classes
> would be to first amend the constitution, creating a new class, and only
> then issue a GR outlining how the practicalities will be handled (if
> needed). There is also an alterna
12 matches
Mail list logo
