[redirecting to -devel where this belongs]
On Mon, Mar 13, 2006 at 12:11:59PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > > --
> > > Question to the release and archive people: Is there such a
> > > requirement? Will such architectures inde
On Sun, Mar 12, 2006 at 01:01:16PM -0800, Ted Walther wrote:
> Debian "feels" less libertarian now than it did eight years ago. Back
> in the day, it was unheard of for Debian Developers to be banished from
> Debian's mailing lists and official IRC channels just because of a
> personals political
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 10:56:57PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
> There is no way at the moment to see any progress of the issues in public.
> Now my question:
> 1.) Do you think it would be a good idea to handle debian-admin more
> openly?
> 2.) Would you encourage debian-admin to do so?
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 10:09:55PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Anthony Towns writes:
> > If I could pick /anything/, it'd be to make Debian suddenly 100% fun
> > for everyone involved.
> Yeah, I'm with you!
> Can you outline perhaps some of the things you think that keep it from
> being 10
Hi all,
As promised in my platform, I'd like to announce who is willing to
assist me if I am elected at the upcoming elections in my DPL team.
At every one of the four promised review moments[0], I will also look at
the team contents, and provide opportunity for team changes if
circumstances woul
unsubscribe
On debian-devel-announce, Thaddeus H. Black wrote:
> CALL FOR DEBATE QUESTIONS
>
> What do you want Don to ask the candidates? Please think of questions
> for the candidates now. This is your chance to get a direct, live
> response in the debate arena from Debian's next DPL to the burning
> ques
Frank Küster wrote:
> Moving this to -devel, it's off-topic for -vote; Cc to -admin.
>
> Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> At some place where it can be found even if you don't want to look up a
> >> month-old announcement. What about http://db.debian.org/machines.cgi,
> >> and th
Moving this to -devel, it's off-topic for -vote; Cc to -admin.
Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> At some place where it can be found even if you don't want to look up a
>> month-old announcement. What about http://db.debian.org/machines.cgi,
>> and the developers reference, in the sec
Frank Küster wrote:
> Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Frank Küster wrote:
> >> >>5. Do you see any services for our users or developers missing or
> >> >> poorly maintained? If so, which and what do you plan to do to
> >> >> fix this?
> >> >
> >> > I'm not directly aware of an
Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frank Küster wrote:
>> >>5. Do you see any services for our users or developers missing or
>> >> poorly maintained? If so, which and what do you plan to do to
>> >> fix this?
>> >
>> > I'm not directly aware of anything important missing at the mome
Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 11:20:47PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > Such requests and requirements change the situation. However, I have
> > to admit that I first read about this particular requirement here. I
> > noticed some babbling about ppc64, sparc64, mips64 and s390
Frank Küster wrote:
> >>5. Do you see any services for our users or developers missing or
> >> poorly maintained? If so, which and what do you plan to do to
> >> fix this?
> >
> > I'm not directly aware of anything important missing at the moment. I
> > know that we struggled to get packages.d
Bill Allombert wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 11:47:25AM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> > Why would we need "more total CPU time"? Not even leisner is
> > overloaded at the moment, and it's probably the slowliest machine.
> > (leisner has a different problem, though).
>
> > Hence, please explai
Steve McIntyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>5. Do you see any services for our users or developers missing or
>> poorly maintained? If so, which and what do you plan to do to
>> fix this?
>
> I'm not directly aware of anything important missing at the moment. I
> know that we struggled to get
On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 10:17:00AM +, MJ Ray wrote:
> Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 10:36:42AM +, MJ Ray wrote:
> > > 2. Do you believe it would be fair to cite someone's non-technical
> > >socio-religious views in the reasoning for or against expulsion?
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 11:47:25AM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Why would we need "more total CPU time"? Not even leisner is
> overloaded at the moment, and it's probably the slowliest machine.
> (leisner has a different problem, though).
> Hence, please explain why we need "more total CPU time
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 11:20:47PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
> Such requests and requirements change the situation. However, I have
> to admit that I first read about this particular requirement here. I
> noticed some babbling about ppc64, sparc64, mips64 and s390x
> architectures but nothing
18 matches
Mail list logo
