Followups set to -vote; can we please keep this on the list that's
designed for these discussions?
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 11:24:52AM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> There's a lot of personal information inside debian-private,
There is? I got 36 of 494 messages (7%) for the month I did, with an
add
[ Removed d-devel, IMHO it's enough to discuss this on d-vote ]
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 11:19:55AM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> Em Qui, 2005-12-08 às 00:08 +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin escreveu:
> > On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 02:47:07PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> > > The first type of publication could
Em Qui, 2005-12-08 às 08:07 +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane escreveu:
> On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 01:39:15AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 02:47:07PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> >> The first type of publication could embrace the entire content of
> >> debian-private, but restri
Em Qui, 2005-12-08 às 01:39 +0100, Wouter Verhelst escreveu:
> On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 02:47:07PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> > I hope this is closer to a consensus...
> Afraid not. This proposal basically creates a second class of people --
> those who we want to sign NDA's to be able to read stu
Em Qui, 2005-12-08 às 00:08 +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin escreveu:
> On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 02:47:07PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> > The first type of publication could embrace the entire content of
> > debian-private, but restrictions will be applied for those who want to
> > read, basically, the nee
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005 08:07:36 +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 01:39:15AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 02:47:07PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
> >> I hope this is closer to a consensus...
>
> > Afraid not. This proposal basically creates a second
6 matches
Mail list logo
