Em Qui, 2005-12-08 às 01:39 +0100, Wouter Verhelst escreveu: > On Wed, Dec 07, 2005 at 02:47:07PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote: > > I hope this is closer to a consensus... > Afraid not. This proposal basically creates a second class of people -- > those who we want to sign NDA's to be able to read stuff.
Well, if you're going to get access to information that if published could damage people, that's not surprise. There's a lot of personal information inside debian-private, which can be usefull for someone doing a research, but even then, should not be available to general public. > That's even further away from 'openness and transparency' than the > status quo. The idea that developers sometimes have private things > to say is at least defendable; the idea that Debian is joining the NDA > crap is not, IMNSHO. Well, Debian Developers today agree to a non-formal NDA about debian-private. I'm just suggesting that this could be extended for others who want to get access to the debian-private archive. daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]