On Tue, 1 Jun 2004 19:19:10 -0400, Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 06:22:09PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
>> In my opinion it's as this:
>>
>> - If a GR has normal majority, and does not conflict with a
>> foundation
>> document, it's ok.
> Until the vote is hel
On Fri, 28 May 2004 13:11:21 -0400, Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 03:38:47PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
>> While we're on the subject of interpretations, the first clause
>> ("The Debian project resolves that it will not compromise on
>> freedom") constitutes
I'm disappointed at the amount of nonsense being posted in this thread
along the following lines:
I hereby propose that we eviscerate the current resolution and
replace it with the following:
Title: Reaffirmation of Our Fundamental Principles and Documents
We the Developers reaffirm
On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 06:22:09PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> In my opinion it's as this:
>
> - If a GR has normal majority, and does not conflict with a foundation
> document, it's ok.
Until the vote is held, it's not reasonable to act on any specific
outcome for the vote -- we can't know wh
On Tue, 01 Jun 2004, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Don Armstrong ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040601 11:40]:
> > On Tue, 01 Jun 2004, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > We, Debian, reaffirm that our priorities are our users and the free
> > > software community. We keep to that, both are our priorities. We
> > > don't
* John H. Robinson, IV ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040601 20:55]:
> To: to debian-devel removed
>
> Andreas Barth wrote:
> > * Andrew Suffield ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040505 14:10]:
> > > ---
> > > The Debian project resolves that it will not compromise on freedom,
> > > and will never knowingly issue anoth
To: to debian-devel removed
Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Andrew Suffield ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040505 14:10]:
> > ---
> > The Debian project resolves that it will not compromise on freedom,
> > and will never knowingly issue another release (excluding point
> > updates to stable releases) that contains
On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 10:19:15AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> I propose the following amendment, replacing the entire text of the
> resolution:
>
> --
> Reaffirmation of the social contract - priorities are our users and
> the free software community
>
> We, Debian, reaffirm th
* Raul Miller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040601 18:10]:
> On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 10:39:10AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > Reason: Please be specific what you want. As long as a GR doesn't say
> > that it might touch a foundation document, it doesn't do.
> It might be nice if the constitution (or some
On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 10:39:10AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> Reason: Please be specific what you want. As long as a GR doesn't say
> that it might touch a foundation document, it doesn't do.
It might be nice if the constitution (or some foundation document)
said this.
As it happens, people ha
On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 10:31:21AM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> Objection. Common sense is what tells you that the world is flat.
Common sense tells me that if the world was flat the horizon would always
be obscured.
--
Raul
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "
Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "We vote for more money"
And a pony!
--
Sam "Eddie" Couter | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian Developer| mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| jabber:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OpenPGP fingerprint: A46B 9BB5 3148 7BEA 1F05 5BD5 8530 03AE DE89
On Jun 01, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I propose the following amendment, replacing the entire text of the
> resolution:
Seconded.
--
ciao, |
Marco | [6555 tr7cnnrfx4XGs]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
* MJ Ray ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040601 11:25]:
> On 2004-06-01 09:19:15 +0100 Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I propose the following amendment, replacing the entire text of the
> >resolution:
> Don't you need to sign it?
According to my mail program, it was signed.
> >We know that,
* Don Armstrong ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040601 11:40]:
> On Tue, 01 Jun 2004, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > We, Debian, reaffirm that our priorities are our users and the free
> > software community. We keep to that, both are our priorities. We
> > don't intend to give one of them up for the other. We stro
On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 10:15:47AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote:
> >course, the Release Manager team is authorized to adjust the release
> >policy.
> So, if this option passes, the RM could just revert it to the
> overruled one immediately?
I think I can safely speak for everyone involved in release and a
On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 10:19:15AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> For our users, we promise to do regular releases; as a guideline, a
> major release of the distribution should happen about once a year.
"We vote for more money"
--
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://
On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 10:19:15AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> We know that, as with every guidelines, there are border cases were
> these guidelines don't really match. We promise to use our common
> sense in this case to get to an appropriate result. We will use our
> guidelines in a way that s
On Tue, 01 Jun 2004, Andreas Barth wrote:
> We, Debian, reaffirm that our priorities are our users and the free
> software community. We keep to that, both are our priorities. We
> don't intend to give one of them up for the other. We strongly
> believe that, in the long run, their interests are th
On 2004-06-01 09:19:15 +0100 Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I propose the following amendment, replacing the entire text of the
resolution:
Don't you need to sign it?
We know that, as with every guidelines, there are border cases were
where not were.
re-inforce the release policy that was
On Tue, Jun 01, 2004 at 10:19:15AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> I propose the following amendment, replacing the entire text of the
> resolution:
>
> --
> Reaffirmation of the social contract - priorities are our users and
> the free software community
>
> We, Debian, reaffirm th
* Raul Miller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040528 19:25]:
> On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 03:38:47PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote:
> > While we're on the subject of interpretations, the first clause ("The
> > Debian project resolves that it will not compromise on freedom")
> > constitutes a position statement ab
> I propose the following amendment, replacing the entire text of the
> resolution:
>
> --
> Reaffirmation of the social contract - priorities are our users and
> the free software community
...
> community, and we don't intend to blow our guidelines up to full legal
> texts, becau
* Andrew Suffield ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040505 14:10]:
> ---
> The Debian project resolves that it will not compromise on freedom,
> and will never knowingly issue another release (excluding point
> updates to stable releases) that contains anything in the 'main' or
> 'contrib' sections which is not
24 matches
Mail list logo
