Re: Statistics on non-free usage

2004-01-16 Thread John Goerzen
On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 11:27:37AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote: > Goerzen: > : > You yourself said that is what you would like to do. There is no need > ^^^ > : > for me to make the accusation. > > > This is Goerzen lying by claiming that i

Re: Statistics on non-free usage

2004-01-16 Thread Raul Miller
On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 11:27:37AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote: > > This is Goerzen lying by claiming that i said i want to pollute main with > > non-free stuff. On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 11:41:59PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote: > You said you wanted things out of non-free. Um... he's posted the rest o

Re: Statistics on non-free usage

2004-01-16 Thread John Goerzen
On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 11:27:37AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote: > Goerzen: > : > You yourself said that is what you would like to do. There is no need > ^^^ > : > for me to make the accusation. > > > This is Goerzen lying by claiming that i

Re: Statistics on non-free usage

2004-01-16 Thread Raul Miller
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 09:02:43PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote: > Thank you for your efforts to lead by example. You're welcome. -- Raul

Re: Statistics on non-free usage

2004-01-16 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 11:27:37AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote: > On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 07:53:26AM -0500, Raul Miller wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 06:49:43PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote: > > > 1. i told you not to contact me again. > > > > This isn't evidence that John lied about anything.

Re: Statistics on non-free usage

2004-01-16 Thread Raul Miller
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 09:02:43PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote: > Thank you for your efforts to lead by example. You're welcome. -- Raul -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Statistics on non-free usage

2004-01-16 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Jan 17, 2004 at 11:27:37AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote: > On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 07:53:26AM -0500, Raul Miller wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 06:49:43PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote: > > > 1. i told you not to contact me again. > > > > This isn't evidence that John lied about anything.

Re: Statistics on non-free usage

2004-01-16 Thread Raul Miller
> > On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 06:49:43PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote: > > > 1. i told you not to contact me again. On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 07:53:26AM -0500, Raul Miller wrote: > > This isn't evidence that John lied about anything. At best, it's evidence > > that he's not following your instructions.

Re: Statistics on non-free usage

2004-01-16 Thread Craig Sanders
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 07:53:26AM -0500, Raul Miller wrote: > On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 06:49:43PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote: > > 1. i told you not to contact me again. > > This isn't evidence that John lied about anything. At best, it's evidence > that he's not following your instructions. for

Re: Statistics on non-free usage

2004-01-16 Thread Raul Miller
> > On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 06:49:43PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote: > > > 1. i told you not to contact me again. On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 07:53:26AM -0500, Raul Miller wrote: > > This isn't evidence that John lied about anything. At best, it's evidence > > that he's not following your instructions.

Re: Screen

2004-01-16 Thread Jim Penny
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 18:04:34 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I was to contact you for the 50,000,000th user > We would love to know who told you to contact us. Debian is a non-profit group dedicated to providing a distribution of free software. We do not sponsor lotteries, pop-up adds, or other

Screen

2004-01-16 Thread SBlank3080
I was to contact you for the 50,000,000th user

Re: Statistics on non-free usage

2004-01-16 Thread Craig Sanders
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 07:53:26AM -0500, Raul Miller wrote: > On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 06:49:43PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote: > > 1. i told you not to contact me again. > > This isn't evidence that John lied about anything. At best, it's evidence > that he's not following your instructions. for

Re: Screen

2004-01-16 Thread Jim Penny
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004 18:04:34 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I was to contact you for the 50,000,000th user > We would love to know who told you to contact us. Debian is a non-profit group dedicated to providing a distribution of free software. We do not sponsor lotteries, pop-up adds, or other

Screen

2004-01-16 Thread SBlank3080
I was to contact you for the 50,000,000th user

Social Contract proposal -- 20040116-13

2004-01-16 Thread Raul Miller
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- This is an updated draft of the proposal I posted earlier today This draft replaces the LSB reference with an ABI reference. Let's hold off on seconding this proposal until the 19th. There's a non-zero chance that it will need to be changed again. Note that t

Social Contract proposal -- 20040116-13

2004-01-16 Thread Raul Miller
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- This is an updated draft of the proposal I posted earlier today This draft replaces the LSB reference with an ABI reference. Let's hold off on seconding this proposal until the 19th. There's a non-zero chance that it will need to be changed again. Note that t

Administrative

2004-01-16 Thread Debian Project Secretary
Hi folks, I shall be away from the country, and away from a computer, starting Sunday till the 1st of February. Since we have a GR simmering at the moment, I was concerned if my vacation shall have an impact on it. From my reading of the constitution, I am not required until after th

Administrative

2004-01-16 Thread Debian Project Secretary
Hi folks, I shall be away from the country, and away from a computer, starting Sunday till the 1st of February. Since we have a GR simmering at the moment, I was concerned if my vacation shall have an impact on it. From my reading of the constitution, I am not required until after th

Re: Why not s/non-free/semi-free/g and remove non-free.

2004-01-16 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi, On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 10:52:29AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote: > On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 08:40:17PM +0100, Osamu Aoki wrote: > > I do understand the negative feeling of carrying archive called > > "non-free" in Debian, the Free Software Organization. At the same > > time, I understand the pra

Re: Why not s/non-free/semi-free/g and remove non-free.

2004-01-16 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi, On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 10:52:29AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote: > On Sun, Jan 11, 2004 at 08:40:17PM +0100, Osamu Aoki wrote: > > I do understand the negative feeling of carrying archive called > > "non-free" in Debian, the Free Software Organization. At the same > > time, I understand the pra