>> On Tue, 25 Mar 2003 07:13:33 +0100 (CET),
>> Peter Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Manoj Srivastava:
>> Why is it harsh? I certainly did not mean it to be. It was meant
>> to be a statement of fact.
> Okay, the use of "shall" instead of "will" just sounded very weird
> to me. But th
Manoj Srivastava:
> Why is it harsh? I certainly did not mean it to be. It was
> meant to be a statement of fact.
Okay, the use of "shall" instead of "will" just sounded very weird to
me. But then again, English is not my mother tongue, so I might just
have misunderstood it.
> Conta
>> On Tue, 25 Mar 2003 10:35:02 +1100,
>> Glenn McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I would like to see NM'ers who have been in the queue for more than
> 6 months be able to vote.
You realize that needs a GR, and one with a super majority
requirement, to change the constitution.
On Mon, 24 Mar 2003 16:03:41 -0600
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My original point was that people who do not actually
> exercise their franchise are unlikely to be one of the active set --
> and need to be looked at to see if they are indeed inactive. Having
> inactive me
>> On Tue, 25 Mar 2003 10:35:02 +1100,
>> Glenn McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I would like to see NM'ers who have been in the queue for more than
> 6 months be able to vote.
You realize that needs a GR, and one with a super majority
requirement, to change the constitution.
>> On Mon, 24 Mar 2003 15:54:45 -0500,
>> Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I did not vote in this election. I know who I'd have voted for, if
> I did vote, but I'm struggling with some more fundamental issues.
The polls are not yet closed.
> More generally, most Debian decisi
>> On Mon, 24 Mar 2003 20:21:33 +0100 (CET),
>> Peter Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Manoj Srivastava:
>> Bottom line, so far there is no way to encrypt a ballot, and
>> encrypting it to my key means it shan't get counted.
> That statement sounds a bit harsh. That it *will* not get cou
Buddha Buck wrote:
> Martin Schulze wrote (publically to Moshe Zadka):
> >And do you really believe that people want you as DPL when you are
> >apparently unable to compress an IRC log to the relevant "offensive"
> >messages, but send a 300 lines IRC logfile instead?
>
> Er, in fairness to Moshe,
On Mon, 24 Mar 2003 16:03:41 -0600
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My original point was that people who do not actually
> exercise their franchise are unlikely to be one of the active set --
> and need to be looked at to see if they are indeed inactive. Having
> inactive me
I did not vote in this election. I know who I'd have voted for, if I
did vote, but I'm struggling with some more fundamental issues.
More generally, most Debian decisions have been made by an "activist
elite". So far, that's seemed to work fairly well -- perhaps because
of our charter, we've be
>> On Mon, 24 Mar 2003 15:54:45 -0500,
>> Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> I did not vote in this election. I know who I'd have voted for, if
> I did vote, but I'm struggling with some more fundamental issues.
The polls are not yet closed.
> More generally, most Debian decisi
>> On Mon, 24 Mar 2003 20:21:33 +0100 (CET),
>> Peter Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Manoj Srivastava:
>> Bottom line, so far there is no way to encrypt a ballot, and
>> encrypting it to my key means it shan't get counted.
> That statement sounds a bit harsh. That it *will* not get cou
Buddha Buck wrote:
> Martin Schulze wrote (publically to Moshe Zadka):
> >And do you really believe that people want you as DPL when you are
> >apparently unable to compress an IRC log to the relevant "offensive"
> >messages, but send a 300 lines IRC logfile instead?
>
> Er, in fairness to Moshe,
>> On Mon, 24 Mar 2003 19:11:32 +0100,
>> Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> And do you really believe that people want you as DPL when you are
> apparently unable to compress an IRC log to the relevant
> "offensive" messages, but send a 300 lines IRC logfile instead?
joey, I
Manoj Srivastava:
> Bottom line, so far there is no way to encrypt a ballot, and
> encrypting it to my key means it shan't get counted.
That statement sounds a bit harsh. That it *will* not get counted I can live
with, but that it *shall* not? Oh well. Maybe it's just me.
Anyway, I just t
I did not vote in this election. I know who I'd have voted for, if I
did vote, but I'm struggling with some more fundamental issues.
More generally, most Debian decisions have been made by an "activist
elite". So far, that's seemed to work fairly well -- perhaps because
of our charter, we've be
Martin Schulze wrote (publically to Moshe Zadka):
If you can't trust Manoj, who else can you trust in this project?
And do you really believe that people want you as DPL when you are
apparently unable to compress an IRC log to the relevant "offensive"
messages, but send a 300 lines IRC logfile
Hi,
To the committee memebrs: there is a potentially high profile
dispute brewing, and the ctte may wish to step in as the independent
recount body as has been requested.
The details are archived at:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2003/debian-devel-announce-200303
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hi,
[No need to cc dwn@ if you post to -vote and/or -devel-announce, monitoring
both always. Providing a stripped down paragraph, however, would be
appreciated.]
Rest for Moshe.
> Date: 24 Mar 2003 15:46:05 -
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> From: Moshe Zadka <[EMAIL PRO
>> On Mon, 24 Mar 2003 19:11:32 +0100,
>> Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> And do you really believe that people want you as DPL when you are
> apparently unable to compress an IRC log to the relevant
> "offensive" messages, but send a 300 lines IRC logfile instead?
joey, I
Manoj Srivastava:
> Bottom line, so far there is no way to encrypt a ballot, and
> encrypting it to my key means it shan't get counted.
That statement sounds a bit harsh. That it *will* not get counted I can live
with, but that it *shall* not? Oh well. Maybe it's just me.
Anyway, I just t
Martin Schulze wrote (publically to Moshe Zadka):
If you can't trust Manoj, who else can you trust in this project?
And do you really believe that people want you as DPL when you are
apparently unable to compress an IRC log to the relevant "offensive"
messages, but send a 300 lines IRC logfile in
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 11:58:04AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> Moshe Zadka wrote:
> > As one of the candidates in the DPL elections, I feel that some remarks
> > made by the secretary in #debian-devel have caused me to be unable to
> > trust his integrity. I do not feel I can trust his words about
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I got this message here:
Can anyone explain what happend in that IRC-log? I just don't get the
problem.
Is the problem just that Manoj doesn't think that developers of Moshes
kind is usefull and therefore Moshe doesn't trust Manoj?
Hi,
To the committee memebrs: there is a potentially high profile
dispute brewing, and the ctte may wish to step in as the independent
recount body as has been requested.
The details are archived at:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2003/debian-devel-announce-200303
Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> Hi,
[No need to cc dwn@ if you post to -vote and/or -devel-announce, monitoring
both always. Providing a stripped down paragraph, however, would be appreciated.]
Rest for Moshe.
> Date: 24 Mar 2003 15:46:05 -
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> From: Moshe Zadka <[EMAIL PROT
Hi,
I got this message here:
--- Begin Message ---
Dear Debian Project Leader,
As one of the candidates in the DPL elections, I feel that some remarks
made by the secretary in #debian-devel have caused me to be unable to
trust his integrity. I do not feel I can trust his words about the
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 11:58:04AM -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
> Moshe Zadka wrote:
> > As one of the candidates in the DPL elections, I feel that some remarks
> > made by the secretary in #debian-devel have caused me to be unable to
> > trust his integrity. I do not feel I can trust his words about
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi,
>
> I got this message here:
Can anyone explain what happend in that IRC-log? I just don't get the
problem.
Is the problem just that Manoj doesn't think that developers of Moshes
kind is usefull and therefore Moshe doesn't trust Manoj?
Hi,
I got this message here:
--- Begin Message ---
Dear Debian Project Leader,
As one of the candidates in the DPL elections, I feel that some remarks
made by the secretary in #debian-devel have caused me to be unable to
trust his integrity. I do not feel I can trust his words about the
Hi Folks,
Since the LDAP server at db.debian.org is misbehaving, the
vote engine is not fully operational. The ballots are being received
and stored (and gpg processing is still happening), but the ballots
are not parsed and tallied, and hance acks are not being generated.
Nex
31 matches
Mail list logo
