On Mon, 24 Mar 2003 16:03:41 -0600 Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My original point was that people who do not actually > exercise their franchise are unlikely to be one of the active set -- > and need to be looked at to see if they are indeed inactive. Having > inactive members is not itself unhealthy, except it does inflate > quorum a trifle, which can be bad in supermajority votes. > I would like to see NM'ers who have been in the queue for more than 6 months be able to vote. Glenn -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
