* Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-02-25 21:54]:
> > Adam Heath tells me he'll be leaving on Friday morning (U.S.
> > time), so the debate needs to be held before then).
>
> No, I don't have to be around.
I suggest we start it on Saturday night (2200 UTC) or Sunday morning
(about UTC).
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 09:37:34PM -0600, Graham Wilson wrote:
> do you think that it is the responsibility of the dpl to get this process
> started?
>
> if so, do you intend to do this? and if not, how do you think the
> process should get started?
If my reply to Steve Langasek was insufficient
On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 03:24:37PM +1100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> I suggest we start it on Saturday night (2200 UTC) or Sunday morning
> (about UTC). I think this time should be reasonable for most.
Works for me.
--
G. Branden Robinson| The software said it required
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Adam Heath tells me he'll be leaving on Friday morning (U.S. time), so
> the debate needs to be held before then).
No, I don't have to be around.
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 09:04:59PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Does this mean you believe it falls within the authority of the DPL to
> "mandate [a] time frame" for releases?
Well, no, not as long as we have a Release Manager -- otherwise the task
of Release Management isn't really "delegated",
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 09:22:53PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 12:48:11AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > 3. We'd better release :
> >
> > [ ] twice a year
> > [ ] once a year
> > [ ] every two years
> > [ ] always, we just throw stable away and keep a slightly m
Follow-up question (other candidates are free to respond):
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 09:22:53PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > 3. We'd better release :
> > [ ] twice a year
> > [ ] once a year
> > [ ] every two years
> > [ ] always, we just throw stable away and keep a slightly modified
>
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 10:18:12AM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> 6. Many people complaint that the pool is too bloated, priorities too
> generic, too many packages to pick the right one from the list...
>
> [ ] making some packages be more "important" to others is bad and will
> make cre
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 12:48:11AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> This is a simple questionnaire. You can answer like you want. Cross
> as many boxes as needed ... but try to keep the answers logical. Feel
> free to justify your choices.
>
> 1. master.debian.org is still running potato. What do y
* Adam Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-02-25 21:54]:
> > Adam Heath tells me he'll be leaving on Friday morning (U.S.
> > time), so the debate needs to be held before then).
>
> No, I don't have to be around.
I suggest we start it on Saturday night (2200 UTC) or Sunday morning
(about UTC).
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 01:20:02AM -0500, David B Harris wrote:
> Evening, all :)
>
> Could the candidates please give us a rundown of what time of day
> (generally speaking, and in UTC please) would be best for them, for the
> live portion of the DPL debate?
>
> If you'd like to also point out s
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 12:02:27AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> DPL delegates looks like something important to you (iirc I even told
> positive things about the delegation in your questionnaire) but you're
> speaking of those things as impersonal things, you should be more
> concrete.
The prin
On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Adam Heath tells me he'll be leaving on Friday morning (U.S. time), so
> the debate needs to be held before then).
No, I don't have to be around.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAI
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 09:22:53PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 12:48:11AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> > 3. We'd better release :
> >
> > [ ] twice a year
> > [ ] once a year
> > [ ] every two years
> > [ ] always, we just throw stable away and keep a slightly m
Follow-up question (other candidates are free to respond):
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 09:22:53PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > 3. We'd better release :
> > [ ] twice a year
> > [ ] once a year
> > [ ] every two years
> > [ ] always, we just throw stable away and keep a slightly modified
>
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 10:18:12AM +0100, Eduard Bloch wrote:
> 6. Many people complaint that the pool is too bloated, priorities too
> generic, too many packages to pick the right one from the list...
>
> [ ] making some packages be more "important" to others is bad and will
> make cre
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 12:48:11AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> This is a simple questionnaire. You can answer like you want. Cross
> as many boxes as needed ... but try to keep the answers logical. Feel
> free to justify your choices.
>
> 1. master.debian.org is still running potato. What do y
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 01:20:02AM -0500, David B Harris wrote:
> Evening, all :)
>
> Could the candidates please give us a rundown of what time of day
> (generally speaking, and in UTC please) would be best for them, for the
> live portion of the DPL debate?
>
> If you'd like to also point out s
On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 12:02:27AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> DPL delegates looks like something important to you (iirc I even told
> positive things about the delegation in your questionnaire) but you're
> speaking of those things as impersonal things, you should be more
> concrete.
The prin
19 matches
Mail list logo
