On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 05:48:26AM -0500, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 06:00:23PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > En réponse à Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > now that all of the debian-* lists are being run through
> > > spamassassin your daily dose of canned meat s
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 06:00:23PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> En réponse à Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > now that all of the debian-* lists are being run through
> > spamassassin your daily dose of canned meat should drop nicely.
>
> It does not work. What about those italian spa
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 05:48:26AM -0500, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 06:00:23PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > En réponse à Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > now that all of the debian-* lists are being run through
> > > spamassassin your daily dose of canned meat s
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 06:00:23PM +0200, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> En réponse à Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > now that all of the debian-* lists are being run through
> > spamassassin your daily dose of canned meat should drop nicely.
>
> It does not work. What about those italian spa
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 01:37:56PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> On Thursday 17 October 2002 12:18, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> >
> > Sven mentioned that people with a poor network connection
> > who have to download all the spam anyway. That is the real
> > issue.
>
> agreed. However I believe
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thursday 17 October 2002 12:19, Jérôme Marant wrote:
>> Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >> Well, manoj, the only problem is that when you filter spam, you do it
>> >> after having paid fo
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 04:23:52PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 01:37:56PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> > On Thursday 17 October 2002 12:18, Jérôme Marant wrote:
>
> > > Sven mentioned that people with a poor network connection
> > > who have to download all the sp
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 01:37:56PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> On Thursday 17 October 2002 12:18, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> >
> > Sven mentioned that people with a poor network connection
> > who have to download all the spam anyway. That is the real
> > issue.
>
> agreed. However I believe
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 07:50:13AM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> On Thursday 17 October 2002 02:33, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 01:06:51AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I am against this proposal as well. W should not be making
> > > things h
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 01:39:09PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> On Thursday 17 October 2002 12:19, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >> Well, manoj, the only problem is that when you filter spam, you do it
> >
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 10:00:15PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 04:38:46PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> > Except that dominates is (if I understand correctly) the appropriate
> > term-of-art.
>
> I'm not sure what you mean by this. What is your basis for this
> statement?
>
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thursday 17 October 2002 12:19, Jérôme Marant wrote:
>> Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >> Well, manoj, the only problem is that when you filter spam, you do it
>> >> after having paid fo
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 11:48:17AM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 01:47:35PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > YM "Schwartz set" here? [0] There might be a "Schulze set" of some sort?
Sorry, there's a "Smith set", not a Schulze set. So presumably we mean the
Schwartz set.
> Rem
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 07:50:13AM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> On Thursday 17 October 2002 02:33, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 01:06:51AM -0500, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I am against this proposal as well. W should not be making
> > > things h
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 01:39:09PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> On Thursday 17 October 2002 12:19, Jérôme Marant wrote:
> > Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >> Well, manoj, the only problem is that when you filter spam, you do it
> >
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 11:48:17AM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 01:47:35PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > YM "Schwartz set" here? [0] There might be a "Schulze set" of some sort?
Sorry, there's a "Smith set", not a Schulze set. So presumably we mean the
Schwartz set.
> Rem
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 10:00:15PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 04:38:46PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> > Except that dominates is (if I understand correctly) the appropriate
> > term-of-art.
>
> I'm not sure what you mean by this. What is your basis for this
> statement?
>
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 04:23:52PM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 01:37:56PM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> > On Thursday 17 October 2002 12:18, Jérôme Marant wrote:
>
> > > Sven mentioned that people with a poor network connection
> > > who have to download all the sp
18 matches
Mail list logo
