On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 10:00:15PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote: > On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 04:38:46PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote: > > Except that dominates is (if I understand correctly) the appropriate > > term-of-art. > > I'm not sure what you mean by this. What is your basis for this > statement? > > Here's my understanding: > > The only place the constitution uses the word "dominates" is in the > appendix (A.6). The proposed constitutional ammendment replaces that > part of the appendix. > > One of the reasons for proposing a new voting system is the ambiguity > of the term "dominates" as defined by the constitution (A.6.2).
<not being entiraly serious> What about giving the algorithm in some programing language ? You will never get english text to be without ambiguities anyway. Friendly, Sven Luther
