Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure

2000-10-28 Thread Joseph Carter
On Sun, Oct 29, 2000 at 03:11:11PM +1100, Peter Eckersley wrote: > > John's proposal is, IMO, a reaction to a growing movement within Debian > > against the DFSG. I do believe that movement exists and has always > > existed to some degree, but it's on the rise as Linux gains in popularity > > and

Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure

2000-10-28 Thread Seth Arnold
* Peter Eckersley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001028 21:09]: > You are confusing *pragmatic* support for an ideological > position with not supporting that position at all... Ok, I promise this is the last anyone will hear from me on the whole issue. I *love* free software. I love that I can run apt-get

Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure

2000-10-28 Thread Peter Eckersley
On Sat, 28 Oct 2000, Joseph Carter wrote: > > John's proposal is, IMO, a reaction to a growing movement within Debian > against the DFSG. I do believe that movement exists and has always > existed to some degree, but it's on the rise as Linux gains in popularity > and new people care less and le

Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure

2000-10-28 Thread Joseph Carter
On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 04:08:03AM -0500, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > You miss my point, i am not speaking about big companies but about smaller > > groups, individuals or research institues or other such. > If you continue like this, I think you make me change my mind about debian > and non-f

Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure

2000-10-28 Thread Seth Arnold
* Peter Eckersley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001028 21:09]: > You are confusing *pragmatic* support for an ideological > position with not supporting that position at all... Ok, I promise this is the last anyone will hear from me on the whole issue. I *love* free software. I love that I can run apt-ge

Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure

2000-10-28 Thread Peter Eckersley
On Sat, 28 Oct 2000, Joseph Carter wrote: > > John's proposal is, IMO, a reaction to a growing movement within Debian > against the DFSG. I do believe that movement exists and has always > existed to some degree, but it's on the rise as Linux gains in popularity > and new people care less and l

Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure

2000-10-28 Thread Joseph Carter
On Thu, Oct 26, 2000 at 04:08:03AM -0500, Christian T. Steigies wrote: > > You miss my point, i am not speaking about big companies but about smaller > > groups, individuals or research institues or other such. > If you continue like this, I think you make me change my mind about debian > and non-