NThis system (Compaq Presario (tower) 7478, see below) has recently
been upgraded to Debian-2.2r2 and everything was working
so well.
I edited /etc/lilo.conf
ran lilo -v and got no errors.
Now, reboots yield
Compaq Presario 7478:
500 AMD K6 II
CD-RW
DVD-ROM
on board AGP grpah
uring installation.
The output of the first step, a make, is attached.
-JoshNarins
gcc -D__KERNEL__ -DMODULE -DLINUX -DEXPORT_SYMTAB -D__NO_VERSION__
-I/usr/include -I. -O2 -pipe -DCONFIG_PROC_FS -DIANS -c -o ans.o ans.c
In file included from e100.h:42,
from ans_driver
build e100-1.3.20, the
>> driver for several Intel NICs. It was not available >>
>> The output of the first step, a make, is attached.
Except that my attachment was eaten and inserted into the message...
>>
>> -JoshNarins
>>
.
> At least in the past, m
Definitely a thumbs up.
http://linux.3dfx.com for drivers, etc.
-JoshNarins
driver without a lot
of unresolved symbol errors.
Of course, since I was using 2.2.17, I needed
to
apt-get install kernel-headers-2.2.17 &&
apt-get source kernel-headers-2.2.17
to avoid the "missing modversions.h" error
that started this.
-JoshNarins
PS I'm dow
The perl way to communicate to a database
is called the DBI(db interface) module,
available at your nearest CPAN mirror.
In addition to the DBI module, you will
need the specific Postgresql DBD(db driver)
module, called DBD::Pg.
DBI is a very popular module.
-JoshNarins
Celebrate Thanksgiving
Yes, this pops up with a particular Intel NIC driver also,
and affects all debian past 2.2.16
The simple key is to unpack source that is no longer unpacked
by defaults.
apt-get source kernel-headers-2.2.17
You might need to do this first...
apt-get install kernel-headers-2.2.17
Since so many people are harping on them, I got a
Compaq Presario 7478 with an extra 64MB (tot 128)
and a Voodoo3 for < 1100USD.
AMD K-6 II 500
30 Gig HD
CD-RW
DVD-R
floppy
2 ISA, 4 PCI, 1 AGP, 2 USB
decent keyboard
Debian noticed both CD-RW and DVD-R right away.
Red Hat only noticed one of them.
root ! # grep RELEASE /usr/linux/include/version.h
#define UTS_RELEASE="2.2.15"
root ! # `uname --release`
2.2.17
Any ideas?
I don't have any SCSI devices, I just need it for to
use cdrecord with an ATAPI IDE.
I guess I am going to have to recompile my kernel,
but first I have to FIND the darn thing.
sr_mod, I feel confident, will be the only remaining
module I need to install.
I've looked through the modules HOWTO a
I did not install SCSI support during my debian-2.2.17pre6
installation, since I have no SCSI devices.
I have one backup mechanism, a CD-Rewritable drive.
The CD-Rewritable howto says I need SCSI support.
(whoops!)
I am eager to try making a debian kernel,
to make sure only the drivers I need ar
Here are a couple links which should help you get on your way.
(Thanks to Stas Bekman, just another mod_perl hacker)
http://www.securityfocus.com/focus/sun/articles/apache-inst.html
http://forum.swarthmore.edu/epigone/modperl/stimlorthen
From what I've been able to gather,
chroot can be secure,
but only if the user can never get root.
FreeBSD's jail had a recent problem.
Mounting /proc inside the chroot is not a good idea.
In a message dated 12/27/00 7:01:21 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
not to dis
I tried, in a subdir of /root, the command
chmod -R o-rwx .*
It changed the permissions on the parent directory,
the parent's parent directory, all the way up.
Now only root can use my computer.
Was chmod supposed to understand .* so differently
than /bin/ls does?
I am running 2.2.19-pre17 on i
Ah, I see now how -R and .* could get kinda crazy.
Thank you.
But I changed the perms of / a bit, but it still won't
work (cd is now working for regular user, but no logins,
nor does ls work).
Does anyone have a proper perms setup for / ?
Is there any chance chmod -R o-rwx .* started working
on
Thanks for the very full explanation.
Sigh.
Reinstall? I have done fresh installs many
times. Sorry I don't know the drill for reinstalls.
I could move the stuff I want to save to one parti
tion, and then reinstall on just / and /boot?
Josh Narins
PS Tough to type like that :)
Joost, your solution was such an elegant thing, that to
ruin my system to learn it was fair enough.
Thank you.
--Original Message-- by joost
On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 06:36:08PM +0200, Martin F. Krafft wrote:
> but anyway, a question for all debianers: how do you get the default
> permissions bac
What an OS! Debian is awesome.
XFree86 is amazing, also.
Blackbox is a really nice, lightweight wm.
I put gnome on the box, just so I could show somebody that it could act
like Windows, if necessary.
I started XWindows after the upgrade, and it works!
Well, blackbox starts, then Gnome starts
They just ran an ad "We'll make your web site run three times faster, or
we'll give you a million dollars."
I guess they were thinking I was just standing around waiting for someone
to blow smoke up my ass.
Either that, or the fine print is that to try, you need to give them two
million dollars.
19 matches
Mail list logo
