Brian writes:
> On Mon 11 Aug 2014 at 14:50:30 -0400, Harry Putnam wrote:
>
>> The oldhost is running exim4 light, while newhost is running
>> exim4-heavy.
>
> Exim is only involved after the mail is collected.
>
>> But still the configuration files look the same
Last time I fiddled with setting up a web server was some 4-5 yrs ago.
Things appear to have changed a bit.
Can anyone point to a URL or etc that would show what a default layout
might look like.
Back when.. /var/www/localhost/htdocs was DocumentRoot and the
default cgi-bin directory was: /var
Running jessie with apache2-2.4.10-1
Haven't run a web server on my home lan for a while so trying to get
that working.
Starting with the default installed setup:
I can hit the default home page and my *html stuff just fine.
However it seems *.cgi scripts are not allowed to fire.
OK, I googl
googling to learn how to enable modules in apache2-2.4.10-1+b1
I'm getting a little too much input to really see what to do.
what is the name of cgi module? That would be very useful for the
`a2enmod' cmd. And for something real simple like making sure it is
installed.
I see several files in
B writes:
> On Wed, 03 Sep 2014 20:55:19 -0400
> Harry Putnam wrote:
>
>> what is the name of cgi module? That would be very useful for the
>> `a2enmod' cmd. And for something real simple like making sure it is
>> installed.
>>
>> I see se
Jerry Stuckle writes:
>
> Not loading a module is not an error - although you should fix the error
> in line 74. Attempting to load a non-existent module would be an error.
Just one thing about that... I have the log level jacked up to trace4
and when I restart apache2, that error does not show
B writes:
> On Wed, 03 Sep 2014 22:19:35 -0400
> Harry Putnam wrote:
>
>> cgi firing on all 8 cylinders.
>
> Comparing to nginx, I'd say: firing on 2 cyl/8 ;)
Oh oh, you'll have to explain that one... it went right over my head.
Just not clever enou
Raffaele Morelli writes:
[...]
>> Thanks for the push... Tinkering with your suggestion lead me to read
>> the `LoadModule' lines on the files in mods-available.
>>
>> The line in cgi.load:
>> LoadModule cgi_module /usr/lib/apache2/modules/mod_cgi.so
>>
>> Looked the most promising, so I trie
Reco writes:
> Hi.
>
> On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 08:26:38PM -0400, Podrigal, Aron wrote:
>> Any idea what can be the cause? I am installing proxmox-ve and when
>> starting pve-cluster it fails with [main] crit: Unable to get local
>> IP address. So I tried
>> to look up with host utility and it do
Raffaele Morelli writes:
>> Is that what you are warning about?
>
> Nope, my warning was to use `a2enmod cgi` instead of `a2enmod
> cgi.load` (which is wrong)
OK, thanks. But once again you've failed to explain the nature of the
wrongness.
Can you define what the nature of this wrongness is?
Bob Proulx writes:
> a2enmod takes a simple name like "cgi" not a name with .load or .conf
> on the end like "cgi.load". You want "a2enmod cgi" without the
> ".load" on the end.
Yeah, I finally got that part.
But still not seeing what is bad about what I did... after all it did
allow the cgi
After an `aptitude full-upgrade' this morning. I still get the
`VULNERABLE' answer to `x='() { :;}; echo VULNERABLE' bash -c :'
I hope that is the correct string... (extracted while googling on
vulnerability)
I did ssh to my user from the same shell I ran aptitude in to make
sure I had a new log
The Wanderer writes:
> On 09/26/2014 at 11:56 AM, Harry Putnam wrote:
>
>> After an `aptitude full-upgrade' this morning. I still get the
>> `VULNERABLE' answer to `x='() { :;}; echo VULNERABLE' bash -c :'
>>
>> I hope that is the correct
Lisi Reisz writes:
> So little mention?? There have been three threads.
I said little... I did not say none.
Compared to systemd cyclone of threads and posts, it is `little' and
probably much more important at least right now.
I guess I expected more than I see here.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
Lisi Reisz writes:
> So little mention?? There have been three threads.
I said little... I did not say none.
Compared to systemd cyclone of threads and posts, it is `little' and
probably much more important at least right now.
I guess I expected more than I see here.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
The Wanderer writes:
> I have (trimmed for brevity):
>
>
> $ apt-cache policy bash
> bash:
> Installed: 4.3-9.1
>
> $ bash --version
> GNU bash, version 4.3.25(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
>
>
> This is as of just over 3 hours ago as I type this.
I'm not sure what that me
Harry Putnam writes:
> The Wanderer writes:
>
>> I have (trimmed for brevity):
>>
>>
>> $ apt-cache policy bash
>> bash:
>> Installed: 4.3-9.1
>>
>> $ bash --version
>> GNU bash, version 4.3.25(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux
The Wanderer writes:
>> But here After finishing the post you quote above... I again
>> ran `aptitude full-upgrade' (this is minutes ago) And there were no
>> packages shown and nothing was done.
>
> When did you last run 'apt-get update' or similar?
Bingo... last upd was last week. But run
Sorry to bring this here again. I did so quite some mnths ago but
having a problem finding the thread and answers.
Building emacs from bzr repository
After a `bzr pull' in emacs trunk sources.
And inital building steps with reconf etc.
./configure returns the error below concerning not findin
Tom Furie writes:
> On Sun, Apr 06, 2014 at 05:12:00PM -0400, Harry Putnam wrote:
>
>> ./configure returns the error below concerning not finding certain
>> pkgs installed concerning X.
>>
>> Tail of output:
>> [...]
>> checking whether gcc und
Tom Furie writes:
> On Sun, Apr 06, 2014 at 05:12:00PM -0400, Harry Putnam wrote:
>
>> ./configure returns the error below concerning not finding certain
>> pkgs installed concerning X.
>>
>> Tail of output:
>> [...]
>> checking whether gcc und
Tom Furie writes:
>> Fine is a bit strong since I am still having problems getting some of
>> the emacsclient code to compile but does not appear to be related
>> to xorg at all.
>
> It builds without trouble here. Are you building on an X system? Are you
> passing any arguments to configure?
Tom Furie writes:
> On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 12:35:39PM -0400, Harry Putnam wrote:
>
>> One thing should be mentioned... I've allowed my debian system to fall
>> badly behind in updates and general maintenance. Now face a bit of a
>> job getting back on track. But
Tom Furie writes:
> On Mon, Apr 07, 2014 at 09:19:25PM +0100, Tom Furie wrote:
>
>> Ah, I tested with wheezy. I'll load up a jessie vm and test again. In
>> theory it shouldn't make any difference, but that's the difference
>> between theory and practice :)
>
> With a fresh install of Jessie plus
Recent install of jessie as vbox guest vm on win 7 64bit
Preferring sendmail to exim I installed the testing package for sendmail
and of course that uninstalled a few things, including exim.
So, my first run at sendmail , just starting the service
# service sendmail start
[] Starting
Scott Ferguson writes:
> No - you didn't. Please learn to read and stop spreading more rubbish
> (or just go back to setting fire to cats and winos).
>
Good lord Scott, we're getting a bit wild here aren't we... hehe.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a su
Filip writes:
> On Sat, 17 May 2014 12:07:56 -0400
> Harry Putnam wrote:
>
>> Recent install of jessie as vbox guest vm on win 7 64bit
>>
>> Preferring sendmail to exim I installed the testing package for
>> sendmail and of course that uninstalled a few thin
Harry Putnam writes:
>> No, it's not normal. The post-install scripts should create a
>> working initial configuration where it at least starts up.
>>
>> Try reinstalling with the --reinstall option.
>>
>> apt-get install sendmail --reinstall
>> a
Filip writes:
[...]
>> I would have thought the install of a pkg would also create any needed
>> directories for the pkg to operate.
>>
>> Is it normal for user to create these things?
>
> No, it's not normal. The post-install scripts should create a
> working initial configuration where it at
I'm having plenty of trouble with the newest version of sendmail on a
brand new install.
I have the version numbers obtained by running:
aptitude search -F sendmail '%p %v'
On a machine with it installed. I understand the command necessary to
install a certain version: aptitude install =
But wh
José Antonio Podadera Moya writes:
[...]
> You can try to install old package versions from the snapshot archive
> (http://snapshot.debian.org). As the page itself says:
>
> "The snapshot archive is a wayback machine that allows access to old packages
> based on dates and version numbers. It
Filip writes:
> On Sat, 17 May 2014 17:08:10 -0400
> Harry Putnam wrote:
>
>> Filip writes:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> >> I would have thought the install of a pkg would also create any
>> >> needed directories for the pkg to operate.
Filip writes:
[...]
>> If you are running version 4.14.4-5.. maybe you could post the perms
>> on:
>
>> /var/spool/clientmqueue (Its a directory that should be created during
>> install but is not). And:
>> /var/lib/sendmail (There should be another directory here named
>> /var/lib/sendmail/ho
Never used exim but trying to get it setup since the latest version of
sendmail seems to have some problems I don't understand on a new debian
install.
I've pounded along googling and scanning the exim documentation on
board for a couple of hours tonight... but I have yet to find a simple
straight
Brian writes:
> There is an implication here that you think exim (or sendmail) is to be
> manipulated directly. That is not the case. It is a daemon which listens
> and which deals with mail *which is sent from a client*. The client
> interacts with Debian's exim and exim, if the setup is sane, p
Curt writes:
> On 2014-05-18, Harry Putnam wrote:
>
>>| rea...@newsguy.com... Deferred: 421 4.3.0 collect: Cannot
>>| write ./dfs4IGodqZ004450 (bfcommit, uid=0, gid=122): No such file or
>>| directory Closing connection to [127.0.0.1]
>> `
>>
>>
Jonathan Dowland writes:
> (as superuser) /usr/sbin/exim4 -v
> (type message)
> ^D
>
> this gives me the entire dialogue with the remote SMTP server from the POV of
> my smarthost. It should for you, too, I hope. If you supply -d instead of -v
> (-d implies -v as well) you get a lot more output.
Brian writes:
> On Mon 19 May 2014 at 07:30:23 -0400, Harry Putnam wrote:
>
>> Brian writes:
>>
>> > There is an implication here that you think exim (or sendmail) is to be
>> > manipulated directly. That is not the case. It is a daemon which listens
>
Jonathan Dowland writes:
> Oops. I forgot you have to provide an address on the command line, which is
> the
> address to which the test message is sent, e.g.
>
>> sudo /usr/sbin/exim4 -v j...@debian.org
>
>> Using -d and sudo I get a heap of interesting info but am not allowed
>> to send anythi
I'm trying to setup exim4 in a situation that has got to be pretty
common. (Other than perhaps the choice of smtp server)
In general it is:
single user home machine running debian
send mail to remote addresses by `smart host'
Retrieve mail by fetchmail, or in some accounts just
use Imap and do
Klaus writes:
> The server (mail.messagingengine.com) doesn't respond to ping nor to an
> attempt at connecting through port 25 right now (20/5/2014, 13:30 GMT)
>
> $ swaks -s mail.messagingengine.com -q FIRST-HELO
> === Trying mail.messagingengine.com:25...
> ^C (manually aborted after a minute
First off, so many thanks are due to posters on this thread. You've
reduced a really vast amount of docu into a few paragraphs of just the
right stuff for my situation.
With my muddled thinking & incomplete background, I would have a been
a very long time getting to the stage offered in this thre
Brian writes:
Darac Marjal wrote:
>> For exim,
>> http://www.manu-j.com/blog/wordpress-exim4-ubuntu-gmail-smtp/75/
>> suggests to set the smarthost to "mail.messagingengine.com::587" (when
>> using debconf) and to add a new routing driver. Probably easiest to just
>> read that page for the inform
Brian writes:
> On Thu 22 May 2014 at 22:43:37 -0400, Harry Putnam wrote:
>
>> I'll be back at it in 2wks or so.. I suspect it will be pretty simple
>> now.
>
> It should be after what follows::)
>
> In update-exim4.conf.conf change 'satellite' to
Brian writes:
> On Sat 24 May 2014 at 01:29:04 -0400, Harry Putnam wrote:
>
>> Brian writes:
>>
>> > On Thu 22 May 2014 at 22:43:37 -0400, Harry Putnam wrote:
>> >
>> >> I'll be back at it in 2wks or so.. I suspect it will be pretty simple
Brian writes:
> On Sat 24 May 2014 at 01:29:04 -0400, Harry Putnam wrote:
>
>> Brian writes:
>>
>> > On Thu 22 May 2014 at 22:43:37 -0400, Harry Putnam wrote:
>> >
>> >> I'll be back at it in 2wks or so.. I suspect it will be pretty simple
An exim4 default of accepting no more than 10 messages at one time
when I use fetchmail to download pop3 mail.
"no immediate delivery: more than 10 messages received in one
connection"
Shows up in the mail.log and anything over 10 is stuck in a que and
delived later.
I want to set that limit to
Jonathan Dowland writes:
> Hi,
>
> This is a common problem (I remember hitting it myself, once upon a time!)
> The Debian Exim FAQ recommends changing fetchmail's behaviour, rather than
> Exim's:
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/PkgExim4UserFAQ#Exim_stops_delivery_after_ten_messages_are_received
Tha
Brian writes:
> On Mon 26 May 2014 at 05:48:53 -0400, Harry Putnam wrote:
>
>> I've tried adding this line:
>>
>> smtp_accept_queue_per_connection=300
>
> I use
>
>smtp_accept_queue_per_connection=0
>
> with the split-file configuration b
Brian writes:
[...]
>> The exim4 FAQ tells of a way to put the load on fetchmail and diddle
>> around with its config, but also says one might change it in exim4 but
>> is not clear about where this change is made.
>
> I put it right at the start of "MAIN CONFIGURATION SETTINGS".
Haa... and as
Running jessie
Trying to use heirloom mailx to test various exim4 settings and It
works, but there is something in it that bugs me. Makes me think I'm
doing something wrong.
Here is a typical example
mailx -v re...@location.com
Subject: what ever
ble
bleh
.
And away it goes and ou
Sorry for taking advantage of the list a bit but as happens pretty
often, this list is more likely to provide useful info on the subject.
I want to begin some training in computer security... training I can
do online... and hopefully a hands on approach.
I'm already an old man at 66 but would lik
Running Wheezy as guest in win7 64 bit host with virtualbox.
How can I set "Focus follows mouse" in lxde desktop?
I've installed lxde-core, lxde-common, lxde and task-lxde-desktop
Usually I found that setting under the settings dialog, then "windows"
amongst the settings for windows.
I do not
Harry Putnam writes:
> Running Wheezy as guest in win7 64 bit host with virtualbox.
>
> How can I set "Focus follows mouse" in lxde desktop?
>
> I've installed lxde-core, lxde-common, lxde and task-lxde-desktop
>
> Usually I found that setting unde
I'd like to try installing debian from an iso file but not burn a
disc. Google turns up actual piles of reports and instructions for
doeing that, but as I plow thru I'm finding they all (so far) seem to
expect the user is installing debian on a windows machine.
I'm already running a linux machine
Julian Rüger writes:
> Harry: If you are interested, I could give you a little step-by-step
> howto.
Thank you for the input and your offer:
Yes I am interested, and please do.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contac
Brian writes:
> On Wed 08 May 2013 at 19:59:02 +0200, Julian Rüger wrote:
>
>> Hi Harry, Brian and others,
>
> Hello Julian,
>
>> > It is far less convenient than booting from an isohybrid and only works
>> > with a netinst ISO if the user is prepared to jump through a number of
>> > small diam
Julian Rüger writes:
> Hi Harry,
>
>> Thank you for the input and your offer:
>> Yes I am interested, and please do.
>
> you may have seen my post in the other thread, I think I CC-ed you:
>
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2013/05/msg00443.html
Thank you, yes I saw it. I'm a litte surpris
Brian writes:
> All the Debian ISOs are isohybrids, so
>
>cat debian.iso > /dev/sdX
>
> and you are on your way to a no fuss installation. A simple one line
> easily remembered command. Couldn't be easier.
I could be easier... especially if you explain a little more about
what you mean above
What should the sources.list of someone following testing look like
now with wheezy released?
My old settings were:
deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ testing main contrib non-free
deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ wheezy-updates main contrib non-free
deb http://security.debian.org/ wheezy/upda
Darac Marjal writes:
[...]
Harry wrote:
>> My old settings were:
>>
>> deb http://ftp.us.debian.org/debian/ testing main contrib non-free
>
> This is fine. This will keep you on testing (wheezy->jessie)
>
>> deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ wheezy-updates main contrib non-free
>
> This probabl
Brian writes:
> On Thu 09 May 2013 at 12:02:07 -0400, Harry Putnam wrote:
>
>> Brian writes:
>>
>> > All the Debian ISOs are isohybrids, so
>> >
>> >cat debian.iso > /dev/sdX
>> >
>> > and you are on your way to a no f
cat /etc/debian_version
7.0
---- ---=--- -
I got here from an oldish wheezy install by setting my sources.list to
"testing" and running
aptitude update
aptitude full-upgrade
The problem I'm about to describe was already there befo
I'm building emacs for the bzr sources but keep being told I don't
have x development pkgs installed.
I installed several xorg.*dev pkgs.. and a few others that looked like
they might be what I need. But still getting the report from
configure that x development files are not found, and offers to
Thanks to all.
That `apt-get build-dep emacs' is great... thanks, I'd forgotten about
that.
Teemu posted the needed list... very helpful.
As it happens, I'd already gotten lucky tracking down the needed pkgs
(and probably a goodly number of unneeded) since my OP.
I will know better next time..
Summary: How to make focus follow mouse when all settings appear to be
set for focus to follow mouse but still it does not happen.
Details:
Running an lxde desktop. I'm setup for ~/.xinitrc to invoke lxde.
I dug around in the settings and found where I could set 'focus follows
mouse' so that wind
Can anyone explain what the final line from an
aptitude update (After setting sources.list to "testing")
aptitude full-upgrade
This very last line from aptitude seems like its probably full of
meaning, but not much use if I cannot find out what the heck it means.
It apparently sums up wha
Darac Marjal writes:
> On Mon, Aug 05, 2013 at 06:21:14AM -0400, Harry Putnam wrote:
>> Can anyone explain what the final line from an
>>
>> aptitude update (After setting sources.list to "testing")
>>
>> aptitude full-upgrade
>>
&g
Ralph Katz writes:
> On 08/04/2013 10:25 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
>> Summary: How to make focus follow mouse when all settings appear to be
>> set for focus to follow mouse but still it does not happen.
>>
>> Details:
>> Running an lxde desktop. I'
Bob Proulx writes:
> Ralph Katz wrote:
>> Also of course:
>> ~$ ls -l /etc/alternatives/x-window-manager
>
> I think the alternatives tool is better.
>
> $ update-alternatives --list x-window-manager
>
> $ update-alternatives --list x-session-manager
>
> Then to configure it:
>
> # update-a
Sharon Kimble writes:
> On Sat, 17 Aug 2013 09:21:57 -0400
> Harry Putnam wrote:
>
>> Bob Proulx writes:
>>
>> > Ralph Katz wrote:
>> >> Also of course:
>> >> ~$ ls -l /etc/alternatives/x-window-manager
>> >
>> > I
I've been seeing something entirely new and unexpected during boot up
lately.
Every few boots, something happens that prevents me logging in.
I boot to console out of long habit, using startx when I want X, so
with this peculiar phenomena I can't login to console.
It appears to be something al
Zenaan Harkness writes:
> On 8/18/13, Harry Putnam wrote:
>> I've been seeing something entirely new and unexpected during boot up
>> lately.
>>
>> Every few boots, something happens that prevents me logging in.
> ..
>> It appears to be a mashup
Zenaan Harkness writes:
[...]
>> Right, and do we know the video hardware, kernel, video driver, etc. ...
>
> Dear OP, do you know the video hardware, kernel, video driver, etc.
> ... my sliver of memory from ~6 or more years ago is not in any way
> definitive, of course.
>From lspci -vk
01:
Running (recently upgraded from wheezy) 'Testing'.
I see something happen when using ~/.inputrc that I don't now how to
track down.
In console (noX) mode the things I have in ~/.inputrc work as
expected.
And example might be
set keymap emacs-meta
f: "find -iname '* *'"
So pressing Atl
I've recently done a tremendous amount of removing and purging. I
wanted rid of kde and finally to install lxde. And threw into the
bargain moving from testing to stable.
There is plenty of howto available for installing lxde, but I'm a bit
puzzled by the output of `aptitude -s install lxde'
It
Chris Bannister writes:
> On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 06:55:48PM -0400, Harry Putnam wrote:
>> I've recently done a tremendous amount of removing and purging. I
>> wanted rid of kde and finally to install lxde. And threw into the
>> bargain moving from testing to stab
ACro writes:
>> Does this list look a little ridiculous?
>
> It doesn't :-) AFAIK this is the default behaviour when installing
> xserver-xorg,
> although not all packages may really be needed.
[...]
Thanks for the details regarding the xserver stuff.
Jochen Spieker writes:
[...]
>> Note th
"Christofer C. Bell" writes:
> On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 11:53 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
>>
>> However, I think that happenstance might mean that even a fairly
>> incompetent klutz might be able to blunder thru a huge bout of ripping
>> out kde and most of X th
Chris Bannister writes:
> On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 01:17:27PM -0400, Harry Putnam wrote:
>> Err yup, looks like Marty Feldman, although now deceased, could make a
>> comeback otherwise.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GlPAVm8Gl6M
Hilarious. Marty's wall eyes a
"Christofer C. Bell" writes:
> On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
>> "Christofer C. Bell" writes:
>>
>>> On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 11:53 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
>>>>
>>>> However, I think that happenstance m
"Christofer C. Bell" writes:
> I would suggest uncommenting the wheezy bits, commenting out the
> squeeze buts (perhaps adding contrib and non-free at your option) and
> running another apt-get update, apt-get upgrade and seeing what it
> wants to do. It's likely to want to install a number of p
John Hasler writes:
> Harry Putnam wrote:
>> But unless squeeze is free of the horrible and fast march of updates
>> one experiences on wheezy it may not be a goal after all.
>
> Why do you feel that you need to closely track Unstable? There is
> usually no urgent need t
I see old bugs from 2011 where this problem is claimed to be solved
but I'm getting the problem now on wheezy.
After installing iceweasel, when I try to run it:
,
| XPCOMGlueLoad error for file /usr/lib/xulrunner-10.0/libxpcom.so:
| libxul.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or d
Camaleón writes:
> On Sat, 14 Jul 2012 10:16:02 -0400, Harry Putnam wrote:
>
>> I see old bugs from 2011 where this problem is claimed to be solved but
>> I'm getting the problem now on wheezy.
>>
>> After installing iceweasel, when I try to run it:
>&g
Chris Bannister writes:
> I'd purge that, and reinstall it, someone has tampered with it;
> otherwise why would /usr/lib/xulrunner-10.0/libxul.so be missing.
It was not missing but was being reported as missing. Anyway I did
remove and purge:
xulrunner-10.0
iceweasel
>> | xulrunner-dev
Ralf Mardorf writes:
>> And still:
>>
>> ls -l /usr/lib/xulrunner-10.0/libx*
>> root root15048 Jun 29 09:52 /usr/lib/xulrunner-10.0/libxpcom.so
>> root root 20280312 Jun 29 09:52 /usr/lib/xulrunner-10.0/libxul.so
>>
>> So not an ounce of progress... I guess.
>
> FWIW, did you run ldconfig m
Camaleón writes:
[...]
> Does it happen the same when you launch iceweasel as another user? For
> instance: "gksu icewasel"
Yes, looks just the same
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.or
This should be sort of simple I think, and yet it turns out not to be.
I want to mount my blackberry's sdcard on a wheezy machine
I'm getting an odd comment when I try the mount
mount /mnt/bbsd
Unable to find suitable address
---- ---=--- -
What are people using who want to look at live network connections as
they happen? Especially if it can be made to work on win7 as well.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http:
"Andrew M.A. Cater" writes:
>> emerge --pretend -vuDN world
Welcome to another former gentoo hand.
If you have X running:
I'm pretty sure, though have never used it, that there is a little
tool on you desktop menus somewhere. With a name like
`Software updates', probably under system tools or
David Guntner writes:
> Harry Putnam grabbed a keyboard and wrote:
>> What are people using who want to look at live network connections as
>> they happen? Especially if it can be made to work on win7 as well.
>
> Wireshark comes to mind. :-)
>
> http://www.wiresha
Bob Proulx writes:
> tcptrack -i eth2
>
> There is also 'iftop'.
>
> iftop -i eth2
OK, checking them out... thanks
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.o
Attempting to build latest emacs I run into a problem gnutls not being
available.
./configure --prefix=/usr/local/src/vcs/git/test --with-x=yes
--with-x-toolkit=athena --with-imagemagick
--with-gpm --with-sound=no
[...]
configure: error: The following required libraries
Harry Putnam writes:
[...]
Reco writes:
[...]
> ...
>> I suspect it might be the dev pkgs that is needed:
>>
>> libgnutls-dev
>
> Indeed, but not this one. Not unless you're using wheezy.
>
>
>> But when I try to install it, I run into a compli
Running debian jesse in a vbox vm on a Solaris host
I have what seems like an unusual problem with root login on this
host.
I've done the normal things one does to allow root login; that is, add
PermitRootLogin yes
to /etc/ssh/sshd_config
Restart ssh, and in fact this host has been rebooted
David Christensen writes:
> On 06/12/2017 06:39 AM, Harry Putnam wrote:
>> Running debian jesse in a vbox vm on a Solaris host
>>
>> I have what seems like an unusual problem with root login on this
>> host.
[...]
>> I'm fresh out of ideas as to what els
Harry Putnam writes:
>>
>> # ls -1 /root/.ssh
>>
Sorry ... I managed to overlook this one:
root # ls -la .ssh
total 12
drwx-- 2 root root 4096 May 30 21:44 .
drwx-- 6 root root 4096 Jun 18 11:35 ..
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 666 May 30 22:17 known_hosts
Harry Putnam writes:
>>
>> # ls -1 /root/.ssh
>>
Sorry ... I managed to overlook this one:
root # ls -la .ssh
total 12
drwx-- 2 root root 4096 May 30 21:44 .
drwx-- 6 root root 4096 Jun 18 11:35 ..
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 666 May 30 22:17 known_hosts
Tom Dial writes:
[...]
>From Harry's settings:
>> LoginGraceTime 120
>> PermitRootLogin without-password
Tom D wrote:
> This will prevent root login using a password. Only other methods, such
> as RSA authentication are to be permitted.
That turned out to be exactly the problem.
Somewhere
201 - 300 of 625 matches
Mail list logo
