On Lu, 18 ian 21, 22:36:22, Brian wrote:
> On Mon 18 Jan 2021 at 23:23:56 +0100, deloptes wrote:
>
> > Long Wind wrote:
> >
> > > this is really advertisementis it ok to post ad on debian list?
> >
> > It is not advertisement, because rhkramer does not benefit from it.
>
> Not even reputational
On 16/1/21 3:02 pm, Dan Hitt wrote:
In 2016, i had a computer with mint on it (which is a form of ubuntu),
and it was connected to an internet modem. There was a super simple
gui on it that i could use to share that connection with some older
hardware that were not directly connected to the
On Ma, 19 ian 21, 02:54:25, Gareth Evans wrote:
> There is apparently a Python 3 fork of wicd (or two) but I can't
> figure out what state they're in - are either of these likely to
> become available in Buster repos? Backports?
Wicd is currently only available in experimental (according to
ht
Hi,
When I boot the machine (5.10.0-1-amd64), I get:
Jan 19 09:47:52 box systemd-udevd[611]: sdg5: Failed to update device symlinks:
Too many levels of symbolic links
Jan 19 09:47:52 box systemd-udevd[581]: sdg6: Failed to update device symlinks:
Too many levels of symbolic links
Jan 19 09:47:
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 12:52:29PM +0800, Robbi Nespu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I installed Debian WSL on my windows.. here some details
>
> ~$ uname -a
> Linux PC 4.4.0-18362-Microsoft #1049-Microsoft Thu Aug 14 12:01:00 PST 2020
> x86_64 GNU/Linux
>
> ~$ cat /etc/debian_version
> 10.5
>
> But sadly
On Tue, 19 Jan 2021, at 07:53, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Ma, 19 ian 21, 02:51:21, Gareth Evans wrote:
> >
> > If the machine in question has a desktop environment and
> > NetworkManager (or equivalent), doesn't /etc/network/interfaces (or
> > interfaces.d) config override nm (etc)?
>
> It shou
On Tue, 19 Jan 2021, at 08:16, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Ma, 19 ian 21, 02:54:25, Gareth Evans wrote:
> > There is apparently a Python 3 fork of wicd (or two) but I can't
> > figure out what state they're in - are either of these likely to
> > become available in Buster repos? Backports?
>
> W
Hello, I have a very general question about what is supposed to happen
with audio routing, I'm not sure what I am doing is right and I'd like
to rule out the person behind the keyboard before I start on debugging
the setup.
I am running debian stable with pulseaudio-dlna installed.
The widget
On Tue 19 Jan 2021 at 10:03:25 +0200, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Lu, 18 ian 21, 22:36:22, Brian wrote:
> > On Mon 18 Jan 2021 at 23:23:56 +0100, deloptes wrote:
> >
> > > Long Wind wrote:
> > >
> > > > this is really advertisementis it ok to post ad on debian list?
> > >
> > > It is not adverti
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 10:03:12AM +0100, steve wrote:
> Jan 19 09:47:52 box systemd-udevd[611]: sdg5: Failed to update device
> symlinks: Too many levels of symbolic links
> Jan 19 09:47:52 box systemd-udevd[581]: sdg6: Failed to update device
> symlinks: Too many levels of symbolic links
Look
On 1/19/21 1:48 PM, elvis wrote:
> Hello, I have a very general question about what is supposed to happen
> with audio routing, I'm not sure what I am doing is right and I'd like
> to rule out the person behind the keyboard before I start on debugging
> the setup.
>
> I am running debian stable wi
hello,
I see that you can get a single network card with 2, 3, 4 connections.
Can you happily make each one on a separate private address block ?
10.0.0.0, 172.16.0.0, 192.168.0.0
mick
--
Key ID4BFEBB31
On 1/19/21 2:47 PM, mick crane wrote:
> hello,
> I see that you can get a single network card with 2, 3, 4 connections.
> Can you happily make each one on a separate private address block ?
> 10.0.0.0, 172.16.0.0, 192.168.0.0
>
I don't know what the purpose is one network card to have multiple
co
Hi.
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 12:47:34PM +, mick crane wrote:
> I see that you can get a single network card with 2, 3, 4 connections.
They call them "ports" usually. Such things exist for a long time in a
server world, but are infrequent in consumer one.
> Can you happily make each on
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 07:41:13AM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 10:03:12AM +0100, steve wrote:
> > Jan 19 09:47:52 box systemd-udevd[611]: sdg5: Failed to update device
> > symlinks: Too many levels of symbolic links
> > Jan 19 09:47:52 box systemd-udevd[581]: sdg6: Failed
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 12:47:34PM +, mick crane wrote:
> hello,
> I see that you can get a single network card with 2, 3, 4 connections.
> Can you happily make each one on a separate private address block ?
> 10.0.0.0, 172.16.0.0, 192.168.0.0
You can even put one connection (aka "port") on se
mick crane wrote:
> hello,
> I see that you can get a single network card with 2, 3, 4 connections.
> Can you happily make each one on a separate private address block ?
> 10.0.0.0, 172.16.0.0, 192.168.0.0
My firewall (yes, it runs Debian) has an Intel 4x 1gig ethernet
card in it, as well as the
Le 19-01-2021, à 14:49:36 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de a écrit :
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 07:41:13AM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 10:03:12AM +0100, steve wrote:
> Jan 19 09:47:52 box systemd-udevd[611]: sdg5: Failed to update device
symlinks: Too many levels of symbolic links
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 03:45:41PM +0100, steve wrote:
> Le 19-01-2021, à 14:49:36 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de a écrit :
>
> >On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 07:41:13AM -0500, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> >>On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 10:03:12AM +0100, steve wrote:
> >>> Jan 19 09:47:52 box systemd-udevd[611]: sdg5: Fa
On Tue, 2021-01-19 at 12:47 +, mick crane wrote:
> hello,
> I see that you can get a single network card with 2, 3, 4
> connections.
> Can you happily make each one on a separate private address block ?
> 10.0.0.0, 172.16.0.0, 192.168.0.0
>
> mick
>
Yes,
but depending on your network topology
On 2021-01-19 14:22, Dan Ritter wrote:
mick crane wrote:
hello,
I see that you can get a single network card with 2, 3, 4 connections.
Can you happily make each one on a separate private address block ?
10.0.0.0, 172.16.0.0, 192.168.0.0
My firewall (yes, it runs Debian) has an Intel 4x 1gig et
Le 19-01-2021, à 15:53:00 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de a écrit :
find /usr -follow -printf ""
find: Boucle détectée dans le système de fichiers ; « ‘/usr/bin/X11’ » est dans
la même boucle que ‘/usr/bin’.
ls -l /usr/bin/X11
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 1 6 mai 2013 /usr/bin/X11 -> .
find /sys -follow
Hi Mick,
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 12:47:34PM +, mick crane wrote:
> I see that you can get a single network card with 2, 3, 4 connections.
> Can you happily make each one on a separate private address block ?
> 10.0.0.0, 172.16.0.0, 192.168.0.0
There is no strong connection between the concept
Hello everybody
If I want to be able to fast reinstall a debian after a crash, I already
backup /etc (including /etc/apt), a file with the output of
apt-show manual
to get the list of manually installed packages, /etc, but It would be
handy to have the state of debconf (with all the answers I
On 2021-01-19 15:06, Andy Smith wrote:
Hi Mick,
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 12:47:34PM +, mick crane wrote:
I see that you can get a single network card with 2, 3, 4 connections.
Can you happily make each one on a separate private address block ?
10.0.0.0, 172.16.0.0, 192.168.0.0
There is no
Hi Erwan,
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 04:09:47PM +0100, Erwan David wrote:
> It would be handy to have the state of debconf (with all the
> answers I already gave).
I do:
dpkg --get-selections \* > /var/lib/dpkg_selections
debconf-get-selections > /var/lib/debconf_selections
(and then back up those
Le 19/01/2021 à 16:23, Andy Smith a écrit :
Hi Erwan,
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 04:09:47PM +0100, Erwan David wrote:
It would be handy to have the state of debconf (with all the
answers I already gave).
I do:
dpkg --get-selections \* > /var/lib/dpkg_selections
debconf-get-selections > /var/lib
> What is the purpose of remote power switch ?
Probably to turn on the popcorn machine when you're not at home.
Stefan
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 04:03:14PM +0100, steve wrote:
> Le 19-01-2021, à 15:53:00 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de a écrit :
>
> >>find /usr -follow -printf ""
> >>find: Boucle détectée dans le système de fichiers ; « ‘/usr/bin/X11’ » est
> >>dans la même boucle que ‘/usr/bin’.
> >>
> >>ls -l /usr/bin/X1
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 04:03:14PM +0100, steve wrote:
> > It'd be interesting to know which one your startup is choking on.
>
> What does it mean more precisely? The lines come from syslog and only
> mention partitions:
>
> Jan 19 09:09:33 box systemd-udevd[607]: sdg6: Failed to update device
>
On 2021-01-19 16:09 +0100, Erwan David wrote:
> Hello everybody
>
> If I want to be able to fast reinstall a debian after a crash, I
> already backup /etc (including /etc/apt), a file with the output of
> apt-show manual
> to get the list of manually installed packages, /etc, but It would be
> han
mick crane wrote:
> What is the purpose of remote power switch ?
It can turn on and off a set of wall outlets, to which other
computers are attached. In other words, if the firewall is
running, I can power-cycle several other machines.
-dsr-
On 2021-01-19 10:16 +0200, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Ma, 19 ian 21, 02:54:25, Gareth Evans wrote:
>> There is apparently a Python 3 fork of wicd (or two) but I can't
>> figure out what state they're in - are either of these likely to
>> become available in Buster repos? Backports?
>
> Wicd is cu
Le 19-01-2021, à 17:11:58 +0100, to...@tuxteam.de a écrit :
>It'd be interesting to know which one your startup is choking on.
What does it mean more precisely? The lines come from syslog and only
mention partitions:
Jan 19 09:09:33 box systemd-udevd[607]: sdg6: Failed to update device symlink
On Tue 19 Jan 2021 at 11:15:05 (-0500), Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 04:03:14PM +0100, steve wrote:
> > > It'd be interesting to know which one your startup is choking on.
> >
> > What does it mean more precisely? The lines come from syslog and only
> > mention partitions:
> >
>
On 2021-01-18 16:40, Dan Hitt wrote:
First, the setup is that i have 3 hosts:
A --- runs debian 10
B --- runs linux mint 16.04
C --- old hardware which cannot connect to my internet-modem-router.
Each of the 3 hosts has 2 network interfaces; there are thus 3 LANs (local
area networks), and e
On Ma, 19 ian 21, 10:37:57, Gareth Evans wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Jan 2021, at 07:53, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > On Ma, 19 ian 21, 02:51:21, Gareth Evans wrote:
>
> > > I thought without eg. connman, a dropped connection on a wifi NIC
> > > configured in /etc/network/interfaces would not automatically
On Ma, 19 ian 21, 17:40:47, Sven Joachim wrote:
>
> The version in experimental is a git snapshot from September 2019,
> apparently development has stalled. People upgrading to bullseye should
> probably look for alternatives, I think network-manager is the only
> reasonable one unless you are wi
On Tue, 19 Jan 2021, at 19:59, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Ma, 19 ian 21, 10:37:57, Gareth Evans wrote:
> > On Tue, 19 Jan 2021, at 07:53, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > > On Ma, 19 ian 21, 02:51:21, Gareth Evans wrote:
> >
> > > > I thought without eg. connman, a dropped connection on a wifi NIC
> > >
On 2021-01-19 04:47, mick crane wrote:
hello,
I see that you can get a single network card with 2, 3, 4 connections.
Can you happily make each one on a separate private address block ?
10.0.0.0, 172.16.0.0, 192.168.0.0
Yes, and more:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Link_aggregation
One feature
David Christensen wrote:
> One feature of link aggregation is increased throughput -- two physical
> connections can work together as one logical connection that is twice as
> fast.
With the caveat that this does not increase the throughput of a single
flow.
> But the killer feature is redun
On 2021-01-19 06:22, Dan Ritter wrote:
mick crane wrote:
hello,
I see that you can get a single network card with 2, 3, 4 connections.
Can you happily make each one on a separate private address block ?
10.0.0.0, 172.16.0.0, 192.168.0.0
My firewall (yes, it runs Debian) has an Intel 4x 1gig et
David Christensen wrote:
> On 2021-01-19 06:22, Dan Ritter wrote:
> >
> > My firewall (yes, it runs Debian) has an Intel 4x 1gig ethernet
> > card in it, as well as the 1 gig port on the motherboard. Each
> > is completely independent, so I have:
> >
> > - one connection to the public Internet
>
On 2021-01-19 14:35, Dan Ritter wrote:
David Christensen wrote:
On 2021-01-19 06:22, Dan Ritter wrote:
My firewall (yes, it runs Debian) has an Intel 4x 1gig ethernet
card in it, as well as the 1 gig port on the motherboard. Each
is completely independent, so I have:
- one connection to the p
On 19/1/2021 6:18 pm, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote
Updating should be exactly the same: the critical thing is that the kernel
remains the one provided by Microsoft, I think, and doesn't update from Debian.
Thank for the information. I never know kernel on WSL are provided by
microsoft.
Why podm
David Christensen wrote:
> On 2021-01-19 14:35, Dan Ritter wrote:
> > So I could drop down to a 2-port NIC, using 3 total and not
> > having any spares, but I already have this setup, and it's been
> > running nicely since 2014. I spent about $250 on it, including
> > some parts I had lying around
Hi,
I deleted some symlinks found in my home, updated the system (bullseye)
this morning, increased udev log level to debug and rebooted the system.
grep symlinks /var/log/syslog
didn't show any mention of previous problem.
Le 19-01-2021, à 11:01:24 -0600, David Wright a écrit :
On Tue 19
Oups, spoke too quickly.
I decreased udev log level, rebooted and the messages came back in
syslog.
48 matches
Mail list logo
