On 11/11/2017 10:08 PM, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 7:26 AM, kamaraju kusumanchi
wrote:
On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 7:04 AM, Laurent Lyaudet
wrote:
Hello,
When I go to :
https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2017/11/threads.html
there is this message at the end of the web
On 2017-11-11, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 9:08 AM, Curt wrote:
>> On 2017-11-11, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
>>>
>>> Thanks. How can I specify the flag in the searches? So, in my example, I
>>> tried
>>>
>>> pandas str /m
>>>
>>> But that query is not finishing.
>>>
>>
On Sunday, November 12, 2017 02:39:22 AM dekks herton wrote:
> in general - any modern laptop will run debian fine [with any DE you
> choose] with IMO the following caveats
>
> 1) Avoid ones with hybrid dual graphics ie intel/nvidia aka optimus
> 2) Avoid anything realtek
I'd add, "avoid Broadcom
On 2017-11-12 at 05:57, Curt wrote:
> On 2017-11-11, kamaraju kusumanchi
> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 9:08 AM, Curt wrote:
>>> '(?i) PanDas' seemed to work.
>>>
>> Ok. That works and does case insensitive search. But the
>> corresponding multiline option does not seem to achieve what
On 11/12, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, November 12, 2017 02:39:22 AM dekks herton wrote:
in general - any modern laptop will run debian fine [with any DE you
choose] with IMO the following caveats
1) Avoid ones with hybrid dual graphics ie intel/nvidia aka optimus
2) Avoid anything real
On 2017-11-12, The Wanderer wrote:
>
>> (?m)(\W|^)panda.*str(\W|$)
>
> That would be expected to find only documents containing 'panda'
> followed by 'str'. To also find ones which contain 'str' followed by
> 'pandas' (and add the missing 's' back in), you'd probably want:
>
> (?m)(\W|^)(pandas.*s
On 11/12/2017 08:23 AM, Curt wrote:
On 2017-11-12, The Wanderer wrote:
(?m)(\W|^)panda.*str(\W|$)
That would be expected to find only documents containing 'panda'
followed by 'str'. To also find ones which contain 'str' followed by
'pandas' (and add the missing 's' back in), you'd probably
Le 10/11/2017 à 09:12, deloptes a écrit :
Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
Here's what I see when I look at my RAID disks:
/dev/sda2: UUID="67d3c233-96a0-737c-5f88-ed9b936ea3ae"
UUID_SUB="48b56869-6f19-21b9-283f-3eee3ac90cf8" LABEL="snowball:1"
TYPE="linux_raid_member" PARTUUID="3bb3729a-528b-4384-b6a5-b6
Le 10/11/2017 à 17:46, Joe Pfeiffer a écrit :
deloptes writes:
you see in your case PARTUUID is different for both members. In my case it
is identical and this is what is bothering me
It's my understanding that PTUUID on a disk using an MBR corresponds to
the UUID on a disk using a GPT, not
Hello,
Thanks for your feedback.
Laurent Lyaudet wrote:
>> >> My install is up-to-date with latest security updates (that's the
>> >> first thing I do anytime I start my laptop).
deloptes wrote:
> There is a rule: "never touch a running system" which means if something
> works let it work. throu
Thanks Pascal,
Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Le 10/11/2017 à 09:12, deloptes a écrit :
>>
>>
>> It looks like the new style raid
>
> Indeed, superblock format 1.x. In addition to the "array UUID" which is
> common to all members of the array, it adds a specific "device UUID" for
> each member. blk
Laurent Lyaudet wrote:
> I think this is a very bad advice.
No it is a wise advise. When you make a change and if you want to be sure it
works - make it on a test system. Otherwise you see what happens!
> You should always be uptodate with security updates since there is
> plenty of people ready
On 11/12/17, Laurent Lyaudet wrote:
> deloptes wrote:
>> I don't use Gnome, because gtk with the concept behind caused a lot of
>> trouble long time ago and could not convince me that it will ever get
>> better so I can't help much. But ... there should be logging facility and
>> you need perhaps
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 12:26:40PM -0500, Cindy-Sue Causey wrote:
[...]
> Does "find" find hidden files without being specifically told how to
> do so? The other thing is that maybe you've just been phenomenally
> blessed to have no errors. That *cou
On 2017-11-12, Cindy-Sue Causey wrote:
> On 11/12/17, Laurent Lyaudet wrote:
>> deloptes wrote:
>>> I don't use Gnome, because gtk with the concept behind caused a lot of
>>> trouble long time ago and could not convince me that it will ever get
>>> better so I can't help much. But ... there shoul
Le 12/11/2017 à 17:57, deloptes a écrit :
So if you know if in this context I have real RAID - I mean data is written
to both drives?
Sorry, I cannot tell. Insufficient data. You can check in /proc/mdstat.
Dear List!
I've a problem with a drbd/ocfs2 dual primary configuration (2 nodes).
The problem is if I write a file to the mounted ocfs2 fs then add
extended attributes to it after this if I try to read back it is doesn't
show any change until read the same file attributes from the other node.
Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> /proc/mdstat
this looks good, however I tried writing to the disk and only one disk led
indicates writes, so I think it is not writing on both disks.
Anyway I will replace those disks
thanks and regards
Papp Rudolf Péter wrote:
> The problem is if I write a file to the mounted ocfs2 fs then add
> extended attributes to it after this if I try to read back it is doesn't
> show any change until read the same file attributes from the other node.
> After if I go back to the original I get the corr
Dear all,
Please help me passthrough my GPU the a KVM guest.
The system I am using:
lshw: https://pastebin.com/tB7FqqxN
Host OS:Debian 9 Stretch
Mainboard: Supermicro C7Z170-M (activated VT-d in Bios)
CPU: Intel Core i7-7700K CPU @ 4.20GHz
GPU: EVGA GeForce GTX1080 Ti
The GPU is not listed beca
Hello,
Well, find behavior and hidden files was not the intended topic of this
thread ;)
I do already know about Ctrl+H, ls -a, etc.
And indeed my find command is incorrect since I forgot the dot or some
wildcard at the beginning.
After correction, I can say there is no .xsession-errors file on my
On Sun, 12 Nov 2017 13:23:46 + dekkz...@gmail.com sent:
> On 11/12, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> >On Sunday, November 12, 2017 02:39:22 AM dekks herton wrote:
> >> in general - any modern laptop will run debian fine [with any DE
> >> you choose] with IMO the following caveats
> >>
> >> 1) Avo
On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 08:55:51 +1100
Charlie S wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Nov 2017 13:23:46 + dekkz...@gmail.com sent:
>
> > On 11/12, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
> > >On Sunday, November 12, 2017 02:39:22 AM dekks herton wrote:
> > >> in general - any modern laptop will run debian fine [with any
On 11/12/2017 04:55 PM, Charlie S wrote:
On Sun, 12 Nov 2017 13:23:46 + dekkz...@gmail.com sent:
On 11/12, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, November 12, 2017 02:39:22 AM dekks herton wrote:
in general - any modern laptop will run debian fine [with any DE
you choose] with IMO the foll
Hi all,
There is no KODI for the buster?
How come?
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 09:51:17AM +0900, Man_without_clue wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> There is no KODI for the buster?
>
> How come?
>
>
https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=kodi
--
Roberto C. Sánchez
On 2017/11/13 10:45, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 09:51:17AM +0900, Man_without_clue wrote:
Hi all,
There is no KODI for the buster?
How come?
https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=kodi
Oh no..
Not considered???
On 2017-11-12 at 21:37, Man_without_clue wrote:
> On 2017/11/13 10:45, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 09:51:17AM +0900, Man_without_clue wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> There is no KODI for the buster?
>>>
>>> How come?
>>
>> https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=kod
My first Linux install was about one year ago. After some missteps, I
have used Debian 8 in reasonable satisfaction on the desktop during that
year. Now I want to leave 8 in place and do a network install for Debian
9 on the same disk and switch back and forth at boot time. LVM reports
as follo
I have some DFTs that i wish to inspect. (Apparently DFT is a common
acronym, but here i mean Discrete Fourier Transform. And properly
speaking it doesn't make sense to inspect a transform, but only to
inspect transformed data, but i'm speaking colloquially.)
DFTs are a common artifact in digita
On 2017/11/13 12:04, The Wanderer wrote:
On 2017-11-12 at 21:37, Man_without_clue wrote:
On 2017/11/13 10:45, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 09:51:17AM +0900, Man_without_clue wrote:
Hi all,
There is no KODI for the buster?
How come?
https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php
On 11/12/2017 09:45 PM, Dan Hitt wrote:
I have some DFTs that i wish to inspect. (Apparently DFT is a common
acronym, but here i mean Discrete Fourier Transform. And properly
speaking it doesn't make sense to inspect a transform, but only to
inspect transformed data, but i'm speaking colloquial
On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 8:50 PM, Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 11/12/2017 09:45 PM, Dan Hitt wrote:
>>
>> I have some DFTs that i wish to inspect. (Apparently DFT is a common
>> acronym, but here i mean Discrete Fourier Transform. And properly
>> speaking it doesn't make sense to inspect a transfor
On 11/12/17 19:27, Dan Norton wrote:
My first Linux install was about one year ago. After some missteps, I
have used Debian 8 in reasonable satisfaction on the desktop during that
year. Now I want to leave 8 in place and do a network install for Debian
9 on the same disk and switch back and for
I tried with newer kernel from backports as you suggested - also
installed the fresh firmware packages too - no change. Weird...
Anyway I report back for linux-image package perhaps.
Thank you Sven!
2017-11-12 20:19 keltezéssel, Sven Hartge írta:
Papp Rudolf Péter wrote:
The problem is i
35 matches
Mail list logo
