Re: Secure boot - Uefi installation

2017-04-22 Thread Pascal Hambourg
Le 21/04/2017 à 12:24, Bonno Bloksma a écrit : If I remember right, when I installed debian alongside windows 8 on my previous UEFI HP laptop, I had to disable fast boot in windows 8, otherwise it would boot directly windows, not grub. The reason for THAT is that Windows with fastboot turne

graph hdd usage with mrtg

2017-04-22 Thread Yuni
Hi I would like graph my hdd usage using mrtg but nothing works I have tried with snmp but it says 0 I tried without snmp with script but still say 0 Some Help Please!!! Thank

help please

2017-04-22 Thread CoreyL
this is my account and yet someone else is controlling it. I know for a fact . coreylendo

Re: help please

2017-04-22 Thread Michael Fothergill
On 22 April 2017 at 10:32, CoreyL wrote: > this is my account and yet someone else is controlling it. I know for a > fact . > > coreylendo > ​What sort of account are you referring to (e.g. bank account?) Regards MF​

CIFS: Enable encryption for SMB3

2017-04-22 Thread debian
Hi! is it possible to add these Kernel patches to Debian 8? https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/azure-file-storage-on-premises-access-for-ubuntu/?cdn=disable https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1670508 Best regards!

Re: Possibly erroneous "device not present" message during boot

2017-04-22 Thread Brian
On Wed 19 Apr 2017 at 15:16:52 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: > On 04/19/2017 02:31 PM, Brian wrote: > > > >As I have detailed elsewhere, > > > >https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2017/04/msg00578.html > > > >the card becomes visible to GRUB with its nativedisk command. The OP has > >a reader whic

Re: Spam on Debian lists

2017-04-22 Thread Michael Fothergill
On 21 April 2017 at 03:11, Cindy-Sue Causey wrote: > On 4/20/17, Ben Finney wrote: > > Patrick Bartek writes: > > > >> On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 22:40:56 +0200 Jochen Spieker > >> wrote: > >> > >> > fc: > >> > > Why not just restrict it to people who have subscribed? > >> > > >> > Because this exclu

Re: Possibly erroneous "device not present" message during boot

2017-04-22 Thread Brian
On Wed 19 Apr 2017 at 21:10:36 -0500, David Wright wrote: > On Sat 15 Apr 2017 at 23:21:33 (+0100), Brian wrote: > > > > Nobody in this thread, apart from the OP, has a Lenovo and an SD card. > > He is in the best position to test and report on this suggestion. Less > > than twenty minutes work.

Re: Possibly erroneous "device not present" message during boot

2017-04-22 Thread Pascal Hambourg
Le 22/04/2017 à 14:50, Brian a écrit : On Wed 19 Apr 2017 at 21:10:36 -0500, David Wright wrote: My guess from this is that the former SD card is connected to the USB bus whereas the latter is connected to a different bus. The likely candidate from what I've read is the PCIe bus. Good guess.

Re: Possibly erroneous "device not present" message during boot

2017-04-22 Thread Pascal Hambourg
Le 22/04/2017 à 00:11, David Wright a écrit : On Wed 19 Apr 2017 at 20:25:46 (+0200), Pascal Hambourg wrote: The boot order in the BIOS has no effect on the device discovery and naming in the Linux system. Also, most of the times USB devices lose the discovery race against ATA devices due to ex

Re: Possibly erroneous "device not present" message during boot

2017-04-22 Thread Brian
On Sat 22 Apr 2017 at 15:35:33 +0200, Pascal Hambourg wrote: > Le 22/04/2017 à 14:50, Brian a écrit : > >On Wed 19 Apr 2017 at 21:10:36 -0500, David Wright wrote: > >> > >>My guess from this is that the former SD card is connected to the > >>USB bus whereas the latter is connected to a different b

Re: Possibly erroneous "device not present" message during boot

2017-04-22 Thread Pascal Hambourg
Le 22/04/2017 à 15:45, Brian a écrit : On Sat 22 Apr 2017 at 15:35:33 +0200, Pascal Hambourg wrote: 0b:00.1 SD Host controller: Ricoh Co Ltd R5C822 SD/SDIO/MMC/MS/MSPro Host Adapter (rev 13) Kernel driver in use: sdhci-pci (taken on my own ThinkPad, but what the heck, it does not have

Re: Possibly erroneous "device not present" message during boot

2017-04-22 Thread Richard Owlett
On 04/22/2017 08:45 AM, Brian wrote: On Sat 22 Apr 2017 at 15:35:33 +0200, Pascal Hambourg wrote: Le 22/04/2017 à 14:50, Brian a écrit : On Wed 19 Apr 2017 at 21:10:36 -0500, David Wright wrote: My guess from this is that the former SD card is connected to the USB bus whereas the latter is c

Re: CIFS: Enable encryption for SMB3

2017-04-22 Thread Martin Read
On 22/04/17 12:30, deb...@alpenjodel.de wrote: Hi! is it possible to add these Kernel patches to Debian 8? That depends what you mean by "add these Kernel patches to Debian 8". If you mean "will a Debian package of the kernel, featuring these patches, be released for Debian 8 'jessie'?", the

new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net today.

2017-04-22 Thread Gene Heskett
Went to newegg.com to look for some optical fiber but the front page, while I think its alive, did not respond to a mouse click on any product link. I hope its not contagious. Many news sites are saying "request entity too large" also. Cheers, Gene Heskett -- "There are four boxes to be used i

Re: Possibly erroneous "device not present" message during boot

2017-04-22 Thread Richard Owlett
On 04/22/2017 06:47 AM, Brian wrote: On Wed 19 Apr 2017 at 15:16:52 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: On 04/19/2017 02:31 PM, Brian wrote: As I have detailed elsewhere, https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2017/04/msg00578.html the card becomes visible to GRUB with its nativedisk command. The OP

spam to aliases and system accounts

2017-04-22 Thread Jonathan de Boyne Pollard
Daniel Pocock: > Do any of the mailers (postfix, exim, etc) provide a convenient way > to exclude delivery to system accounts by default, or to exclude > these aliases and accounts from receiving mail from external senders? > Could anybody share examples of how they do it or pointers to > any

Re: Possibly erroneous "device not present" message during boot

2017-04-22 Thread Brian
On Sat 22 Apr 2017 at 11:56:27 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: > On 04/22/2017 06:47 AM, Brian wrote: > >On Wed 19 Apr 2017 at 15:16:52 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: > > > >>On 04/19/2017 02:31 PM, Brian wrote: > >>> > >>>As I have detailed elsewhere, > >>> > >>>https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/20

Re: Possibly erroneous "device not present" message during boot

2017-04-22 Thread Brian
On Sat 22 Apr 2017 at 19:00:50 +0100, Brian wrote: > When I spoke of "5-in-1 reader" I was using your description in > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2017/04/msg00505.html > > IOW, I was referring to the reader which is inbuilt into the Lenovo. Are > these data for when your recently pu

Re: Possibly erroneous "device not present" message during boot

2017-04-22 Thread Richard Owlett
On 04/22/2017 01:00 PM, Brian wrote: On Sat 22 Apr 2017 at 11:56:27 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: On 04/22/2017 06:47 AM, Brian wrote: On Wed 19 Apr 2017 at 15:16:52 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: On 04/19/2017 02:31 PM, Brian wrote: As I have detailed elsewhere, https://lists.debian.org/deb

Re: Possibly erroneous "device not present" message during boot

2017-04-22 Thread Brian
On Sat 22 Apr 2017 at 13:34:41 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: > On 04/22/2017 01:00 PM, Brian wrote: > > > >When I spoke of "5-in-1 reader" I was using your description in > > > > https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2017/04/msg00505.html > > > >IOW, I was referring to the reader which is inbuilt in

Mouse pointer _sometimes_ too big

2017-04-22 Thread Andreas Ronnquist
Hi! I have just got myself a new nice monitor, and after setting it up and playing around with settings I have a problem where my mouse cursor is sometimes showing too large. Most GTK2-programs shows the mouse too large, except Firefox, which shows it normal size _except_ when hovering the window

Re: Possibly erroneous "device not present" message during boot

2017-04-22 Thread David Wright
On Sat 22 Apr 2017 at 13:34:41 (-0500), Richard Owlett wrote: > On 04/22/2017 01:00 PM, Brian wrote: > >On Sat 22 Apr 2017 at 11:56:27 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: > > > >>On 04/22/2017 06:47 AM, Brian wrote: > >>>On Wed 19 Apr 2017 at 15:16:52 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote: > >>> > On 04/19/2017

Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net today.

2017-04-22 Thread songbird
Gene Heskett wrote: > Went to newegg.com to look for some optical fiber but the front page, > while I think its alive, did not respond to a mouse click on any product > link. I hope its not contagious. > > Many news sites are saying "request entity too large" also. i've not seen any problems (

Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net today.

2017-04-22 Thread Gene Heskett
On Saturday 22 April 2017 17:20:00 songbird wrote: > Gene Heskett wrote: > > Went to newegg.com to look for some optical fiber but the front > > page, while I think its alive, did not respond to a mouse click on > > any product link. I hope its not contagious. > > > > Many news sites are saying "r

Re: No sound-inputs but sound recording FMIT

2017-04-22 Thread Lisi Reisz
On Saturday 04 March 2017 13:32:28 rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > On Friday, March 03, 2017 02:53:26 PM The Wanderer wrote: > > Because hitting New means you have to put in the To address, but hitting > > Reply means the address is already there and you can just start typing > > your message (and poss

Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net today.

2017-04-22 Thread Patrick Bartek
On Sat, 22 Apr 2017 12:24:32 -0400 Gene Heskett wrote: > Went to newegg.com to look for some optical fiber but the front page, > while I think its alive, did not respond to a mouse click on any > product link. I hope its not contagious. > > Many news sites are saying "request entity too large"

Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net today.

2017-04-22 Thread Gene Heskett
On Saturday 22 April 2017 23:22:45 Patrick Bartek wrote: > On Sat, 22 Apr 2017 12:24:32 -0400 Gene Heskett > > wrote: > > Went to newegg.com to look for some optical fiber but the front > > page, while I think its alive, did not respond to a mouse click on > > any product link. I hope its not con

Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net today.

2017-04-22 Thread Frank
Op 23-04-17 om 06:21 schreef Gene Heskett: And how do you get that 10 year newer flash? The adobe site doesn't show me anything newer than the 11.xx.xx.xxx stuff. Really? Both https://www.adobe.com/software/flash/about/ and https://get.adobe.com/nl/flashplayer/ definitely show 25.0.0.148 for

Re: new firefox for wheezy last night, can't do squat on the net today.

2017-04-22 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
On 23/04/17 16:21, Gene Heskett wrote: And how do you get that 10 year newer flash? The adobe site doesn't show me anything newer than the 11.xx.xx.xxx stuff. flashplugin-nonfree is often broken. Here is my workaround: https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2017/03/msg00491.html See also: https