On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 06:40:18PM -0700, David Christensen wrote:
> On 03/18/2016 02:13 PM, Curt wrote:
> >I have never had a failed dist-upgrade. Of course, you gotta follow the
> >goddamn directions, do about five or ten minutes of reading of the
> >appropriate material, which isn't too much to
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 10:52:25PM +, Brian wrote:
> William Lee Valentine's only post is about installing newer kernels and
> has nothing to with booting a Debian image.
Which probably means he wasn't subscribed. :(
--
The media's the most powerful entity on earth.
They have the power to m
I tried running Synaptic on Wayland, received error "Cannot open display
0.0" .
It works fine on native XServer.
Any solutions ?
Debian Stretch; Synaptic Version 0.83+b1
Regards
Himanshu Shekhar
Whenever I boot in the system, while in grub, messages pops up on my
monitor that I operate in 800x600 while preferred resolution is
1920x1080. After I got login prompt or in the system itself I god
1920x1080. But do I do with monitor message when it is in grub? Can
grub go to 1920x1080 resolution
On 23.03.2016 09:23, Himanshu Shekhar wrote:
> I tried running Synaptic on Wayland, received error "Cannot open display 0.0"
> .
> It works fine on native XServer.
> Any solutions ?
it tries to connect to X - do you have
GDK_BACKEND=wayland
set?
Anyway, if synaptic does does not work with wayla
On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 18:52:03 +0100
Christian Seiler wrote:
> On 03/20/2016 06:45 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > One of the problems I have is architecture related, synaptic thinks
> > for some unfathomable to me reason, that this is an i386 machine.
> > But its not, currently running kernel 3.16.0-0
On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 14:26:25 +
Brian wrote:
> On Sun 20 Mar 2016 at 17:08:11 +0300, Adam Wilson wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 12:19:55 +
> > Brian wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun 20 Mar 2016 at 12:08:02 +0300, Adam Wilson wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 14:20:03 -0500
> > > >
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 10:44:24AM -0700, Lotek wrote:
> On 03/19/2016 05:40 AM, lina wrote:
> >Every time since I installed the system,
> >
> >every time I tried Shut Down, it mainly restart again.
> >
> >I checked online and tried several methods but still don't work.
> >
> >Can anyone suggest me
On Mar 23, 2016 2:34 PM, "arian" wrote:
>
>
>
> On 23.03.2016 09:23, Himanshu Shekhar wrote:
> > I tried running Synaptic on Wayland, received error "Cannot open
display 0.0" .
> > It works fine on native XServer.
> > Any solutions ?
> it tries to connect to X - do you have
> GDK_BACKEND=wayland
>
Yayy!
I updated my system yesterday, which included updating kernel to version
4.4. Now, wifi switch works.
Regards
Himanshu Shekhar
> How do I start XWayland?
I think it depends on your compositor, but should be mentioned in most wayland
getting started guides.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Mon 21 Mar 2016 at 07:28:07 +0300, Adam Wilson wrote:
> You wrote "contraining". I was asking whether you meant "constraining",
> or whether "contraining" was some specialised technical vocabulary used
> to describe an implied inverse correlation between two historical
> trends.
>
> "Constrain
On Wed 23 Mar 2016 at 04:46:23 (-0400), German wrote:
> Whenever I boot in the system, while in grub, messages pops up on my
> monitor that I operate in 800x600 while preferred resolution is
> 1920x1080. After I got login prompt or in the system itself I god
> 1920x1080. But do I do with monitor me
On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 07:33:29 -0500
David Wright wrote:
> On Wed 23 Mar 2016 at 04:46:23 (-0400), German wrote:
> > Whenever I boot in the system, while in grub, messages pops up on my
> > monitor that I operate in 800x600 while preferred resolution is
> > 1920x1080. After I got login prompt or in
On Wed 23 Mar 2016 at 21:53:15 (+1300), chrisb@localhost.localdomain wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 10:44:24AM -0700, Lotek wrote:
> > On 03/19/2016 05:40 AM, lina wrote:
> > >Every time since I installed the system,
> > >
> > >every time I tried Shut Down, it mainly restart again.
> > >
> > >I c
On Wed 23 Mar 2016 at 08:52:46 (-0400), German wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 07:33:29 -0500
> David Wright wrote:
>
> > On Wed 23 Mar 2016 at 04:46:23 (-0400), German wrote:
> > > Whenever I boot in the system, while in grub, messages pops up on my
> > > monitor that I operate in 800x600 while pre
David Wright writes:
> you have to take on trust, or check, that bar="some value" is
> the default configured, or set elsewhere, for foo. OTOH, when
> you copy /lib/systemd/system/... to /etc, you know you've got
> hold of the default configuration. IOW, it's self-documenting.
Why is that better t
Hi,
I'm using mpm_itk module (on Apache 2.4.10 - Debian Jessie) but the web
server returns 403 errors :
[Wed Mar 23 12:03:35.303631 2016] [core:error] [pid 18224]
(13)Permission denied: [client 172.31.130.36:54815] AH00035: access to
/favicon.ico denied (filesystem path '/var/www/portail/fav
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 02:41:14PM +0100, Olivier Desport wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using mpm_itk module (on Apache 2.4.10 - Debian Jessie) but the
> web server returns 403 errors :
>
> [Wed Mar 23 12:03:35.303631 2016] [core:error] [pid 18224]
> (13)Perm
Hi Thomas,
I don't want to set 755 permissions to this folder for security reasons.
It worked well like this (750) with Wheezy/Apache 2.2 and I want to keep
my settings.
Le 23/03/2016 15:02, to...@tuxteam.de a écrit :
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 0
On Wed 23 Mar 2016 at 08:16:18 (-0500), John Hasler wrote:
> David Wright writes:
> > you have to take on trust, or check, that bar="some value" is
> > the default configured, or set elsewhere, for foo. OTOH, when
> > you copy /lib/systemd/system/... to /etc, you know you've got
> > hold of the def
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 03:48:41PM +0100, Olivier Desport wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> I don't want to set 755 permissions to this folder for security
> reasons. It worked well like this (750) with Wheezy/Apache 2.2 and I
> want to keep my settings.
Whate
Le 19/03/2016 14:31, Jiri 'Ghormoon' Novak a écrit :
> what may I be missing, if the configuration that came with wordpress
> package doesn't apply correctly?
> there is: /usr/share/wordpress/wp-config.php:
> define('WP_CONTENT_DIR', '/var/lib/wordpress/wp-content');
>
> but that doesn't have
Jean-Louis Mas wrote:
> Le 19/03/2016 14:31, Jiri 'Ghormoon' Novak a écrit :
>
>> what may I be missing, if the configuration that came with wordpress
>> package doesn't apply correctly?
>> there is: /usr/share/wordpress/wp-config.php:
>> define('WP_CONTENT_DIR', '/var/lib/wordpress/wp-content')
It's true that Apache is running under www-data group on Jessie :
root 11718 0.0 3.4 446260 35680 ?Ss 15:03 0:00
/usr/sbin/apache2 -k start
www-data 11722 0.0 1.3 446292 13424 ?S15:03 0:00
/usr/sbin/apache2 -k start
www-data 11723 0.0 1.3 446292 13424 ?
Greetings,
Debian GNU/Linux 8.3 (jessie)
lightdm 1.10.3-3
lightdm-gtk-greeter 1.8.5-2
I currently have a configuration in place using pam_time(8) to enforce
user login times at the Linux console (i.e. against the PAM login(1)
service). This entry works in this case:
# /etc/pam.d/login
account r
THIS ANNOUNCEMENT IS ONLY RELEVANT TO SYSTEMS THAT HAVE AMD PILEDRIVER
MICROPROCESSORS (AMD-FX, and AMD Opteron 3300 / 4300 / 6300).
AMD has released a microcode update that fixes a severe fault (also
known as "erratum") on AMD Piledriver processors. This erratum can
cause dangerous system instab
On Wed 16 Mar 2016 at 16:14:47 +, Brian wrote:
> On Wed 16 Mar 2016 at 12:06:40 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday 16 March 2016 10:12:59 Brian wrote:
> >
> > > Now find a *small* PDF file and send it directly to the printer with
> > > netcat:
> > >
> > > nc 192.168.71.20 9100 <
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 04:40:57PM +0100, Olivier Desport wrote:
> It's true that Apache is running under www-data group on Jessie :
[...]
> But on Wheezy, Apache is running under root, so I don't have to give
> execute access to the folder :
[...]
On Tue 22 Mar 2016 at 22:35:32 (+), Russell Gadd wrote:
> On 22/03/16 19:00, The Wanderer wrote:
> >...
> >
> >How did you test? By launching a new terminal (with bash set as your
> >default shell), by running the command 'bash' in an existing terminal,
> >by logging all of the way out (to the
On 2016-03-23 at 20:23, David Wright wrote:
> On Tue 22 Mar 2016 at 22:35:32 (+), Russell Gadd wrote:
>
>> On 22/03/16 19:00, The Wanderer wrote:
>>> Also, at least on my system, ~/.bashrc is invoked only by being
>>> sourced from ~/.profile or ~/.bash_profile. Unless your system is
>>> conf
On Tue 22 Mar 2016 at 12:45:46 (+0100), Sven Hartge wrote:
> Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
>
> > Any clue to why the debian repositories, especially testing and sid,
> > seem to be unchanged since Mar 20th?
>
> Maybe this has something to do with the removal of the SHA1 checksums in
> the Release fil
On 03/21/2016 09:28 PM, Celejar wrote:
On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 21:49:43 -0700
David Christensen wrote:
4. The laptop TX bytes (1.2 GiB) and NAS RX bytes (731.5 MiB) do not
correlate well.
Why would [laptop TX bytes and NAS RX bytes] match?
You want to devise experiments that isolate and measur
On 03/20/2016 10:30 PM, Michael Milliman wrote:
> On 03/20/2016 03:26 AM, Adam Wilson wrote:
>> On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 19:30:57 +
>> Joe wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 19:57:56 +0100
>>> Sven Arvidsson wrote:
>>>
On Sat, 2016-03-19 at 18:38 +, Joe wrote:
> I've never seen sudo in
On 03/23/2016 12:44 AM, chrisb@localhost.localdomain wrote:
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 06:40:18PM -0700, David Christensen wrote:
I'm not a good Debian owner. I download and install 3rd party software. I
modify system configuration files.
As do most of us. An upgrade won't overwrite configurati
David Christensen writes:
> If I am running version N, have changed the configuration file to M',
> and then upgrade to version N+1, you're saying dist-upgrade throws
> away +X and -Y. I may want or need those.
The package management system will notice that you have changed the
file. You will be
On Wed, 23 Mar 2016 18:48:23 -0700
David Christensen wrote:
> On 03/21/2016 09:28 PM, Celejar wrote:
> > On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 21:49:43 -0700
> > David Christensen wrote:
> >> 4. The laptop TX bytes (1.2 GiB) and NAS RX bytes (731.5 MiB) do not
> >> correlate well.
> >
> > Why would [laptop TX by
On 03/23/2016 07:46 PM, John Hasler wrote:
David Christensen writes:
If I am running version N, have changed the configuration file to M',
and then upgrade to version N+1, you're saying dist-upgrade throws
away +X and -Y. I may want or need those.
The package management system will notice tha
38 matches
Mail list logo
