Am 12.10.2014 um 19:01 schrieb Luca Perico:
> Hi
> After 3,14 gnome shell update (i use debian jessie) i have see synaptic
> p.m, very slow to show the package list at startup and also when i change
> the package list (i.e "all" to "removable" even with a short package list).
> If i stop Caribou S
On Du, 12 oct 14, 14:24:32, Steve Litt wrote:
>
> Because it can run in the foreground, it's a prime candidate for
> daemontools (or one of the daemontools-inspired programs like nosh,
> etc).
$ apt-cache show nosh
E: No packages found
> So if you don't like brand new top level directories, igno
2014/10/12 23:07 "Andrei POPESCU" :
>
> On Sb, 11 oct 14, 21:40:49, Steve Litt wrote:
> >
> > From my viewpoint, shellscripts were never intended to be big, huge
> > programs. To me, they just glue together commands, and have a few
> > rudimentary branching and looping constructs.
>
> Isn't that li
just as a general comment, ufw is workable
almost out of the box, it has a gui interface
gufw. a while ago i used the arno-iptables-
firewall script as that also did what i needed
to have done.
my problem is that i tend to not do much
with things once they are set up and working
so whatever
2014/10/13 2:14 "Andrei POPESCU" :
>
> On Du, 12 oct 14, 10:30:52, The Wanderer wrote:
> > On 10/12/2014 at 10:07 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> >
> > > Any program that requires additional scripting just to get it running
> > > is insufficiently advanced.
> > >
> > > (you can quote me on that)
> >
>
On Du, 12 oct 14, 18:47:09, lee wrote:
> Andrei POPESCU writes:
>
> > On Mi, 08 oct 14, 16:01:37, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> >>
> >> The tech-ctte exploration was extremely thorough, entirely transparent and
> >> I
> >
> > In addition, the tech-ctte took special precautions to make sure their
>
Bas Wijnen writes:
> [Moving this to -project, where it belongs; please follow up only
> there, not on -user or -devel.]
>
> On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 06:18:01PM +0200, lee wrote:
>> Why doesn't Debian just do a GR on this issue?
>
> Because for a GR, a member of Debian has to request it and it nee
2014/10/13 2:45 "Steve Litt" :
>
> On Sun, 12 Oct 2014 09:33:43 +0100
> Martin Read wrote:
>
> > On 12/10/14 04:12, Peter Zoeller wrote:
> > > But the nice
> > > thing is shell scripting is simplistic easy to learn and understand.
> >
> > I refer the audience to David A. Wheeler's essay[1] on how
On 10/08/2014 09:36 AM, The Wanderer wrote:
On 10/08/2014 at 09:18 AM, Steve Litt wrote:
On Wed, 8 Oct 2014 12:16:25 +0300 Andrei POPESCU
wrote:
I was specifically asking about a reference for "Thorsten Glaser
was ordered not to bring up alternate inits...".
I'll restate the URL I gave in
Am 13.10.2014 um 00:21 schrieb Michael Biebl:
> Am 12.10.2014 um 19:01 schrieb Luca Perico:
>> Hi
>> After 3,14 gnome shell update (i use debian jessie) i have see synaptic
>> p.m, very slow to show the package list at startup and also when i change
>> the package list (i.e "all" to "removable" ev
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 11:28 PM, lee wrote:
> Steve Litt writes:
>
>> A) Tell everyone it's a moderated list
>> B) Send the poster a short reason why his post has been moderated.
>
> It would be against RFC-821 to silently drop messages.
That's why RFCs aren't/shouldn't be consider hard standar
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 7:04 AM, lee wrote:
> Bas Wijnen writes:
>
>> [Moving this to -project, where it belongs; please follow up only
>> there, not on -user or -devel.]
Uhm, might I ask, ${what}-project ?
Oh.
https://lists.debian.org/debian-project/2014/10/
Is that going to be appreciated?
Joel Rees writes:
> (But in this case, absolutely requiring a response would be building a
> DOS and potential privacy vulnerability into the message
> infrastructure. The RFCs really should be stored with a summary of
> relevant comments.)
Could you explain how an MTA would create a privacy vul
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 1:39 AM, Martin Read wrote:
> On 12/10/14 01:43, lee wrote:
>>
>> Reco writes:
>>
>>>
>>> http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/tree/src/core/dbus-manager.c?id=3731acf1acfb4a6eb68374a5b137f3b368f63381#n638
>>
>>
>> Ah, this is a wonderful example :) My assumptions a
On 10/12/2014 10:18 AM, lee wrote:
> Jerry Stuckle writes:
>
>> On 10/8/2014 8:42 PM, lee wrote:
>>> Jerry Stuckle writes:
>>>
On 10/6/2014 7:30 PM, lee wrote:
> Jerry Stuckle writes:
>
>> For instance, MUAs typically connect on port 587 (at least that is the
>> recommendat
On 10/12/2014 1:37 PM, Brian wrote:
> On Sun 12 Oct 2014 at 15:56:05 +0200, lee wrote:
>
>> Jerry Stuckle writes:
>>
>>> If you don't know the difference between an MTA and an MUA, there is no
>>> way I can help you.
>>
>> I'm not asking what the difference is but what difference it makes when
>>
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 9:24 AM, lee wrote:
> Joel Rees writes:
>
>> (But in this case, absolutely requiring a response would be building a
>> DOS and potential privacy vulnerability into the message
>> infrastructure. The RFCs really should be stored with a summary of
>> relevant comments.)
>
>
On 10/12/2014 2:11 PM, Brian wrote:
> On Sun 12 Oct 2014 at 18:45:42 +0200, lee wrote:
>
>> Martin Read writes:
>>
>>> On 12/10/14 15:53, lee wrote:
And when they are filtered, does the sender get a message telling him
that their message hasn't been delivered?
>>>
>>> The requirement in
Jonathan Dowland writes:
> On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 02:45:44PM -0400, Harry Putnam wrote:
>> > And if so, is that not acquired from /etc/hosts?
> snip
>> Egad ... I just noticed that was from a different machine... but the
>> format is the same on all of mine. So still should stand as something
Jerry Stuckle writes:
>> On 10/12/2014 9:56 AM, lee wrote:
>>> Jerry Stuckle writes:
>>
>>> If you don't know the difference between an MTA and an MUA, there is no
>>> way I can help you.
>>
>> I'm not asking what the difference is but what difference it makes when
>> this setting is involved.
Jerry Stuckle writes:
> Among other things, legitimate MTAs have MX records. Anti-spam routines
Who prevents a MUA from having an MX record and sending a HELO that
matches the RDNS entry? And what are these "other things" you're
referring to?
--
Again we must be afraid of speaking of daemon
Harry Putnam writes:
> Martin Read writes:
>
>> On 12/10/14 14:52, lee wrote:
>>> Harry Putnam writes:
>>>
Can any of you experienced exim4 hands interpret this output?
>>>
>>> Reading RFC-821 would tell you more.
>>
>> Reading RFC 2821 would be even better, since RFC 821 is obsoleted by
>
Harry Putnam writes:
> lee writes:
>
> [...]
>
> Thanks for the tips.
>
>>> SMTP>> EHLO 2xd
>
>> That's an invalid helo string.
>
> Is a valid one made up of just the full fqdn?
See https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2821#section-4.1.1.1
It says to either use the fqdn or, if not possible, an IP
On 10/12/2014 10:24 PM, lee wrote:
> Jerry Stuckle writes:
>
>> Among other things, legitimate MTAs have MX records. Anti-spam routines
>
> Who prevents a MUA from having an MX record and sending a HELO that
> matches the RDNS entry? And what are these "other things" you're
> referring to?
>
On 10/10/2014, Bret Busby wrote:
> This will probably show as a new thread, due to me correcting a
> spelling error in the Subject field of the message.
>
> On 08/10/2014, Joe wrote:
>> On Wed, 8 Oct 2014 15:23:55 +0800
>> Bret Busby wrote:
>>
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> I have a 23" monitor, that I want
On 12/10/2014, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Sb, 11 oct 14, 23:09:20, Bret Busby wrote:
>> >
>> > Definitely, I'm using my TV as external monitor sometimes. Could you
>> > please attach your Xorg.0.log? Inlining works as well if you take care
>> > not to break long lines.
>>
>> What is the path to th
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 07:53:03AM +0900, Joel Rees wrote:
> 2014/10/13 2:14 "Andrei POPESCU" :
> >
> > On Du, 12 oct 14, 10:30:52, The Wanderer wrote:
> > > On 10/12/2014 at 10:07 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> > >
> > > > Any program that requires additional scripting just to get it running
> > > >
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 1:38 PM, Chris Bannister
wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 07:53:03AM +0900, Joel Rees wrote:
>> 2014/10/13 2:14 "Andrei POPESCU" :
>> >
>> > On Du, 12 oct 14, 10:30:52, The Wanderer wrote:
>> > > On 10/12/2014 at 10:07 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Any program t
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 09:05:14PM -0400, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
> Among other things, legitimate MTAs have MX records.
Not necessarily. In the absence of an MX record an A record is perfectly
legitimate.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubsc
Hi.
On Sun, 12 Oct 2014 02:53:37 +0200
lee wrote:
> Reco writes:
>
> > 3) User Alice goes away, but keeps her session in place, locking the
> > screen.
> >
> > 4) User Bob logs in another X session.
>
> How does Bob log in while the screen is locked?
Either by selecting 'Switch session' in
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 09:40:44PM +0200, Erwan David wrote:
> The mount unit requires the device to mount. How to do this with a luks
> disk ? And how to mount hen, with the password entered in the ssh
> session and not on the console ?
It would be something like 'sudo systemctl start my-mount-se
101 - 131 of 131 matches
Mail list logo
