On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 03:42:15PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > If the tool does not provide a means to undelete messages, then I also
> > find the decision to not make permanent deletion (either when the user
> > changes f
Florian Kulzer wrote:
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 10:06:12 +, john gennard wrote:
Florian Kulzer wrote:
[...]
What is your graphics card? Please find the relevant lines in the output
of "lspci" and post them here (lines mentioning "VGA", "graphic(s)" or
"display").
The only reference to
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 16:46:34 -0500, Tony Heal wrote:
>
> I have a problem. If you look below you will see that webalizer is
> installed and has a dependency of either libgd2 or libgd2-noxpm. If
> you look further down neither libgd2 nor libgd2-xpm are installed.
> Apt-get -f install shows no pa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/14/07 16:23, Dave Sherohman wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 03:42:15PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
>>> If the tool does not provide a means to undelete messages, then I also
>>> find the decision to not make permanent deletion (either when the use
Dave Sherohman wrote:
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 02:30:48PM -0500, Daniel B. wrote:
Dave Sherohman wrote:
On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 12:36:55PM -0500, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
I was complaining solely about the use of "compact" to mean "delete".
Are you confusing the logical level (w
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 22:23:53 +, john gennard wrote:
> Florian Kulzer wrote:
[...]
> >Normally when X is started during boot by [xkg]dm and it fails then you
> >are just returned to the command prompt. If your box locks up completely
> >then there might be something really wrong with the g
Good catch, and I can fix that. I removed the libd2-xpm package and that remove
webalizer and my private package. When I
try to install my package I get an error stating
The following packages have unmet dependencies.
{my package}: Depends: xlibs but it is not going to be installed
Since I had
On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 01:15:53AM EST, Greg Folkert wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-02-09 at 15:07 -0500, cga2000 wrote:
> > Could someone direct me to an /etc/apt/sources.list file that works for
> > "etch" or explain how I should go about creating one.
[..]
> ## Christian Marillat's stuff (http://www.
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> installation reports:
>
> reportbug installation
>
> upgrade reports:
>
> reportbug upgrade-reports
Please don't file bug reports on "installation", "install", "installer",
or other names that people like to make up. Every single one has to be
tracked down and man
I was wondering is there a way i could down load the stuff ineed too run
this wonderful scasnner
could u please let me no
thank-you for ur time
James scott
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 12:03 -0600, Default User wrote:
> I am running Debian Etch-testing on an old i586 system with a 32-bit AMD
> K6-2 processor. Update Manager just did its daily check, showing 22
> available updates. Among them was libc6-amd64, which the description
> states is a 64-bit libra
Hi!
I'm trying to install woody on Digital Venturis 466 486DX66, 540MB HDD,
20MB RAM, CD-ROM, S3 Turbo VGA 1MB and EtherWorks III ISA network adapter.
The first stage of install went fine but after installing lilo and
rebooting I never got prompt. There are many errors:
Read-only file system
not
thanks. It was "syslog2mysql.sh"
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I tried to produce dvi output from a tex file I have and latex just refuses to
do it. I tried:
latex -output-format=dvi .tex
And it's as if the option is not there, I just get a pdf file again.
How do I force latex to produce a dvi file?
This is with debian unstable and the tetex packages, not texl
cga2000 wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 10, 2007 at 01:15:53AM EST, Greg Folkert wrote:
>
>
>> Now. when Etch goes stable, The Official and security lines need to be
>> changed to "stable"
>>
>
> And naturally you will notify me.
>
> :-)
>
> Thanks,
>
> cga
>
>
>
Or you could just change the lines
> From: "Mirko Scurk"
> Newsgroups: gmane.linux.debian.user
> Subject: Woody on 486 problem
> Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 02:01:56 +0100 (CET)
> Hi!
Hallo, Mirko.
> I'm trying to install woody on Digital Venturis 466 486DX66, 540MB HDD,
> 20MB RAM, CD-ROM, S3 Turbo VGA 1MB and EtherWorks III ISA netw
* Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070214 20:43]:
> I tried to produce dvi output from a tex file I have and latex just refuses to
> do it. I tried:
> latex -output-format=dvi .tex
> And it's as if the option is not there, I just get a pdf file again.
> How do I force latex to produce a dvi file?
> I think you should. The current version is 9.0.31.0.1. Your version is
> trying to fetch a file which is no longer hosted by Adobe.
Thanks. My sources were in fact the problem. I changed the sources to:
deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian etch main contrib non-free
and then I updated it,
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 04:23:17PM -0600, Dave Sherohman wrote:
>
> OK, one more time: Delete by default does not have to mean delete
> *immediately* by default. Look at the underlined text above. I already
> explicitly stated that I didn't mean immediate deletion and that delete-
> on-folder-c
On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 11:36 -0500, Michael S. Peek wrote:
> Hi Debian gurus,
>
> I jumped aboard the Debian bandwagon mid-Sarge, and so that's the
> version of Debian that our machines are currently running. As Etch
> nears it's completion I've been preparing for the upgrade from Sarge to
> Et
You must be accustomed to a strange TeX distribution - all varieties I've
encountered produce dvi files (as Don Knuth originally coded it). Also
remember that there are a number of commercial TeX distributions and they have
quite a few modifications and additional style files and may not work
(Off-Topic because this is really a LaTeX question rather than a Debian
question.)
I've been using OpenOffice.org to produce paper copies of songs written
for guitar, but with all the talk about LaTeX on this list lately, I got
to wondering if it might be a better product.
The material looks like
On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 16:24 +0100, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 18:37:04 -0800, Kenward Vaughan wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 21:53 +0100, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 21:11:54 -0800, Kenward Vaughan wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > I finally caught wind of one
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Default User wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 12:03 -0600, Default User wrote:
>> I am running Debian Etch-testing on an old i586 system with a 32-bit AMD
>> K6-2 processor. Update Manager just did its daily check, showing 22
>> available updates. Amon
On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 20:39 -0800, Kenward Vaughan wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-02-14 at 16:24 +0100, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 18:37:04 -0800, Kenward Vaughan wrote:
...
> > >
> > > 06:32:58
> > > daddy:~# xmodmap -pk | grep Switch_VT
> > >
> > > 06:33:19
> > > daddy:~#
> > >
Dave Sherohman wrote:
> OK, one more time: Delete by default does not have to mean delete
> *immediately* by default. Look at the underlined text above. I already
> explicitly stated that I didn't mean immediate deletion and that delete-
> on-folder-change or delete-on-exit are probably better,
Philipp Esselbach wrote:
>
> The current specifications of the CompatDB.org 1.0 XML document format
> can found here – http://www.compatdb.org/specs-1.0.txt and daily
> snapshots of the compatibility lists here -
> http://www.compatdb.org/page9.html. CompatDB.org is currently
> supporting 30 Linu
101 - 127 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
