Re: Minimalist HTML 4 viewer available?

On 4/11/24 23:26, Michael Kjörling wrote: On 4 Nov 2024 09:36 -0500, from monn...@iro.umontreal.ca (Stefan Monnier): Frames were current up through HTML 4[7] but are non-conformant in HTML 5[8], although interestingly enough still described[9]. Not sure if we're talking about the same "frames"

Re: Minimalist HTML 4 viewer available?

Hi, I do not know, if this is what you are searching for, but take a look at bluegriffon https://www.bluegriffon.org Also (if it must not the super modern tool), you can try "kompozer" or its successor "NVU" (but I believe, NVU is only for MAC and Windows). You searched for "small", but small

Re: Minimalist HTML 4 viewer available?

>>> Frames were current up through HTML 4[7] but are non-conformant in >>> HTML 5[8], although interestingly enough still described[9]. >> Not sure if we're talking about the same "frames", but uMatrix has >> a column dedicated to frames and I see it used fairly frequently for >> captchas and onlin

Re: Minimalist HTML 4 viewer available?

On 4 Nov 2024 09:36 -0500, from monn...@iro.umontreal.ca (Stefan Monnier): >> Frames were current up through HTML 4[7] but are non-conformant in >> HTML 5[8], although interestingly enough still described[9]. > > Not sure if we're talking about the same "frames", but uMatrix has > a column dedicat

Re: Minimalist HTML 4 viewer available?

> Frames were current up through HTML 4[7] but are non-conformant in > HTML 5[8], although interestingly enough still described[9]. Not sure if we're talking about the same "frames", but uMatrix has a column dedicated to frames and I see it used fairly frequently for captchas and online credit car

Re: Minimalist HTML 4 viewer available?

On 4 Nov 2024 19:30 +0800, from b...@busby.net (Bret Busby): >> Yes, later versions of HTML have _added_ quite a lot of stuff, and >> perhaps slightly changed the default _semantics_ of some; but very >> little has been _removed_. (One biggie might be , which was >> deprecated as of HTML 4.01[1] an

Re: Minimalist HTML 4 viewer available?

On 4/11/24 18:56, Michael Kjörling wrote: On 4 Nov 2024 06:00 +, from a...@strugglers.net (Andy Smith): Installing 20+ year old software just to make sure it can never parse HTML5 is total lunacy. There will be no support community for such a thing for a start, so any problem you have is goi

Re: Minimalist HTML 4 viewer available?

On 4 Nov 2024 06:00 +, from a...@strugglers.net (Andy Smith): > Installing 20+ year old software just to make sure it can never parse > HTML5 is total lunacy. There will be no support community for such a > thing for a start, so any problem you have is going to be a showstopper. Also, it shoul

Re: Minimalist HTML 4 viewer available?

On Sun, 3 Nov 2024, Richard Owlett wrote: I'm working on a weird personal proof-of-concept project. A HTML 5 compatible browser will *NOT* be considered. I would really prefer a product aimed at HTML 2. In any case CSS and/or JavaScript will not be used. You do not say whether you will be writ

Re: Minimalist HTML 4 viewer available?

On Mon, Nov 04, 2024 at 06:00:03AM +, Andy Smith wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Nov 03, 2024 at 07:43:44AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote: > > I'm working on a weird personal proof-of-concept project. > > A HTML 5 compatible browser will *NOT* be considered. > > I can see why you might THINK this is a

Re: Minimalist HTML 4 viewer available?

Hi, On Sun, Nov 03, 2024 at 07:43:44AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote: > I'm working on a weird personal proof-of-concept project. > A HTML 5 compatible browser will *NOT* be considered. I can see why you might THINK this is a good requirement: you're probably thinking that by only wanting minimal f

Re: Minimalist HTML 4 viewer available?

On Sun, Nov 03, 2024 at 12:18:39PM -0700, Antonio Russo wrote: > > > On Sun, Nov 03, 2024 at 07:43:44AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote: > > > > I'm working on a weird personal proof-of-concept project. > > > > A HTML 5 compatible browser will *NOT* be considered. > > On 11/3/24 07:51, Richard Owlett

Re: Minimalist HTML 4 viewer available?

r to Debian 9 would be running Amaya, which was last released on Debian 3.1 (sarge), I believe, as amaya 8.5. I think a WYSIWYG HTML editor might qualify as a viewer. https://www.w3.org/Amaya/ says that the latest version, 11.4.4, about 12 years old, is available, and offers support for HTML 4.01, XH

Re: Minimalist HTML 4 viewer available?

How do I control brightness and contrast in Debian? xrandr does not work.

Re: Minimalist HTML 4 viewer available?

On 4/11/24 04:21, Bret Busby wrote: On 3/11/24 21:43, Richard Owlett wrote: I'm working on a weird personal proof-of-concept project. A HTML 5 compatible browser will *NOT* be considered. I would really prefer a product aimed at HTML 2. In any case CSS and/or JavaScript will not be used. [Before

Re: Minimalist HTML 4 viewer available?

On 3/11/24 21:43, Richard Owlett wrote: I'm working on a weird personal proof-of-concept project. A HTML 5 compatible browser will *NOT* be considered. I would really prefer a product aimed at HTML 2. In any case CSS and/or JavaScript will not be used. [Before I get flamed on supposed security is

Re: Minimalist HTML 4 viewer available?

On Sun, Nov 03, 2024 at 07:43:44AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote: I'm working on a weird personal proof-of-concept project. A HTML 5 compatible browser will *NOT* be considered. On 11/3/24 07:51, Richard Owlett wrote: Manpage for w3m hints it may be particularly suitable. Will investigate elink

Re: Minimalist HTML 4 viewer available?

Richard Owlett writes: > I'm working on a weird personal proof-of-concept project. > A HTML 5 compatible browser will *NOT* be considered. > I would really prefer a product aimed at HTML 2. > In any case CSS and/or JavaScript will not be used. > Any suggestions? Emacs and it's eww mode.

Re: Minimalist HTML 4 viewer available?

On 11/3/24 8:21 AM, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: On Sun, Nov 03, 2024 at 07:43:44AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote: I'm working on a weird personal proof-of-concept project. A HTML 5 compatible browser will *NOT* be considered. I would really prefer a product aimed at HTML 2. In any case CSS and/or Jav

Re: Minimalist HTML 4 viewer available?

On Sun, Nov 03, 2024 at 07:43:44AM -0600, Richard Owlett wrote: > I'm working on a weird personal proof-of-concept project. > A HTML 5 compatible browser will *NOT* be considered. > I would really prefer a product aimed at HTML 2. > In any case CSS and/or JavaScript will not be used. > [Before I ge

Minimalist HTML 4 viewer available?

I'm working on a weird personal proof-of-concept project. A HTML 5 compatible browser will *NOT* be considered. I would really prefer a product aimed at HTML 2. In any case CSS and/or JavaScript will not be used. [Before I get flamed on supposed security issues - system will be isolated from web

Re: webp in Image Viewer

On 8/6/24 18:40, cor...@free.fr wrote: Hi My Image Viewer on desktop seems not to support webp format. do you have any ideas? You might need the package "webp-pixbuf-loader". "webp-pixbuf-loader integrates libwebp library into GDK image processing framework, so GDK based appl

Re: webp in Image Viewer

On Wed, 2024-08-07 at 06:40 +0800, cor...@free.fr wrote: > Hi Hullo, > My Image Viewer on desktop seems not to support webp format. > do you have any ideas? It depends on what you want to do with it, but GIMP can handle webp, and export to any othwer format you may find easier to handle. Cheers!

webp in Image Viewer

Hi My Image Viewer on desktop seems not to support webp format. do you have any ideas? Thank you. -- corey hickman

Re: Recommended simple PDF viewer to replace Evince

> Try xpdf, but be aware it doesn't support forms nor other special stuff > in PDF like video. qpdfview is awfully simple. #apt install qpdfview (does well with trixie and sid) It prints well with CUPS that provides a driver for my Kyocera FS-920 b&w laser printer. That printer is 15 years old.

Re: Recommended simple PDF viewer to replace Evince

On 12/6/23 9:06 PM, Bert Riding wrote: On Tue, 05 Dec 2023 14:30:01 +0100, Eric S Fraga wrote: I use zathura which is also quite light but I'm not sure if you can print from it. I tend to print directly using lp although very infrequently in any case. In zathura :print brings up the Gtk+ prin

Re: Recommended simple PDF viewer to replace Evince

On Tue, 05 Dec 2023 14:30:01 +0100, Eric S Fraga wrote: > I use zathura which is also quite light but I'm not sure if you can > print from it. I tend to print directly using lp although very > infrequently in any case. In zathura :print brings up the Gtk+ print dialog.

Re: Recommended simple PDF viewer to replace Evince

On 06/12/2023 12:14, tomas wrote: Debian Bullseye here. Xpdf links against libpoppler102, which has GPLv2 or V3, same as xpdf. Perhaps fact checking of the following is required. Gnome forked xpdf to have a library (poppler) for a PDF viewer (evince). For security reasons Debian maintainers

Re: Recommended simple PDF viewer to replace Evince

On Wed, 6 Dec 2023 06:14:00 +0100 wrote: On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 05:01:37PM -0500, Paul M Foster wrote: [...] I've used Xpdf from Arch, and it's an entirely different program. My understanding was that the Arch version depended on poppler. I can only imagine that the version in Debian is

Re: Recommended simple PDF viewer to replace Evince

On Tue, Dec 05, 2023 at 05:01:37PM -0500, Paul M Foster wrote: [...] > I've used Xpdf from Arch, and it's an entirely different program. My > understanding was that the Arch version depended on poppler. I can only > imagine that the version in Debian is different because there is a > licensing is

Re: Recommended simple PDF viewer to replace Evince

On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 12:09:09AM +0700, Max Nikulin wrote: > On 05/12/2023 18:30, Tom Browder wrote: > > When I manually print via Evince It seems to sometimes change important > > settings like page scaling and orientation. > > I had an impression that GUI print dialog may remember some settin

Re: Recommended simple PDF viewer to replace Evince

useful. > The following seems to list most of the various programs discussed in this > thread, plus a > couple of others: > apt-cache search pdf-viewer Thanks so much Mike! And also many thanks to all my Debian friends who answered. I think my side of this thread is done now. "Merry Christmas to all and t all a good night!" -Tom

Re: Recommended simple PDF viewer to replace Evince

On 6/12/23 01:09, Max Nikulin wrote: I believed that CUPS stack is based on PDF while earlier PostScript was used. I recently wrote a  user space CUPS driver for a thermal printer. At the point I get to process the print data it has already been rasterised into a bitmap. My impression is

Re: Recommended simple PDF viewer to replace Evince

On 05/12/2023 18:30, Tom Browder wrote: When I manually print via Evince It seems to sometimes change important settings like page scaling and orientation. I had an impression that GUI print dialog may remember some settings from its previous invocation. Unsure if it is relevant to evince. I

Re: Recommended simple PDF viewer to replace Evince

On 12/5/23 6:23 AM, Eric S Fraga wrote: I use zathura which is also quite light but I'm not sure if you can print from it. I tend to print directly using lp although very infrequently in any case. I do a lot of printing from zathura but have had trouble setting up print preview.. Paul

Re: Recommended simple PDF viewer to replace Evince

I use zathura which is also quite light but I'm not sure if you can print from it. I tend to print directly using lp although very infrequently in any case. -- Eric S Fraga via gnus (Emacs 30.0.50 2023-09-14) on Debian 12.2

Re: Recommended simple PDF viewer to replace Evince

On Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 17:12 Tom Browder wrote: > I have used Evince as my PDF viewer and printer program for many I see I need to read the CUPS man page more closely. It looks like it has most all of the answers I need for my current situation. Thanks to all who responded. Happy Christ

Re: Recommended simple PDF viewer to replace Evince

On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 01:14 Marco Moock wrote: > Am 04.12.2023 um 17:12:28 Uhr schrieb Tom Browder: > > > I would like to use another program which is similar but has good > > documentation. I don't need a heavy duty program like LibreOffice, > > Just something for viewing and printing. > > Try

Re: Recommended simple PDF viewer to replace Evince

On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 02:06 Paul M Foster wrote: > On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 05:12:28PM -0600, Tom Browder wrote: > > > I have used Evince as my PDF viewer and printer program for many > > years. It still works, but it has been spitting out error messages for > >

Re: Recommended simple PDF viewer to replace Evince

On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 05:12:28PM -0600, Tom Browder wrote: > I would like to use another program which is similar but has good > documentation. I don't need a heavy duty program like LibreOffice, > Just something for viewing and printing. > Hi Tom: I recommend Okular. Has KDE dependencies, but IM

Re: Recommended simple PDF viewer to replace Evince

um Though chromium is a web browser, it can display PDFs quiet properly and can fillout formulars, print PDFs, etc. For my daily reading I want a lightweight viewer, so I use evince, but for filling out formulars I use chromium. Best regards, Klaus. -- Klaus Singvogel GnuPG-Key-ID: 1024R/5068792D 1994-06-27

Re: Recommended simple PDF viewer to replace Evince

On Mon, 4 Dec 2023 17:12:28 -0600 Tom Browder wrote: I have used Evince as my PDF viewer and printer program for many years. It still works, but it has been spitting out error messages for a very long time. to wit: (evince:81435): EvinceView-CRITICAL **: 16:44:57.520

Re: Recommended simple PDF viewer to replace Evince

Am 04.12.2023 um 17:12:28 Uhr schrieb Tom Browder: > I would like to use another program which is similar but has good > documentation. I don't need a heavy duty program like LibreOffice, > Just something for viewing and printing. Try xpdf, but be aware it doesn't support forms nor other special

Re: Recommended simple PDF viewer to replace Evince

Am 04.12.2023 um 19:19:37 Uhr schrieb Paul M Foster: > Don't think it has a CLI interface. However, I would imagine that > simply feeding a PDF to the printer should work for printing. I could > be wrong, though. IIRC that depends on the printer. Simply running lpr file.pdf didn't work for my pr

Re: Recommended simple PDF viewer to replace Evince

On 12/4/23 19:20, Paul M Foster wrote: On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 05:12:28PM -0600, Tom Browder wrote: I have used Evince as my PDF viewer and printer program for many years. It still works, but it has been spitting out error messages for a very long time. to wit: (evince:81435): EvinceView

Re: Recommended simple PDF viewer to replace Evince

Also, before I started using evince, I used to use gv (based on ghostview) quite a bit. The following seems to list most of the various programs discussed in this thread, plus a couple of others: apt-cache search pdf-viewer mrc

Re: Recommended simple PDF viewer to replace Evince

On Mon 04/12/2023 at 23:12, Tom Browder wrote: > I have used Evince as my PDF viewer and printer program for many > years. It still works, but it has been spitting out error messages for > a very long time. to wit: > > (evince:81435): EvinceView-CRITICAL *

Re: Recommended simple PDF viewer to replace Evince

On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 05:12:28PM -0600, Tom Browder wrote: > I have used Evince as my PDF viewer and printer program for many > years. It still works, but it has been spitting out error messages for > a very long time. to wit: > > (evince:81435): EvinceView-CRITICAL *

Recommended simple PDF viewer to replace Evince

I have used Evince as my PDF viewer and printer program for many years. It still works, but it has been spitting out error messages for a very long time. to wit: (evince:81435): EvinceView-CRITICAL **: 16:44:57.520: \ ev_pixbuf_cache_set_selection_list: \ assertion

Re: QEMU/KVM doesn't open new window - Access only via vnc viewer

Am Thu, 31 Mar 2022 15:42:43 +0100 schrieb Gareth Evans : >A different invocation method, but does this help, or give a clue to something >equivalent? > >https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2021/09/msg00691.html The link was the path to the solution. For gtk output in a newly created window I h

Re: QEMU/KVM doesn't open new window - Access only via vnc viewer

#x27;t open a new window, but a message > appears, telling me to access the output via a vnc viewer. With the vnc > viewer I can see this output: the VM started correctly. > > How can I get back the output of the VM in a window (like in Debian9)? > > My researches in the interne

Re: QEMU/KVM doesn't open new window - Access only via vnc viewer

a std -m 3072 -enable-kvm -rtc base=localtime -boot order=c > > As a result QEMU/KVM opened a new window with the output of the VM. > > With Debian11/Bullseye QEMU/KVM doesn't open a new window, but a message > appears, telling me to access the output via a vnc viewer. With the vnc &

QEMU/KVM doesn't open new window - Access only via vnc viewer

a std -m 3072 -enable-kvm -rtc base=localtime -boot order=c As a result QEMU/KVM opened a new window with the output of the VM. With Debian11/Bullseye QEMU/KVM doesn't open a new window, but a message appears, telling me to access the output via a vnc viewer. With the vnc viewer I can see t

Re: why pdf viewer is missing in firefox for bullseye?

Thank Cater! actually firefox for debian 11 can view my local pdf file maybe those web sites with PDF files set MIME type incorrectly

Re: why pdf viewer is missing in firefox for bullseye?

On Sat, Feb 05, 2022 at 04:02:44PM -0500, lou wrote: > how to install pdf plugin? > > firefox for old debian distro can open pdf file > > > According to the Firefox release notes from Mozilla, firefox now includes its own pdf viewer - click on the link or open it in you

why pdf viewer is missing in firefox for bullseye?

how to install pdf plugin? firefox for old debian distro can open pdf file

Re: couldn't build pipe-viewer with debian

I put libreadline-dev on the machine since that wasn't installed and ran the instructions in the README.md file in pipe-viewer directory and the whole package built and installed. Thanks for the pointer on that -dev file. I'll have to check for those in the future. On Mon, 3 Jan

Re: couldn't build pipe-viewer with debian

I forgot to install the -dev package. I'll try this again and see if it goes through. On Mon, 3 Jan 2022, Greg Wooledge wrote: > On Mon, Jan 03, 2022 at 07:38:25PM -0500, Jude DaShiell wrote: > > pipe-viewer youtube-viewer and straw-viewer cannot be built with debian. > >

Re: couldn't build pipe-viewer with debian

On Mon, Jan 03, 2022 at 07:38:25PM -0500, Jude DaShiell wrote: > pipe-viewer youtube-viewer and straw-viewer cannot be built with debian. > The reasons for that are each of those packages require > Term::ReadLine::Gnu and Term::ReadLine::Gnu cannot be built withreadline > 2.0. That&

couldn't build pipe-viewer with debian

pipe-viewer youtube-viewer and straw-viewer cannot be built with debian. The reasons for that are each of those packages require Term::ReadLine::Gnu and Term::ReadLine::Gnu cannot be built withreadline 2.0. That's an ancient version of readline. I tried with readline 2.01 and my x86_64 equi

No success trying to get vinagre (Gnome Remote Desktop Viewer) to work with Raspberry Pi (RealVNC server)

he RealVNC server installed and running on a Raspberry Pi 4 running the latest up-to-date Raspberry Pi OS. The VNC connection works with the RealVNC viewer but it has a long EULA (non-libre) and is not well integrated (theming, etc.) into the Gnome desktop. So far Vinagre has resisted all of my effo

Re: Viewer for html files

on, of course, to rename the file as foo.html > > It would be nice to have an html viewer which opens a file in the > current directory with auto-completion of the initial word of the filename. > > Is there such a thing? > > Consider html2text which is perfect for t

Re: Viewer for html files

On Ma, 11 feb 20, 12:26:38, Thomas George wrote: > > It would be nice to have an html viewer which opens a file in the current > directory with auto-completion of the initial word of the filename. It's not clear where that "current directory" is, a shell, file manager, e

Re: Viewer for html files

On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 12:26:38PM -0500, Thomas George wrote: > > file:///home/user/directory/long file name.html > > It would be nice to have an html viewer which opens a file in the current > directory with auto-completion of the initial word of the filename. > > Is the

Re: Viewer for html files

on, of course, to rename the file as foo.html > > It would be nice to have an html viewer which opens a file in the > current directory with auto-completion of the initial word of the filename. > > Is there such a thing? > $ python3 -m http.server then point your browser to localhost:

Viewer for html files

subsequently want to view the file I must type something like file:///home/user/directory/long file name.html My browsers have no auto-complete and do not like file names with included spaces. The solution, of course, to rename the file as foo.html It would be nice to have an html viewer which opens

Re: Gnome application: Remote Desktop Viewer/vinagre bug

On 2019-05-11, Esteban L wrote: > Thanks for the Reply Curt, > > Sorry in advance to the rest of the group, with my lack of > "professionalism" and lack of Subject line =) I was very tired, as I am > sure many can appreciate. Perpetual stage of tiredness. > > I have tried editing the file, by rem

Re: Gnome application: Remote Desktop Viewer/vinagre bug

--Original Message- From: Curt To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: (unknown) Date: Sat, 11 May 2019 12:26:32 - (UTC) On 2019-05-11, Esteban L wrote: > Hello, > > I have this weird situation, I can't figure out. > > I can launch the Remote Deskto

Re: Paper size reported in Document Viewer.

Hi. On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 10:56:05PM -0700, pe...@easthope.ca wrote: > Hi, > > Debian 9 with Document Viewer 3.22.1 here. > > Given > http://easthope.ca/AIGAbusIconScaled.svg 8.5/11 = .7727272... > the file > http://easthope.ca/AIGAbus

Paper size reported in Document Viewer.

Hi, Debian 9 with Document Viewer 3.22.1 here. Given http://easthope.ca/AIGAbusIconScaled.svg the file http://easthope.ca/AIGAbusIconScaled.pdf is obtained by rsvg-convert -f pdf AIGAbusIconScaled.svg > AIGAbusIconScaled.pdf . The svg file has attributes 'width="8.5in" hei

Re: Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT) viewer and/or file format

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 09:15:39PM -0800, Dan Hitt wrote: [...] > Thanks Tomás, Richard, Eike, and Henning for your replies! :) Glad to help :) > As for usenet, thanks for the leads on the various providers > (aeiou.net, individual.net, supernews.c

Re: Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT) viewer and/or file format

On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 1:31 AM, wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 07:45:13PM -0800, Dan Hitt wrote: >> I have some DFTs that i wish to inspect. (Apparently DFT is a common >> acronym, but here i mean Discrete Fourier Transform. And properly >>

Re: Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT) viewer and/or file format

On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 07:45:13PM -0800, Dan Hitt wrote: > I have some DFTs that i wish to inspect. (Apparently DFT is a common > acronym, but here i mean Discrete Fourier Transform. And properly > speaking it doesn't make sense to inspect a transform, but only to > inspect transformed data, but

Re: Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT) viewer and/or file format

On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 05:49:42AM -0300, Eike Lantzsch wrote: > On Sunday, November 12, 2017 10:06:11 PM -03 Dan Hitt wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 8:50 PM, Richard Owlett wrote: > > > On 11/12/2017 09:45 PM, Dan Hitt wrote: > > >> I have some DFTs that i wish to inspect. (Apparently DFT is

Re: Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT) viewer and/or file format

On 11/13/2017 12:06 AM, Dan Hitt wrote: On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 8:50 PM, Richard Owlett wrote: On 11/12/2017 09:45 PM, Dan Hitt wrote: I have some DFTs that i wish to inspect. (Apparently DFT is a common acronym, but here i mean Discrete Fourier Transform. And properly speaking it doesn't m

Re: Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT) viewer and/or file format

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 07:45:13PM -0800, Dan Hitt wrote: > I have some DFTs that i wish to inspect. (Apparently DFT is a common > acronym, but here i mean Discrete Fourier Transform. And properly > speaking it doesn't make sense to inspect a transfo

Re: Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT) viewer and/or file format

On Sunday, November 12, 2017 10:06:11 PM -03 Dan Hitt wrote: > On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 8:50 PM, Richard Owlett wrote: > > On 11/12/2017 09:45 PM, Dan Hitt wrote: > >> I have some DFTs that i wish to inspect. (Apparently DFT is a common > >> acronym, but here i mean Discrete Fourier Transform. An

Re: Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT) viewer and/or file format

On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 8:50 PM, Richard Owlett wrote: > On 11/12/2017 09:45 PM, Dan Hitt wrote: >> >> I have some DFTs that i wish to inspect. (Apparently DFT is a common >> acronym, but here i mean Discrete Fourier Transform. And properly >> speaking it doesn't make sense to inspect a transfor

Re: Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT) viewer and/or file format

On 11/12/2017 09:45 PM, Dan Hitt wrote: I have some DFTs that i wish to inspect. (Apparently DFT is a common acronym, but here i mean Discrete Fourier Transform. And properly speaking it doesn't make sense to inspect a transform, but only to inspect transformed data, but i'm speaking colloquial

Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT) viewer and/or file format

I have some DFTs that i wish to inspect. (Apparently DFT is a common acronym, but here i mean Discrete Fourier Transform. And properly speaking it doesn't make sense to inspect a transform, but only to inspect transformed data, but i'm speaking colloquially.) DFTs are a common artifact in digita

Re: Re: default image viewer in midnight commander-SOLVED

gt; >>> Celejar >>> >>> >> >> I now have in /etc/mc/mc.ext: >> >> shell/.jpg >> Open=feh %f >> View=feh %f ALL_FORMATS >> >> and images open with ristretto image viewer. Not exactly what I expected >> op

Re: default image viewer in midnight commander

I suppose, there is a menu in mc itself, where you can edit all the connections to a programm according to its ending. Look at "Command", then "Edit extension file" (if you use English version). If you do not find it, cause your Debian is in another language, start mc by using LANG=C mc. Good

Re: default image viewer in midnight commander

On Fri 07 Oct 2016 at 14:36:45 (-0400), Celejar wrote: > On Fri, 7 Oct 2016 19:53:05 +0200 (CEST) > "sp113...@telfort.nl" wrote: > > > >> Hello, > > >> I have difficulties with mc's default image viewer. > > > >Try /etc/mc/mc.ext whic

Re: default image viewer in midnight commander

t of your file). Try replacing that line with a simpler 'shell/.jpg' or similar, restart mc, and see if it works. Celejar I now have in /etc/mc/mc.ext: shell/.jpg Open=feh %f View=feh %f ALL_FORMATS and images open with ristretto image viewer. Not exactly what I expected ope

Re: Re: default image viewer in midnight commander

seeing the rest of your file). Try replacing that line with a >simpler 'shell/.jpg' or similar, restart mc, and see if it works. > >Celejar > > I now have in /etc/mc/mc.ext: shell/.jpg Open=feh %f View=feh %f ALL_FORMATS and images open with ristrett

Re: default image viewer in midnight commander

On Fri, 7 Oct 2016 19:53:05 +0200 (CEST) "sp113...@telfort.nl" wrote: > >> Hello, > >> I have difficulties with mc's default image viewer. > >Try /etc/mc/mc.ext which calls /usr/lib/mc/ext.d/image.sh Either there, or (my preference) ~/.config/mc/mc.ext &

Re: default image viewer in midnight commander

On Fri, 7 Oct 2016 19:53:05 +0200 (CEST) "sp113...@telfort.nl" wrote: > >> Hello, > >> I have difficulties with mc's default image viewer. > >> I want to use feh, but default is gimp, firefox or wine internet > >> explorer. Wine is not even

Re: Re: default image viewer in midnight commander

>> Hello, >> I have difficulties with mc's default image viewer. >> I want to use feh, but default is gimp, firefox or wine internet >> explorer. Wine is not even installed! >> I can not find where to change the default. >> I have mc directories in: >&g

Re: default image viewer in midnight commander

On Fri, 7 Oct 2016 14:20:58 +0200 (CEST) "sp113...@telfort.nl" wrote: > Hello, > I have difficulties with mc's default image viewer. > I want to use feh, but default is gimp, firefox or wine internet > explorer. Wine is not even installed! > I can not find where t

default image viewer in midnight commander

Hello, I have difficulties with mc's default image viewer. I want to use feh, but default is gimp, firefox or wine internet explorer. Wine is not even installed! I can not find where to change the default. I have mc directories in: ~/.local/share/mc ~/.config/mc /etc/mc/ usr/lib/mc/ /usr/sha

Re: LXDE - how to set default image viewer?

to reconfigure LXDE to use eog or gpicview as default image viewer? Thanks, Markos Have you tried searching the Internet? I typed file extension associations lxde in my browser's search engine and got results that look promising. I don't use lxde myself, so I can't verify

LXDE - how to set default image viewer?

onfigure LXDE to use eog or gpicview as default image viewer? > > Thanks, > Markos Have you tried searching the Internet? I typed file extension associations lxde in my browser's search engine and got results that look promising. I don't use lxde myself, so I can't ver

LXDE - how to set default image viewer?

Hi, I'm using Lxde with Debian Jessie. I installed Wine and now whenever I try to open an image (png, gif etc.) the system use Internet Explorer with Wineto open the image. How to reconfigure LXDE to use eog or gpicview as default image viewer? Thanks, Markos

Re: Gray screen vnc viewer (Debian 8.3)

Just sharing: i am no longer using default vino server. i am using vnc4server and also tightvncserver both shows the same result. On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 10:41 PM, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote: > All, > > I am having gray screen issue no matter what setting i put in my xstartup > file. > > when e

Gray screen vnc viewer (Debian 8.3)

All, I am having gray screen issue no matter what setting i put in my xstartup file. when ever i connect the client it shows me something gray screen i can not see anything in the log i dont know what is going on. it never happend to me before. no xstartup config is working in this. any suggesti

Re: looking for a sound waveform viewer, but not audacity for reasons explained

On Thu, 2 Jul 2015, Doug wrote: And, I have a nice 200MHz Tektronix analog scope! <--green But if I don't have to hook it up, fine! Sounds to me, sir, that your motivation to gaze at waveforms may leave a lot to be desired! Either hook up the gosh-darn thing or put it on a UPS truck ad

Re: looking for a sound waveform viewer, but not audacity for reasons explained

On 07/01/2015 11:31 PM, Bob Bernstein wrote: On Wed, 1 Jul 2015, Joe wrote: ...it could be used if there was nothing better, and it may offer features which the OP 'didn't know he needed'. Speaking of the OP, has he been seen in these here parts since the thread began? I've been wanting t

Re: looking for a sound waveform viewer, but not audacity for reasons explained

On Wed, 1 Jul 2015, Joe wrote: ...it could be used if there was nothing better, and it may offer features which the OP 'didn't know he needed'. Speaking of the OP, has he been seen in these here parts since the thread began? I've been wanting to ask him why he wants to view sound waveforms.

Re: looking for a sound waveform viewer, but not audacity for reasons explained

On Wed, 1 Jul 2015 08:27:20 +0100 Lisi Reisz wrote: > On Wednesday 01 July 2015 01:28:15 David Wright wrote: > > > > Why do "typical audio files" fail your "sound" check? > > Or are you philosophising? :) > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/If_a_tree_falls_in_a_forest > > They don't. scilab does

Re: looking for a sound waveform viewer, but not audacity for reasons explained

: > > > > > Quoting Lisi Reisz (lisi.re...@gmail.com): > > > > > > On Monday 29 June 2015 02:28:20 Richard Owlett wrote: > > > > > > > Dan Hitt wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > >

  1   2   3   4   5   >