On Sun, Mar 26, 2023 at 11:33 PM Ram Ramesh wrote:
> Hi Ramesh,
>
> this might help. The bug is fixed with kernel 6.0.2-1
>
> https://groups.google.com/g/linux.debian.bugs.dist/c/p-sgJiTR00A?pli=1
>
> All the best to you
> Eike
>
> Elke,
>
> Thanks. v6.1 is available on bullseye-backports. I ins
Hi Ramesh,
this might help. The bug is fixed with kernel 6.0.2-1
https://groups.google.com/g/linux.debian.bugs.dist/c/p-sgJiTR00A?pli=1
All the best to you
Eike
Elke,
Thanks. v6.1 is available on bullseye-backports. I installed it and the
trouble is gone now.
BTW, does non-free firmware t
On Sonntag, 26. März 2023 18:08:15 -04 Ram Ramesh wrote:
> I wanted to upgrade my server from 10 year old HW to something newer.
> THis server runs debian bullseye with v5.19 kernel from backports.
[snip]
>
> The only trouble I have is that it refuses to
> reboot/shutdown/poweroff. It seem to go t
I wanted to upgrade my server from 10 year old HW to something newer.
THis server runs debian bullseye with v5.19 kernel from backports. Here
is the list of items I got in the upgraded system
1. Intel z690 mother board (asrock steel legend)
2. Core i3-13100 cpu
3. Super Flower 650W PSU,
4. G.SK
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 05/01/2015 11:29 PM, Jean-Marc wrote:
>
> Not in Sid yet but in experimental. If you use testing or sid,
> adding experimental is not a problem. It is a non-automatic
> release.
>
> Jean-Marc
>
latest kbuild in experimental is 3.18 :/
-B
Fri, 01 May 2015 17:15:18 -0700
Joris Bolsens écrivait :
> Just tried that:
>
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> linux-headers-4.0.0-trunk-amd64 : Depends: linux-kbuild-4.0 but it is
> not installable
>
> seems linux-kbuild-4.0 is not in sid repos yet
Not in Sid yet but in ex
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 05/01/2015 12:58 AM, Jean-Marc wrote:
> Fri, 01 May 2015 00:06:57 -0700 No need to do it yourself, it is
> already done here:
> https://packages.debian.org/experimental/linux-image-4.0.0-trunk-amd64
>
> Jean-Marc
>
Just tried that:
The foll
Fri, 01 May 2015 00:06:57 -0700
Joris Bolsens écrivait :
> [...]
> Thanks, thats what im doing now, just compiled 4.0.1
No need to do it yourself, it is already done here:
https://packages.debian.org/experimental/linux-image-4.0.0-trunk-amd64
Jean-Marc
pgpyvZFsrLqnI.pgp
Description: PGP sign
Le primidi 11 floréal, an CCXXIII, Joris Bolsens a écrit :
> I was wondering if anyone had instructions on how to update to kernel
> 3.19 or above.
> I have spent ~an hour googling, but all I can find are tutorials for
> ubuntu, most of which do it through apt.
>
> I checked jessie-backports but 3
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 05/01/2015 12:05 AM, humbert.olivie...@free.fr wrote:
> Hi
>
>> I was wondering if anyone had instructions on how to update to
>> kernel
> 3.19 or above.
>> I have spent ~an hour googling, but all I can find are tutorials
>> for
> ubuntu, most
humbert.olivie...@free.fr writes:
> Looks to be there :
> https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/ch08s06.html.en
the document does not mention configuration with 'make oldconfig', which
may simplify the process and has worked for me when i built 3.17.
-- juha
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi
> I was wondering if anyone had instructions on how to update to kernel
3.19 or above.
> I have spent ~an hour googling, but all I can find are tutorials for
ubuntu, most of which do it through apt.
Looks to be there : https://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/ch08s06.html.en
Hope that help
Hi list,
I was wondering if anyone had instructions on how to update to kernel
3.19 or above.
I have spent ~an hour googling, but all I can find are tutorials for
ubuntu, most of which do it through apt.
I checked jessie-backports but 3.16 seems to be the latest available
outside of unstable.
Th
On 24/01/2015 21:40, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
mrr a écrit :
I saw somewhere during kernel compilation an option to load a kernel on
the fly but I haven't gone further (maybe it was targeted at kernel
developers).
If you're talking about kexec, it just avoid the firmware POST and
bootloader stag
mrr a écrit :
>
> I saw somewhere during kernel compilation an option to load a kernel on
> the fly but I haven't gone further (maybe it was targeted at kernel
> developers).
If you're talking about kexec, it just avoid the firmware POST and
bootloader stage of a complete reboot, but not the sy
On 16/01/2015 17:50, Marc Auslander wrote:
Pol Hallen writes:
Hi folks!
a security updates of kernel is available (from apt-get upgrade), so:
must I reboot my pc (after upgrade) to avoid security problems? Is
there another way?
thanks for help!
Pol
I always reboot after a kernel related
Pol Hallen writes:
> Hi folks!
>
> a security updates of kernel is available (from apt-get upgrade), so:
> must I reboot my pc (after upgrade) to avoid security problems? Is
> there another way?
>
> thanks for help!
>
> Pol
>
>
I always reboot after a kernel related upgrade on the grounds that if
Hello,
Pol Hallen a écrit :
>
> a security updates of kernel is available (from apt-get upgrade), so:
> must I reboot my pc (after upgrade) to avoid security problems?
Usually yes. Until then, the old kernel is still active.
> Is there another way?
You could use kexec-tools to load and start
Hi folks!
a security updates of kernel is available (from apt-get upgrade), so:
must I reboot my pc (after upgrade) to avoid security problems? Is there
another way?
thanks for help!
Pol
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou
On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 1:02 PM, François Patte
wrote:
> Le 04/07/2014 16:12, Lisi Reisz a écrit :
>> On Friday 04 July 2014 14:42:47 Stephen Powell wrote:
>>>
>>> Since you are trying to install a 3.14 kernel from backports, I
>>> assume that you are running wheezy. You need to install the
>>> in
El vie, 04-07-2014 a las 15:25 +0200, François Patte escribió:
> Bonjour,
>
> I don't understand the following:
>
> # apt-get install linux-image-3.14-0.bpo.1-amd64
> linux-headers-3.14-0.bpo.1-amd64
>
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
On Fri, Jul 04, 2014 at 07:02:42PM +0200, François Patte wrote:
> Le 04/07/2014 16:12, Lisi Reisz a écrit :
> > I had no trouble installing the backported kernel, but I
> > specifically instructed aptitude to use wheezy-backports
> > repository. <-t wheezy-backports install>
>
> OK thank this wor
On 2014-07-04, François Patte wrote:
>
> OK thank this worked... I thought that adding backports repository to
> the source.list file was enough! This is quite redondant!
>
The repository is desactivated by default; otherwise, well, I'll leave
that as an exercise ...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email t
On Friday 04 July 2014 15:30:10 Linux-Fan wrote:
> On 07/04/2014 04:12 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Friday 04 July 2014 14:42:47 Stephen Powell wrote:
> >> Since you are trying to install a 3.14 kernel from backports, I assume
> >> that you are running wheezy. You need to install the initramfs-too
On Friday 04 July 2014 18:02:42 François Patte wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Le 04/07/2014 16:12, Lisi Reisz a écrit :
> > On Friday 04 July 2014 14:42:47 Stephen Powell wrote:
> >> Since you are trying to install a 3.14 kernel from backports, I
> >> assume that you a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le 04/07/2014 16:12, Lisi Reisz a écrit :
> On Friday 04 July 2014 14:42:47 Stephen Powell wrote:
>> Since you are trying to install a 3.14 kernel from backports, I
>> assume that you are running wheezy. You need to install the
>> initramfs-tools pack
On 07/04/2014 04:12 PM, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> On Friday 04 July 2014 14:42:47 Stephen Powell wrote:
>> Since you are trying to install a 3.14 kernel from backports, I assume
>> that you are running wheezy. You need to install the initramfs-tools
>> package from wheezy-backports too, version 0.115~bp
On Friday 04 July 2014 14:42:47 Stephen Powell wrote:
> Since you are trying to install a 3.14 kernel from backports, I assume
> that you are running wheezy. You need to install the initramfs-tools
> package from wheezy-backports too, version 0.115~bpo70+1, I think.
I had no trouble installing th
On Fri, 04 Jul 2014 09:25:51 -0400 (EDT), François Patte wrote:
>
> I don't understand the following:
>
> # apt-get install linux-image-3.14-0.bpo.1-amd64
> linux-headers-3.14-0.bpo.1-amd64
>
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> Some p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bonjour,
I don't understand the following:
# apt-get install linux-image-3.14-0.bpo.1-amd64
linux-headers-3.14-0.bpo.1-amd64
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Some packages could not be installe
On Thu, 18 Aug 2011 10:54:08 +0200, Michael Ott wrote:
> I got the following output when I try to update my DNS323. Can anybody
> help me?
>
> Thanks in advance
(...)
> Can't find /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.39-2-orion5x and
> /boot/initrd.img-2.6.39-2-orion5x
(...)
There was a bug for a similar proble
Hi!
I got the following output when I try to update my DNS323.
Can anybody help me?
Thanks in advance
~# apt-get -uVf dist-upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading state information... Done
Calculating upgrade... Done
0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remov
Greg Madden wrote:
On Saturday 02 October 2010 11:59:02 Mark wrote:
Based on what I've read, kernel 2.6.32 has fixed the broadcom 4306 rev02
wireless card 1 MB/s speed issue and I'd like to have my Lenny system boot
into that kernel to fix this issue.
Debian backports (official) has the 2.
On Saturday 02 October 2010 11:59:02 Mark wrote:
> Based on what I've read, kernel 2.6.32 has fixed the broadcom 4306 rev02
> wireless card 1 MB/s speed issue and I'd like to have my Lenny system boot
> into that kernel to fix this issue. The only help I've found for doing
> this without doing a
Based on what I've read, kernel 2.6.32 has fixed the broadcom 4306 rev02
wireless card 1 MB/s speed issue and I'd like to have my Lenny system boot
into that kernel to fix this issue. The only help I've found for doing this
without doing a custom compile is here (
http://www.khattam.info/installin
Clean slate, sort of.
I've removed any xorg.conf and am not blacklisting any more.
System docked will not give me a display on the external screen, whether
booted from old kernel or new one.
System undocked works perfectly.
I'm attaching a new dmesg output with the system docked with the new
On 06/12/2010 03:20 PM, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2010-06-12 21:06 +0200, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
I have both xserver-xorg-video-nouveau and xser-xorg-video-fbdev
installed (just confirmed it in aptitude), but it doesn't appear that
they are being used.
I see. The latest xserver-xorg-core in si
On 06/11/2010 04:30 PM, Andreas Rönnquist wrote:
I've ran into this too, and got this solved by blacklisting the nouveau
module in
/etc/modprobe.d/blacklist.conf
(adding a line containing just "blacklist nouveau"),
and adding modeset=0 to my kernel line in /boot/grub/menu.lst (I am
still on gru
On 06/12/2010 03:20 PM, Sven Joachim wrote:
You may as well blacklist nouveau then, since it is completely useless
without KMS (the nouveau X driver requires KMS). Note, however, that
without an xorg.conf the most recent xserver-xorg-core will still load
the module.
I decided to take baby st
On 06/12/2010 03:20 PM, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2010-06-12 21:06 +0200, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
I have both xserver-xorg-video-nouveau and xser-xorg-video-fbdev
installed (just confirmed it in aptitude), but it doesn't appear that
they are being used.
I see. The latest xserver-xorg-core in si
On 2010-06-12 21:06 +0200, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
> I have both xserver-xorg-video-nouveau and xser-xorg-video-fbdev
> installed (just confirmed it in aptitude), but it doesn't appear that
> they are being used.
I see. The latest xserver-xorg-core in sid uses nouveau by default, but
that versio
On 06/12/2010 01:42 PM, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2010-06-12 15:38 +0200, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
On 06/12/2010 04:03 AM, Sven Joachim wrote:
Thanks. I don't see anything unusual in it, in particular nouveau
detects the 1680x1050 resolution of the external display:
[7.308183] [drm] nouvea
On 2010-06-12 15:38 +0200, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
> On 06/12/2010 04:03 AM, Sven Joachim wrote:
>>
>> Thanks. I don't see anything unusual in it, in particular nouveau
>> detects the 1680x1050 resolution of the external display:
>>
>>> [7.308183] [drm] nouveau :01:00.0: allocated 1680x10
On Fri, 2010-06-11 at 22:30 +0200, Andreas Rönnquist wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:06:04 -0400
> Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
>
> > Running Squeeze with Xfce desktop environment (only) on Dell Latitude
> > D810. Nvidia video card running the VESA driver (though there's a bunch
> > of verbiage in d
On 06/12/2010 04:03 AM, Sven Joachim wrote:
This is to be expected, because it detects and uses the display's native
resolution. This is usually what you want, but you can override it with
the video=800x600 boot parameter (or whatever other resolution you like).
Looks like I have a bit of sear
On 2010-06-12 00:15 +0200, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
> On 06/11/2010 03:08 PM, Sven Joachim wrote:
>> On 2010-06-11 19:06 +0200, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
>>
>>> I undock from the port replicator and use the notebook's built-in
>>> 1920x1200 display, and the boot with the new kernel brings me to
>>> n
On 06/11/2010 04:30 PM, Andreas Rönnquist wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:06:04 -0400
Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
Running Squeeze with Xfce desktop environment (only) on Dell Latitude
D810. Nvidia video card running the VESA driver (though there's a bunch
of verbiage in dmesg about nouveau). System
On 06/11/2010 03:08 PM, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2010-06-11 19:06 +0200, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
Running Squeeze with Xfce desktop environment (only) on Dell Latitude
D810. Nvidia video card running the VESA driver (though there's a
bunch of verbiage in dmesg about nouveau). System is normally
co
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 13:06:04 -0400
Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
> Running Squeeze with Xfce desktop environment (only) on Dell Latitude
> D810. Nvidia video card running the VESA driver (though there's a bunch
> of verbiage in dmesg about nouveau). System is normally connected to a
> port replicato
On 2010-06-11 19:06 +0200, Gilbert Sullivan wrote:
> Running Squeeze with Xfce desktop environment (only) on Dell Latitude
> D810. Nvidia video card running the VESA driver (though there's a
> bunch of verbiage in dmesg about nouveau). System is normally
> connected to a port replicator and DVI di
Running Squeeze with Xfce desktop environment (only) on Dell Latitude
D810. Nvidia video card running the VESA driver (though there's a bunch
of verbiage in dmesg about nouveau). System is normally connected to a
port replicator and DVI display (1680x1050).
Upgraded from 2.6.32-3 to 2.6.32-6 t
On Sunday 06 June 2010 17:06:25 Long Wind wrote:
> I have etch which use kernel 2.6.18-6
> I want to upgrade it to kernel 2.6.24 or later
> but it doesn't contain it:
>
> deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian etch main
>
> Where can I find new kernel images in Debian packages?
Suggestions so far:
Thank Dale, Charles Kroeger and Stephen Powell!
I will install from backports.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktilhgiwaquboc_q1sqvsly5f4kbbhrdee
On Sun, 06 Jun 2010 18:06:25 -0400 (EDT),
Long Wind wrote:
>
> I have etch which use kernel 2.6.18-6
> I want to upgrade it to kernel 2.6.24 or later
> but it doesn't contain it:
>
> deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian etch main
>
> Where can I find new kernel images in Debian packages?
You h
You could install a package like:
linux-image-2.6-
what this does is depends on the latest Linux kernel 2.6 and modules.
In other words if you have this installed it will always have the latest
kernel there too.
You might not want that.
--
C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@
On 7 June 2010 07:36, Long Wind wrote:
> I have etch which use kernel 2.6.18-6
> I want to upgrade it to kernel 2.6.24 or later
> but it doesn't contain it:
>
> deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian etch main
>
> Where can I find new kernel images in Debian packages?
>
>
have you had a look into De
I have etch which use kernel 2.6.18-6
I want to upgrade it to kernel 2.6.24 or later
but it doesn't contain it:
deb http://http.us.debian.org/debian etch main
Where can I find new kernel images in Debian packages?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
--- On Wed, 11/12/08, Sven Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Sven Joachim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Cannot upgrade kernel
> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> Date: Wednesday, November 12, 2008, 9:59 AM
> On 2008-11-12 15:17 +0100, Brian Kimsey-Hickma
On 2008-11-12 15:17 +0100, Brian Kimsey-Hickman wrote:
> I have been going around in circles on this. I am trying to upgrade
> my kernel from 2.2.20 to the current stable kernel 2.6.18. When I run
> aptitude I get a glibc error because it needs at least a 2.4.1 kernel
> to install but the new ke
On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 06:42:39 -0800 (PST)
Brian Kimsey-Hickman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was afraid that I was going to have to reinstall the system.
>
> You are right. This is an old system that has not been upgraded in
> quite some time.
Well, you can try to upgrade, but as said, you ca
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 06:17:23AM -0800, Brian Kimsey-Hickman wrote:
> I have been going around in circles on this. I am trying to upgrade my
> kernel from 2.2.20 to the current stable kernel 2.6.18. When I run aptitude
> I get a glibc error because it needs at least a 2.4.1 kernel to install
I was afraid that I was going to have to reinstall the system.
You are right. This is an old system that has not been upgraded in quite some
time.
Thanks,
Brian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have been going around in circles on this. I am trying to upgrade my kernel
from 2.2.20 to the current stable kernel 2.6.18. When I run aptitude I get a
glibc error because it needs at least a 2.4.1 kernel to install but the new
kernel won't install without the new glibc.
Here is what is ha
On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 10:11:55PM +0530, Siju George wrote:
> Hi,
>
> One of the sarge machines runs and older kernel and "apt-get
> dist-upgrade" does not install the newer kernel.
>
> Could some one please help me trouble shoot this?
> debian:~# uname -a
> Linux debian 2.6.8-11-amd64-k8 #1 Sa
Hi,
One of the sarge machines runs and older kernel and "apt-get
dist-upgrade" does not install the newer kernel.
Could some one please help me trouble shoot this?
=
debian:~# uname -a
Linux debian 2.6.8-11-amd64-k8 #1 Sat Jul 1 12:02:45 UTC 2
Ishwar Rattan wrote:
>
># apt-get install
>
> sometimes complains that it will not upgrade the running
> kernel. So, what is the correct way to upgrade kernel image?
That's correct, that's the right way. What's the exact message you're
getting?
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 11:31:15AM -0500, Ishwar Rattan wrote:
>
> # apt-get install
>
> sometimes complains that it will not upgrade the running
> kernel. So, what is the correct way to upgrade kernel image?
what is the exact message? I know it complains that it IS updat
# apt-get install
sometimes complains that it will not upgrade the running
kernel. So, what is the correct way to upgrade kernel image?
-ishwar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Arnau wrote, On 2006-09-15 07:38:
I've got two powerdege 2850 with 5 disks to configure:) I've
installed the iso debian-dell-2.4.31.iso downloaded from
http://staff.osuosl.org/~kveton/debian/debian-dell-2.4.31.iso. The
installation has been very smooth, the problems arised when I tried to
upgr
I've got two powerdege 2850 with 5 disks to configure:) I've
installed the iso debian-dell-2.4.31.iso downloaded from
http://staff.osuosl.org/~kveton/debian/debian-dell-2.4.31.iso. The
installation has been very smooth, the problems arised when I tried to
upgrade to the latest kernel available
On Sat, December 17, 2005 23:37, Josh King said:
> Ernst-Magne Vindal wrote:
>> Hi,
>> not sure this is a problem but I'll like to check anyway.
>>
>> When doing apt-get upgrade the only package listed for upgrade is the
>> kernel image. this is working fine and I'm not sure what the upgrade
>> wil
On Sat, Dec 17, 2005 at 04:40:08PM +0100, Ernst-Magne Vindal wrote:
> Hi,
> not sure this is a problem but I'll like to check anyway.
>
> When doing apt-get upgrade the only package listed for upgrade is the
> kernel image. this is working fine and I'm not sure what the upgrade will
> do.
>
> The
On 12/17/2005 10:50 AM, Ernst-Magne Vindal wrote:
> Hi,
> not sure this is a problem but I'll like to check anyway.
>
> When doing apt-get upgrade the only package listed for upgrade is the
> kernel image. this is working fine and I'm not sure what the upgrade will
> do.
>
> The sources list say
Ernst-Magne Vindal wrote:
Hi,
not sure this is a problem but I'll like to check anyway.
When doing apt-get upgrade the only package listed for upgrade is the
kernel image. this is working fine and I'm not sure what the upgrade will
do.
The sources list say "stable". I got a few packages from un
Hi,
not sure this is a problem but I'll like to check anyway.
When doing apt-get upgrade the only package listed for upgrade is the
kernel image. this is working fine and I'm not sure what the upgrade will
do.
The sources list say "stable". I got a few packages from unstable, but apt
is configure
On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 12:18 -0700, Tony Godshall wrote:
> According to Matt Zagrabelny,
> > On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 22:50 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Will newer
> > > versions of some packages eventually need a newer kernel?
> >
> > yes. for instance some desktop stuff is starting to use u
According to Matt Zagrabelny,
> On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 22:50 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Will newer
> > versions of some packages eventually need a newer kernel?
>
> yes. for instance some desktop stuff is starting to use udev/hotplug.
> this requires a 2.6 kernel.
Can you indicate which o
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 18 August 2005 11:50 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a couple of machines which I'm in the process of upgrading to
Sarge. I'm wondering about whether to upgrade the kernels. They're
all running some version of 2.4, which I've built for the particula
On 10:13 Thu 18 Aug 2005, Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> And when a newer version of a package, can't think of one, NEEDS the 2.6
> kernel, it will tell you.
>
> My own reason for 2.6.9 is that the soundest patch for multi-user Linux
> (2.6.9-ruby.vz11) wants that kernel release.
Is this patch for a
I wrote:
> I have a couple of machines which I'm in the process of upgrading to
> Sarge. I'm wondering about whether to upgrade the kernels.
> They're all running some version of 2.4, which I've built for the particular
> machines. If I don't get new hardware which need newer drivers, and I
> do
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a couple of machines which I'm in the process of upgrading to
Sarge. I'm wondering about whether to upgrade the kernels. They're
all running some version of 2.4, which I've built for the particular
machines. If I don't get new hardware which need newer drivers,
On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 22:50 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Will newer
> versions of some packages eventually need a newer kernel?
yes. for instance some desktop stuff is starting to use udev/hotplug.
this requires a 2.6 kernel.
-matt zagrabelny
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a couple of machines which I'm in the process of upgrading to
Sarge. I'm wondering about whether to upgrade the kernels. They're
all running some version of 2.4, which I've built for the particular
machines. If I don't get new hardware which need newer drivers,
On Thursday 18 August 2005 11:50 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have a couple of machines which I'm in the process of upgrading to
> Sarge. I'm wondering about whether to upgrade the kernels. They're
> all running some version of 2.4, which I've built for the particular
> machines. If I don't
I have a couple of machines which I'm in the process of upgrading to
Sarge. I'm wondering about whether to upgrade the kernels. They're
all running some version of 2.4, which I've built for the particular
machines. If I don't get new hardware which need newer drivers, and I
don't care about any
On Sat, Dec 25, 2004 at 03:27:57PM -0500, Michael Murphy wrote:
> Any one else? Googling's born no fruit. I'm brand new to debian (a
> recent redhat emigree) and am unsure where, or whether, to report
> this. Any insight or direction members of this list can share will
> be gratefully received.
Upgrading to 2.4.27-2-686 (from sid) does not fix the slowness problem
(at least for me). The bug corresponding to this problem is #288272:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=288272
Jason
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 06:13:24AM +0100, Thomas Hood wrote:
> Possibly a result of applications trying to play sound effects but sound
> not working.
I can play ogg files. Sounds like crap (since processor can't decode
quickly enough), but screen output for ogg123 is normal.
> Building your own
On Tue, 04 Jan 2005 23:10:11 +0100, Jason Rennie wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 25, 2004 at 03:27:57PM -0500, Michael Murphy wrote:
>> After upgrading, the computer ran so slowly that it was as if I were
>> trying to run on a '486. On boot, the lines *crawled* up the screen
>> in shifting waves.
Possibly
On Sat, Dec 25, 2004 at 03:27:57PM -0500, Michael Murphy wrote:
> After upgrading, the computer ran so slowly that it was as if I were
> trying to run on a '486. On boot, the lines *crawled* up the screen
> in shifting waves. Also, the soundcard couldn't be found and alsa
> didn't load. I restor
On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 04:05:35AM +0100, Agustin wrote:
> On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 02:10:05 +0100, David Mandelberg wrote:
>
> > Agustin wrote:
> >> Thanks, Adam. This is exactly what I want to do, but I'm not sure what I
> >> can delete or move. How will I find this out?
> > You can get rid of older
On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 02:10:05 +0100, David Mandelberg wrote:
> Agustin wrote:
>> Thanks, Adam. This is exactly what I want to do, but I'm not sure what I
>> can delete or move. How will I find this out?
> You can get rid of older kernels (always keep the current one though), you can
> delete old lo
Agustin wrote:
> On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 00:50:05 +0100, Adam Aube wrote:
>> Agustin wrote:
>>> All the same, the question is still pertinent. I'm having difficulty
>>> upgrading the kernel because I get the message that my partition hdh2
>>> is full, so installation is not possible.
>>
>> Free some
Agustin wrote:
> Thanks, Adam. This is exactly what I want to do, but I'm not sure what I
> can delete or move. How will I find this out?
You can get rid of older kernels (always keep the current one though), you can
delete old log files (in /var/log), another thing is, if /home is on the same
part
On Mon, 03 Jan 2005 00:50:05 +0100, Adam Aube wrote:
> Agustin wrote:
>
>> All the same, the question is still pertinent. I'm having difficulty
>> upgrading the kernel because I get the message that my partition hdh2 is
>> full, so installation is not possible.
>
> Free some space on hdh2 (you
Agustin wrote:
> All the same, the question is still pertinent. I'm having difficulty
> upgrading the kernel because I get the message that my partition hdh2 is
> full, so installation is not possible.
Free some space on hdh2 (your root partition).
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL P
Apparently, _Agustin_, on 01/01/05 17:59,typed:
Hi and happy new year to everyone,
I have a question regarding the possibility of upgrading the kernel on my
debian sarge machine. I see from the synaptic manager that what I have
installed is kernel-image-2.6.7-1-386, and that there is another
availa
On Sun, 02 Jan 2005 19:20:11 +0100, Agustin wrote:
> On Sun, 02 Jan 2005 00:20:10 +0100, Agustin wrote:
>
>> Hi and happy new year to everyone,
>>
>> I have a question regarding the possibility of upgrading the kernel on my
>> debian sarge machine. I see from the synaptic manager that what I hav
On Sun, 02 Jan 2005 00:20:10 +0100, Agustin wrote:
> Hi and happy new year to everyone,
>
> I have a question regarding the possibility of upgrading the kernel on my
> debian sarge machine. I see from the synaptic manager that what I have
> installed is kernel-image-2.6.7-1-386, and that there is
Hi and happy new year to everyone,
I have a question regarding the possibility of upgrading the kernel on my
debian sarge machine. I see from the synaptic manager that what I have
installed is kernel-image-2.6.7-1-386, and that there is another
available, kernel-image-2.6.9-1-386. Can anyone tell
1 - 100 of 164 matches
Mail list logo
