Re: Please help with sendmail-fetchmail problem

2002-06-05 Thread irado furioso com tudo
Em Tue, 4 Jun 2002 18:47:11 -0700 (PDT) Brian Schramm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, conhecido consumidor de drogas (Coke e McDonald's), escreveu: re are the errors out of the syslog file: > > Jun 4 21:48:18 schserv fetchmail[3050]: Authorization > failure on [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Jun 4 21:48:18 schserv fe

Please help with sendmail-fetchmail problem

2002-06-04 Thread Brian Schramm
I am running Debian Woody as up to date as I can get. I have 3 mail servers on the net that I want to get my mail onto my local machine I figure fetchmail to get the mail by pop3 and sendmail on my local server to deliver it to my local mailboxes. I keep getting error messages that refer to the i

Re: mail list abuse? (was Re: sendmail/fetchmail how?)

1999-07-27 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Jul 27, 1999 at 09:36:49AM -0400, Samuel R. Scarano wrote: > Hm. So this guy's not really subscribing to the list, but wants us > subscribers to help you out? I think this is considered bad form -- I > don't think the mailing list is intended to allow people to mooch help > without actuall

Re: sendmail/fetchmail how?

1999-07-27 Thread Nate Duehr
Install the exim package instead. It works great for a single-user setup and has a nice install script that will help anyone through getting it up and running in a number of different modes. +---++ | Nate Duehr - [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: mail list abuse? (was Re: sendmail/fetchmail how?)

1999-07-27 Thread Stephen Pitts
On Tue, Jul 27, 1999 at 09:36:49AM -0400, Samuel R. Scarano wrote: > On 27 Jul, Geocrawler.com wrote: > > This message was sent from Geocrawler.com by "Joakim Svensson" <[EMAIL > > PROTECTED]> > > Be sure to reply to that address. > > Hm. So this guy's not really subscribing to the list, but want

mail list abuse? (was Re: sendmail/fetchmail how?)

1999-07-27 Thread Samuel R. Scarano
On 27 Jul, Geocrawler.com wrote: > This message was sent from Geocrawler.com by "Joakim Svensson" <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]> > Be sure to reply to that address. Hm. So this guy's not really subscribing to the list, but wants us subscribers to help you out? I think this is considered bad form -- I don'

sendmail/fetchmail how?

1999-07-27 Thread Geocrawler.com
is a good way for a home system ? So If anyone could help me out here I would be very grateful. I do not need to use sendmail/fetchmail btw So any other good solution would be ok too. Best Regards Joakim Svensson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Geocrawler.com - The Knowledge Archive

Re: sendmail/fetchmail

1999-04-29 Thread Robert-Jan Kuijvenhoven
On Wed, Apr 28, 1999 at 06:23:13PM -0400, add|ct|on wrote: > ok maybe i'm simple-minded but i cannot get fetchmail to fetch my mail > from my pop3 server. running fetchmail in -v mode, there were no errors > logging into the pop3 server, but once it gets to fetching the messages > it just sit

Re: sendmail/fetchmail yet again

1999-04-29 Thread Arcady Genkin
add|ct|on <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > the .fetchmailrc is, simply, as follows: > > poll pop.myserver.net protocol pop3 username myusername password > mypasswd Since you are running it as root, it will attempt to delive the mail from your ISP to "root" user. This is a bad practice. My .fetchma

re: sendmail/fetchmail yet again

1999-04-29 Thread add|ct|on
the .fetchmailrc is, simply, as follows: poll pop.myserver.net protocol pop3 username myusername password mypasswd

re: sendmail/fetchmail yet again

1999-04-28 Thread add|ct|on
the .fetchmailrc is, simply, as follows: poll pop.myserver.net protocol pop3 username myusername password mypasswd

Re: sendmail/fetchmail

1999-04-28 Thread Arcady Genkin
add|ct|on <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > ok maybe i'm simple-minded but i cannot get fetchmail to fetch my mail > from my pop3 server. running fetchmail in -v mode, there were no errors > logging into the pop3 server, but once it gets to fetching the messages > it just sits there on the first

sendmail/fetchmail

1999-04-28 Thread add|ct|on
ok maybe i'm simple-minded but i cannot get fetchmail to fetch my mail from my pop3 server. running fetchmail in -v mode, there were no errors logging into the pop3 server, but once it gets to fetching the messages it just sits there on the first one and does nothing. to test my se

Re: smail vs sendmail, fetchmail, K6 processor

1998-06-03 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Tue, Jun 02, 1998 at 10:36:41PM -0700, Joel Klecker wrote: > At 07:07 -0700 1998-06-02, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > >K6 IS supported in multiprocessor, but it is using an SMP scheme called > >OpenPIC or similar. Cyrix use the same spec. Intel use a different spec > >though and no motherboards availa

Re: smail vs sendmail, fetchmail, K6 processor

1998-06-03 Thread Joel Klecker
At 07:07 -0700 1998-06-02, Hamish Moffatt wrote: >K6 IS supported in multiprocessor, but it is using an SMP scheme called >OpenPIC or similar. Cyrix use the same spec. Intel use a different spec >though and no motherboards available support the open one. No motherboards for x86 processors that is.

Re: smail vs sendmail, fetchmail, K6 processor

1998-06-03 Thread Joel Klecker
At 15:12 -0700 1998-06-02, Rev. Joseph Carter wrote: >Or going Alpha or PPC. Cost effectiveness seems to indicate PPC to me, >though there are 1,000,001 different PPC for Linux branches it seems. There are five PPC subarchitectures of Linux: * CHRP-compliant PowerPC machines * PC

Re: smail vs sendmail, fetchmail, K6 processor

1998-06-02 Thread Rev. Joseph Carter
On Wed, Jun 03, 1998 at 12:07:36AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > I think I heard at some point that you can't have two K6's on the same > > board is that true? > > This is my understanding [could be wrong]: > > K6 IS supported in multiprocessor, but it is using an SMP scheme called > OpenPIC o

Re: smail vs sendmail, fetchmail, K6 processor

1998-06-02 Thread Obi
Ciao, > be sent > to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (my ISP) which is definitely not what I want. I'm using smail on a hamm system. I configured smail with 1, giving the mail host of my ISP as smart host. I also have a visible name different from the name of my machine (that is the domain name of outgoing mai

Re: smail vs sendmail, fetchmail, K6 processor

1998-06-02 Thread Hamish Moffatt
On Tue, Jun 02, 1998 at 11:17:16AM +0200, Karsten Bolding wrote: > I think I heard at some point that you can't have two K6's on the same > board is that true? This is my understanding [could be wrong]: K6 IS supported in multiprocessor, but it is using an SMP scheme called OpenPIC or similar. Cy

smail vs sendmail, fetchmail, K6 processor

1998-06-02 Thread Karsten Bolding
As the subject says - different topics. I have tried to configure both smail and sendmail without to much luck. What I want is that local mail stays local and remote mail is send when I via PPP connects to the Internet. If I choose option 1 in smailconfig and answer the questions (the way I think

Re: Sendmail/fetchmail problems?

1998-03-08 Thread Walter L. Preuninger II
On Sat, 7 Mar 1998, George Bonser wrote: > > Yeah, this is a problem with the kernel. It does not allow enough open > files for a server that is busy. hmmm, i only noticed this since i upgraded from sendmail 8.8.8-X to the 8.8.8-9. I didnt think my system would be classified as busy... a pentium

Sendmail/fetchmail problems?

1998-03-08 Thread Walter L. Preuninger II
Is this familiar to anyone? reading message 116 of 204 (2361 bytes) .popclient: SMTP error: 451 Can't create transcript file xfWAA00603: Too many open files in system popclient: SMTP error: 451 Can't open /dev/null: Too many open files in system popclient: SMTP transaction error while fetching fro