Dear David,
below is what you asked for, I hope it's enough, thanks.
On Fri, 2022-10-21 at 17:26 -0700, David Christensen wrote:
> On 10/21/22 05:40, nimrod wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm running a Debian 10 Samba server with winbind and kerberos in a
> > Act
On 10/21/22 05:40, nimrod wrote:
Hi,
I'm running a Debian 10 Samba server with winbind and kerberos in a
Active Directory domain.
Domain users can access a unique share, which is then divideded into
different directories, each with different file system permissions,
based on domain user
Hi,
I'm running a Debian 10 Samba server with winbind and kerberos in a
Active Directory domain.
Domain users can access a unique share, which is then divideded into
different directories, each with different file system permissions,
based on domain users and groups. A single user can
account and Samba config
that matters.
> problem is I think with smb passwords. I can't seem to get smbpassword
> to create records in an smb password database. I think I am supposed
> to run smbpassword as root on the Debian box that I want to be the
> samba server. Or perhaps as
s, but now there is a need for file
sharing all these types of computers Debian/Mac/Windows. For this
new (to me) function, I think making one of my Debian boxes a Samba
server is the easiest way to go. But I am having a problem, or maybe
several problems.
I know how to install Debian packages.
all these types of computers Debian/Mac/Windows. For this
new (to me) function, I think making one of my Debian boxes a Samba
server is the easiest way to go. But I am having a problem, or maybe
several problems.
I know how to install Debian packages. I've been doing it for almost
a decade. B
On Thu, 22 Dec 2011 11:30:20 -0500, Jonathan Polom wrote:
> On Dec 21, 2011 1:13 PM, "Camaleón" wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 19 Dec 2011 12:32:08 -0500, Jonathan Polom wrote:
>>
>> (...)
>>
>> > Why is printing enabled on a system that has no connected printers
>> > and doesn't even have CUPS installed?
On Dec 21, 2011 1:13 PM, "Camaleón" wrote:
>
> On Mon, 19 Dec 2011 12:32:08 -0500, Jonathan Polom wrote:
>
> (...)
>
> > Why is printing enabled on a system that has no connected printers and
> > doesn't even have CUPS installed?
>
> (...)
>
> I think that's a Samba default setting and AFAIK, Debi
On Mon, 19 Dec 2011 12:32:08 -0500, Jonathan Polom wrote:
(...)
> Why is printing enabled on a system that has no connected printers and
> doesn't even have CUPS installed?
(...)
I think that's a Samba default setting and AFAIK, Debian tends to keep
the upstream defaults untouched unless ther
This is an interesting issue. I have a client that runs Voyage Linux
(based on Debian) running mpd which I use a network audio player. It
accesses a CIFS/SMB share with music files that's served by a device
on my network that runs Debian stable with Samba 3.5.6. Every now and
then, music playback o
We solved it, was not about the upgrade, this was just a coincidence. Was
another machine that was acting as local master browser.
Sorry for the noise
--
Marc Olivé
Grup Blau
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact l
Hello,
Our samba server stoped working fine after Lenny upgrade.
I can connect using "smbclient", but "smbtree" says:
"Server requested plaintext password but 'client plaintext auth' is disabled
anonymous failed session setup with NT_STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETE
i can't resolve.
when i try to check smb://work_group i get no computers in your
workgroup. (from memory maybe it said in diffrent words)
maybe it is related to the thing that the samba server isn't the main
one . or some thing related to domain master = yes
but the problem with that is
Adam Hardy on 14/11/07 10:17, wrote:
I'm trying to copy files from a Mac running OS X to a Samba share that I
have set up on an Etch machine, using samba 3.0.24.
The Mac complains that the file name is invalid (for any file even
test.txt) and then refuses to copy, and the operation leaves a
I'm trying to copy files from a Mac running OS X to a Samba share that I have
set up on an Etch machine, using samba 3.0.24.
The Mac complains that the file name is invalid (for any file even test.txt) and
then refuses to copy, and the operation leaves a zero-byte file with the same
name on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Lueck wrote:
> Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
>> No offense, but that is not a very useful bug report. If you really
>> want to help out, you need to also send the following as a follow-up to
>> the initial bug report:
>>
>> - your related configu
Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
No offense, but that is not a very useful bug report. If you really
want to help out, you need to also send the following as a follow-up to
the initial bug report:
- your related configuration file(s)
- commands which produce the strange behavior
- excerpts of log f
On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 11:11:55PM -0400, Michael Lueck wrote:
>
> 1) Wrong / Missing Windows group memberships (domain groups, etc...)
> 2) Inability to use the 'net' command to assign the permission to add
> workstations to the domain for a special account
> 3) Inability to make the domain admi
I am noticing weirdness testing Etch / Samba. Specifically:
1) Wrong / Missing Windows group memberships (domain groups, etc...)
2) Inability to use the 'net' command to assign the permission to add
workstations to the domain for a special account
3) Inability to make the domain admin group prin
here would mention this step.
Thanks Greg,
-Jeff.
-Original Message-
From: Greg Folkert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2007 11:22 AM
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Joining an Etch AMD64 Samba server to an existing
Windows2003Domain
On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 0
On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 09:25 -0700, Jeff Thurston wrote:
> I’m hoping someone can give me a clue what I am doing wrong here,
> Running Etch (AMD64), I followed the samba wiki at:
> http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_&_Active_Directory#Prerequisites.
> I get mostly good results, except when I try
Im hoping someone can give me a clue what I am doing wrong here,
Running Etch (AMD64), I followed the samba wiki at:
http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_&_Active_Directory#Prerequisites.
I get mostly good results, except when I try to run getent passwd or
getent group only local users/groups
Hi and thx for ur response,
i changed the name of my admin in all configurations files. I referred
him to as root.
I added root as a pozixAccount. Here is my result :
sambaLMPassword F0D412BD764FFE81AAD3B435B51404EE
sambaPrimaryGroupSIDS-1-5-21-634357371-4061345844-4009714039-513
displayName
chuchyyy wrote:
is there a relation between my problem and a configuration of
common-auth in /etc/pam.d/, or common-passwd?
Cause i did all advices that u told me but it doesnt work...
Nope. PAM is for authentication. NSS is like DNS for user IDs
On 5/17/05, chuchyyy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
here
is there a relation between my problem and a configuration of
common-auth in /etc/pam.d/, or common-passwd?
Cause i did all advices that u told me but it doesnt work...
Thank you,
Guillaume
On 5/17/05, chuchyyy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> here is my ldif file :
>
> dn: cn=admin,dc=netc,dc=net
here is my ldif file :
dn: cn=admin,dc=netc,dc=net
objectclass: sambaSamAccount
cn: admin
o: netc
uid : 0
mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sn: Administrateur
then ldapadd.
"id admin" doesnt seem to work... My computer is in my LDAP yet. all
permissions are good. Even more than 644...
thx for your patienc
chuchyyy wrote:
Hi Mark,
thx for your response !
I tried id admin : no such user like u said. I had already install
libnss-ldap, but i had "files ldap" for passwd and group.
but id admin still doesnt work.
"id root" says:
uid=0(root) gid=0(root) groups=0(root)
But the LDAP administrator is "admi
is "admin" not "root" ... i dont understand why...
Cheers,
Guillaume
On 5/17/05, Mark Roach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 11:26 -0400, chuchyyy wrote:
>
> > i ve got a problem. Im running open LDAP with samba server. I have an
> >
On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 11:26 -0400, chuchyyy wrote:
> i ve got a problem. Im running open LDAP with samba server. I have an
> LDAPadministrator which is referred to as "admin".
> i added my computer windows 2K to LDAP with "smbldap-useradd -w" from
> smbldap-too
Hi all !
i ve got a problem. Im running open LDAP with samba server. I have an
LDAPadministrator which is referred to as "admin".
i added my computer windows 2K to LDAP with "smbldap-useradd -w" from
smbldap-tools.
Now i can't join the samba server with "admin".
Anyone have any ideas about the following problem.
We have a W2K Advanced Server as a PDC in a domain: WINDOMAIN
And we have a Samba 2.x server as the PDC (through LDAP & PAM) of
another domain: LINUXDOMAIN
Any computer in WINDOMAIN can access shares on any computer (Linux,
Windows, etc.) in LIN
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 05:32:16PM +0100, Andreas Janssen wrote:
> To openbsd ssh package is called ssh, however it contains the server and
> the client (at least on woody, I don't know if this has changed).
It has not (yet).
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Kent West wrote:
Joris Huizer wrote:
Hello,
At the end of the knoppix harddisc installation, the installer asked
to set up some servers, accidentilly I *did* allow it to setup the
openbsd ssh server and samba server - but it's of no use for me (I
didn't intend to do this - and I
Hello
Joris Huizer (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> At the end of the knoppix harddisc installation, the installer asked
> to set up some servers, accidentilly I *did* allow it to setup the
> openbsd ssh server and samba server - but it's of no use for me (I
> didn'
Joris Huizer wrote:
Hello,
At the end of the knoppix harddisc installation, the installer asked to
set up some servers, accidentilly I *did* allow it to setup the openbsd
ssh server and samba server - but it's of no use for me (I didn't intend
to do this - and I don't even r
Hello,
At the end of the knoppix harddisc installation, the installer asked to
set up some servers, accidentilly I *did* allow it to setup the openbsd
ssh server and samba server - but it's of no use for me (I didn't intend
to do this - and I don't even really know what
samba server that
serves profiles and home dirs for ~300 users for the past 8-9 months.
sounds good :)
How does SAMBA interact with ACLs?
There is no short/simple answer. Samba can use ACL's, for info on
exactly how to do so, first understand acls. Next understand winbind (if
you are on
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 14:06, Hans Wilmer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I´m trying to figure out what the best approach may be to set up a SAMBA
> server with Woody that provides ACLs so that access rights could be
> specified in detail.
>
> In an announcement of the 2.6.x kernels,
Hi,
I´m trying to figure out what the best approach may be to set up a SAMBA
server with Woody that provides ACLs so that access rights could be
specified in detail.
In an announcement of the 2.6.x kernels, I´ve read that these kernels will
come readily with ACL support for ext3fs. Does
Hi Gang!
We have mostly Windows boxes here on the LAN--20 computers in
all--but also two Linuces running Samba. The one I was thinking
of using as a file server for a workgroup here, though, has
proved to be strangely slower than the other when sending files
to a Windows box. Both are Pentium
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said...
> I have configured my Samba Server and all PCs in diferent NT domains are
> able to access my Samba Server.
> The only computers that cannot access the Samba Server are those with
I have configured my Samba Server and all PCs in diferent NT domains are
able to access my Samba Server.
The only computers that cannot access the Samba Server are those with
Windows 2000 installed.
Does anyone know anything about it?
Thanks
yeah it makes it so everyone can access it. you just gotta change the
interfaces option to suite the needs, i dont have your last email, if you
cant get it working give me the ip address of the client machine(unless
its localhost) and output of 'ifconfig -a' on the machine.
on my machine:
interf
Aphro,
Spot on! Removing the interface binding means it works but I assume this
means everyone on the Internet has access to the share which is not what I
wanted. smb.conf reads :
#Global parameters
debug level = 3
netbios name = gateway
workgroup = workgroup
server string = %h server (Debian)
#
On Wed, 23 Feb 2000, Patrick Kirk wrote:
patric >gateway:/home/patrick# smbclient -L gateway
patric >Client started (version 2.0.5a).
patric >resolve_name: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name gateway<0x20>
patric >resolve_name: Attempting host lookup for name gateway<0x20>
patric >Connecting to 192
Hi all,
I just got to step 3 of the samba diagnostics when I found my problem.
gateway:/home/patrick# smbclient -L gateway
Client started (version 2.0.5a).
resolve_name: Attempting lmhosts lookup for name gateway<0x20>
resolve_name: Attempting host lookup for name gateway<0x20>
Connecting to 192
ics >
kubics >AD1: I run a Linux machine to serve NT Workstations with some common
disk
kubics >area. It works just fine, we can connect to the server, but it's too
good.
kubics >Because if I connect to the Samba server from a workstation, I can make
kubics >several connectio
AD1: I run a Linux machine to serve NT Workstations with some common disk
area. It works just fine, we can connect to the server, but it's too good.
Because if I connect to the Samba server from a workstation, I can make
several connections with the name of the other users without asking to
when duplicating a samba server... what needs to be copied across to the
new server to re-establish the origional samba shares/passwords?
Hi there,
is it possible to access a samba server across a switch or router so
that the client is on one side and the server on the other side
(physically) of the wire? We ran into this problem because our network
group decided to exchange the repeater and put a switch there instead.
What do I
Oh my god, it's time to ask this question,
Hi there,
is it possible to access a samba server across a switch or router so
that the client is on one side and the server on the other side
(physically) of the wire? We ran into this problem because our network
group decided to exchange the rep
51 matches
Mail list logo
