On Thu, 22 Dec 2011 11:30:20 -0500, Jonathan Polom wrote: > On Dec 21, 2011 1:13 PM, "Camaleón" <noela...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Mon, 19 Dec 2011 12:32:08 -0500, Jonathan Polom wrote: >> >> (...) >> >> > Why is printing enabled on a system that has no connected printers >> > and doesn't even have CUPS installed? >> >> (...) >> >> I think that's a Samba default setting and AFAIK, Debian tends to keep >> the upstream defaults untouched unless there's a very strong and good >> reason to do it otherwise. >> >> > Perhaps I need to direct this question to the Debian samba maintainers, > and if its an upstream issue then direct it there. Perhaps samba should > not behave this way and there's a bug causing the timeout to halt data > transfer. This could even be fixed in a more recent version of samba > which would put the issue back into the Debian realm. I've been trouble > free now for days so I'm pretty confident that this was the cause. > Thanks for the reply.
That's what I would do. In addition, I'd also post this issue at the samba mailing list to get more feedback. First, as you say, samba should not give a time out for a CUPS thingy, that's something for the samba team to look further and run some tests to debug. And secondly, having CUPS enabled by default it can be a matter of taste: some people can argue it is useful while others find not gain at all. Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pan.2011.12.22.16.37...@gmail.com
