Hi,
Does anyone know of a POP server that supports the LAST command? I know,
I know, the LAST command has been deprecated for over 10 years, but I
have a case where I need a server that supports it. Currently using
Courier, but no support there.
Any ideas or suggestions?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
> Can anybody recommend a good pop3 server to serve a user community of
> a few thousand? Ideally something that supports APOP, SSL, etc... and
> is less I/O intensive than qpopper, hopefully by a good margin?
I don't know, if this applies to your case, but you can tweak the I/O
intensity of q
Hey all,
Can anybody recommend a good pop3 server to serve a user community of
a few thousand? Ideally something that supports APOP, SSL, etc... and
is less I/O intensive than qpopper, hopefully by a good margin? Our
mail server is running with a L.A. around 55 at the moment, which just
isn't a
On Mon, Sep 29, 2003 at 12:07:55PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 10:24, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> > This works well:
> >
> > http://freshmeat.net/projects/swendeleter/?topic_id=29
> >
> > To use in cron, I commented out the line:
> >
> > say "$nmails left in the mailbox";
>
On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 10:24, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
> This works well:
>
> http://freshmeat.net/projects/swendeleter/?topic_id=29
>
> To use in cron, I commented out the line:
>
> say "$nmails left in the mailbox";
>
> So I only get cron email if it deleted anything.
The problem with using h
This works well:
http://freshmeat.net/projects/swendeleter/?topic_id=29
To use in cron, I commented out the line:
say "$nmails left in the mailbox";
So I only get cron email if it deleted anything.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
Opps, forgot to mention that the line:
$delete=0 if /^To.*?linux/i;
Must be altered. Replace the linux part with any string that occurs in
your email address. eg if you address is [EMAIL PROTECTED] you should
replace linux with abc123 ie.
$delete=0 if /^To.*?abc123/i;
My bad,
Cheers
Paul
--
Heres my perl script. I also run it in cron.
On Sat, 2003-09-27 at 03:49, Ron Johnson wrote:
> (Mailfilter only checks headers, so can't see filenames of
> attachments.)
>
> I've got this in my crontab:
> */5 * * * * (/home/me/pop_zap_msft.py && fetchmail -s)
>
> The rc (named ~/.pop_zap_msftrc)
Another possibility is this:
#!/usr/bin/perl
use Mail::POP3Client;
$pop3user="your-user-name";
$pop3pass="your-mail-password";
$pop3host="your-ISP's-POP3-server";
$pop = new Mail::POP3Client( USER => $pop3user,
PASSWORD => $pop3pass,
HOST => $pop3hos
On (26/09/03 10:49), Ron Johnson wrote:
> (Mailfilter only checks headers, so can't see filenames of
> attachments.)
>
> I've got this in my crontab:
> */5 * * * * (/home/me/pop_zap_msft.py && fetchmail -s)
>
> The rc (named ~/.pop_zap_msftrc) has this *exact* format:
> SERVER=pop.someisp.net
> U
(Mailfilter only checks headers, so can't see filenames of
attachments.)
I've got this in my crontab:
*/5 * * * * (/home/me/pop_zap_msft.py && fetchmail -s)
The rc (named ~/.pop_zap_msftrc) has this *exact* format:
SERVER=pop.someisp.net
USER=snarfle
PASS=blah
Hope you find it useful
--
--
On Fri, 28 Mar 2003 13:53:10 -0500, stan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> claimed:
[snip
> I;ve never set up a POP server before. What packages should I
look at?
I use courier (package courier-pop) because it uses Maildirs and is very
easy to set up (even with SSL support); moreover, there'
rs to be able to POP this mail to
> there desktops. It would be perhaps nice to offer webmal to them as well.
>
> We rae talking failry ligh usage here.
>
> I;ve never set up a POP server before. What packages should I look at?
Take a look at the courier packages for pop and imap serv
webmal to them as well.
We rae talking failry ligh usage here.
I;ve never set up a POP server before. What packages should I look at?
--
"They that would give up essential liberty for temporary safety deserve
neither liberty nor safety."
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 25 November 2002 5:46 pm, Robert Wilhelm Land wrote:
> Alan,
> the fetchmail manpage Elizabeth partly pasted in this thread
> documents using the mda command forces fetchmail to
> pass all mail to the application stated in the argument
> of t
Alan,
the fetchmail manpage Elizabeth partly pasted in this thread
documents using the mda command forces fetchmail to
pass all mail to the application stated in the argument
of the mda command - rather than forwarding to port 25.
But this seems not to be the point. I've no idea why fetchmail
is c
Elizabeth, the suggested mda command did not work.
For every of the 5 messages awaiting on the pop server I got:
"
About to rewrite Resent-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rewritten version is Resent-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
fetchmail: about to deliver with: /usr/sbin/sendmail -oem -f
[
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 23 November 2002 3:45 pm, Robert Wilhelm Land wrote:
> Addionaly a helpful person had sent me his configuration,
> unfortunatly he's no on the list anymore.
> What he uses was a system fetchmailrc with this line:
> mda "/usr/sbin/exim -oMr
m the POP3 server."
> Was he refering to the data in the envelopes being passed from
> >pop_server ->to -> fetchmail ->to -> exim < =A0 ?
> Could you give me some assistance in understanding this?
That does not make sense.
The idea is to retrieve the mail from the P
Elizabeth, can't say how glad I am reading your response.
Yet I can't really figure out what the part of man page
you pasted precisely means.
Does this doubling refer to double envelopes or double
message headers?
Addionaly a helpful person had sent me his configuration,
unfortunatly he's no on
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Robert Wilhelm Land) writes:
> The file below shows errors relating to unexpected message
> lengths. Could it have something to do with the
> missing options exim is complaining about?
>
> Any help is grately appreciated
Probably. From fetchmail(1):
-m , --mda
socket error while fetching from pop.btx.dtag.de
...ploting a error for each of the three messages awaiting on
the pop server on both of tests.
The file below shows errors relating to unexpected message
lengths. Could it have something to do with the
missing options exim is complaining about?
An
hi ya richard
good... and yes... ftp can work with /etc/ftpaccess tooo
along with its other ftp config files..
now, if ya up to it, convert from port 110 ( insecure pop3 ) to
secure pop3s
/etc/xinetd.conf/ipop3s
disable = no
and change the ipop3s: entry too in hosts.allow
and
On Fri, 18 Oct 2002 15:29:50 -0700 (PDT)
Alvin Oga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> on kimber...
>make sure in.pop3 or equivalent is listed in /etc/hosts.allow
> ipop3: localhost, 192.168.xx.0/255.255.255.0
>
> ( you should see similar entries for wuftpd, in.telnetd
> (
What happens when you try to telnet kimber 110? If that succeeds, there's
some problem with the setup of your POP server in terms of compatibility
with the client. If it fails, there's a network problem.
ap
--
Andre
ver the machine's name is). If this fails but
> you can do it from the machine running the pop server you have a) a
> network issue b) an over secure problem (meaning something is protecting
> the pop server and shouldn't be).
Well, I tried to pre-empt that sort of problem by
em
make sure pop3 or equivalent is listed in /etc/inetd.conf or
/etc/xinetd.conf/ipop3
# disable = yes
disable = no
restart inetd
kimber# telnet localhost 110
...blah Pop server read ..
quit
other windoze_pc# telnet kimber 110
than it should work from the wind
machine's name is). If this fails but you
can do it from the machine running the pop server you have a) a network issue
b) an over secure problem (meaning something is protecting the pop server and
shouldn't be).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ort. I don't think that's what
> > > you're looking for.
> >
> > Well I got that from the man page.
>
> Which one?
man qpopper says:-
You can confirm that the POP server is running on Unix by telneting
to
port 110 (or 109 if you set it up th
, which is
> > equivalent to the pop3 port. I don't think that's what you're looking
> > for.
>
> Well I got that from the man page.
Which one?
>
> What's not clear to me is what I call the pop server (i.e. what I should
> enter into the
at's what you're looking
> for.
Well I got that from the man page.
What's not clear to me is what I call the pop server (i.e. what I should
enter into the mail client's setup as the email server to connect to - my
ISP's server is called pop.ntlworld.com, and I assumed m
What are you trying to do? telnet pop. 110 tells telnet to find
a machine called "pop.hostname" and connect to port 110, which is
equivalent to the pop3 port. I don't think that's what you're looking for.
ap
--
Andrew J Perrin -
I'm getting in a bit of a muddle setting up qpopper as a mail server for a
local pc.
>From my machine I can do:
telnet pop3
and see how many unread messages there are.
But if I try
telnet pop. 110
I get: could not resolve pop./110: Name or service not known
and essentially the same message when
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Actually, qpopper will give you pop3, and you can keep the mbox format. Of
course I don't understand why you want to keep mbox it's really not any
better than Maildir (and vice versa), and MTAs like exim can easily deliever
to either one.
Jus
Sean wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> I'm currently running courier-imap-ssl and courier-pop-ssl for IMAP and POP3
> on a smallish server I have sitting out there in the great beyond, and have
> had good luck so far.
>
> Sean
>
courier...
That only supports Maildi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm currently running courier-imap-ssl and courier-pop-ssl for IMAP and POP3
on a smallish server I have sitting out there in the great beyond, and have
had good luck so far.
Sean
On Sunday 08 September 2002 08:59 pm, Tom Allison wrote:
> I'm loo
Tom Allison said:
> I'm looking for suggestions on a pop-ssl server.
> I'm currently working with postfix and am not really a great
> expert on POP.
if you use sslwrap you can SSL-enable any POP3 server on the
system I've been doing this for years without any trouble,
same for IMAP4 servers.
I'm looking for suggestions on a pop-ssl server.
I'm currently working with postfix and am not really a great
expert on POP.
I am looking for something that is relatively simple and
straight-forward in it's set-up.
Any suggestions?
--
Life is just a bowl of cherries, but why do I always get t
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 10:41:31PM -0400, Daniel Barclay wrote:
>
>
> > From: Hans Ekbrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > ...
> > On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 11:31:06PM -0400, Daniel Barclay wrote:
> ...
> > > I'd like to have a local POP server that, whe
> From: Hans Ekbrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ...
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 11:31:06PM -0400, Daniel Barclay wrote:
...
> > I'd like to have a local POP server that, when queried, queries another
> > POP server and looks at a local mail file, and then serves the com
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 11:31:06PM -0400, Daniel Barclay wrote:
> Is there any POP server that can combine the mail from another POP server
> with mail in a mail file?
>
> I'd like to have a local POP server that, when queried, queries another
> POP server and looks at a local
Is there any POP server that can combine the mail from another POP server
with mail in a mail file?
I'd like to have a local POP server that, when queried, queries another
POP server and looks at a local mail file, and then serves the combined
set of messages to the POP client.
Here&#x
Hi all,
I setup my exim in a Potato Debian GNU/Linux box with virtual domains
and aliases. MTA is working great.
It stores mails in /var/spool/mail/domain/*.
My question is:
What about pop?
I find to use qpopper. How to use it to get mail from the ri
I checked the link below that so kindly Alvin Oga (Thanks!) sugested to
check out and it has several names of secure pop servers, one that I saw
both there, and on the apt-cache list was qpopper so I installed that
one...
Hope that helps!
On Tue, 16 Oct 2001, R. Alexander wrote:
> Could you advi
D]>
Cc: "Kurt Lieber" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Debian Users List"
Sent: Tuesday, 16 October 2001 12:54
Subject: Re: Pop server...
>
> hi ya
>
> use secure pop3 or secure imap
> http://www.Linux-Sec.net/Mail/secure_pop3.txt
>
> c ya
> alvin
>
>
Alexander Wallace wrote:
>Hello there! What do I need to apt-get to be a pop server?
gnu-pop3d
--
Oliver Elphick[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Isle of Wight http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver
GPG: 1024D/3E1D0C1C: CA12 09E0 E8D5 8870 5839 932A 6
hi ya
use secure pop3 or secure imap
http://www.Linux-Sec.net/Mail/secure_pop3.txt
c ya
alvin
On Mon, 15 Oct 2001, Alexander Wallace wrote:
> Thanks! I can see a couple of them... Any recomendations anyone???
>
> On Mon, 15 Oct 2001, Kurt Lieber wrote:
>
> > apt-cache search pop3
> >
> >
of off the top of my head.
>
> hth
>
> --kurt
>
> On Monday 15 October 2001 h:05 am, Alexander Wallace wrote:
> > Hello there! What do I need to apt-get to be a pop server?
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
apt-get to be a pop server?
Hello there! What do I need to apt-get to be a pop server?
thanks!
JD Kitch wrote:
>
> I running a Debain Potato system, and only serving mail for a
> handfull of users. I see a few different POP server packages
> available, and was wondering which one is most recomended/easiest to
> configure/most secure...etc, etc...
i use qpopper, although i
I running a Debain Potato system, and only serving mail for a
handfull of users. I see a few different POP server packages
available, and was wondering which one is most recomended/easiest to
configure/most secure...etc, etc...
Thanks in advance,
jdk
Amos Shapira wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Is anyone aware of a POP server (preferably allready packaged
> for Debian) which can understand the "AUTH" command?
>
> I have the Qualcomm popper (qpopper) installed on the mail server
> right now (qpopper), and sometimes w
Hello,
Is anyone aware of a POP server (preferably allready packaged
for Debian) which can understand the "AUTH" command?
I have the Qualcomm popper (qpopper) installed on the mail server
right now (qpopper), and sometimes want to use Netscape to read
mail from the workplace, sin
running the pop server outside of inetd since its
pretty small and it gets hit about once every 3 minutes on average anyway.
It looks like I'd have to compile my own; in.pop3d seems to be inetd
specific. Is this true? Any pitfalls to running a standalone pop daemon I'm
not thinking abou
55 matches
Mail list logo
