Solved someone on another list remembered for me that I had this same
problem several months ago where existing machines on the network
could get out but not new ones. Rebooting the Netopia gateway solved
the problem. Thanks to those who responded.
--
Mathew E. Enders
"Where once Samba and Apa
On Lu, 09 apr 12, 22:38:59, Mat Enders wrote:
> Here is a stumper. I just completed a brand new installation of
> Debian, during installation it could not reach the repositories so
> only a base installation was completed.
>
> I am logged directly into the machine not via ssh. Network appears to
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 2:39 AM, Scott Ferguson
wrote:
> On 10/04/12 12:38, Mat Enders wrote:
>> Here is a stumper. I just completed a brand new installation of
>> Debian, during installation it could not reach the repositories so
>> only a base installation was completed.
>>
>> I am logged direc
On 10/04/12 12:38, Mat Enders wrote:
> Here is a stumper. I just completed a brand new installation of
> Debian, during installation it could not reach the repositories so
> only a base installation was completed.
>
> I am logged directly into the machine not via ssh.
So you've proven the NIC
Ugh. What does route show? It sounds like your route to your gateway is b0rked.
--b
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 12:00 AM, Mat Enders wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Brad Alexander wrote:
>> Sounds like a dns problem, Mat. Can you ping a network address outside
>> your borders? I like to k
On Apr 9, 2012, at 7:38 PM, Mat Enders wrote:
> Here is a stumper. I just completed a brand new installation of
> Debian, during installation it could not reach the repositories so
> only a base installation was completed.
>
> I am logged directly into the machine not via ssh. Network appears to
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Brad Alexander wrote:
> Sounds like a dns problem, Mat. Can you ping a network address outside
> your borders? I like to keep several in the back of my head for that:
> GTE/MCI/VZN's dns servers are 4.2.2.1, 4.2.2.2 and 4.2.2.3. Google's
> are 8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4.
Sounds like a dns problem, Mat. Can you ping a network address outside
your borders? I like to keep several in the back of my head for that:
GTE/MCI/VZN's dns servers are 4.2.2.1, 4.2.2.2 and 4.2.2.3. Google's
are 8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4. Can you ping them by address? what does the
search and/or domain
Here is a stumper. I just completed a brand new installation of
Debian, during installation it could not reach the repositories so
only a base installation was completed.
I am logged directly into the machine not via ssh. Network appears to
have configured correctly via dhcp.
ifconfig says I ha
On Sat, 04 Jun 2011 16:33:35 -0700, Johnathan Ritzi wrote:
> Problem solved (I think). After digging some more, I realized that after
> the install the only partition marked bootable was /dev/sda6 (Linux
> root).
As you installed GRUB into the MBR, that makes sense.
> I used fdisk to make /dev/
On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 15:33 -0700, Johnathan Ritzi wrote:
> [snip] Just to experiment, I went into fdisk, deleted all my new
> partitions (leaving just the Windows ones) [snip]
> I'm not even getting to the grub boot screen, so something is wrong
> even before the point. Reinstalling grub to the Ma
Problem solved (I think). After digging some more, I realized that after the
install the only partition marked bootable was /dev/sda6 (Linux root). I
used fdisk to make /dev/sda2 also bootable (the main Windows partition) and
grub (and everything else) came up fine. I believe the original set up wa
(posted this to a Linux forum, cross-posting here as recommended by the
install guide troubleshooting instructions)
I recently purchased a new Lenovo Thinkpad T420i and am having problems
installing the latest version of Squeeze from CD. After receiving the
laptop, I started it up, configured Wind
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 1:17 AM, Brian Ryans wrote:
> Quoting Juan R. de Silva on 2011-04-21 16:36:
>> I preserved the user names for both of users in a new squeeze
>> installation but UID and GID are different. So, by simply using 'cp -
>> a' (or rsync) I would run
Quoting Juan R. de Silva on 2011-04-21 16:36:
> I preserved the user names for both of users in a new squeeze
> installation but UID and GID are different. So, by simply using 'cp -
> a' (or rsync) I would run into problem of their mismatch.
>
> Is there a simple and q
from /etc needed to be restored.
>
> I preserved the user names for both of users in a new squeeze
> installation but UID and GID are different. So, by simply using 'cp -
> a' (or rsync) I would run into problem of their mismatch.
>
> Is there a simple and quick way t
stored.
I preserved the user names for both of users in a new squeeze
installation but UID and GID are different.
How different? In Debian, the user numbers start at 1000 and go
upwards. The user 1000 will be the first user you created (usually gets
created during the installation of the OS).
On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 18:54:38 -0400, George Standish wrote:
> On 21/04/11 06:16 PM, Juan R. de Silva wrote:
>
>> ..Debian uses the same values as Ubuntu does. Good.
>
> I'm sure you mean, Ubuntu uses the same as values as Debian does ;)
You were reading my thoughts. :-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
On 21/04/11 06:16 PM, Juan R. de Silva wrote:
..Debian uses the same values as Ubuntu does. Good.
I'm sure you mean, Ubuntu uses the same as values as Debian does ;)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...
ed
> to be restored.
>
> I preserved the user names for both of users in a new squeeze
> installation but UID and GID are different. So, by simply using 'cp - a'
> (or rsync) I would run into problem of their mismatch.
>
> Is there a simple and quick way to resolve it
I'm in the process of moving from Ubuntu to Debian. I've installed
squeeze and want to restore some of 2 users home files and directories
from a backup made in Ubuntu. There are also some files from /etc needed
to be restored.
I preserved the user names for both of users in a n
On Jo, 16 sep 10, 21:12:39, AG wrote:
>
> Windows will automatically wipe the entire HD clean during
> installation,
I'm not a fan of Windows, but this is just not true, at least not with
every version until Windows XP. It will screw up grub though, so have a
boot disk handy if you didn't inst
On 9/16/2010 4:12 PM, AG wrote:
On 10/09/10 03:30, Doug wrote:
I just downloaded debian-testing i386 Net Inst and burned the
.iso onto disk. Before I do something silly, I want to make sure
that this is designed to live with other os's on the hd. (I remember
one older version of Ubuntu that took
On 17/09/10 04:15, James Zuelow wrote:
> LOL. If anyone thinks this thread has been extremist or hateful, you need to
> get out more. :)
*nod
> That being said, I think some people have lost track of the thread.
What are you trying to say James? :-) Surely every post has
focused on solving
On 17/09/10 02:48, Tom H wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 11:05 PM, Scott Ferguson
> wrote:
>>
>> And you probably don't see pro-Ubuntu posts/whines on a Debian mailing
>> list as trolling either... ;-p
> Not at all. Definitely not whining.
> ;-p
I didn't take you comment on Ubuntu as whining
On 10/09/10 03:30, Doug wrote:
I just downloaded debian-testing i386 Net Inst and burned the
.iso onto disk. Before I do something silly, I want to make sure
that this is designed to live with other os's on the hd. (I remember
one older version of Ubuntu that took over the drive, and wiped
ever
LOL. If anyone thinks this thread has been extremist or hateful, you need to
get out more. :)
That being said, I think some people have lost track of the thread.
Tom H is the one who said, and I'll paraphrase here:
"If you use the debian installer, and it asks you if you want to use the ent
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 11:05 PM, Scott Ferguson
wrote:
> On 16/09/10 12:17, Tom H wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 6:04 AM, Klistvud wrote:
>>> Dne, 15. 09. 2010 11:36:48 je Lisi napisal(a):
I find the hand-holding, suitable-for newbies, so-called-easy Ubuntu
installer utterly i
On Wed, 15 Sep 2010 22:17:19 -0400
Tom H wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 6:04 AM, Klistvud
> wrote:
> > Dne, 15. 09. 2010 11:36:48 je Lisi napisal(a):
> >>
> >> I find the hand-holding, suitable-for newbies, so-called-easy
> >> Ubuntu installer utterly incomprehensible.
> >
> > +1
>
> I find b
On 16/09/10 12:17, Tom H wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 6:04 AM, Klistvud wrote:
>> Dne, 15. 09. 2010 11:36:48 je Lisi napisal(a):
>>> I find the hand-holding, suitable-for newbies, so-called-easy Ubuntu
>>> installer utterly incomprehensible.
>> +1
> I find both your statements utterly incompr
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 6:04 AM, Klistvud wrote:
> Dne, 15. 09. 2010 11:36:48 je Lisi napisal(a):
>>
>> I find the hand-holding, suitable-for newbies, so-called-easy Ubuntu
>> installer utterly incomprehensible.
>
> +1
I find both your statements utterly incomprehensible! :)
I only use the Ubunt
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 1:03 AM, Scott Ferguson
wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 12:22 AM, Scott Ferguson
>> wrote:
2010/9/13 Jes�s M. Navarro :
> On Friday 10 September 2010 21:17:24 Tom H wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 11:25 PM, Miles Fidelman
>>> Now if you consider it user
Dne, 15. 09. 2010 11:36:48 je Lisi napisal(a):
I find the hand-holding, suitable-for newbies, so-called-easy Ubuntu
installer
utterly incomprehensible.
+1
That said, however, I don't think the main question here should be
"what kind of users is d-i targeted for". I think the crucial issue
On Wednesday 15 September 2010 06:03:54 Scott Ferguson wrote:
> Hand-holding installations have been discussed to death - the general
> consensus seems to be if you want hand-holding use one of the "less
> pure" Debians (Ubuntu et al).
> If you want choice use the Debian installer - it may wipe an
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 12:22 AM, Scott Ferguson
> wrote:
>>> 2010/9/13 Jes�s M. Navarro :
On Friday 10 September 2010 21:17:24 Tom H wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 11:25 PM, Miles Fidelman
>> Now if you consider it user error to give the default answers, when you
>> actually
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 12:22 AM, Scott Ferguson
wrote:
>> 2010/9/13 Jes�s M. Navarro :
>>> On Friday 10 September 2010 21:17:24 Tom H wrote:
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 11:25 PM, Miles Fidelman
> Now if you consider it user error to give the default answers, when you
> actually want to sa
> 2010/9/13 Jes�s M. Navarro :
>> On Friday 10 September 2010 21:17:24 Tom H wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 11:25 PM, Miles Fidelman
Now if you consider it user error to give the default answers, when you
actually want to save the current install, then your anwer is accurate.
>>> I do
2010/9/13 Jesús M. Navarro :
> On Friday 10 September 2010 21:17:24 Tom H wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 11:25 PM, Miles Fidelman
>> >
>> > Now if you consider it user error to give the default answers, when you
>> > actually want to save the current install, then your anwer is accurate.
>>
>> I
Dne, 14. 09. 2010 01:53:07 je Jesús M. Navarro napisal(a):
> install. With Ubuntu's installer, aimed at a less technical crowd,
the
> default is to do a side-by-side install.
Seems much saner (and proper) to me.
+1
--
Regards,
Klistvud
Certifiable Loonix User #481801
http://bufferoverflow.
Hi:
On Friday 10 September 2010 21:17:24 Tom H wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 11:25 PM, Miles Fidelman
>
[...]
> > Now if you consider it user error to give the default answers, when you
> > actually want to save the current install, then your anwer is accurate.
>
> I do. It's a PEBKAC. With d-
On 9/10/2010 3:01 PM, Rob Owens wrote:
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 02:32:40PM -0400, Doug wrote:
On 9/10/2010 8:22 AM, Rob Owens wrote:
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 11:32:20AM +0100, Joao Ferreira gmail wrote:
On Fri, 2010-09-10 at 01:59 -0400, Doug wrote:
Trying to install. I come to the partitioner
2010/9/9 Doug
>
> I just downloaded debian-testing i386 Net Inst and burned the
> .iso onto disk. Before I do something silly, I want to make sure
> that this is designed to live with other os's on the hd. (I remember
> one older version of Ubuntu that took over the drive, and wiped everything
>
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 11:25 PM, Miles Fidelman
wrote:
> Tom H wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 10:30 PM, Doug wrote:
>>>
>>> I just downloaded debian-testing i386 Net Inst and burned the
>>> .iso onto disk. Before I do something silly, I want to make sure
>>> that this is designed to live with
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 02:32:40PM -0400, Doug wrote:
> On 9/10/2010 8:22 AM, Rob Owens wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 11:32:20AM +0100, Joao Ferreira gmail wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2010-09-10 at 01:59 -0400, Doug wrote:
Trying to install. I come to the partitioner. It says there is 261 GB
On 9/10/2010 8:22 AM, Rob Owens wrote:
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 11:32:20AM +0100, Joao Ferreira gmail wrote:
On Fri, 2010-09-10 at 01:59 -0400, Doug wrote:
Trying to install. I come to the partitioner. It says there is 261 GB
available. (This is empty, unpartitioned and unformatted space, lef
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 11:32:20AM +0100, Joao Ferreira gmail wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-09-10 at 01:59 -0400, Doug wrote:
> > Trying to install. I come to the partitioner. It says there is 261 GB
> > available. (This is empty, unpartitioned and unformatted space, left
> > over after cloning drive f
On Fri, 2010-09-10 at 01:59 -0400, Doug wrote:
> Trying to install. I come to the partitioner. It says there is 261 GB
> available. (This is empty, unpartitioned and unformatted space, left
> over after cloning drive from a smaller one.) On-screen instructions say
>
> [!!] Partition disks
>
On Thu, 2010-09-09 at 22:30 -0400, Doug wrote:
> I just downloaded debian-testing i386 Net Inst and burned the
> .iso onto disk. Before I do something silly, I want to make sure
> that this is designed to live with other os's on the hd. (I remember
> one older version of Ubuntu that took over the
Dne, 10. 09. 2010 04:39:46 je Aaron Toponce napisal(a):
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 10:30:35PM -0400, Doug wrote:
> (I remember
> one older version of Ubuntu that took over the drive, and wiped
> everything else out.)
This isn't Ubuntu. :)
Well, while it isn't Ubuntu, it's *testing* nonetheless:
Trying to install. I come to the partitioner. It says there is 261 GB
available. (This is empty, unpartitioned and unformatted space, left
over after cloning drive from a smaller one.) On-screen instructions say
[!!] Partition disks
The maximum size for this partition is 261.6 GB
Hint: "m
Tom H wrote:
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 10:30 PM, Doug wrote:
I just downloaded debian-testing i386 Net Inst and burned the
.iso onto disk. Before I do something silly, I want to make sure
that this is designed to live with other os's on the hd. (I remember
one older version of Ubuntu that too
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 10:30 PM, Doug wrote:
> I just downloaded debian-testing i386 Net Inst and burned the
> .iso onto disk. Before I do something silly, I want to make sure
> that this is designed to live with other os's on the hd. (I remember
> one older version of Ubuntu that took over the d
Aaron Toponce wrote:
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 10:30:35PM -0400, Doug wrote:
I just downloaded debian-testing i386 Net Inst and burned the
.iso onto disk. Before I do something silly, I want to make sure
that this is designed to live with other os's on the hd. (I remember
one older version of
On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 10:30:35PM -0400, Doug wrote:
> I just downloaded debian-testing i386 Net Inst and burned the
> .iso onto disk. Before I do something silly, I want to make sure
> that this is designed to live with other os's on the hd. (I remember
> one older version of Ubuntu that took ov
I just downloaded debian-testing i386 Net Inst and burned the
.iso onto disk. Before I do something silly, I want to make sure
that this is designed to live with other os's on the hd. (I remember
one older version of Ubuntu that took over the drive, and wiped
everything else out.) If everything
55 matches
Mail list logo
