Missing ldd

Hi. I searched the archives about this and found a thread or two that was relevant, but they were more than 3 years old. At that time, the issue was caused by moving ldd from ldso to libc6. I have a woody system that I recently installed fresh. I have libc6 2.2.5-6. I don't have ldd, which is

Re: missing LDD in Linux

I'd probably just snarf the package off the Debian website. Go to , and you should be given the option of downloading the debfile. Once completed, do ``dpkg -i ldso*.deb'' (as root). Note: I'm assuming that you're running the stable branch (2

Re: missing LDD in Linux

Gregory T. Norris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > /usr/bin/ldd is one of the dynamic-linker utilities, and is provided by > the ldso package. It definately ought to be present... I'd suggesr > reinstalling ldso. hmm... ok i am a newbie, how do i do that? or can i ju

Re: missing LDD in Linux

ut that's smth else), i get an error, > saying missing "ldd" or smth like that (should be in usr/bin/ ?) > what is ldd? it isnt a package in Debian, i think... is it smth special?

missing LDD in Linux

hi, while compiling my kernel (and pine, but that's smth else), i get an error, saying missing "ldd" or smth like that (should be in usr/bin/ ?) what is ldd? it isnt a package in Debian, i think... is it smth special? B

Re: missing ldd - SOLVED

On Mon, May 24, 1999 at 10:49:23PM +0200, Ingo Hohmann wrote: <...> > As ldd seems not to be installed, which package provides it? <...> OK, I found it now, it was in the ldso package, I reinstalled it, et voila! I still have no clue, why it hasn't been installed the first time around. thanks to

Re: missing ldd

On Wed, May 26, 1999 at 01:14:47AM -0400, Wayne Topa wrote: > > Subject: Re: missing ldd > Date: Wed, May 26, 1999 at 12:07:37AM -0500 > > In reply to:Brad > > Quoting Brad([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > On Tue, 25 May 1999, Wayne Topa wrote: > > >

Re: missing ldd

On 26-May-99 Brad wrote: > On Tue, 25 May 1999, Wayne Topa wrote: > >> So? I don't understand. Do you have ldso installed or not? >> libc6 doesn't provide ldd, ldso does. > > In potato, libc6 does. Apparently ldso does in slink. Yes, that is what I recall. On my system, 'dpkg -S ldd' says th

Re: missing ldd

Subject: Re: missing ldd Date: Wed, May 26, 1999 at 12:07:37AM -0500 In reply to:Brad Quoting Brad([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > On Tue, 25 May 1999, Wayne Topa wrote: > > > So? I don't understand. Do you have ldso installed or not? > > libc6 doesn't pro

Re: missing ldd

On Tue, 25 May 1999, Wayne Topa wrote: > So? I don't understand. Do you have ldso installed or not? > libc6 doesn't provide ldd, ldso does. In potato, libc6 does. Apparently ldso does in slink.

Re: missing ldd

Subject: Re: missing ldd Date: Tue, May 25, 1999 at 10:24:39PM +0200 In reply to:Ingo Hohmann Quoting Ingo Hohmann([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > in reply to both messages ... > > On Tue, May 25, 1999 at 01:46:36AM -0400, Wayne Topa wrote: > <...> > > > As ld

Re: missing ldd

in reply to both messages ... On Tue, May 25, 1999 at 01:46:36AM -0400, Wayne Topa wrote: <...> > > As ldd seems not to be installed, which package provides it? > > > > Try dpgg -S ldd I've tried it: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ingo > dpkg -S ldd ldso: /usr/man/man1/ldd.1.gz tetex-base: /usr/lib/texmf

Re: missing ldd

Subject: missing ldd Date: Mon, May 24, 1999 at 10:49:23PM +0200 In reply to:Ingo Hohmann Quoting Ingo Hohmann([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > When I run > > debian/rules binary > > in the gnurobots source dir, it exits with: > > dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: can

RE: missing ldd

On 24-May-99 Ingo Hohmann wrote: > When I run > > debian/rules binary > > in the gnurobots source dir, it exits with: > > dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: cannot exec ldd: No such file or directory > dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: ldd on `debian/tmp/usr/games/grobots' gave error > exit status 2 > dh_s

missing ldd

When I run debian/rules binary in the gnurobots source dir, it exits with: dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: cannot exec ldd: No such file or directory dpkg-shlibdeps: failure: ldd on `debian/tmp/usr/games/grobots' gave error exit status 2 dh_shlibdeps: command returned error code make: *** [bi

Re: Beta-testing and the glibc 2.1 (Was: Missing ldd? Have libc6 on hold? Get ldso from slink...

On Wed, Mar 17, 1999 at 02:10:20PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Wed, 17 Mar 1999, Seth M. Landsman wrote: > > > > If you need your machine for "real work" then you shouldn't be running > > > unstable. > > > > If debian unstable isn't tested on machines used for real work, > > debian i

dbackup (was: Re: Beta-testing and the glibc 2.1 (Was: Missing ldd? Have libc6 on hold? Get ldso from slink...)

On Wed, Mar 17, 1999 at 01:10:44PM -0800, David Bristel wrote: > This is a good point, and it actually leads to an interesting idea > for a package that would take care of this issue. Now, this is NOT > an easy project, but, what about a package that has a list of the > config files for ALL the pa

Re: Beta-testing and the glibc 2.1 (Was: Missing ldd? Have libc6 on hold? Get ldso from slink...

Seth, If you want support information like this sugar-coated, you can write it yourself, you can run it through debian-publicity first, you can make it however you want. I really don't care. Just so *someone* writes it and posts it to the appropriate lists. That's being part of the solution. -- R

Re: Beta-testing and the glibc 2.1 (Was: Missing ldd? Have libc6 on hold? Get ldso from slink...

>> If you need your machine for "real work" then you shouldn't be running >> unstable. > If debian unstable isn't tested on machines used for real work, > debian is going to end up a toy distribution which is only suitable for > work on systems which aren't appropriate for real work. I agree wh

Re: Beta-testing and the glibc 2.1 (Was: Missing ldd? Have libc6 on hold? Get ldso from slink...

On Wed, Mar 17, 1999 at 02:19:05PM -0500, Seth M. Landsman wrote: > If debian unstable isn't tested on machines used for real work, > debian is going to end up a toy distribution which is only suitable for > work on systems which aren't appropriate for real work. > > Think about it. S

Re: Beta-testing and the glibc 2.1 (Was: Missing ldd? Have libc6 on hold? Get ldso from slink...

EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Edward Betts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: Beta-testing and the glibc 2.1 (Was: Missing ldd? Have libc6 on > hold? Get ldso from slink... > Resent-Date: 17 Mar 1999 20:22:15 - >

Re: Beta-testing and the glibc 2.1 (Was: Missing ldd? Have libc6 on hold? Get ldso from slink...

On Wed, 17 Mar 1999, Seth M. Landsman wrote: > Okay, let's not turn this into a flame war. My point is that > breakages in unstable are *REALLY BAD THINGS*. I have no intention of flaming anybody; from my standpoint, at least, everything I say is sober and reasonable. Everyone else's opini

Re: Beta-testing and the glibc 2.1 (Was: Missing ldd? Have libc6 on hold? Get ldso from slink...

> > > If you need your machine for "real work" then you shouldn't be running > > > unstable. > > > > If debian unstable isn't tested on machines used for real work, > > debian is going to end up a toy distribution which is only suitable for > > work on systems which aren't appropriate for real

Re: Beta-testing and the glibc 2.1 (Was: Missing ldd? Have libc6 on hold? Get ldso from slink...

On Wed, 17 Mar 1999, Seth M. Landsman wrote: > > If you need your machine for "real work" then you shouldn't be running > > unstable. > > If debian unstable isn't tested on machines used for real work, > debian is going to end up a toy distribution which is only suitable for > work on syste

Re: Beta-testing and the glibc 2.1 (Was: Missing ldd? Have libc6 on hold? Get ldso from slink...

> > May be these chickens are people who have some work to do. These sarcasms > > or > > those of Edward Betts will not convince people that Debian is a serious > > distribution, intended for real work. > > > > If you need your machine for "real work" then you shouldn't be running > unstable.

Re: Beta-testing and the glibc 2.1 (Was: Missing ldd? Have libc6 on hold? Get ldso from slink...

On Wed, Mar 17, 1999 at 11:16:18AM +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > On Sunday 14 March 1999, at 16 h 57, the keyboard of Robert Woodcock > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Those of you who are tracking unstable but are too chicken to install the > > new glibc 2.1 may have noticed that your ldd

Re: Beta-testing and the glibc 2.1 (Was: Missing ldd? Have libc6 on hold? Get ldso from slink...

On Wed, Mar 17, 1999 at 11:16:18AM +0100, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > May be these chickens are people who have some work to do. These sarcasms or > those of Edward Betts will not convince people that Debian is a serious > distribution, intended for real work. Quite frankly, unstable isn't some

Beta-testing and the glibc 2.1 (Was: Missing ldd? Have libc6 on hold? Get ldso from slink...

On Sunday 14 March 1999, at 16 h 57, the keyboard of Robert Woodcock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Those of you who are tracking unstable but are too chicken to install the > new glibc 2.1 may have noticed that your ldd has disappeared. May be these chickens are people who have some work to do. T

Re: Missing ldd? Have libc6 on hold? Get ldso from slink...

On Mon, Mar 15, 1999 at 02:44:51PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote: > On Sun, Mar 14, 1999 at 04:57:05PM -0800, Robert Woodcock wrote: > > The solution is to downgrade the ldso package to the one in slink, or > > actually take the plunge to glibc 2.1. > > so what's likely to break if i upgrade to glibc

Re: Missing ldd? Have libc6 on hold? Get ldso from slink...

On Mon, Mar 15, 1999 at 02:44:51PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote: > On Sun, Mar 14, 1999 at 04:57:05PM -0800, Robert Woodcock wrote: > > The solution is to downgrade the ldso package to the one in slink, or > > actually take the plunge to glibc 2.1. > > so what's likely to break if i upgrade to glibc

Re: Missing ldd? Have libc6 on hold? Get ldso from slink...

On Mon, Mar 15, 1999 at 02:44:51PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote: > > The solution is to downgrade the ldso package to the one in slink, or > > actually take the plunge to glibc 2.1. > > so what's likely to break if i upgrade to glibc 2.1? will i still be > left with a (mostly) usable system? > > (i

Re: Missing ldd? Have libc6 on hold? Get ldso from slink...

On Sun, Mar 14, 1999 at 04:57:05PM -0800, Robert Woodcock wrote: > The solution is to downgrade the ldso package to the one in slink, or > actually take the plunge to glibc 2.1. so what's likely to break if i upgrade to glibc 2.1? will i still be left with a (mostly) usable system? (i'm willing t

Missing ldd? Have libc6 on hold? Get ldso from slink...

Those of you who are tracking unstable but are too chicken to install the new glibc 2.1 may have noticed that your ldd has disappeared. That's because /usr/bin/ldd moved from the ldso package to the libc6 package. Therefore if you're using a new ldso package and an old libc6 package, you won't hav