On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 10:55:57AM +0100, michael wrote:
> On 16 Apr 2008, at 02:37, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> >On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 12:32:26PM -0500, Sam Leon wrote:
> I presume you have iceweasel in an i386 chroot since there's no
> working flash for the 64 bit? This is something I am thin
On Thu, 2008-04-17 at 14:28 +0200, Jochen Schulz wrote:
> michael:
> > On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 08:12 -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> >>
> >> when I migrated to amd64, I did nothing special for flash, and it
> >> seems to just work... (Now I'm thinking I need to go check). In
> >> theory, in si
On Thu, 2008-04-17 at 14:28 +0200, Jochen Schulz wrote:
> michael:
> > On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 08:12 -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> >>
> >> when I migrated to amd64, I did nothing special for flash, and it
> >> seems to just work... (Now I'm thinking I need to go check). In
> >> theory, in si
michael:
> On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 08:12 -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>>
>> when I migrated to amd64, I did nothing special for flash, and it
>> seems to just work... (Now I'm thinking I need to go check). In
>> theory, in sid, you use nsplugin-wrapper to allow 32bit flash to run
>> on 64bit
On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 08:12 -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 10:55:57AM +0100, michael wrote:
> >
> > On 16 Apr 2008, at 02:37, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> >> On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 12:32:26PM -0500, Sam Leon wrote:
> >>> Could one easily upgrade to an amd64 system just
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 12:32:26PM -0500, Sam Leon wrote:
>> Could one easily upgrade to an amd64 system just by formating /,
>> reinstalling with the proper arch, and then reinstalling all the apps
>> that were installed an
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 10:55:57AM +0100, michael wrote:
>
> On 16 Apr 2008, at 02:37, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 12:32:26PM -0500, Sam Leon wrote:
>>> Could one easily upgrade to an amd64 system just by formating /,
>>> reinstalling with the proper arch, and then reinstalli
On 16 Apr 2008, at 02:37, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 12:32:26PM -0500, Sam Leon wrote:
Could one easily upgrade to an amd64 system just by formating /,
reinstalling with the proper arch, and then reinstalling all the apps
that were installed and hopefully all the conf files
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 12:32:26PM -0500, Sam Leon wrote:
> Could one easily upgrade to an amd64 system just by formating /,
> reinstalling with the proper arch, and then reinstalling all the apps
> that were installed and hopefully all the conf files in /home/user will
> be compatible with the
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 03:44:27PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 04/15/08 12:32, Sam Leon wrote:
> > Could one easily upgrade to an amd64 system just by formating /,
> > reinstalling with the proper arch, and then reinstalling all the apps
> > that were installed and hopefully all the conf files i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/15/08 12:32, Sam Leon wrote:
> Could one easily upgrade to an amd64 system just by formating /,
> reinstalling with the proper arch, and then reinstalling all the apps
> that were installed and hopefully all the conf files in /home/user will
> be
Could one easily upgrade to an amd64 system just by formating /,
reinstalling with the proper arch, and then reinstalling all the apps
that were installed and hopefully all the conf files in /home/user will
be compatible with the arch change of kde and other apps? (of course I
am only talking a
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 11:47:51PM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
...
> Just to follow up... yes you can migrate from i386 to amd64, but what
> a royal pain...
>
> lots of manual dpkg work... jumping back and forth between new and
> old install and chrooting into the new install to get thing
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 09:03:56AM -0700, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 12:32:35PM -0300, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> > Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> >> Alsom, FTR, I've learned that the biggest hurdle is the fact that you
> >> can't complete the debootstrap process with
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 12:32:35PM -0300, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI wrote:
> Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>> Alsom, FTR, I've learned that the biggest hurdle is the fact that you
>> can't complete the debootstrap process without already running a 64bit
>> kernel. You need to be able to chroot into the n
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
Alsom, FTR, I've learned that the biggest hurdle is the fact that you
can't complete the debootstrap process without already running a 64bit
kernel. You need to be able to chroot into the new install and run
*its* binaries to complete the process. That means you need
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 11:13:11AM +0100, Jörg-Volker Peetz wrote:
> Maybe you don't came across: on the list linux.debian.ports.amd64 this
> was discussed several times, see, e.g.,
> "Re: In-place upgrade from i386"
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-amd64/2008/02/msg00155.html
I hadn't seen that,
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 09:23:41AM +0100, Joost Witteveen wrote:
> On 26/03/2008, David Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 3:44 PM, Andrew Sackville-West > That means I
> >
> > get to move up to 64 bit. In keeping with my personal
> >
> > > preference to *never* reinstall
Maybe you don't came across: on the list linux.debian.ports.amd64 this was
discussed several times, see, e.g.,
"Re: In-place upgrade from i386"
http://lists.debian.org/debian-amd64/2008/02/msg00155.html
--
Regards,
Jörg-Volker.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "u
On 26/03/2008, David Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 3:44 PM, Andrew Sackville-West > That means I
>
> get to move up to 64 bit. In keeping with my personal
>
> > preference to *never* reinstall, I've got an opportunity to attempt to
> > migrate a running system from 3
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 07:38:17PM -0700, David Fox wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 3:44 PM, Andrew Sackville-West > That means I
> get to move up to 64 bit. In keeping with my personal
>
> > preference to *never* reinstall, I've got an opportunity to attempt to
> > migrate a running system fr
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 3:44 PM, Andrew Sackville-West <
> I've done some preliminary research and found the following links:
>
> http://www.digitalkingdom.org/~rlpowell/hobbies/debian_arch_up/index.html
But that article is trying to get you to upgrade the architecture in
place, which to me seem
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 3:44 PM, Andrew Sackville-West > That means I
get to move up to 64 bit. In keeping with my personal
> preference to *never* reinstall, I've got an opportunity to attempt to
> migrate a running system from 32 to 64 bit. I also have the
> opportunity to practice on my lap
Hey list,
I am getting to upgrade (woo-hoo!) from my crusty old -k7 box to a
shiny new core2duo blah blah blah box.
That means I get to move up to 64 bit. In keeping with my personal
preference to *never* reinstall, I've got an opportunity to attempt to
migrate a running system from 32 to 64 bit
24 matches
Mail list logo
