Re: auxiliary mail client for HTML

2019-11-13 Thread Wim
On Tuesday, 12 November at 15:40, Dejan Jocic wrote: > > >> I thought everybody just used a mailcap file and was fine. > > > > > > I do and have it setup to use w3m to deal with most HTML mail. Some > > > does look better in a GUI program and that's why I do this. > > > > text/html; firefox

Re: auxiliary mail client for HTML

2019-11-12 Thread David Wright
On Tue 12 Nov 2019 at 09:23:54 (-), Curt wrote: > On 2019-11-08, Nate Bargmann wrote: > > > >> I thought everybody just used a mailcap file and was fine. > > > > I do and have it setup to use w3m to deal with most HTML mail. Some > > does look better in a GUI program and that's why I do this.

Re: auxiliary mail client for HTML

2019-11-12 Thread Dejan Jocic
On 12-11-19, Curt wrote: > On 2019-11-08, Nate Bargmann wrote: > > > >> I thought everybody just used a mailcap file and was fine. > > > > I do and have it setup to use w3m to deal with most HTML mail. Some > > does look better in a GUI program and that's why I do this. > > > > Well, then > >

Re: auxiliary mail client for HTML

2019-11-12 Thread Curt
On 2019-11-08, Nate Bargmann wrote: > >> I thought everybody just used a mailcap file and was fine. > > I do and have it setup to use w3m to deal with most HTML mail. Some > does look better in a GUI program and that's why I do this. > Well, then text/html; /usr/bin/firefox %s >/dev/null 2>&1

Re: auxiliary mail client for HTML

2019-11-08 Thread Nate Bargmann
* On 2019 07 Nov 10:27 -0600, Curt wrote: > On 2019-11-07, Nate Bargmann wrote: > > > > > > What I did was set up an account at my domain that I can "bounce" mail > > from Neomutt and then fetch it via Evolution that is configured only for > > that account. It worked well for those HTML/Javascrip

Re: auxiliary mail client for HTML

2019-11-08 Thread Nate Bargmann
* On 2019 07 Nov 19:12 -0600, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > Ok, thanks -- so, iiuc, you have more than one email account, and you use one > of those accounts to forward mail to the other machine. Right, though it's just to another program on the same machine via another email account, but that's th

Re: auxiliary mail client for HTML

2019-11-07 Thread rhkramer
On Thursday, November 07, 2019 12:40:48 PM Nate Bargmann wrote: > * On 2019 07 Nov 09:10 -0600, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > > On Thursday, November 07, 2019 09:06:25 AM Nate Bargmann wrote: > > > A bit late... > > > > > > What I did was set up an account at my domain > > > > I don't understand wh

Re: auxiliary mail client for HTML

2019-11-07 Thread Nate Bargmann
* On 2019 07 Nov 09:10 -0600, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > On Thursday, November 07, 2019 09:06:25 AM Nate Bargmann wrote: > > A bit late... > > > > What I did was set up an account at my domain > > I don't understand what you mean by "domain" -- do you mean your ISP, your > (local) LAN, or just

Re: auxiliary mail client for HTML

2019-11-07 Thread Curt
On 2019-11-07, Nate Bargmann wrote: > > > What I did was set up an account at my domain that I can "bounce" mail > from Neomutt and then fetch it via Evolution that is configured only for > that account. It worked well for those HTML/Javascript only mails I get > on occasion. Since I use Gnome,

Re: auxiliary mail client for HTML

2019-11-07 Thread rhkramer
On Thursday, November 07, 2019 09:06:25 AM Nate Bargmann wrote: > A bit late... > > What I did was set up an account at my domain I don't understand what you mean by "domain" -- do you mean your ISP, your (local) LAN, or just a domain name that you've registered with a registration agent? If

Re: auxiliary mail client for HTML

2019-11-07 Thread Nate Bargmann
A bit late... What I did was set up an account at my domain that I can "bounce" mail from Neomutt and then fetch it via Evolution that is configured only for that account. It worked well for those HTML/Javascript only mails I get on occasion. Since I use Gnome, I get Evolution "for free", heh!

Re: auxiliary mail client for HTML

2019-11-06 Thread Russell L. Harris
On Thu, Nov 07, 2019 at 04:31:35AM +, mick crane wrote: I've settled on Roundcube, Dovecot, Sieve, getmail Roundcube is what my old ISP was using for the webmail interface, and I used it for almost a year. But I never thought of it as a package for my desktop. And it is in the Debian arch

Re: auxiliary mail client for HTML

2019-11-06 Thread mick crane
On 2019-11-04 23:22, Russell L. Harris wrote: Several times a week I receive a HTML email with numerous links. Mutt (or neoMutt, which I am using until I upgrade my Debian installation) seems not to be a good solution for such messages. What is a decent, simple GUI client which I can point at m

Re: auxiliary mail client for HTML

2019-11-06 Thread Russell L. Harris
On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 09:43:00AM -0500, rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: Just to throw one more suggestion into the ring, I'm sure older versions of kmail can do what you want, like the one in KDE 4.8.4 / Debian Wheezy (kmail 1.13.7). The few times I have used KDE stuff it has been impressive. But

Re: auxiliary mail client for HTML

2019-11-06 Thread Russell L. Harris
On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 01:13:10PM +, ? wrote: How about Gnus? Below is example: https://gitlab.com/soyeomul/Gnus/blob/master/ss/IMG_20191106_215916_resized_20191106_100052740.jpg I did consider Gnus. My editor is Emacs, and ten or more years ago I did run Gnus, for about a year.

Re: auxiliary mail client for HTML

2019-11-06 Thread rhkramer
On Wednesday, November 06, 2019 08:13:10 AM 황병희 wrote: > > Several times a week I receive a HTML email with numerous links. Mutt > > (or neoMutt, which I am using until I upgrade my Debian installation) > > seems not to be a good solution for such messages. Just to throw one more suggestion into

Re: auxiliary mail client for HTML

2019-11-06 Thread 황병희
"Russell L. Harris" writes: > Several times a week I receive a HTML email with numerous links. Mutt > (or neoMutt, which I am using until I upgrade my Debian installation) > seems not to be a good solution for such messages. How about Gnus? Below is example: https://gitlab.com/soyeomul/Gnus/blo

Re: auxiliary mail client for HTML

2019-11-06 Thread 황병희
"Russell L. Harris" writes: > Several times a week I receive a HTML email with numerous links. Mutt > (or neoMutt, which I am using until I upgrade my Debian installation) > seems not to be a good solution for such messages. How about Gnus? Below is example: https://gitlab.com/soyeomul/Gnus/blo

Re: auxiliary mail client for HTML

2019-11-06 Thread 황병희
"Russell L. Harris" writes: > Several times a week I receive a HTML email with numerous links. Mutt > (or neoMutt, which I am using until I upgrade my Debian installation) > seems not to be a good solution for such messages. How about Gnus? Below is example: https://gitlab.com/soyeomul/Gnus/blo

Re: auxiliary mail client for HTML

2019-11-04 Thread Mark Rousell
On 05/11/2019 05:57, Russell L. Harris wrote: > For some reason which I do not immediately recall, I chose POP3 over > IMAP the last time I had the option. That would make sense. POP3 is best for when you want to download everything for local processing, as you are doing. IMAP makes more sense wh

Re: auxiliary mail client for HTML

2019-11-04 Thread Russell L. Harris
On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 05:30:10AM +, Mark Rousell wrote: Before I go on, I should say that this is now an area with which I am not overly familiar in detail. I know Thunderbird very well but I am not familiar in detail with getmail, Dovecot or maildir structures. No problem; I know getmail

Re: auxiliary mail client for HTML

2019-11-04 Thread darb
* Russell L. Harris wrote: > Several times a week I receive a HTML email with numerous links. Mutt > (or neoMutt, which I am using until I upgrade my Debian installation) > seems not to be a good solution for such messages. > > What is a decent, simple GUI client which I can point at my maildir >

Re: auxiliary mail client for HTML

2019-11-04 Thread Charles Curley
On Mon, 4 Nov 2019 23:22:58 + "Russell L. Harris" wrote: > Several times a week I receive a HTML email with numerous links. Mutt > (or neoMutt, which I am using until I upgrade my Debian installation) > seems not to be a good solution for such messages. > > What is a decent, simple GUI clie

Re: auxiliary mail client for HTML

2019-11-04 Thread Mark Rousell
ave web hosting for my weather > station, and the web hosting agreement includes email (which I have > not bothered to set up, because I have not had need for it), the > easiest solution is to set up an email account on the URL of the > weather station web site, forward problematic messages t

Re: auxiliary mail client for HTML

2019-11-04 Thread Russell L. Harris
not had need for it), the easiest solution is to set up an email account on the URL of the weather station web site, forward problematic messages to that account, then configure a GUI mail client for that mail account, or else use the webmail interface of the ISP.

Re: auxiliary mail client for HTML

2019-11-04 Thread Mark Rousell
On 05/11/2019 03:04, Russell L. Harris wrote: > I installed Thunderbird -- what a huge truck-load of stuff! But the > configuration wizard would not allow me simply to point Thunderbird to > the maildir to which getmail delivers incoming messages. Thunderbird has *experimental* maildir (actually

Re: auxiliary mail client for HTML

2019-11-04 Thread Jude DaShiell
On Tue, 5 Nov 2019, Russell L. Harris wrote: > Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2019 22:04:57 > From: Russell L. Harris > To: Jude DaShiell > Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: auxiliary mail client for HTML > Resent-Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 03:51:38 + (UTC) > Res

Re: auxiliary mail client for HTML

2019-11-04 Thread Russell L. Harris
On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 09:46:14PM -0500, Jude DaShiell wrote: urlscan and a macro to bring urlscan up once a link got highlighted would help if you still want to use mutt or neomutt. I am using urlscan. I would be happy to forward to you one or two sample messages; each has a dozen links, and

Re: auxiliary mail client for HTML

2019-11-04 Thread Jude DaShiell
On Mon, 4 Nov 2019, Russell L. Harris wrote: > Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2019 18:22:58 > From: Russell L. Harris > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: auxiliary mail client for HTML > Resent-Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2019 23:43:57 + (UTC) > Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org

auxiliary mail client for HTML

2019-11-04 Thread Russell L. Harris
Several times a week I receive a HTML email with numerous links. Mutt (or neoMutt, which I am using until I upgrade my Debian installation) seems not to be a good solution for such messages. What is a decent, simple GUI client which I can point at my maildir structure to read such messages and b

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

2016-09-02 Thread gricketson
Johann Spies wrote: I use mutt. From time to time I have experimented with things like kmail, pine, evolution, thunderbird (icedove), claws, gnus and maybe some others and every time I came back to mutt. Regards Johann I also like mutt. The base mutt has become much more

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

2016-09-02 Thread Joel Roth
Johann Spies wrote: > I use mutt. From time to time I have experimented with things like kmail, > pine, evolution, > thunderbird (icedove), claws, gnus and maybe some others and every time I > came back to mutt. > > Regards > Johann I also like mutt. The base mutt has become much more valuable si

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

2016-08-29 Thread Byung-Hee HWANG (황병희)
Hellow! No Spam 께서 쓰시길, 《記事 全文 <20160828210616.GC2923@jens-ThinkPad-Edge-E145> 에서》: > Hi, > > So it is 12 years later; > > has someone found something working? For now i use Gnus. by the way it is hard to recomend you. It is not easy to handle. The ~/.gnus.el is changed, all the time! Since

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

2016-08-29 Thread Henning Follmann
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 08:35:12AM +0200, Johann Spies wrote: > I use mutt. From time to time I have experimented with things like kmail, > pine, evolution, > thunderbird (icedove), claws, gnus and maybe some others and every time I > came back to mutt. > +1 for mutt -H -- Henning Follmann

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

2016-08-29 Thread John Hasler
Stefan writes: > ...offlineimap... That looks like it could be useful. Thank you. -- John Hasler jhas...@newsguy.com Elmwood, WI USA

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

2016-08-29 Thread Stefan Monnier
> sequentially. When you're on a metered internet connection, with only > a five-hour unmetered window in each 24, then making maximum use of > the unmetered window is important. In such a situation I think you'd want to use something like leafnode and offlineimap. Stefan

Re: Pulling mail for local access (was Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck)

2016-08-29 Thread Gene Heskett
t from my mailboxes. > > I've been interested in trying to set up a system like that for some > years, but never had occasion to make a Project out of it, and never > found an obvious place to get started - especially for when migrating > away from a workflow which is already based

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

2016-08-29 Thread John Hasler
Brian writes: > But will [Gnus] download from multiple newsfeeds *simultaneously*, and > combine the feeds if you subscribe to the same group from more than > one source? I use Leafnode to transfer news to my machine and then read it locally with Gnus. -- John Hasler jhas...@newsguy.com Elmwood,

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

2016-08-29 Thread Gene Heskett
On Monday 29 August 2016 07:22:46 rhkra...@gmail.com wrote: > On Sunday, August 28, 2016 05:06:16 PM No Spam wrote: > > So it is 12 years later; > > > > has someone found something working? > > So, if you expect a helpful answer, you might detail the problems that > you have with the mail clients

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

2016-08-29 Thread John Hasler
Brian writes: > I like having newsgroups and mail in a single program. So do I. That's one of the reasons I use Gnus, -- John Hasler jhas...@newsguy.com Elmwood, WI USA

Pulling mail for local access (was Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck)

2016-08-29 Thread The Wanderer
ct out of it, and never found an obvious place to get started - especially for when migrating away from a workflow which is already based on having the mail client configured to contact the remote server directly. (And even more especially when dealing with an IMAP account, and wanting to be able to s

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

2016-08-29 Thread rhkramer
On Sunday, August 28, 2016 05:06:16 PM No Spam wrote: > So it is 12 years later; > > has someone found something working? So, if you expect a helpful answer, you might detail the problems that you have with the mail clients you've tried. I've used kmail for a long time, and though it has some w

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

2016-08-29 Thread tomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 06:15:23AM -0400, brian wrote: [Gnus] > But will it download from multiple newsfeeds *simultaneously*, and > combine the feeds if you subscribe to the same group from more than > one source? [...] TBH I never tried that, beca

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

2016-08-29 Thread brian
On Mon, 29 Aug 2016 11:11:51 +0200, you wrote: > >On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 04:59:04AM -0400, brian wrote: >> On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 23:06:16 +0200, you wrote: >> >> >Hi, >> > >> >So it is 12 years later; >> > >> >has someone found something working? >> > >> >> This will be a recommendation which mos

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

2016-08-29 Thread tomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 04:59:04AM -0400, brian wrote: > On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 23:06:16 +0200, you wrote: > > >Hi, > > > >So it is 12 years later; > > > >has someone found something working? > > > > This will be a recommendation which most likely nobod

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

2016-08-29 Thread brian
On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 23:06:16 +0200, you wrote: >Hi, > >So it is 12 years later; > >has someone found something working? > This will be a recommendation which most likely nobody else will support, but here we go... I like having newsgroups and mail in a single program. While there's nothing outst

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

2016-08-29 Thread Joe
On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 23:06:16 +0200 No Spam wrote: > Hi, > > So it is 12 years later; > > has someone found something working? > Gmail on a web browser not good enough for you? OK, I'll vote for claws-mail as well, with the same reservation. It has bugs. But not serious ones, and curiously th

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

2016-08-29 Thread Gene Heskett
On Monday 29 August 2016 02:55:14 deloptes wrote: > Gene Heskett wrote: > > On Monday 29 August 2016 02:16:09 deloptes wrote: > >> Neal P. Murphy wrote: > >> > About the time of squeeze or wheezy, kmail (and KDE for that > >> > matter) began slipping over the edge into the abyss. I finally > >> >

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

2016-08-28 Thread deloptes
Gene Heskett wrote: > On Monday 29 August 2016 02:16:09 deloptes wrote: > >> Neal P. Murphy wrote: >> > About the time of squeeze or wheezy, kmail (and KDE for that matter) >> > began slipping over the edge into the abyss. I finally found XFCE >> > which is about as simple and is as useful as KDE

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

2016-08-28 Thread Gene Heskett
On Monday 29 August 2016 02:16:09 deloptes wrote: > Neal P. Murphy wrote: > > About the time of squeeze or wheezy, kmail (and KDE for that matter) > > began slipping over the edge into the abyss. I finally found XFCE > > which is about as simple and is as useful as KDE3 was. > > KDE3 still lives a

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

2016-08-28 Thread Johann Spies
I use mutt. From time to time I have experimented with things like kmail, pine, evolution, thunderbird (icedove), claws, gnus and maybe some others and every time I came back to mutt. Regards Johann -- Because experiencing your loyal love is better than life itself, my lips will praise you. (P

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

2016-08-28 Thread deloptes
Neal P. Murphy wrote: > About the time of squeeze or wheezy, kmail (and KDE for that matter) began > slipping over the edge into the abyss. I finally found XFCE which is about > as simple and is as useful as KDE3 was. KDE3 still lives and KMail is still as usable as before ... even better as bugs

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

2016-08-28 Thread Neal P. Murphy
On Sun, 28 Aug 2016 23:06:16 +0200 No Spam wrote: > Hi, > > So it is 12 years later; > > has someone found something working? > > greets > > J More years ago, BeOS' email client was perfect for me. It use separate files and made very liberal use of BFS' equivalent of attributes to sort and

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

2016-08-28 Thread Ben Finney
No Spam writes: > So it is 12 years later; To what event are you referring? Your message's header has no standard “In-Reply-To” field, so it apparently is not composed as a reply. > has someone found something working? I hope you can find an email client that correctly preserves the thread of

Re: [Rant] The Endless Search for a Mail Client That Doesn't Suck

2016-08-28 Thread No Spam
Hi, So it is 12 years later; has someone found something working? greets J signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [ A little off topic] Best e-mail client for Android

2016-04-14 Thread pjw
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016, at 06:02 AM, German wrote: > I wonder what Debian users use on their phone/tablet. ProfiMail Go https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.lonelycatgames.PM&hl=en

Re: [ A little off topic] Best e-mail client for Android

2016-04-12 Thread Siard
li...@rickv.com: > Siard: > > I really hate K9-Mail's logo. > > Looks like a severely battered blind dog. > > That's why I go for Kaiten. > > Glad you said that -- I don't like the dog either. I don't get the > reference, so Kaiten's postbox makes more sense. > > I bought Kaiten too, but after i

Re: [ A little off topic] Best e-mail client for Android

2016-04-12 Thread Peter Ludikovsky
Reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K-9_%28Doctor_Who%29 Am 12.04.2016 um 02:40 schrieb li...@rickv.com: > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 04:44:50PM +0200, Siard wrote: >> Byung-Hee HWANG: >> I really hate K9-Mail's logo. >> Looks like a severely battered blind dog. >> That's why I go for Kaiten. >

Re: [ A little off topic] Best e-mail client for Android

2016-04-11 Thread Keith Bainbridge
On 12 Apr 2016, Willy MANGA wrote: >Hi, > >Le 11/04/2016 13:02, German a écrit : >> I wonder what Debian users use on their phone/tablet. > >K9-mail from https://f-droid.org/ ;) Good morning I been using K@ for a few months. Works well for day to day stuff I'm still looking for an app that inc

Re: [ A little off topic] Best e-mail client for Android

2016-04-11 Thread lists
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 08:49:41AM -0400, shawn wilson wrote: Y'all know you can buy kaiten mail and support the dev, right? On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 8:29 AM, Byung-Hee HWANG (?) wrote: On 2016??? 4??? 11??? ?? 9??? 8??? 6??? GMT+09:00, Hans wrote: Am Montag, 11. April 2016, 08:0

Re: [ A little off topic] Best e-mail client for Android

2016-04-11 Thread lists
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 04:44:50PM +0200, Siard wrote: Byung-Hee HWANG: I really hate K9-Mail's logo. Looks like a severely battered blind dog. That's why I go for Kaiten. Glad you said that -- I don't like the dog either. I don't get the reference, so Kaiten's postbox makes more sense. I bo

Re: [ A little off topic] Best e-mail client for Android

2016-04-11 Thread Willy MANGA
Hi, Le 11/04/2016 13:02, German a écrit : > I wonder what Debian users use on their phone/tablet. K9-mail from https://f-droid.org/ ;)

Re: [ A little off topic] Best e-mail client for Android

2016-04-11 Thread ken
On 04/11/2016 08:08 AM, Hans wrote: Am Montag, 11. April 2016, 08:02:13 schrieb German: I wonder what Debian users use on their phone/tablet. Thanks K9-Mail +1

Re: [ A little off topic] Best e-mail client for Android

2016-04-11 Thread Jochen Spieker
David Baron: > > Microsoft's Outlook (not the Windows Outlook or Express!) is a decent > lightweight contender and integrates calendar and contacts functions as well. If you are talking about the app¹ you should know that it routes your e-mails and access credentials through its own servers. Se

Re: [ A little off topic] Best e-mail client for Android

2016-04-11 Thread Andrew McGlashan
On 11/04/2016 10:02 PM, German wrote: > I wonder what Debian users use on their phone/tablet. I like K9, just wish it has one more feature when I delete messages, I would prefer them to be shown with a strike through and then I could either /really/ delete them or I could simply undelete the

Re: [ A little off topic] Best e-mail client for Android

2016-04-11 Thread John L. Ries
Actually, I rather like the logo. It does have the advantage of being instantly recognizable. --| John L. Ries | Salford Systems | Phone: (619)543-8880 x107 | or (435)867-8885 | --| On Mon, 11 Apr 2016, Siard wrot

Re: [ A little off topic] Best e-mail client for Android

2016-04-11 Thread Siard
Michael: > Siard: > > I really hate K9-Mail's logo. > > Looks like a severely battered blind dog. > > That's why I go for Kaiten. > > Its The Doctors faithful companion K9! Ah, a robot dog in some sci-fi TV-series. I see.

Re: [ A little off topic] Best e-mail client for Android

2016-04-11 Thread Michael
On Mon, 2016-04-11 at 16:44 +0200, Siard wrote: >  > I really hate K9-Mail's logo. > Looks like a severely battered blind dog. > That's why I go for Kaiten. > Its The Doctors faithful companion K9!

Re: [ A little off topic] Best e-mail client for Android

2016-04-11 Thread Siard
Byung-Hee HWANG: > Hans: > > German: > > > I wonder what Debian users use on their phone/tablet. > > > > K9-Mail > > Me too, i use now k-9 with google apps. I really hate K9-Mail's logo. Looks like a severely battered blind dog. That's why I go for Kaiten.

Re: [ A little off topic] Best e-mail client for Android

2016-04-11 Thread David Baron
K9 and the forks and family are oldies and goodies. They are showing their age, but still, one cannot go wrong with them. GMail and Inbox are resource hogs (along with most gapps). Microsoft's Outlook (not the Windows Outlook or Express!) is a decent lightweight contender and integrates calenda

Re: [ A little off topic] Best e-mail client for Android

2016-04-11 Thread shawn wilson
Y'all know you can buy kaiten mail and support the dev, right? On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 8:29 AM, Byung-Hee HWANG (황병희) wrote: > On 2016년 4월 11일 오후 9시 8분 6초 GMT+09:00, Hans wrote: >>Am Montag, 11. April 2016, 08:02:13 schrieb German: >>> I wonder what Debian users use on their phone/tablet. >>> >>

Re: [ A little off topic] Best e-mail client for Android

2016-04-11 Thread cbannister
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 01:12:45PM +0100, Darac Marjal wrote: > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 08:02:13AM -0400, German wrote: > >I wonder what Debian users use on their phone/tablet. > > I use K-@ Mail [1] which, as far as I understand, is a Material redesign of > Kaiten Mail which, in turn, is a fork o

Re: [ A little off topic] Best e-mail client for Android

2016-04-11 Thread Sébastien Gautrin
On 11/04/16 14:12, Darac Marjal wrote: On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 08:02:13AM -0400, German wrote: I wonder what Debian users use on their phone/tablet. I use K-@ Mail [1] which, as far as I understand, is a Material redesign of Kaiten Mail which, in turn, is a fork of K-9 Mail. I've not gone b

Re: [ A little off topic] Best e-mail client for Android

2016-04-11 Thread cbannister
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 08:02:13AM -0400, German wrote: > I wonder what Debian users use on their phone/tablet. What Debian version are you using on your tablet? -- The media's the most powerful entity on earth. They have the power to make the innocent guilty and to make the guilty innocent, a

Re: [ A little off topic] Best e-mail client for Android

2016-04-11 Thread Darac Marjal
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 08:02:13AM -0400, German wrote: I wonder what Debian users use on their phone/tablet. I use K-@ Mail [1] which, as far as I understand, is a Material redesign of Kaiten Mail which, in turn, is a fork of K-9 Mail. I've not gone back to see how K-9 Mail is faring these

Re: [ A little off topic] Best e-mail client for Android

2016-04-11 Thread Ron Leach
On 11/04/2016 13:02, German wrote: I wonder what Debian users use on their phone/tablet. K-9, here; using IMAP to reach Dovecot on Debian. Took a little setting up to limit the display of mailbox folders to only those I want/need to use on the phone/tablet. Solid performance, though. Ron

Re: [ A little off topic] Best e-mail client for Android

2016-04-11 Thread Hans
Am Montag, 11. April 2016, 08:02:13 schrieb German: > I wonder what Debian users use on their phone/tablet. > > Thanks K9-Mail

[ A little off topic] Best e-mail client for Android

2016-04-11 Thread German
I wonder what Debian users use on their phone/tablet. Thanks

Re: About new mail client

2016-01-20 Thread Adam Wilson
On Tue, 19 Jan 2016 14:41:22 +0100 Jonas Hedman wrote: > On 15-12-18 11:12:29, Klearchos-Angelos Gkountras wrote: > > My branch is sid and used to use icedove as default mail client . I > > think with enigmail is kinda broken and I can't use as encryption > > and sign

Re: About new mail client

2016-01-20 Thread Cindy-Sue Causey
On 1/20/16, Darac Marjal wrote: > On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 08:05:07PM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote: >>On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 10:51:53AM +1000, Stuart Longland wrote: >>> On 21/12/15 23:59, Chris Bannister wrote: >>> >> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. >> >>Umm,

Re: About new mail client

2016-01-20 Thread Darac Marjal
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 08:05:07PM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote: On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 10:51:53AM +1000, Stuart Longland wrote: On 21/12/15 23:59, Chris Bannister wrote: >> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. Umm, I didn't write that. (You went overboard with

Re: About new mail client

2016-01-19 Thread Chris Bannister
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 10:51:53AM +1000, Stuart Longland wrote: > On 21/12/15 23:59, Chris Bannister wrote: > >> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. Umm, I didn't write that. (You went overboard with your snipping.) > > Sent using mutt from my laptop! > > Oddly

Re: About new mail client

2016-01-19 Thread Stuart Longland
On 21/12/15 23:59, Chris Bannister wrote: >> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. > Sent using mutt from my laptop! Oddly enough, I've found mutt running on my server from my phone using ConnectBot (for SSH) vastly superior to K-9 Mail (and the stock Android client)

Re: About new mail client

2016-01-19 Thread Dan Ritter
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 11:11:33AM -0500, Jude DaShiell wrote: > On Tue, 19 Jan 2016, Jonas Hedman wrote: > > >Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 08:41:22 > >From: Jonas Hedman > >To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > >Subject: Re: About new mail client > > > >On 15-1

Re: About new mail client

2016-01-19 Thread Jude DaShiell
On Tue, 19 Jan 2016, Jonas Hedman wrote: Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 08:41:22 From: Jonas Hedman To: debian-user@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: About new mail client On 15-12-18 11:12:29, Klearchos-Angelos Gkountras wrote: My branch is sid and used to use icedove as default mail client . I think

Re: About new mail client

2016-01-19 Thread Jonas Hedman
On 15-12-18 11:12:29, Klearchos-Angelos Gkountras wrote: > My branch is sid and used to use icedove as default mail client . I think > with enigmail is kinda broken and I can't use as encryption and sign messages > . any suggestions ? I am thinking about sylpheed or claws

Re: About new mail client

2015-12-21 Thread Chris Bannister
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 11:12:29AM +0200, Klearchos-Angelos Gkountras wrote: > > My branch is sid and used to use icedove as default mail client . I > think with enigmail is kinda broken and I can't use as encryption and > sign messages . any suggestions ? I am thinking about sy

Re: About new mail client

2015-12-18 Thread Joe
On Fri, 18 Dec 2015 11:12:29 +0200 Klearchos-Angelos Gkountras wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > My branch is sid and used to use icedove as default mail client . I > think with enigmail is kinda broken and I can't use as encryption and &

About new mail client

2015-12-18 Thread Klearchos-Angelos Gkountras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 My branch is sid and used to use icedove as default mail client . I think with enigmail is kinda broken and I can't use as encryption and sign messages . any suggestions ? I am thinking about sylpheed or claws .which one you suggest me ? - --

[SOLVED] Re: alpine mail client with gmx.net as mail provider

2015-07-28 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, the trick is to go to the configuration item "Customized Headers" and to add a customized "From:" header. Like From: Full Name One can gets this instruction by pressing the help key "?" on the item "User Domain" and following the "here" link in the third paragraph. By setting my GMX mail

Re: alpine mail client with gmx.net as mail provider

2015-07-28 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, by hardcoding my GMX mail address in alpine-2.20/imap/src/c-client/smtp.c, i was able to prove that my workstation hostname in the "MAIL FROM:" argument is indeed the stumblestone which prevented SMTP success with gmx.net. Whew. Now i need to find out how to regularly configure the component

Re: alpine mail client with gmx.net as mail provider

2015-07-27 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, Nicolas George wrote: > Do try strace, and if > you know a bit of SMTP, which seems the case, you should be able to spot the > problem in a few minutes. It's nearly too late in the evening. But (with alpine 2.20 from source): read(9, "220 gmx.com (mrgmx102) Nemesis E"..., 8192) = 52 wri

Re: alpine mail client with gmx.net as mail provider

2015-07-27 Thread Nicolas George
Le nonidi 9 thermidor, an CCXXIII, Thomas Schmitt a écrit : > > strace can tell you that and much more, especially if the encryption is done > > by a separate program. > Whatever, the ports and encryption are ok. It's alpine's > way of speaking ESMTP and/or Nemesis' unfilfilled ESMTP > expectations

Re: alpine mail client with gmx.net as mail provider

2015-07-27 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, David Wright a écrit : > > It would be nice to know which port numbers alpine is trying to > > use. Nicolas George: > strace can tell you that and much more, especially if the encryption is done > by a separate program. I do know the port number if stunnel is involved. Whatever, the ports a

Re: alpine mail client with gmx.net as mail provider

2015-07-27 Thread David Wright
Quoting Thomas Schmitt (scdbac...@gmx.net): > > Were I a user of mail.gmx.net, I would ask them. > > Futile. They'd want me to use the web interface with lots > of advertising. Oh dear. Well, could you attack the problem the other way round and connect alpine to exim, say, on your own machine. U

Re: alpine mail client with gmx.net as mail provider

2015-07-27 Thread Nicolas George
Le nonidi 9 thermidor, an CCXXIII, David Wright a écrit : > OK. It would be nice to know which port numbers alpine is trying to > use. strace can tell you that and much more, especially if the encryption is done by a separate program. Regards, -- Nicolas George signature.asc Description: Di

Re: alpine mail client with gmx.net as mail provider

2015-07-27 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, > OK. It would be nice to know which port numbers alpine is trying to > use. It did connect with explicitely setting port 587 for "/tls/". But i bet that neither port nor encryption protocol is the problem. If not alpine mimicks a SMTP error 503 then the connection is good enough to transmit

Re: alpine mail client with gmx.net as mail provider

2015-07-27 Thread David Wright
Quoting Thomas Schmitt (scdbac...@gmx.net): > David Wright wrote: > > > > I can direct alpine unencrypted to port 30029 and see the same > > > effect as with alpine's own encryption via "/ssl/" or "/tls/". > > > I'm sorry if I appear to be thick but I get very little sense from > > "see the same

Re: alpine mail client with gmx.net as mail provider

2015-07-27 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, Bob Bernstein wrote: > I suggest you join the alpine discussion list. > https://mailman13.u.washington.edu/mailman/listinfo/alpine-info Will ask there after i managed to get version 2.20 running from source tarball. (Or after i encountered a showstopper.) Have a nice day :) Thomas -- To

Re: alpine mail client with gmx.net as mail provider

2015-07-27 Thread Thomas Schmitt
Hi, David Wright wrote: > > I can direct alpine unencrypted to port 30029 and see the same > > effect as with alpine's own encryption via "/ssl/" or "/tls/". > I'm sorry if I appear to be thick but I get very little sense from > "see the same effect as with alpine's own encryption". I can't be >

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >