On Sat, May 01, 2004 at 05:59:36PM -0600, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Markus Lindström wrote:
> > Bob Proulx wrote:
> > > Please be specific. What does "activated" mean? Does it mean that
> > > you have this following alias in your ~/.bashrc file?
> > >
> > >eval `dircolors -b`
> > >alias ls='ls
Markus Lindström wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > Please be specific. What does "activated" mean? Does it mean that
> > you have this following alias in your ~/.bashrc file?
> >
> >eval `dircolors -b`
> >alias ls='ls --color=auto'
>
> Yes, that's the behavior I'm trying to obtain.
Does yo
Bob Proulx wrote:
Markus Lindström wrote:
I'm trying to find a way to make bash use ls colors by default, on all
virtual consoles. It seems my ~/.bashrc has this activated, but it only
uses it on any virtual terminal I create in X.
Please be specific. What does "activated"
Markus Lindström wrote:
> I'm trying to find a way to make bash use ls colors by default, on all
> virtual consoles. It seems my ~/.bashrc has this activated, but it only
> uses it on any virtual terminal I create in X.
Please be specific. What does "activated" mean
On Sat, May 01, 2004 at 11:28:44AM +0200, Markus Lindstr?m wrote:
> I'm trying to find a way to make bash use ls colors by default, on
> all virtual consoles. It seems my ~/.bashrc has this activated, but
> it only uses it on any virtual terminal I create in X.
>
> I search
On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 11:08:17AM +0800, csj wrote:
> On my system the colors printed by a simple "ls" (actually an
> alias for "ls --color=auto") differ from the colors when the
> command is qualified by a file name or wildcard, say, "ls -d *"
> or "ls configure".
>
> With either "ls -d *" or "l
On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 11:08:17AM +0800, csj wrote:
> On my system the colors printed by a simple "ls" (actually an
> alias for "ls --color=auto") differ from the colors when the
> command is qualified by a file name or wildcard, say, "ls -d *"
> or "ls configure".
>
> With either "ls -d *" or "l
On Sun, Jan 12, 2003 at 11:08:17 +0800, csj wrote:
> On my system the colors printed by a simple "ls" (actually an
> alias for "ls --color=auto") differ from the colors when the
> command is qualified by a file name or wildcard, say, "ls -d *"
> or "ls configure".
>
> With either "ls -d *" or "ls
On my system the colors printed by a simple "ls" (actually an
alias for "ls --color=auto") differ from the colors when the
command is qualified by a file name or wildcard, say, "ls -d *"
or "ls configure".
With either "ls -d *" or "ls configure", the file name
"configure" is printed out in green.
On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 02:56:11PM -0500, Andrew D Dixon babbled:
> Hi All,
> anyone know how to change the colors that ls outputs?
>
> thanks,
> Andy
>
>
You can change the values I believe with:
/usr/bin/dircolors
not quite sure though
Terry
//Terry Warner//
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior Tech
Terry Warner wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 02:56:11PM -0500, Andrew D Dixon babbled:
> > Hi All,
> > anyone know how to change the colors that ls outputs?
> >
> > thanks,
> > Andy
> >
> >
>
> You can change the values I believe with:
>
> /usr/bin/dircolors
>
>
yup that did the trick. than
* Andrew D Dixon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (2001-06-04 20:03):
> anyone know how to change the colors that ls outputs?
The way I did it was to run "dircolors -p >~/.dircolors", which
outputs the current dircolors settings to a nice, easy to read file,
and then put
eval `dircolors -b ~/.dircolors`
in
Hi All,
anyone know how to change the colors that ls outputs?
thanks,
Andy
Try man dircolors
Sebastian Canagaratna
> Hi,
> how do I configure the colors ls shows? I cant find any kind of manual
> for this ... neither man ls nor info ls nor /usr/share/doc/fileutils ...
>
> mfg
> --
> Andreas Sliwka | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | f y cn rd ths y mst hv bn sng
> nx
On Sun, Mar 19, 2000 at 12:25:06PM -0800, Eric G . Miller wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 19, 2000 at 09:09:23PM +0100, Andreas Sliwka wrote:
> > Hi, how do I configure the colors ls shows? I cant find any kind of
> > manual for this ... neither man ls nor info ls nor
> > /usr/share/doc/fileutils ...
>
> >Fr
On Sun, Mar 19, 2000 at 09:09:23PM +0100, Andreas Sliwka wrote:
> Hi, how do I configure the colors ls shows? I cant find any kind of
> manual for this ... neither man ls nor info ls nor
> /usr/share/doc/fileutils ...
>From man ls:
--color[=WHEN]
control whether color is use
> "Andreas" == Andreas Sliwka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi, how do I configure the colors ls shows? I cant find any kind
> of manual for this ... neither man ls nor info ls nor
> /usr/share/doc/fileutils ...
Try man dircolours and info dircolors.
> mfg -- Andreas Sliwka |
Hi,
how do I configure the colors ls shows? I cant find any kind of manual
for this ... neither man ls nor info ls nor /usr/share/doc/fileutils ...
mfg
--
Andreas Sliwka | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | f y cn rd ths y mst hv bn sng nx
--BEGIN GEEK CODE V3.12 BLOCK-
GCS/MU/L d-(+) S:+
On Mon, 20 Oct 1997, Jason Bauer wrote:
> Thanks for the alias settings help and the quick response! I've got
> another question while i'm thinking of stuff. I used to run Slakware
> linux until I heard about how much better Debian is. In Slakware, when I
> did an ls it showed all of the files in
Thanks for the alias settings help and the quick response! I've got
another question while i'm thinking of stuff. I used to run Slakware
linux until I heard about how much better Debian is. In Slakware, when I
did an ls it showed all of the files in colors according to their type,
while Debian does
e wonderful if
> it worked, etc. etc." when the person replied with the correct answer to
> the question. You should've asked the right question, which is "ls color
> appears to work when I am in regular console mode, but not in my xterm,"
> or even better "when
On Tue, 18 Feb 1997, Robert D. Hilliard wrote:
> Version 3.13 of ls has the default dircolors compiled in, so the
> "eval `dircolors`" line in the profile is redundant as far as 'ls' is
> concerned. However, a few other programs (I can't remember which
On Wed, 19 Feb 1997, Richard Jones wrote:
>
> William Chow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 17 Feb 1997, Michael Harnois wrote:
> >
> > > >
> > > >.bashrc and/or .profile (or .cshrc or .zshrc, whatever):
> > > > eval `dircolors`
> > > > alias ls 'ls --color=auto
Version 3.13 of ls has the default dircolors compiled in, so the
"eval `dircolors`" line in the profile is redundant as far as 'ls' is
concerned. However, a few other programs (I can't remember which at
the moment) depend on the LS-COLORS variable that dircolors s
Folks, please hold your tone. You are both right. With XFREE 3.2, the
colorization of xterm is not active by default. One would not notice
this unless one has removed the previously released (and now obsolete)
xterm-color package. So, if the problem was "I do get color in ls on the
console
William Chow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On 17 Feb 1997, Michael Harnois wrote:
>
> > >
> > >.bashrc and/or .profile (or .cshrc or .zshrc, whatever):
> > > eval `dircolors`
> > > alias ls 'ls --color=auto'
> >
> > This would be wonderful if it were the correct answer. However, as
On 17 Feb 1997, Michael Harnois wrote:
> >
> >.bashrc and/or .profile (or .cshrc or .zshrc, whatever):
> > eval `dircolors`
> > alias ls 'ls --color=auto'
>
> This would be wonderful if it were the correct answer. However, as we
This IS the correct answer, WTF are you talking abou
These are the commands I use in my /etc/profile
..
# set up color-ls environment variables
if [ "$SHELL" = "/bin/zsh" ]; then
eval `dircolors -z`
elif [ "$SHELL" = "/bin/ash" ]; then
eval `dircolors -s`
else
eval `dircolors -b`
fi
# set color-ls alias's
alias ls='ls --color=auto ';
alias
28 matches
Mail list logo
