On Tuesday 21 September 2004 11:51, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Dominique Dumont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[2004.09.21.1141 +0200]:
> > > I forgot to mention that spamc is of course being used. However,
> > > spamc does not provide the means to strip markup from email
> > > messages, nor can it
also sprach Dominique Dumont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.09.21.1141 +0200]:
> > I forgot to mention that spamc is of course being used. However,
> > spamc does not provide the means to strip markup from email
> > messages, nor can it report to razor. My users don't need
> > spamassassin for spam chec
martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I forgot to mention that spamc is of course being used. However,
> spamc does not provide the means to strip markup from email
> messages, nor can it report to razor. My users don't need
> spamassassin for spam checking, but for spam processing.
Have
also sprach Adam Aube <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.09.21.0222 +0200]:
> What if you wrote a shell wrapper around SpamAssassin that lowered
> its priority before running it, then had your users run this
> wrapper instead?
... then this may solve the problem temporarily, until the next
comes along. apa
also sprach Stefan O'Rear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.09.21.0246 +0200]:
> Now, if you make the script NOPASSWD sudo -u sa_learn able, and
> make sa_learn only executable by user sa_learn, only one will be
> running at a time.
yeah, and it would force everyone to use the same database, which
is not
Stefan O'Rear wrote:
> How about a serializing wrapper?
> Now, if you make the script NOPASSWD sudo -u sa_learn able, and make
> sa_learn only executable by user sa_learn, only one will be running at a
> time.
Or you could make the script setGID, then remove world read and execute
rights on the
On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 08:22:13PM -0400, Adam Aube wrote:
> martin f krafft wrote:
> > Every now and then, coincidence will have it that 10 or 20 users
> > invoke spamassassin at the same time. Spamassassin is a resource
> > hog and that will cause the machine to basically become unusable,
> > wit
martin f krafft wrote:
> Every now and then, coincidence will have it that 10 or 20 users
> invoke spamassassin at the same time. Spamassassin is a resource
> hog and that will cause the machine to basically become unusable,
> with the load going to 30 and higher.
> Obviously, I have put limits o
also sprach Brett Carrington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.09.20.1806 +0200]:
> I had a similar problem. My solution was to disallow the use of
> spamassassin and force users to use spamc. This requires your
> server to run spamd as well. The spamassassin docs have info on
> the benefits and risks of t
On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 16:57:21 +0200, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I operate a shell server with about 200 users. Spamassassin powers
> the machine, and users use sa-learn to teach it about spam and ham.
> The machine receives about 5-20 mails per second and the hardware
> keeps the l
I operate a shell server with about 200 users. Spamassassin powers
the machine, and users use sa-learn to teach it about spam and ham.
The machine receives about 5-20 mails per second and the hardware
keeps the load between 0.15 and 0.30.
Every now and then, coincidence will have it that 10 or 20
11 matches
Mail list logo
