On Tuesday 21 September 2004 11:51, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Dominique Dumont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.09.21.1141 +0200]: > > > I forgot to mention that spamc is of course being used. However, > > > spamc does not provide the means to strip markup from email > > > messages, nor can it report to razor. My users don't need > > > spamassassin for spam checking, but for spam processing. > > > > Have you tried the '-m' switch on spamd ? > > Sure. As I said, spamd is not the problem. It's users executing > <resource-intensive-app> multiple times, with the last time being > spamassassin that almost killed the system. > > > You may need to use perl5.8.x to avoid signal handling bugs > > mentionned in spamd man page. See "PERL_SIGNALS" in perlrun and > > "Deferred Signals (Safe Signals)" in perlipc for details. > > All being done here.
Back in 2002 I asked on lkml a question similar to yours <http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0211.3/0583.html>. Rik Van Riel mentioned his fairsched <http://surriel.com/patches/>, but it looks like it's not been ported to recent kernels. Marc-Christian Petersen pointed me to another patch <http://www.tls-technologies.com/CPU/cpu-intro.html>. But again, it's not been ported to recent kernels, it seems. B/R, -- Frederik Dannemare | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=Frederik+Dannemare http://frederik.dannemare.net | http://www.linuxworlddomination.dk Key fingerprint: BB7B 078A 0DBF 7663 180A F84A 2D25 FAD5 9C4E B5A8 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
