On Tue 12 Jul 2022 at 20:52:47 (-0500), Igor Korot wrote:
> In order to test my program I ran "make install".
>
> This installed it into "/usr/local/{bin,lib}
>
> So now in order to run the program I need to update
> the ld library cache with "ldconfig"
On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 08:52:47PM -0500, Igor Korot wrote:
> So now in order to run the program I need to update
> the ld library cache with "ldconfig".
>
> Unfortunately it is not available by default and trying to
> search for it produces following:
>
> [cod
Hi,
In order to test my program I ran "make install".
This installed it into "/usr/local/{bin,lib}
So now in order to run the program I need to update
the ld library cache with "ldconfig".
Unfortunately it is not available by default and trying to
search for it produce
On 2018-03-11 at 13:10, Curt Howland wrote:
> Good questions:
>
> The Wanderer wibbled:
>> (Also, have you checked that directory to confirm that libGL.so.1 is
> actually present there?)
>
> No, its not.
>
> $ dir /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libGL*
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 Sep 13 2015
> /usr/
ng to it? Let
me try adding the mesa-diverted directory to the ld.so.conf.d and see
what happens.
# cat local.conf
/usr/lib/mesa-diverted/i386-linux-gnu
# ldconfig
# ldconfig -p | grep libGL.so.1
libGL.so.1 (libc6,x86-64) => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libGL.so.1
libGL.so.1 (libc6) =
On 2018-03-10 at 19:52, Curt Howland wrote:
> Ok. Having some difficulty getting GL to work.
>
> Stable, up to date. Running Wine32, the package libgl1-mesa-glx:i386
> is installed, but no matter what I do I keep getting
>
> # ldconfig -p | grep libGL.so.1
> lib
Ok. Having some difficulty getting GL to work.
Stable, up to date. Running Wine32, the package libgl1-mesa-glx:i386
is installed, but no matter what I do I keep getting
# ldconfig -p | grep libGL.so.1
libGL.so.1 (libc6,x86-64) => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libGL.so.1
On a differ
;>> :-?
> Amongst other stuff, it gives
>
> ==
(...)
> Setting up pidgin-data (2.4.3-4lenny6) ... Setting up libpurple0
> (2.4.3-4lenny6) ... ldconfig: /usr/lib/libwins.so is not an ELF file -
> it has the wrong magic bytes at the start.
> ==
>
> Any idea why all thes
r/lib/libwins.so: data'.
>>
>> Review your "/var/log/apt/term.*" files to find any hint about where
>> that file comes from. I cannot find any reference to it in any place :-?
Amongst other stuff, it gives
==
Setting up libkrb53 (1.6.dfsg.4~beta1-5lenny3) ...
ldconfig:
Camaleón schreef:
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 14:40:30 +0200, Merciadri Luca wrote:
Camaleón wrote:
Did you try "file /usr/lib/libwins.so" to see the file type?
It gives `/usr/lib/libwins.so: data'.
Review your "/var/log/apt/term.*" files to find any hint about where that
file comes from. I c
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 14:40:30 +0200, Merciadri Luca wrote:
> Camaleón wrote:
>>> Did you try "file /usr/lib/libwins.so" to see the file type?
>>>
> It gives `/usr/lib/libwins.so: data'.
Review your "/var/log/apt/term.*" files to find any hint about where that
file comes from. I cannot find a
Camaleón wrote:
>> Did you try "file /usr/lib/libwins.so" to see the file type?
>>
It gives `/usr/lib/libwins.so: data'.
P.S.: This time, your message was correctly received in my e-mail inbox.
--
Merciadri Luca
See http://www.student.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~merciadri/
I use PGP. If there is
El 2010-04-26 a las 17:14 +0530, Anand Sivaram escribió:
(resending to the list)
> Did you try "file /usr/lib/libwins.so" to see the file type?
Greetings,
--
Camaleón
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 11:06:23 +0200, Merciadri Luca wrote:
> When upgrading with apt-get, I sometimes encounter
>
> ==
> ldconfig: /usr/lib/libwins.so is not an ELF file - it has the wrong
> magic bytes at the start
> ==
>
> How can I solve this problem?
Not sure...
Anand Sivaram wrote:
> Just see which package it belongs to. From root,
> dpkg --search /usr/lib/libwins.so
>
> If it belongs to some packet, try to reinstall it.
> apt-get install --reinstall
> Then see the problem is repeating.
Unfortunately, it gives
`dpkg: /usr/lib/libwins.so not found.' :-(
Hi,
When upgrading with apt-get, I sometimes encounter
==
ldconfig: /usr/lib/libwins.so is not an ELF file - it has the wrong
magic bytes at the start
==
How can I solve this problem?
Thanks.
--
Merciadri Luca
See http://www.student.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~merciadri/
I use PGP. If there is an
Hi,
Has anyone used ldconfig -l to manually link individual libraries? I
tried a command like "ldconfig -l /opt/glib/lib/libglib-2.0.so, but it
did not work.
Thank you.
Kind Regards,
Jupiter
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "u
Somewhere, somehow, this item got replaced with a file rather than a symlink
to one. I might have done it myself trying to replace some errant version.
Whatever.
So ... to get rid of this repeated message, I moved the file and made it a
bonafied symlink. It works ... for a little while.
Then t
> * From: "Dennis G. Wicks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ldconfig: /usr/lib/libgnutls-openssl.so.11 is not a symbolic link
> I was installing a bunch of packages and it seemed to repeat, but not with
> every program.
only the packages which execute ldconfig in t
Greetings;
Well, locales is installed and working, I guess. Now I
am getting screens full of messages like
> ldconfig: /usr/lib/libgnutls-openssl.so.11 is not a
symbolic link
I was installing a bunch of packages and it seemed to
repeat, but not with every program.
Anybody know how
g this error message
===
ldconfig /lib/libgtkhtml.so.6 is not a symbolic link
===
Any idea what this means and how to fix? Is it fatal? Should I
re-install Debian again?
Regards
TAC
During an upgrade, I got the following output:
"/var/lib/dpkg/info/libreadline5.postinst: line 6: 1322 Illegal
instruction ldconfig"
I don't think the problem is in the package since I get the same
Illegal instruction message when I try running ldconfig separately
from t
71
> Illegal instruction ldconfig
> dpkg: error processing libpam0g (--configure):
> subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 132
> Errors were encountered while processing:
> libpam0g
> E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
>
On 14/09/05, Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Chris Purves wrote:
>
> It's a long shot, but you might try changing the problem machine to
> point to the server used by the non-problem machine.
>
I was able to solve the ldconfig problem by downgrading libc6 to t
Chris Purves wrote:
>I also
>updated a second system on the same day from testing main (although
>from a different server) and didn't have any problems.
>
>
It's a long shot, but you might try changing the problem machine to
point to the server used by the non-problem machine.
--
Kent
--
T
Luc, what is your kernel version?
--
Take care, eh.
Chris
Chris Purves wrote:
>On 12/09/05, Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>Chris: What does your "/etc/apt/sources.list" look like? Do you have any
>>non-official sources in it? Do you have a mix of branches, and if so,
>>what's the order of them?
>>
>>
>I should have addressed this the fi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I can report the same problem.
>
>"aptitude upgrade" fails because a series of post-installation scripts
>exits with "28690 Illegal instruction ldconfig". I also get "Illegal
>instruction" when invoking ldconfig manually.
&
I can report the same problem.
"aptitude upgrade" fails because a series of post-installation scripts
exits with "28690 Illegal instruction ldconfig". I also get "Illegal
instruction" when invoking ldconfig manually.
"dist-upgrade" equally fails. I also t
Chris Purves wrote:
> On 9/12/05, *Kent West* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>
> Next, try "strace ldconfig" and watch for any error messages.
>
>
> >>>
> dmcnet:/var/lib/dpkg/info# strace -v ldconfig
> execve("
On 9/12/05, Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Next, try "strace ldconfig" and watch for any error messages.
>>>dmcnet:/var/lib/dpkg/info# strace -v ldconfig
execve("/sbin/ldconfig", ["ldconfig"], [/* 17 vars */]) = 0
uname({sysname="Linux"
Chris Purves wrote:
> Here are the contents of the file:
>
> >>>
> #!/bin/sh -e
>
> case "$1" in
> configure)
> ldconfig
> ;;
> abort-upgrade|abort-remove|abort-deconfigure)
> ;;
&g
r maybe move it manually, etc.Here are the contents of the file:
>>>
#!/bin/sh -e
case "$1" in
configure)
ldconfig
;;
abort-upgrade|abort-remove|abort-deconfigure)
;;
esac
# Automatically added by dh_makeshl
Chris Purves wrote:
> A recent upgrade with aptitude on testing exited halfway through with
> the following error:
>
> Preconfiguring packages ...
> Setting up libpam0g (0.76-23) ...
> /var/lib/dpkg/info/libpam0g.postinst: line 3: 31771 Illegal
> instruction ldconfig
I&
A recent upgrade with aptitude on testing exited halfway through with the following error:
Preconfiguring packages ...
Setting up libpam0g (0.76-23) ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/libpam0g.postinst: line 3: 31771 Illegal instruction ldconfig
dpkg: error processing libpam0g (--configure):
subprocess
Hi again,
> After that, all programs linked against libc.so.6 failed with the same
> message.
>
> As a temporary fix, I can do "ldconfig -l /lib/libc-2.3.2.so", but
> if I later run ldconfig in non-library mode, i.e. just call "ldconfig",
> the problem
not open shared
object file: No such file or directory
After that, all programs linked against libc.so.6 failed with the same
message.
As a temporary fix, I can do "ldconfig -l /lib/libc-2.3.2.so", but
if I later run ldconfig in non-library mode, i.e. just call "ldconfig"
kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
Philipp Kern wrote:
On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 01:53 -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
section 8.1 of debian-policy states that
[sic]The run-time library package should include the symbolic link
that |ldconfig| would create for the shared libraries. [sic]
Does not
Philipp Kern wrote:
On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 01:53 -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
section 8.1 of debian-policy states that
[sic]The run-time library package should include the symbolic link that
|ldconfig| would create for the shared libraries. [sic]
Does not this mean that ldconfig
Mr Mike wrote:
On Sat, 09 Jul 2005 20:44:12 -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
Let's say I have a file called libfortranposix.so.0.0.0, whose soname is
libfortranposix.so.0 . Now when I run 'sudo ldconfig', I should have 3
files namely, libfortranposix.so, libfortranposix.s
On Sat, 09 Jul 2005 20:44:12 -0400, kamaraju kusumanchi wrote:
>
> Let's say I have a file called libfortranposix.so.0.0.0, whose soname is
> libfortranposix.so.0 . Now when I run 'sudo ldconfig', I should have 3
> files namely, libfortranposix.so, libfortr
Let's say I have a file called libfortranposix.so.0.0.0, whose soname is
libfortranposix.so.0 . Now when I run 'sudo ldconfig', I should have 3
files namely, libfortranposix.so, libfortranposix.so.0 which point to
libfortranposix.so.0.0.0 according to
http://wiki.linuxque
A re-install seems to have fixed it. Although I have no idea how it
broke in the first place.
Thanks
Joris Huizer wrote:
Graham Smith wrote:
I tried installing nmap a couple of days ago and ran into a bit of a
problem. ldconfig seems to have died with a segmentation fault. In the
past when I
Graham Smith wrote:
I tried installing nmap a couple of days ago and ran into a bit of a
problem. ldconfig seems to have died with a segmentation fault. In the
past when I have had problems with apt they have resolved themselves in
a couple of days when a working version of a package appears
I tried installing nmap a couple of days ago and ran into a bit of a
problem. ldconfig seems to have died with a segmentation fault. In the
past when I have had problems with apt they have resolved themselves in
a couple of days when a working version of a package appears but this
problem
lier problem --
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2004/debian-user-200403/msg00184.html)
---
WHERE I'M STUCK
-
I have persisting ldconfig problems... and I don't have a good idea of how
to fix them. It seems some libraries and config files were messed (on the
debhelper install) an
My original problem was that I had run ldconfig with a bogus
LD_LIBRARY_PATH variable setting and that hosed up my
/etc/ld.so.cache.
Matthias Hentges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and David Z Maze
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> both recommended booting knoppix and using
chroot to run ldconfig so as to up
Bill Benedetto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I ran "ldconfig" when I had an LD_LIBRARY_PATH variable set to
> point to old old libraries. Once "ldconfig" finished, then no
> commands would work. Nothing.
Oops. :-( If you happen to have a statically link
Poweredge running Woody.
> Installed with bf24 and using ext3 for /.
> Installed and running for about 4-6 weeks.
>
> Problem:
> I ran "ldconfig" when I had an LD_LIBRARY_PATH variable set to
> point to old old libraries. Once "ldconfig" finished, then
d and running for about 4-6 weeks.
Problem:
I ran "ldconfig" when I had an LD_LIBRARY_PATH variable set to
point to old old libraries. Once "ldconfig" finished, then no
commands would work. Nothing. No, I didn't write down the
messages that occurred when I tried any com
I've been unable to install any
software because running ldconfig returns "bus error".
I've tried going back to 2.3.1 from testing but having the same problem
here - never had any trouble before though.
At first I thought this might be a hardware issue but it's definitely
not si
On Tue, 12 Nov 2002 22:02:47 -0500, Jerome Acks Jr
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 04:03:14AM +, Pigeon wrote:
>> Nonono you didn't read my post! I'm trying to do exactly what this
>> page suggests. ar still works, so I can get to the control & data
>> .tar.gz stage. But ta
On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 04:03:14AM +, Pigeon wrote:
> Nonono you didn't read my post! I'm trying to do exactly what this
> page suggests. ar still works, so I can get to the control & data
> .tar.gz stage. But tar/gzip don't work. So I have to copy the .tar.gzs
> onto my DOS partition, reboot i
to
>> >the hard drive. Now the kernel can find init, but it still gets an
>> >error loading shared libraries - undefined symbol: stderr - and panics
>> >(unsurprisingly). Same with rescue 2.2.12 kernel and my 2.4.18.
>> >
>> Am I right in thinking that all
he dpkg file directly. ldconfig has a '-r root' option,
too, when you are ready for it.
Is it possible to add dpkg to busybox? That would be useful.
Elizabeth
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and panics
> >(unsurprisingly). Same with rescue 2.2.12 kernel and my 2.4.18.
> >
> Am I right in thinking that all ldconfig does is update the symlinks
> and /etc/ld.so.c[ache|onf]? If so, isn't all I need to know, what is
> the binary data at the beginning of /etc/ld.
lly and copy *.so
>>> to /usr/lib. But of course ldconfig is broken too, so I can't tell the
>>> machine its libraries are back.
>>>
>>> Please can someone tell me how to do ldconfig's job by hand...
>>
>>Try using the rescue disk. If it
On 10 Nov 2002 18:48:44 -0600, Elizabeth Barham
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Pigeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I can boot using my install CD, unpack the .deb manually and copy *.so
>> to /usr/lib. But of course ldconfig is broken too, so I can't tell th
Pigeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I can boot using my install CD, unpack the .deb manually and copy *.so
> to /usr/lib. But of course ldconfig is broken too, so I can't tell the
> machine its libraries are back.
>
> Please can someone tell me how to do ldconfig'
uld reinstall...
I can't even reboot - kernel panics cos it can't find init. Presumably
it means it can't load it properly, since /sbin/init is still there.
Passing init=/sbin/init doesn't help.
I can boot using my install CD, unpack the .deb manually and copy *.so
to /usr/li
On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 07:57:20PM +0300, Tuomo Karhu wrote:
> (#:/work) dpkg -i libc6_2.1.3-20.deb
> dpkg: `ldconfig' not found on PATH.
> dpkg: 1 expected program(s) not found on PATH.
> NB: root's PATH should usually contain /usr/local/sbin, /usr/sbin and /sbin.
>
&
On Thu, May 02, 2002 at 07:57:20PM +0300, Tuomo Karhu wrote:
> (#:/work) dpkg -i libc6_2.1.3-20.deb
> dpkg: `ldconfig' not found on PATH.
> dpkg: 1 expected program(s) not found on PATH.
> NB: root's PATH should usually contain /usr/local/sbin, /usr/sbin and /sbin.
>
&
it's really unusual to not have ldconfig on debian, it comes with libc6
location of ldconfig is not in your path
do this
export PATH=$PATH:/sbin
dpkg -i whatever.deb
Marcin Kurc
CAD Systems Administrator
Cooper-Standard Automotive
-Original Message-
From: Tuomo Karhu [mailto:[
On Thu, 2002-05-02 at 11:57, Tuomo Karhu wrote:
> (#:/work) dpkg -i libc6_2.1.3-20.deb
> dpkg: `ldconfig' not found on PATH.
> dpkg: 1 expected program(s) not found on PATH.
> NB: root's PATH should usually contain /usr/local/sbin, /usr/sbin and
> /sbin.
>
> ( [E
(#:/work) dpkg -i libc6_2.1.3-20.deb dpkg:
`ldconfig' not found on PATH.dpkg: 1 expected program(s) not found on
PATH.NB: root's PATH should usually contain /usr/local/sbin, /usr/sbin and
/sbin.
([EMAIL PROTECTED])(/dev/pts/4)(19:53:46)(Thu
May 2)(6)(1)(#:/work) locat
uot;atexit" function...
> Using dpkg to install original package failed, owing to missing ldconfig.
> My brilliant new toy is now broken. Throw a newbie a bone
ldconfig should be in libc6_2.2.4-7*.deb. Perhaps, the package never got
properly
installed? Anyway, if you can:
$ cd
sages when trying to
install further packages, namely a conspicuous missing "atexit".
Research informed me that this was not uncommon. Reinstalling libc6
2.2.1-1 seemed a good idea.
Using dpkg to install original package
failed, owing to missing ldconfig. My brilliant new toy is n
Sendt: 25. oktober 2001 17:16
>Til: Ola Muan
>Kopi: debian-user@lists.debian.org
>Emne: Re: dpkg "out of order" because of ldconfig?
>
>On Thu, 25 Oct 2001 10:07:08 +0200, Ola Muan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> So I checked root's PATH, and it was
anything.
>
> So i tried different things, without really knowing what I was doing, and
> suddenly dpkg does not work at all, and I receive this error message:
>
> dpkg: `ldconfig' not found on PATH.
> dpkg: 1 expected program(s) not found on PATH.
> NB: root's PATH
eive this error message:
dpkg: `ldconfig' not found on PATH.
dpkg: 1 expected program(s) not found on PATH.
NB: root's PATH should usually contain /usr/local/sbin, /usr/sbin and /sbin.
So I checked root's PATH, and it was all there, but ldconfig was not found
anywhere. Disappeared
On Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 06:10:14PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> edit /etc/ld.so.conf and remove the reference to /usr/X11R6/lib/Xaw3d
Thank-you. I'd forgotten where ldconfig got its ideas...
Cheers,
--
Mike Pfleger
There's seventy brilliant people on earth.
Where are they hi
On Fri, Aug 10, 2001 at 02:56:56PM -0700, Mike Pfleger wrote:
> Hello.
>
> While checking some things on my system, I noticed something odd in the
> o/p of ldconfig -v as follows:
>
> # ldconfig -v | grep aw
> ldconfig: Can't stat /usr/X11R6/lib/Xaw3d:
Hello.
While checking some things on my system, I noticed something odd in the
o/p of ldconfig -v as follows:
# ldconfig -v | grep aw
ldconfig: Can't stat /usr/X11R6/lib/Xaw3d: No such file or directory
libawe.so.0.4 -> libawe.so.0.4.3
libXaw3d.so.6 -> libX
the same error message to that below - (this actual error was
> > obtained by trying to remove a program I don't need to see if
> > there's an overall problem with ldconfig).
> > The paths are in fact correct.
> >
> > --
> > # dpkg -r elvis-tin
by trying to remove a program I don't need to see if
> there's an overall problem with ldconfig).
> The paths are in fact correct.
>
> ------
> # dpkg -r elvis-tiny
> dpkg: `ldconfig' not found on PATH.
> dpkg: 1 expected program(s) not found on PATH.
> NB:
I have dselect in somewhat of a mess, having a number of programs
'in limbo' (including libc6). Trying to downgrade libc6, I got
the same error message to that below - (this actual error was
obtained by trying to remove a program I don't need to see if
there's an overall p
tried to
downgrade back to 2.1.3-18 (stable). I think I broke something by doing
so. The libc6 2.1.3-18 package wouldn't configure successfully. In fact,
I can't use dpkg to configure and install any new software for my system
because I'm now getting a message about "ldcon
es apt), but now it doesn't seem to be
> okay at all.
>
> Any suggestions on how I should proceed? Should I reformat and start
> over or try to install ldso manually? Should I try to upgrade to Woody
> (can I even do this without ldconfig/ldso?)? Or maybe there's a bett
esn't seem to be
okay at all.
Any suggestions on how I should proceed? Should I reformat and start
over or try to install ldso manually? Should I try to upgrade to Woody
(can I even do this without ldconfig/ldso?)? Or maybe there's a better
idea?
Thanks!
Jen
--- Mathias <[
> > Building Dependency Tree... Done
> > Note, selecting ldso instead of ldconfig
> > Sorry, ldso is already the newest version
> > 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 4 not
> > upgraded.
>
> Hmm, this looks like a dependence prob
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Building Dependency Tree... Done
> Note, selecting ldso instead of ldconfig
> Sorry, ldso is already the newest version
> 0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 4 not
> upgraded.
Hmm, this looks like a depen
On Sun, Apr 01, 2001 at 10:51:46PM -0700, jennyw wrote:
> Weird problem ... I tried installing some software I downloaded
> (compupic -- software to manage images) using dpkg -i and dpkg
> returned:
>
> 'ldconfig' not found on PATH.
>
> I searched the file
Weird problem ... I tried installing some software I downloaded
(compupic -- software to manage images) using dpkg -i and dpkg
returned:
'ldconfig' not found on PATH.
I searched the file system and there is no ldconfig anywhere. I tried
'apt-get install ldconfig' and i
Hello,
I corrupted my "ldconfig". Can anybody please send me his ldconfig (it's
located in one of the sbin-directories)?.
Please send the file to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cheers and thanks in advance
Didi
Hi Jim:
There is hope. I just went through the same problem and was able
to locate a web page devoted to this problem. I didn't save the url
but I used geocrawler to search debian-user for ldso. ( or maybe
it was ldconfig). Anyway it told how to reload ldconfig for those who
tried to upgra
** Reply to message from Osamu Aoki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Wed, 14 Mar
2001 13:10:47 -0800
Thank you. I forced ldso and it installed. Now to see how it works
dselect works fine now.-)
--
Jim Bowering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Carlos Laviola, thank you for your suggestion. Unfortunately, any permutation
of dpkg --force that I try returns the error about not finding ldconfig.
Apparently, I can't install ldconfig without having ldconfig.
Also, I can't find libc6 in source, so I can't try it that w
As I see it,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:potato$ zgrep -e ldconfig Contents-i386.gz |less
sbin/ldconfig.new base/ldso
usr/man/man1/voldconfig.1.gzutils/vold
usr/sbin/voldconfig utils/vold
usr
On 14-Mar-2001 Carlos Laviola wrote:
>
> On 14-Mar-2001 Jim Bowering wrote:
>> Hi, all.
>>
>> I'm unable to use dselect/apt because it says it can't find ldconfig. I
>> don't blame it because I can't find it either. Where should ldconfig b
On 14-Mar-2001 Jim Bowering wrote:
> Hi, all.
>
> I'm unable to use dselect/apt because it says it can't find ldconfig. I
> don't blame it because I can't find it either. Where should ldconfig be
> and how can I get it back there?
>
You *definately* s
Hi, all.
I'm unable to use dselect/apt because it says it can't find ldconfig. I
don't blame it because I can't find it either. Where should ldconfig be
and how can I get it back there?
Thanks
--
---
Jim Bowering <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
On Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 09:26:15PM +0100, Kai Weber wrote:
> + John Kerr Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > dpkg: `ldconfig' not found on PATH.
> > dpkg: 1 expected program(s) not found on PATH.
> > NB: root's PATH should usually contain /usr/local/sbi
+ John Kerr Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> dpkg: `ldconfig' not found on PATH.
> dpkg: 1 expected program(s) not found on PATH.
> NB: root's PATH should usually contain /usr/local/sbin, /usr/sbin and
> /sbin.
Are you running dselect with sudo?
Kai.
--
mail | [EM
dpkg) is working fine!
Maybe that helps .
Philipp
John Kerr Anderson wrote:
> I have been getting the following message when trying use dselect:
>
> dpkg: `ldconfig' not found on PATH.
> dpkg: 1 expected program(s) not found on PATH.
> NB: root's PATH should usually cont
John Kerr Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I have been getting the following message when trying use dselect:
>
>dpkg: `ldconfig' not found on PATH.
>dpkg: 1 expected program(s) not found on PATH.
>NB: root's PATH should usually contain /usr/local/sbin, /usr/sb
Once i had a similar problem. i did two things:
1) modify the file /etc/ld.conf and added the path for ldconfig( i`m not
sure about the name :-( i`m writing from a Windows machine so i can`t check
it )see man for ldconfig it name the file there
2) Related to the problem was that i change glibc
I have been getting the following message when trying use dselect:
dpkg: `ldconfig' not found on PATH.
dpkg: 1 expected program(s) not found on PATH.
NB: root's PATH should usually contain /usr/local/sbin, /usr/sbin and
/sbin.
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (2)
S
Hi,
I have accidentally lost ldconfig: I have installed libc6 (2.2.2-1
version) from unstable distribution, and then downgraded to libc6
(2.1.3-13
from stable distribution). In fact, I try to downgrade, because I got an
error message telling me that ldconfig does not exist any more(?!?).
I have
2.2 probably
Daniel> because it is a libc5 compiled app. Here is the output I
Daniel> get when attempting to run matlab:
Daniel> $ matlab /opt/matlab/V11.1/bin/lnx86/matlab: can't load
Daniel> library 'libXt.so.6'
Daniel> Ok, so my limit
/bin/lnx86/matlab: can't load library 'libXt.so.6'
Ok, so my limited understanding tells me to check ldconfig for
libXt.so.6:
# ldconfig -v | grep libXt
libXtst.so.6 => libXtst.so.6.1
libXt.so.6 => libXt.so.6.0
or
# locate libXt.so.6
/usr/X11R6/lib/libXt.so.6
/u
1 - 100 of 146 matches
Mail list logo
