On Sun, 03 Jun 2012 21:35:12 +0100, dobrima...@yahoo.pl wrote:
(please, no html formatted posts, thanks :-) )
> Hello, I have a problem with patching kernel 2.6-2.6.32.
>
> I'm trying to add PVUSB [1] support in Xen. According to [1] I should
> add a patch [2] to kernel. I was trying to do it wi
Hello, I have a problem with patching kernel 2.6-2.6.32.
I'm trying to add PVUSB [1] support in Xen. According to [1] I should add a
patch [2] to kernel. I was trying to do it with steps described in [3].
I had to make some changes in the patch file because in the meantime some other
changes a
On 10/15/05, Jon Dowland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The patch files are from the base release, not the last EXTRAVERSION -
> so you need linux-2.6.13 to patch rather than linux-2.6.13.2. Sorry!
Thanks for the info.
--
L.V.Gandhi
http://lvgandhi.tripod.com/
linux user No.205042
On Sat, Oct 15, 2005 at 09:42:02AM +0530, L.V.Gandhi wrote:
> I already had linux kernel linux-2.6.13.2.tar.bz2. I untaared in
> /usr/src. and sym link to linux. I downloaded patch for 13.3 and 13.3
> gz files and gunzipped.
> I did dry run patch. I got error.
Look at the patch file - you should s
I already had linux kernel linux-2.6.13.2.tar.bz2. I untaared in
/usr/src. and sym link to linux. I downloaded patch for 13.3 and 13.3
gz files and gunzipped.
I did dry run patch. I got error.
lvghomepc:/usr/src# ln -s linux-2.6.13.2 linux
lvghomepc:/usr/src# cd linux
lvghomepc:/usr/src/linux# cp /
Hi Johnathan,
> I'm confused, are You trying to install a debain patch on a vanilla
> kernel or the other way round? I cannot find a cobalt patch with my
> woody package list, so it's not in the current stable distribution?
> Anyway, debian kernel packages are usually somehow patched and You
> m
Hallo,
> I'm trying to get debian up and running on two of these units, and I
>really want to use a 'proper' debian package to install the kernel from.
>I've installed the 2.4.23 kernel source (no package available for this)
>and the kernel-patch-2.4-cobalt package.
I'm confused, are You trying
Hi Folks,
Has anyone recently built a kernel for the i386 based Cobalt RAQ500?
I'm trying to get debian up and running on two of these units, and I
really want to use a 'proper' debian package to install the kernel from.
I've installed the 2.4.23 kernel source (no package available for this)
Hello
Bill Moseley (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> My notes are not perfect, but I believe on one machine that's running
> 2.4.23 the kernel was built from kernel.org sources but make-kpkg was
> used to build the kernel.
>
> I just downloaded and patched the 2.4.23 source tree with the 2.4.24
> p
On Mon, Jan 05, 2004 at 11:09:09AM -0800, Bill Moseley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have notes of hand-editing the changelog before, but I can't see to
> get the format correct. I know there's a tool to update the changelog,
> but can't remember what that is.
You should use 'dch -i' and add a c
My notes are not perfect, but I believe on one machine that's running
2.4.23 the kernel was built from kernel.org sources but make-kpkg was
used to build the kernel.
I just downloaded and patched the 2.4.23 source tree with the 2.4.24
patch. Then I ran
fakeroot make-kpkg --revision=custom.
Ronald Castillo wrote:
> Greetings...
>
> When I apply a patch to my kernel (from 2.2.12 to 2.2.13), do I need to do
> any other step after I do the "gzip -cd patchxx.gz | patch -p0"?
>
> Thanks..
>
>
The sources are now patched. (assuming you were in the /usr/src directory when
you
unzipped and
Greetings...
When I apply a patch to my kernel (from 2.2.12 to 2.2.13), do I need to do
any other step after I do the "gzip -cd patchxx.gz | patch -p0"?
Thanks..
Hi all.
(Sorry, forgot to include the meaningful subject: message below)
> I've just applied 2.0.35, 2.0.36 and 2.0.37 patches to my 2.0.34 kernel.
> Now as I compile the kernel, I get these errors:
>
> setup.c: In function `Cx86model':
> setup.c:286: `Cx86_mult' undeclared (first use this functi
Hello!
When I tried to patch my kernel I encounter a lot of error messages, I'm not
sure if I can continue, hoping somebody with more experience can give me some
suggestion. I've collected the error messages and attatched it to this mail.
All what I did is (as root):
cp /download/patch-2.0.36.
On Wed, 9 Apr 1997, Jim Pick wrote:
> > Great! I
> > would like to see
> > http://localhost/cgi-bin/dwww?type=dir&location=/usr/doc done as a
> > multi-column table; it would look better and be easier to search with
> > the eyes. You could add tags conditional on $ENV{'USER_AGENT'} being
> > a t
Ahem... could all further users please not "reply-to-all" in further
replies to Karl's message? He put all the staff members at Internet
Arena in the CC field ( although only a few are members of PLUG ) and
we've been recieving replies we don't always need. I think only three
of us are subscribed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
RE: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is this a beta testers report??? If so is this the place to send these
reports to Debian? I'm a bit confused here since most people subscribed to
this list have been using bo, or parts of it for some time now.
I've been on this list sinc
> I glanced over the new 'dwww' documantation interface, and its really
> looking good!
Cool.
> I hadn't had the menu package installed previously.
> The documents under that hierarchy look really nice! Is that the
> debiandoc DTD that the doc people have been talking about?
I'm not sure.
I just upgraded BitterSweet to Debian pre1.3, over the modem. It
took all night at 33.6, to ftp the files I selected. Everything I'd
carefully chosen, a 1 hour job, with `dselect` transfered without a
single glitch, from ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian>. I selected
files from bo, contrib, and non-
20 matches
Mail list logo
