Am Tue, 23 Jun 2009 16:31:51 -0600
schrieb lee :
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 10:09:22PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> > No, it is as Kumar said. And you don't have to download the full
> > source if you have 2.6.29 already. With your proposal, you would
> > need 2.6.29, _every_ patch-2.6.29.y and ap
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 04:09:51PM -0600, lee wrote:
> > Look at the "alternatives to patch" section here. Specifically, the
> > interdiff part:
> >
> > http://www.mjmwired.net/kernel/Documentation/applying-patches.txt
> >
> > That should handle your problem.
>
> Thanks, I've seen that and it to
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 10:09:22PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> No, it is as Kumar said. And you don't have to download the full source
> if you have 2.6.29 already. With your proposal, you would need 2.6.29,
> _every_ patch-2.6.29.y and apply them consecutively -- this becomes
> rather tedious if
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 10:09:22PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2009-06-23 21:30 +0200, lee wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 01:44:21PM -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> >>
> >> I believe that the patch-2.6.29.x applies against the tree of 2.6.29,
> >> which is why some hunks would already be
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 02:53:25PM -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 01:30:43PM -0600, lee wrote:
> > > I believe that the patch-2.6.29.x applies against the tree of 2.6.29,
> > > which is why some hunks would already be present if you try to apply
> > > it against 2.6.29.4.
> >
On 2009-06-23 21:30 +0200, lee wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 01:44:21PM -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
>>
>> I believe that the patch-2.6.29.x applies against the tree of 2.6.29,
>> which is why some hunks would already be present if you try to apply
>> it against 2.6.29.4.
>>
>> The easiest sol
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 01:30:43PM -0600, lee wrote:
> > I believe that the patch-2.6.29.x applies against the tree of 2.6.29,
> > which is why some hunks would already be present if you try to apply
> > it against 2.6.29.4.
> >
> > The easiest solution is to get the full 2.6.29.5 tree, or get the
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 01:44:21PM -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 12:41:45PM -0600, lee wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > what are kernel patches for when they cannot be applied? I'm getting:
> >
> >
> > l...@cat:~/inst/KERNEL/linux-2.6.29
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 12:41:45PM -0600, lee wrote:
> Hi,
>
> what are kernel patches for when they cannot be applied? I'm getting:
>
>
> l...@cat:~/inst/KERNEL/linux-2.6.29.4$ patch -p1 < patch-2.6.29.5
> patching file Documentation/filesystems/Locking
>
Hi,
what are kernel patches for when they cannot be applied? I'm getting:
l...@cat:~/inst/KERNEL/linux-2.6.29.4$ patch -p1 < patch-2.6.29.5
patching file Documentation/filesystems/Locking
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n]
I haven't applied a pat
Joey Hess wrote:
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
Installing the source package for Sid linux-2.6 gets you
linux-2.6_2.6.20-3.dsc
linux-2.6_2.6.20.orig.tar.gz
linux-2.6_2.6.20-3.diff.gz
Does that mean that the original is 2.6.20.3?
No, the -3 is the number of uploads of the debian package of 2.6.20.
2.
Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
> Installing the source package for Sid linux-2.6 gets you
> linux-2.6_2.6.20-3.dsc
> linux-2.6_2.6.20.orig.tar.gz
> linux-2.6_2.6.20-3.diff.gz
>
> Does that mean that the original is 2.6.20.3?
No, the -3 is the number of uploads of the debian package of 2.6.20.
2.6.20-3 ac
Hi,
Installing the source package for Sid linux-2.6 gets you
linux-2.6_2.6.20-3.dsc
linux-2.6_2.6.20.orig.tar.gz
linux-2.6_2.6.20-3.diff.gz
Does that mean that the original is 2.6.20.3?
And are the patches all in linux-2.6_2.6.20-3.diff.gz?
Are those patches better described anywhere?
So you w
H. S. wrote:
This may sound like a dumb question but should one apply debian kernel
patches to a Debian source kernel before compiling one? e.g. I am right
now working on kernel source of 2.6.9. Are the patches included in this
source or should I select and install the ones listed by
H. S. wrote:
This may sound like a dumb question but should one apply debian kernel
patches to a Debian source kernel before compiling one? e.g. I am right
now working on kernel source of 2.6.9. Are the patches included in this
source or should I select and install the ones listed by
On Sat, 2004-11-20 at 11:47 -0500, H. S. wrote:
> This may sound like a dumb question but should one apply debian kernel
> patches to a Debian source kernel before compiling one? e.g. I am right
> now working on kernel source of 2.6.9. Are the patches included in this
> source
This may sound like a dumb question but should one apply debian kernel
patches to a Debian source kernel before compiling one? e.g. I am right
now working on kernel source of 2.6.9. Are the patches included in this
source or should I select and install the ones listed by:
$> COLUMNS=160 dpkg
Hello!
Please don't just reply to a previous posting in order to start a new
thread. Instead, compose a new mail inserting the list address.
On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 01:56:01PM -0400, Ishwar Rattan wrote:
> How do the patches work? If I want to apply patch-2.6.7-rc3.gz, does
> it apply to kernel-2
How do the patches work? If I want to apply patch-2.6.7-rc3.gz, does
it apply to kernel-2.6.6 sources directly or all the previous patches
have to applied first? (Is the 2.6.7-rc3 patch cumulative??)
-ishwar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troubl
Pigeon escribió:
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 11:57:57AM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
I've patched my kernel.org kernel from one version to the next, but now
I have one machine running 2.4.21 that I'd like to upgrade.
Is there a way to get a patch generated (patch-o-matic kind of thing) to
patch from
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 11:57:57AM -0800, Bill Moseley wrote:
> I've patched my kernel.org kernel from one version to the next, but now
> I have one machine running 2.4.21 that I'd like to upgrade.
>
> Is there a way to get a patch generated (patch-o-matic kind of thing) to
> patch from 2.4.21 to
I've patched my kernel.org kernel from one version to the next, but now
I have one machine running 2.4.21 that I'd like to upgrade.
Is there a way to get a patch generated (patch-o-matic kind of thing) to
patch from 2.4.21 to 2.4.25?
I also have machines running 2.4.24.
Or is it time to move to
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003, Ross Boylan wrote:
> I am trying to apply kernel patches with make-kpkg, but am running into
> difficulties, particularly on repeated runs.
[...]
> START applying patch "Debian Logo"
[...]
There was a discussion regarding the kernel-debian-logo-patch b
ri, 2003-12-12 at 12:45, Ross Boylan wrote:
> I am trying to apply kernel patches with make-kpkg, but am running into
> difficulties, particularly on repeated runs.
>
> First, I am not able to find the .rej files when patches fail to apply.
> I thought this might have been from a subsequ
I am trying to apply kernel patches with make-kpkg, but am running into
difficulties, particularly on repeated runs.
First, I am not able to find the .rej files when patches fail to apply.
I thought this might have been from a subsequent make-kpkg clean, but
even without that, they're not
[Please don't top quote! It makes your message harder to read,
especially in long threads.]
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 01:03:47PM +0100, Greg Bolshaw wrote:
> Vincent Dupont wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I'm staring with Debian and find the security updates very usefull with
> >apt-get
> >It's very comfort
The kernel doesn't get upgraded with an `apt-get upgrade`, it must be
done manually:
`apt-cache search kernel-image-2.4.18` (or whichever version you want).
Pick one, and `apt-get install` it. The lilo entry for the current
kernel will be renamed "LinuxOLD", and a "Linux" entry created for the
Hi,
I'm staring with Debian and find the security updates very usefull with
apt-get
It's very comfortable to keep one's packages up to date
But what happens when a package update concerns the Kernel? Should the
kernel be re-compiled or not?? is it automatically re-compiled?
Vincent
--
To UNSUB
>>"sean" == sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 06:39:11PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I have edited /etc/kernel-pkg.conf and added the lines
>> "patch_the_kernel=yes" and "config_target=menuconfig".
> i could be way off, but this is what i have in my kern
On Sun, 2003-02-09 at 18:28, sean finney wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 06:39:11PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I have edited /etc/kernel-pkg.conf and added the lines
> > "patch_the_kernel=yes" and "config_target=menuconfig".
>
> i could be way off, but this is what i have in my kernel-pk
On Sun, Feb 09, 2003 at 06:39:11PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I have edited /etc/kernel-pkg.conf and added the lines
> "patch_the_kernel=yes" and "config_target=menuconfig".
i could be way off, but this is what i have in my kernel-pkg.conf:
patch_the_kernel := YES
perhaps it's either case
xfs deb, and it created
the directory /usr/src/kernel-patches/all/xfs with three
kernel-patchgz files.
I have edited /etc/kernel-pkg.conf and added the lines
"patch_the_kernel=yes" and "config_target=menuconfig".
I did "make-kpkg --added-patches xfs kernel_image
hi everyone,
I'm trying to install demudi on my woody amd k7 box, but in order to do so I have to
re-roll
my kernel, and it's giving my trouble. here's the situation:
the demudi kernel is patched with: Posix capability; low-latency; and
acpi.
I need: full support for nvidia graphics; and usb in
Hello
WARNING : don't follow thread, perhaps out of subject.
briefly, I've got same chipset, excepted a "spurious" message at boot, have
no problems, 48Mo/s with DMA on ata5 'if remember fine) on HD and good rate
on (RW-)CD's.
Running 2.4.20 but 2.4.18 fine (customs kernel)
Hop'it'elp
David Du
Pigeon wrote:
On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 05:53:54PM -0700, Al Davis wrote:
I have since installed Debian, with 2.4.20-bf2.4, and now I
wonder if it is safe to re-enable DMA.
I have a VIA 82C686 southbridge, and 2.4.20 enables its "VIA
southbridge workaround" when it boots. So presumably the pr
Pigeon said:
> I think there are a lot of VIA chipsets out there but most people
> don't have problems; presumably some other factor is needed to make the
> bug show up. Wonder what?
not entirely related but thought to mention ..
about a year and a half ago I was looking for a MB to get an Athlo
On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 05:53:54PM -0700, Al Davis wrote:
> I was getting disk corruption with an older kernel (2.4.8 or
> 2.4.18, Mandrake). A colleague said it might have something
> to do with a hardware bug (south bridge VIA VT82C686). He also
> said there was a fix in recent kernels. I
A bit off topic here.. sorry
Others ahve expressed problems with Asus based on memory issues. Anyone
have any thoughts?
The recent comment was on the A7V8X being very picky with RAM. My
friend picked up a different KT400 based system and popped in the same
PC2700 (not PC3200) that didnt work
Ron Johnson wrote:
>
> On Sun, 2003-01-19 at 15:48, Bob Proulx wrote:
> > ...
> ...
> But the A7M266-D doesn't use a Via chipset.
> >From http://usa.asus.com/mb/socketa/a7m266-d/overview.htm :
> "The A7M266-D leverages the technology of the AMD 760MPX chipset"
>
> A quick google, and the *first*
Pigeon wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 11:27:28AM -0500, Daniel Barclay wrote:
> > I'm getting disk corruption if I try to enable DMA mode for my IDE
> > disks.
...
> If you have a VIA chipset try making sure that VIA chipset support is
> included in the kernel.
No, it's an Asus A7M266-D, whic
On Sun, 2003-01-19 at 15:48, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Wayne Topa wrote:
> > Al Davis([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> > > How do I find out?
> > > I am using the one on the woody bf2.4 cd.
> >
> > lspci will show if you have VIA and
> >
> > grep VIA /usr/src/linux/.config will show if yo
On Sun, 2003-01-19 at 15:43, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Ron Johnson wrote:
> > Well, 1st, do you know which chipset the A7V266-D runs?
> > Btw, the ASUS web site only mentions the A7V266-C.
> > http://usa.asus.com/mb/socketa/a7v266-c/overview.htm
>
> Try this url for the dual model. (D is for dual.)
>
On Sun, Jan 19, 2003 at 03:10:23PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Sun, 2003-01-19 at 13:42, Al Davis wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 11:27:28AM -0500, Daniel Barclay
> > wrote:
> > > > I'm getting disk corruption if I try to enable DMA mode for
> > > > my IDE disks.
> >
> > On Saturday 18 Ja
On Sunday 19 January 2003 02:48 pm, Bob Proulx wrote:
> Wayne Topa wrote:
> > Al Davis([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> > > How do I find out?
> If you are using the bf24 kernel then the config is installed
in /boot.
> grep VIA /boot/config-2.4.18-bf2.4
> CONFIG_BLK_DEV_VIA82CXXX
Wayne Topa wrote:
> Al Davis([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> > How do I find out?
> > I am using the one on the woody bf2.4 cd.
>
> lspci will show if you have VIA and
>
> grep VIA /usr/src/linux/.config will show if you have enabled it.
If you are using the bf24 kernel then the c
Ron Johnson wrote:
> Well, 1st, do you know which chipset the A7V266-D runs?
> Btw, the ASUS web site only mentions the A7V266-C.
> http://usa.asus.com/mb/socketa/a7v266-c/overview.htm
Try this url for the dual model. (D is for dual.)
http://usa.asus.com/mb/socketa/a7m266-d/overview.htm
Bob
Al Davis([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
>
> > On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 11:27:28AM -0500, Daniel Barclay
> wrote:
> > > I'm getting disk corruption if I try to enable DMA mode for
> > > my IDE disks.
>
> On Saturday 18 January 2003 04:14 pm, Pigeon wrote:
> > If you have a VIA chipse
Al Davis wrote:
On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 11:27:28AM -0500, Daniel Barclay
wrote:
I'm getting disk corruption if I try to enable DMA mode for
my IDE disks.
On Saturday 18 January 2003 04:14 pm, Pigeon wrote:
If you have a VIA chipset try making sure that VIA chipset
support is included in t
On Sun, 2003-01-19 at 13:42, Al Davis wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 11:27:28AM -0500, Daniel Barclay
> wrote:
> > > I'm getting disk corruption if I try to enable DMA mode for
> > > my IDE disks.
>
> On Saturday 18 January 2003 04:14 pm, Pigeon wrote:
> > If you have a VIA chipset try making
> On Sat, Jan 18, 2003 at 11:27:28AM -0500, Daniel Barclay
wrote:
> > I'm getting disk corruption if I try to enable DMA mode for
> > my IDE disks.
On Saturday 18 January 2003 04:14 pm, Pigeon wrote:
> If you have a VIA chipset try making sure that VIA chipset
> support is included in the kernel
hdc: status error: status=0x58 { DriveReady, SeekComplete, DataRequest }
> hdc: drive not ready for command
>
>
> The linux-kernel mailing list archives seem to indicate that there
> is a patch for a kernel bug that can cause disk corruption.
>
> Does anybody know whic
y for command
The linux-kernel mailing list archives seem to indicate that there
is a patch for a kernel bug that can cause disk corruption.
Does anybody know which 2.4.x kernel patches are supposed to fix that?
Or is the problem something else?
Thanks,
Daniel
--
Daniel Barclay
[EMAIL PROT
I am reading up about Debian prior to installing 3.0 when it comes out.
(I'm moving over from Mandrake).
I'd be grateful if someone could point me to a document that explains the
nature of the kernel that is installed in the first instance and which
patches have been applied. I'd like to work out
On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 08:07:33PM -0800, Jeremy Zawodny wrote:
> There's s README.Debian file in the kernel-source packages which lists
> a variety of patches that have been applied to the source.
>
> Where can I find those patches?
I always wondered but never track down. So I did.
After adding
There's s README.Debian file in the kernel-source packages which lists
a variety of patches that have been applied to the source.
Where can I find those patches?
Jeremy
--
Jeremy D. Zawodny | Perl, Web, MySQL, Linux Magazine, Yahoo!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | http://jeremy.zawodny.com/
Hi,
kernel-package supports kernel patches, as I learned short time ago.
But IMO, it lacks the documentation for this.
If i understand correctly:
- patches go into /usr/src/kernel-patches/$arch/$version/apply.
- If "PATCH_THE_KERNEL" is set, patches are automatically applied on
make-
* Carlos Laviola ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010325 07:03]:
>
> On 24-Mar-2001 Nate Amsden wrote:
> > Hall Stevenson wrote:
> >>
> >> I apologize that this isn't directly Debian-related, but I know there
> >> are some people around who probably know the answer...
> >>
> >> I'm currently running kernel
On 24-Mar-2001 Nate Amsden wrote:
> Hall Stevenson wrote:
>>
>> I apologize that this isn't directly Debian-related, but I know there
>> are some people around who probably know the answer...
>>
>> I'm currently running kernel 2.4.2-ac20. I just downloaded the patch for
>> 2.4.2-ac24. My questio
Hall Stevenson wrote:
>
> I apologize that this isn't directly Debian-related, but I know there
> are some people around who probably know the answer...
>
> I'm currently running kernel 2.4.2-ac20. I just downloaded the patch for
> 2.4.2-ac24. My question is, can I apply this patch against my cur
I apologize that this isn't directly Debian-related, but I know there
are some people around who probably know the answer...
I'm currently running kernel 2.4.2-ac20. I just downloaded the patch for
2.4.2-ac24. My question is, can I apply this patch against my current
source tree (2.4.2-ac20) ??
On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 01:50:34PM +0100, Peter Hugosson-Miller wrote:
> > you definitely do not want use the patches for 2.2.18 with any
> > other kernel, unless you really know what you are doing (you
> > would have to make sure that the files that the patch changes
> > are unchanged between 2.2.
> you definitely do not want use the patches for 2.2.18 with any
> other kernel, unless you really know what you are doing (you
> would have to make sure that the files that the patch changes
> are unchanged between 2.2.18 and whatever you will use).
This brings up another question: According to w
On Sat, 22 Jul 2000, Art Edwards wrote:
> I'm sure this is an old question, but I have found browsing the list
> archives daunting. I'm attempting to build a new 2.2.15-ide kernel from
> 2.2.15 sources. I have found the ide patch. I downloaded it into /root
> and used dpkg to install it. Is it now
I'm sure this is an old question, but I have found browsing the list
archives daunting. I'm attempting to build a new 2.2.15-ide kernel from
2.2.15 sources. I have found the ide patch. I downloaded it into /root
and used dpkg to install it. Is it now applied to the 2.2.15 source
tree? If not, what
I would have thought this were explained better..
I have kernel-package installed and have kernel source for 2.2.13 and the
kerneli package installed. The documentation for kernel-package states
that make-kpkg can apply the patches during build, then remove them during
clean. What I can't figure o
"F. Fernandez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'd like to know where can I find the patches to recompile the kernel
> 2.0.36 and/or 2.2.x so that the system supports more open files.
>
> [...]They also say that the 2.2.5 that comes with
> RH6.0 already has been patched to work with Informix and Ora
On Tue, May 11, 1999 at 12:02:56 +0100, F. Fernandez wrote:
> I'm posting this message in debian-user and debian-testing since it
> relates both to slink and to potato so excuse me if you get it twice.
At the moment, debian-user is the appropriate list for both slink and
potato. debian-testing is
Hi all!
I'm posting this message in debian-user and debian-testing since
it relates both to slink and to potato so excuse me if you
get it twice.
I'd like to know where can I find the patches to recompile the kernel
2.0.36 and/or 2.2.x so that the system supports more open files.
I'm trying to
AFAIK there's no patch path through the 2.0.x -> 2.2.x barrier. You
could try to install the kernel-source package of the kernel you wish to
upgrade to, or you could get the raw source from ftp.kernel.org, the
"official" site.
On Sun, 14 Mar 1999, Doug Dine wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Where can I downloa
http://www.kernel.org and look at the mirror list for latest versions.
On Sun, 14 Mar 1999, Doug Dine wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Where can I download patches for the Linux kernel? I have 2.0.36
> currently and am seeing that everyone else has 2.2.x
>
> Thanks.
>
> Doug Dine
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ht
Hi,
Where can I download patches for the Linux kernel? I have 2.0.36
currently and am seeing that everyone else has 2.2.x
Thanks.
Doug Dine
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.xoom.com/dougdine
http://members.xoom.com/loveless
NetZero - We
On Fri, Jan 22, 1999 at 10:34:26AM -0700, Bob Nielsen wrote:
> I have the source for 2.2.0-pre2 and all the patches up to pre9. When I
> try to apply these patches with patch-kernel, I just get the result
>
> Current kernel version is 2.2.0
>
> I assume this is because the patch-kernel script won
I have the source for 2.2.0-pre2 and all the patches up to pre9. When I
try to apply these patches with patch-kernel, I just get the result
Current kernel version is 2.2.0
I assume this is because the patch-kernel script won't handle the 'preX'
suffix. It there a patch anywhere for the patch sc
Hi
Can someone please point the place where i can get the kernel patches for the
via motherboard ?
thanks
---
Mario Filipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://neptuno.sc.uevora.pt/~mjnf
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL
I'm searching for the patches to the 2.0.30 kernel that enable the Cyrix
166+ chips to function as Pentiums instead of "unknown 486"s. Now that
linuxhq.com is gone, I don't know where to look.
Any suggestions?
sunsite just has a bunch of patch#.tar.gz files; no clue what's for what.
75 matches
Mail list logo
