I did finally get the 4.17.11 kernel to compile so that my large drives
are visible now, but I had to use a 'shotgun' approach in including as
many SCSI/SATA/etc variables as possible.
I do intend on comparing the non-functioning config for 4.17.11 against
both the functioning config, as well
On Wed 01 Aug 2018 at 23:37:33 (-0600), Taren wrote:
> I'm running Stretch, with kernel 4.9.0.7, and am trying to compile a
> new kernel (preferably 4.17.11) into which I can boot.
> The kernel builds successfully, but whenever I try booting into the
> new kernel, I end up in emergency mode, with t
Correction:
The kernel version I'm using (which sees my 2.7T drives) is 4.9.0-7-amd,
not 4.9.0.7.
I can provide the .config file for 4.17.11, if needed.
On 08/01/2018 11:37 PM, Taren wrote:
I'm running Stretch, with kernel 4.9.0.7, and am trying to compile a
new kernel (preferably 4.17.11)
I'm running Stretch, with kernel 4.9.0.7, and am trying to compile a new
kernel (preferably 4.17.11) into which I can boot.
The kernel builds successfully, but whenever I try booting into the new
kernel, I end up in emergency mode, with the error
Unit dev-disk-by\x2duuid-.device has fai
Please don't top post on this mailing list.
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 04:22:30PM +0500, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
> Actually the problem is i am trying to install KVM guest windows 7 64 bit.
> during the installation everything went well. but when guest start for the
> first time my KVM guest sho
On Thu, 23 Oct 2014 03:20:36 -0400 (EDT), Muhammad Yousuf wrote:
>
> actually i never compile or patch any kernel before for some reasons and
> learning i am installing kernel 3.16 stable with patch.
> now the question is when i visit kernel.org website i see 3.16 kernel and
> patch and inc.patch.
Thanks Dervin, for the encouragement and it is really nice to know that
there is a community exist for newbies as well.i will definitly start
working on your given information it is very helpful.
just sharing to all after lots of efforts and updates nothing has achieved
so far.
started a new email
Muhammad Yousuf Khan writes:
> So my KVM host is not a production server so i thought it is a best time to
> play with the kernal patching because i am working on linux for years but
> never
> perform such task i always rely on default/stable debian repository but this
> is
> a first time i am
On 23/10/2014 14:22, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
Actually the problem is i am trying to install KVM guest windows 7 64 bit.
during the installation everything went well. but when guest start for the
first time my KVM guest shows "booting from harddirve..." and struck.
my "/var/log/libvirt/qem
Actually the problem is i am trying to install KVM guest windows 7 64 bit.
during the installation everything went well. but when guest start for the
first time my KVM guest shows "booting from harddirve..." and struck.
my "/var/log/libvirt/qemu/(myguestfile) show this
>KVM: entry
On 23/10/14 at 03:37pm, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
> Thanks for your guidence,
> can you please share that i do not see kernel architecture on the website.
> does that kernel file contain both x86 and amd64?
>
...of course it does.
But, do you know what are you doing?
--
« Nunc est bibendum,
Thanks for your guidence,
can you please share that i do not see kernel architecture on the website.
does that kernel file contain both x86 and amd64?
On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 2:51 PM, tv.deb...@googlemail.com <
tv.deb...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On 23/10/2014 10:20, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
>
On 23/10/2014 10:20, Muhammad Yousuf Khan wrote:
actually i never compile or patch any kernel before for some reasons and
learning i am installing kernel 3.16 stable with patch.
now the question is when i visit kernel.org website i see 3.16 kernel and
patch and inc.patch.
i can understand what i
actually i never compile or patch any kernel before for some reasons and
learning i am installing kernel 3.16 stable with patch.
now the question is when i visit kernel.org website i see 3.16 kernel and
patch and inc.patch.
i can understand what is patch it could be a fix to some bugs but what is
bout compiling a kernel is "buried" in
> a thread about building a computer. :(
>From the thread Building computer, I've asked:
> On Thu, 2013-09-26 at 23:57 -0300, Beco wrote:
> > How long a "considered fast" kernel compilation would last? I'd like
> &
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 11:57:43PM -0300, Beco wrote:
> On 26 September 2013 22:22, Tom H wrote:
>
>
> > (I've compiled a kernel on a netbook; you'd better have a few hours to
> > spare...)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> Questions for people who compile kernel and their machines:
You are better off starting
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 01:41:10 -
Cam Hutchison wrote:
> David Witbrodt writes:
>
> >(My goal was to
> >produce a kernel that boots without an initrd; most people will not
> >share that goal.)
>
> I would have thought that most people would share that goal, since
> building an initrd is usefu
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Cam Hutchison wrote:
> David Witbrodt writes:
>
>>(My goal was to
>>produce a kernel that boots without an initrd; most people will not
>>share that goal.)
>
> I would have thought that most people would share that goal, since
> building an initrd is useful for on
r had a deep reason to compile my own kernel
until now, that my wifi card stopped from working since kernel >2.6.39,
that is, since 3.0.0 branch and upwards. The involved "function" that has
been added to the wifi driver has been detected and I was given a
workaround but I still nee
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 7:26 PM, Stephen Powell wrote:
>
> I will continue to use and recommend kernel-package. But I'm not going
> to argue with those who wish to use "make deb-pkg".
It's all a question of habit. If I need to have a package, I use
"make-dpkg" on Debian distribs and "rpmbuild" on
ept
when I ask the hardware boys and girls to change a failing disk or ram
module or check the cabling or install/remove a box or ...
>> Over the years, I've never had the need to compile a kernel and this is
>> my 4 kernel compilation in one month... but now I'm making
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Camaleón wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 14:22:33 +, Camaleón wrote:
>
> Okay, let's get the numbers.
>
> I followed Sven and Stephen's advice so I:
>
> - Used "make localmodconfig" to generate the ".config" file
> - Appended "CONCURRENCY_LEVEL=2" to "make-kpkg"
>
Cam Hutchison:
>
>> (My goal was to
>> produce a kernel that boots without an initrd; most people will not
>> share that goal.)
>
> I would have thought that most people would share that goal, since
> building an initrd is useful for only two reasons I can think of:
I regularly built custom kern
David Witbrodt writes:
>(My goal was to
>produce a kernel that boots without an initrd; most people will not
>share that goal.)
I would have thought that most people would share that goal, since
building an initrd is useful for only two reasons I can think of:
1) You are building a distro kerne
On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 10:27:09 -0400 (EDT), Brian wrote:
>
> Indeed, but the deck is stacked against kernel-package when it is
> associated with 'deprecated' in the minds of users. It may not suit the
> Kernel Team for their use but I've happily and successfully compiled
> kernels with it for many
rips a few times along the way, and has a steep
learning curve in the beginning.
Over the years, I've never had the need to compile a kernel and this is
my 4 kernel compilation in one month... but now I'm making these tests
"just for fun" because all these compilations were aim
On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 14:22:33 +, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
> Any trick?
Yes, I got many useful tricks, a big thanks to all.
Okay, let's get the numbers.
I followed Sven and Stephen's advice so I:
- Used "make localmodconfig" to generate the ".config" file
- Appended "CONCURRENCY_LEVEL=2" to "m
> From: Stan Hoeppner
> Sent: Sun, September 25, 2011 11:27:13 AM
> Subject: Re: Reducing kernel compilation time
>
> > If that option had existed when I
> > was learning about this, it would have saved me many, many
> > hours!
>
> But then you would
all the drivers you don't have. If you're unsure, ask.
I'm using Sven's advice (in join with Stephen's one), I find it a very
good approach.
> And be patient with yourself. Nearly everyone who embarks on the "roll
> your own" journey trips a few times al
On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 08:16:53 -0700, David Witbrodt wrote:
>> From: Camaleón
>
>> Sent: Sun, September 25, 2011 10:30:30 AM Subject: Re: Reducing kernel
>> compilation time
>>
>>
>> > I'd guess you're including the kitchen sink. Don't
On 9/25/2011 10:16 AM, David Witbrodt wrote:
If that option had existed when I
was learning about this, it would have saved me many, many hours!
But then you wouldn't have learned as much. Easier is not always
better, even though it often seems so.
--
Stan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to deb
On 9/25/2011 9:30 AM, Camaleón wrote:
Fair enough, but I wonder "what" to include in the recipe. If I put too
much salt or leave the oven for many hours at the maximun temperature
I'll get a "pastiche" nobody will be able to eat...
Have you used make-menuconfig? Simply go through all the hard
> From: Camaleón
> Sent: Sun, September 25, 2011 10:30:30 AM
> Subject: Re: Reducing kernel compilation time
>
>
> > I'd guess you're including the kitchen sink. Don't build the hundreds
> > of driver modules your machines won't ever us
On Sun 25 Sep 2011 at 08:21:17 -0400, Stephen Powell wrote:
[Snipped: Some advantages of using kernel-package]
> But, to each his own. Whatever floats your boat, man.
Indeed, but the deck is stacked against kernel-package when it is
associated with 'deprecated' in the minds of users. It may not
On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 16:15:51 -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> On 9/24/2011 9:22 AM, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
>> I don't need nothing special, just to be able to boot the system, test
>> the staging drivers and then remove/compile a new kernel again so
>> wasting the less time in the process would be g
On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 08:25:19 -0400, Tom H wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>>
>> In fact, I already have a set of tools installed (along with
>> "fakeroot", that "kernel-package") because I'm following Debian
>> Installation Guide instructions:
>>
>> http://d-i.alioth.deb
On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 08:30:36 -0400, Stephen Powell wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 07:53:59 -0400 (EDT), Camaleón wrote:
>> Stephen Powell wrote:
>>> If you decide to try kernel-package, make sure that you apply the
>>> patch file listed in the web page. It won't work properly with a
>>> version 3 k
On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 07:53:59 -0400 (EDT), Camaleón wrote:
> Stephen Powell wrote:
>> If you decide to try kernel-package, make sure that you apply the patch
>> file listed in the web page. It won't work properly with a version 3
>> kernel unless you do.
>
> Hum... you mean the one for EDID? I've
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Camaleón wrote:
>
> In fact, I already have a set of tools installed (along with "fakeroot",
> that "kernel-package") because I'm following Debian Installation Guide
> instructions:
>
> http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/en.i386/ch08s06.html
There's also the kern
On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 03:42:24 -0400 (EDT), Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
>
> Isn't [1] the proper way to build Debian kernels?
>
> [1] http://kernel-handbook.alioth.debian.org/ch-common-tasks.html
That depends on your definition of "proper". The kernel handbook,
not surprisingly, is maintained by th
ff would be welcome in the official wiki. The
> kernel team encourages the use of "make deb-pkg". But I personally
> don't like "make deb-pkg" because of its "one size fits all" build
> philosophy. For example, it always produces a headers package, and
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Stephen Powell wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 13:56:35 -0400 (EDT), Tom H wrote:
>>
>> CONCURRENCY_LEVEL=$(getconf _NPROCESSORS_ONLN)
>> although "getconf _NPROCESSORS_ONLN" on an atom's probably "1"; but
>> you never know...
>>
>> You can also pass "INSTALL_MOD_STRI
On 9/25/2011 2:42 AM, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
* Stephen Powell [110924 14:13 -0400]:
On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 12:18:47 -0400 (EDT), Camaleón wrote:
What do you mean by "kernel-package"? Debian's vanilla kernel?
"kernel-package" is the name of a Debian package, as in
aptitude install kerne
On 9/24/2011 6:55 PM, Stephen Powell wrote:
On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 17:15:51 -0400 (EDT), Stan Hoeppner wrote:
5 hours? Did you say 5 hours?
I have a 10 year old dual Mendocino 550 machine with only 384MB of PC100
that takes about 30 minutes to compile my custom kernels using make -j2.
I'd guess
* Stephen Powell [110924 14:13 -0400]:
> On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 12:18:47 -0400 (EDT), Camaleón wrote:
> >
> > What do you mean by "kernel-package"? Debian's vanilla kernel?
>
> "kernel-package" is the name of a Debian package, as in
>
>aptitude install kernel-package
Isn't [1] the proper way
On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 17:15:51 -0400 (EDT), Stan Hoeppner wrote:
>
> 5 hours? Did you say 5 hours?
>
> I have a 10 year old dual Mendocino 550 machine with only 384MB of PC100
> that takes about 30 minutes to compile my custom kernels using make -j2.
>
> I'd guess you're including the kitchen si
On 9/24/2011 11:01 AM, Stephen Powell wrote:
On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 10:22:33 -0400 (EDT), Camaleón wrote:
Intel's Atom N455
I'm not familiar with the capabilities of your hardware, but if you have
multiple CPUs ("cores")
The Atom 455 is a single core 64/32 bit CPU with HyperThreading,
1.66G
On Sat, 2011-09-24 at 22:44 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-09-24 at 20:20 +,
> debian-user-digest-requ...@lists.debian.org wrote:
> > CONCURRENCY_LEVEL=2
>
> I didn't read the thread, just one mail.
>
> For my 2.1 GHz dual-core Athlon CONCURRENCY_LEVEL does minimal reduce
> compili
On 9/24/2011 9:22 AM, Camaleón wrote:
Hello,
I had to compile the latest upstream kernel sources to make some
debugging with my wifi drivers (from staging) and discovered that
compilation took ~5 hours.
That's much for testing purposes.
Compilation takes place in a netbook governed by Intel's
On Sat, 2011-09-24 at 20:20 +,
debian-user-digest-requ...@lists.debian.org wrote:
> CONCURRENCY_LEVEL=2
I didn't read the thread, just one mail.
For my 2.1 GHz dual-core Athlon CONCURRENCY_LEVEL does minimal reduce
compiling time. I suspect that consequently reducing unneeded stuff
would be m
On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 13:56:35 -0400 (EDT), Tom H wrote:
>
> CONCURRENCY_LEVEL=$(getconf _NPROCESSORS_ONLN)
> although "getconf _NPROCESSORS_ONLN" on an atom's probably "1"; but
> you never know...
>
> You can also pass "INSTALL_MOD_STRIP=1" to make-kpkg so that the "make
> modules_install" step st
t;make deb-pkg" because of its "one size fits all" build
philosophy. For example, it always produces a headers package, and I
often don't need a headers package. With kernel-package, I only get
the packages that I ask for. And since your goal is to reduce kernel
compilation
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Stephen Powell wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 10:22:33 -0400 (EDT), Camaleón wrote:
>>
>> I had to compile the latest upstream kernel sources to make some
>> debugging with my wifi drivers (from staging) and discovered that
>> compilation took ~5 hours.
>>
>> That's
On 2011-09-24 18:04 +0200, Camaleón wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 17:18:08 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
>
>> Plug in any hardware that you intend to use with your netbook and then
>> run "make localmodconfig". This works from Linux 2.6.32 onwards¹.
>
> I'll test that, it sounds very good :-)
>
> (I
On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 12:01:07 -0400, Stephen Powell wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 10:22:33 -0400 (EDT), Camaleón wrote:
(...)
>> I don't need nothing special, just to be able to boot the system, test
>> the staging drivers and then remove/compile a new kernel again so
>> wasting the less time in t
On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 17:18:08 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> On 2011-09-24 16:22 +0200, Camaleón wrote:
(...)
>> I don't need nothing special, just to be able to boot the system, test
>> the staging drivers and then remove/compile a new kernel again so
>> wasting the less time in the process would
On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 10:22:33 -0400 (EDT), Camaleón wrote:
>
> I had to compile the latest upstream kernel sources to make some
> debugging with my wifi drivers (from staging) and discovered that
> compilation took ~5 hours.
>
> That's much for testing purposes.
>
> Compilation takes place in a
On 2011-09-24 16:22 +0200, Camaleón wrote:
> I had to compile the latest upstream kernel sources to make some
> debugging with my wifi drivers (from staging) and discovered that
> compilation took ~5 hours.
>
> That's much for testing purposes.
>
> Compilation takes place in a netbook governed b
sting the less time in the process would be great :-)
>>
>> Any trick?
> I would build only the relevant kernel *module*, I want to play with (or
> imported from linux-next):
>
> http://wiki.debian.org/HowToRebuildAnOfficialDebianKernelPackage
I'll give it a whirl, but
I would build only the relevant kernel *module*, I want to play with
(or imported from linux-next):
http://wiki.debian.org/HowToRebuildAnOfficialDebianKernelPackage
HTH
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 4:22 PM, Camaleón wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I had to compile the latest upstream kernel sources to make some
Hello,
I had to compile the latest upstream kernel sources to make some
debugging with my wifi drivers (from staging) and discovered that
compilation took ~5 hours.
That's much for testing purposes.
Compilation takes place in a netbook governed by Intel's Atom N455 with 2
GiB of RAM and I wou
Hi,
You can use the option --revision in make-kpkg
(make-kpkg --initrd --revision 1.0 kernel_image)
or you can change the default in file /etc/kernel-pkg.conf to 1.0
so everytime you give make-kpkg the revision is always want you want.
Bye
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Hello Miguel,
if you are using make-kpkg ,
you may try the option `--revision'
hth,
Jerome
Miguel J. Jiménez wrote:
Hi... I am testing self made kernels on my desktop, using the debian way
found in http://www.howtoforge.com... My question is about the name
given to the deb package generated..
Hi... I am testing self made kernels on my desktop, using the debian way
found in http://www.howtoforge.com... My question is about the name
given to the deb package generated... How can I change the string
"-10.00.Custom_i386" in the package name? I am running debian
"testing/lenny". Thanks a
Hi all,
I was always downloading from www.kernel.org, using always the same
.config file, and everything was fine. Up to the point I found out that
the newer kernels which were supposed to have new options
(CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP) are not having them. I tried to compile the
configure the kernel wi
Hello
Roman Kouzmenko (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> I've managed after some work to install debian on my new Dell machine
> (ICH7 controller + SATA): I debootstrapped the system from Knoppix and
> then installed the latest kernel 2.6.15-1-686-smp from the backports
> with initramfs-tools. I need
Hello Roman,
Just been through the exercise of building my first Debian kernel
myself. If you have never built a Debian kernel before, the
'Debian way' of doing it seems quite different to that on most other
Linux's.
The method I used to reproduce my stock stable kernel-source-2.6.8
after a new i
Hello,
After being stuck for 3 days trying to recompile my kernel, I'm seeking
help. Guess the answer should be quite simple.
I've managed after some work to install debian on my new Dell machine
(ICH7 controller + SATA): I debootstrapped the system from Knoppix and
then installed the latest
.1.0
kernel_image
for more details google with "debian kernel compilation"
Regards,
Abhisawa
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Brent!
> Thanks for replying, no its from the debian repositry.
ok. But which version did you obtain?
> ukgate:/usr/src/linux# dpkg -l | grep -i gcc
> ii gcc 4.0.2-2The GNU C compiler
> ii gcc-2.95 2.95.4-22 The GNU C
Andi Drebes wrote:
Hi!
For some reason I seem to be getting the following message when type make
menuconfig
scripts/kconfig/mconf.c:91: error: static declaration of 'current_menu'
follows non-static declaration scripts/kconfig/lkc.h:63: error: previous
declaration of 'current_menu' was here ma
Hi!
> For some reason I seem to be getting the following message when type make
> menuconfig
> scripts/kconfig/mconf.c:91: error: static declaration of 'current_menu'
> follows non-static declaration scripts/kconfig/lkc.h:63: error: previous
> declaration of 'current_menu' was here make[1]: ***
>
Hi all
For some reason I seem to be getting the following message when type make
menuconfig
scripts/kconfig/mconf.c:91: error: static declaration of 'current_menu' follows
non-static declaration
scripts/kconfig/lkc.h:63: error: previous declaration of 'current_menu' was here
make[1]: *** [scri
Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
>On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 the mental interface of
>Raffaele D'Elia told:
>
>
>
>>Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 the mental interface of
>>>Doofus told:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>tar -xjf kernel-version.tar.bz
>>>cd linux-version
>>>make-kpkg debian
>>>dc
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 the mental interface of
Raffaele D'Elia told:
> Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
>
> >On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 the mental interface of
> >Doofus told:
> >
> >
> >
> >tar -xjf kernel-version.tar.bz
> >cd linux-version
> >make-kpkg debian
> >dch -i
> >Type your changes to the changelog li
Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
>On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 the mental interface of
>Doofus told:
>
>
>
>tar -xjf kernel-version.tar.bz
>cd linux-version
>make-kpkg debian
>dch -i
>Type your changes to the changelog like:
>"New vanilla upstream"
>cp /boot/config-whatever .config
>make menuconfig to custom yo
On Monday 18 July 2005 07:43 pm, Doofus wrote:
> The debian reference manual says there are two ways, the debian standard
> method:
>
> http://www.uk.debian.org/doc/manuals/reference/ch-kernel.en.html#s-kernel-d
>ebian
>
> and the classic method:
>
> http://www.uk.debian.org/doc/manuals/reference/c
Doofus wrote:
> Is there any reason not to combine the two methods, ie download the
> latest 2.4 from kernel.org (which I want), but use "make-kpkg clean" and
> "make-kpkg kernel_image" (which I like)?
Combine the methods? That's how the maintainers make the deb packages more
or less.
--
To U
Doofus writes:
> Is there any reason not to combine the two methods, ie download the
> latest 2.4 from kernel.org (which I want), but use "make-kpkg clean" and
> "make-kpkg kernel_image" (which I like)?
No. Kernel-package works fine with kernel.org kernels.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, e
Doofus wrote:
Is there any reason not to combine the two methods, ie download the
latest 2.4 from kernel.org (which I want), but use "make-kpkg clean"
and "make-kpkg kernel_image" (which I like)?
I do not have an answer to your question. But may I ask why you are
trying to compile
1) lates
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 the mental interface of
Doofus told:
[...]
> Is there any reason not to combine the two methods, ie download the latest
> 2.4
> from kernel.org (which I want), but use "make-kpkg clean" and "make-kpkg
> kernel_image" (which I like)?
The way I do it:
As root:
$EDITOR /etc/ke
The debian reference manual says there are two ways, the debian standard
method:
http://www.uk.debian.org/doc/manuals/reference/ch-kernel.en.html#s-kernel-debian
and the classic method:
http://www.uk.debian.org/doc/manuals/reference/ch-kernel.en.html#s-kernel-classic
where the first uses a ke
Hey ho,
From my very first steps with Debian, I was taught to compile kernel
sources myself, rather than the proverbial Debian way, so that's what
I've been doing ever since.
After compilation, an "sh ./NVIDIA_binary_driver_package.run" has never
failed on me, until recently. For some reason,
Got it!
I update the system and it upgraded initrd-tools, plus I updated the
kernel-2.6.11 also. Then I copyed the new default config from /boot and
I'm now running it.
So, I suppose initrd-tools was buggy...
thanks anyway,
bye
Alberto
On May 24, 2005 at 10:01:16AM +0200, Alberto Bert wrote:
I usually run vanilla sources. For the 2.6.11.-ck8 I wanted to give the
much praised -ck patch a try, but for now I haven't seen any difference
yet :-)
Ionut
On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 09:02:59AM +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> On 23 May 2005, Ionut Georgescu wrote:
> > Hello Alberto,
> >
> > I ru
On May 24, 2005 at 09:02:59AM +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote:
> On 23 May 2005, Ionut Georgescu wrote:
> > Hello Alberto,
> >
> > I run 2.6.11-ck8 and 2.6.11.2 with no issues. Both compiled with
> > make-kpkg.
> >
> > Could it be a wrong .config file ?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Ionut
> >
>
> Is this
On 23 May 2005, Ionut Georgescu wrote:
> Hello Alberto,
>
> I run 2.6.11-ck8 and 2.6.11.2 with no issues. Both compiled with
> make-kpkg.
>
> Could it be a wrong .config file ?
>
> Regards,
> Ionut
>
Is this the vanilla kernel source or the Debian kernel-source package?
Anthony
--
[EMAIL PR
On May 23, 2005 at 10:03:13PM -0700, Marc Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 07:06:31PM +0200, Alberto Bert wrote:
> > I just tryed to compile the 2.6.22 kernel with make-kpkg and the default
> > config file.
>
> Is there any indication whatsoever that the "default" configuration file is
> ap
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 07:06:31PM +0200, Alberto Bert wrote:
> I just tryed to compile the 2.6.22 kernel with make-kpkg and the default
> config file.
Is there any indication whatsoever that the "default" configuration file is
appropriate for your hardware?
If you don't know what you're doing, s
Hello Alberto,
I run 2.6.11-ck8 and 2.6.11.2 with no issues. Both compiled with
make-kpkg.
Could it be a wrong .config file ?
Regards,
Ionut
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 07:11:00PM +0200, Alberto Bert wrote:
> Sorry, I forgot to say that I'm running sid
>
> Alberto
>
> On May 23, 2005 at 07:06:31P
Sorry, I forgot to say that I'm running sid
Alberto
On May 23, 2005 at 07:06:31PM +0200, Alberto Bert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just tryed to compile the 2.6.22 kernel with make-kpkg and the default
> config file.
>
> I doesn't boot giving endless loop with and error apparently related
> to proc and i
Hi,
I just tryed to compile the 2.6.22 kernel with make-kpkg and the default
config file.
I doesn't boot giving endless loop with and error apparently related
to proc and init. I cannot be more precise cause I don't know where to find back
what it was on the console...
Is that a known problem of
Alex Papadopoulos([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is reported to have said:
> I've managed to reinstall gcc-3.3 (with aptitude), after having cleared my
> apt cache (apt-get clean) so as to be sure that a "correct" version would
> be downloaded...
> Same problem, segmentation fault when I do 'gcc -v'
>
I hav
I've managed to reinstall gcc-3.3 (with aptitude), after having cleared my
apt cache (apt-get clean) so as to be sure that a "correct" version would be
downloaded...
Same problem, segmentation fault when I do 'gcc -v'
_
Express your
And it seems all my gcc-3.x packages don't work... gcc-2.95 is fine, but too
old...
_
Don't just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search!
http://search.msn.com/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "u
I removed some of my gcc's, keeping the gcc-x.x-base files though, they
seemed necessary. I tried again, same error. The funny thing, even 'make
clean' fails :
...
/bin/sh: line 1: 15413 Segmentation fault gcc -D__KERNEL__ -Iinclude
-Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -fno-strict-alia
I do have all the necessary packages. The thing is that I configured my
kernel a couple of months ago (when 2.6.5 was the latest stable kernel
version). It worked fine. Yesterday I found shfs module, and while trying to
compile it I got this error message.
It isn't a "normal" compilation error,
Yes I have, with the latest provided by debian : 2.6.9
The problem seems to be unrelated to the version of the kernel because even
module compilation fails, as I stated before.
Thanks for helping
Hi
Have you tried to compile another 2.6.x kernel with your 2.6.5/.config
? Moreover you will have a
Hello,
while trying to compile a module (shfs) for my kernel (compiled from source,
version 2.6.5) I got a segmentation fault error. I deleted my kernel-source
folder, while keeping a copy of my configuration, and tried to recompile it.
I got the same error again, here it is :
==
--- James Vahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you
> wrote:
> > Anyone can tell me howto install kernel sources
> under
> > Debian Testing, I already try:
> >
> > apt-cache search kernel sources
>
> Try: apt-cache search ^kernel-source
>
> I prefer the sources from
1 - 100 of 362 matches
Mail list logo
