Gary L. Roach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| I have a Toshiba Qosmio G25 that comes with windows XP installed. I used the
newest Etch
| installer to load Debian onto the 2nd harddrive. This worked reasonably well.
Grep was
| installed in the /MBR of the first (XP) disk. All this worked fine. The
On 6/11/07, Gary L. Roach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have a Toshiba Qosmio G25 that comes with windows XP installed. I used
the newest Etch installer to load Debian onto the 2nd harddrive. This
worked reasonably well. Grep was installed in the /MBR of the first (XP)
disk. All this worked fine.
I have a Toshiba Qosmio G25 that comes with windows XP installed. I used
the newest Etch installer to load Debian onto the 2nd harddrive. This
worked reasonably well. Grep was installed in the /MBR of the first (XP)
disk. All this worked fine. Then I decided that I wanted to customize the
kern
On Mon, Jun 12, 2006 at 10:20:27AM -0400, Sam Rosenfeld wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Sun, 11 Jun 2006, Loke Berne wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, 2006-06-11 at 13:13 -0400, Sam Rosenfeld wrote:
> > > > I am using Debian Sarge with a 2.4.27 linux kernel. To replace this
> > > > kernel with a late 2.6 kernel, is
On Mon, June 12, 2006 16:20, Sam Rosenfeld said:
>
>
>
>> On Sun, 11 Jun 2006, Loke Berne wrote:
>>
>> > On Sun, 2006-06-11 at 13:13 -0400, Sam Rosenfeld wrote:
>> > > I am using Debian Sarge with a 2.4.27 linux kernel. To replace this
>> > > kernel with a late 2.6 kernel, is it a simple apt-get
> On Sun, 11 Jun 2006, Loke Berne wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 2006-06-11 at 13:13 -0400, Sam Rosenfeld wrote:
> > > I am using Debian Sarge with a 2.4.27 linux kernel. To replace this
> > > kernel with a late 2.6 kernel, is it a simple apt-get install? If so, is
> > > there any danger of wiping out p
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 08:19:00PM +0200, Joris Huizer wrote:
> Sam Rosenfeld wrote:
> >I am using Debian Sarge with a 2.4.27 linux kernel. To replace this
> >kernel with a late 2.6 kernel, is it a simple apt-get install? If so, is
> >there any danger of wiping out parts of my home directory? If
On 11-jun-2006, at 20:19, Joris Huizer wrote:
Sam Rosenfeld wrote:
I am using Debian Sarge with a 2.4.27 linux kernel. To replace this
kernel with a late 2.6 kernel, is it a simple apt-get install? If
so, is
there any danger of wiping out parts of my home directory? If
it's not a
simpl
Joris Huizer wrote:
> I don't know what needs to change when using GRUB.
Usually nothing. GRUB is automatically updated via script by default.
Sam, you should also install "udev" package along with 2.6 kernel. Also
choose a kernel optimized for your system - for example
"kernel-image-k7" (or "li
Sam Rosenfeld wrote:
I am using Debian Sarge with a 2.4.27 linux kernel. To replace this
kernel with a late 2.6 kernel, is it a simple apt-get install? If so, is
there any danger of wiping out parts of my home directory? If it's not a
simple apt-get install, is there a suitable HOWTO?
It's
I am using Debian Sarge with a 2.4.27 linux kernel. To replace this
kernel with a late 2.6 kernel, is it a simple apt-get install? If so, is
there any danger of wiping out parts of my home directory? If it's not a
simple apt-get install, is there a suitable HOWTO?
Thanks.
sam
--
To UNSUBSC
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I usually boot into my backup image, dpkg -r the kernel-package, and then
dpkg-i the new kernel-package. This for the same version. For different
version of the kernel (where the /lib/modules directory is not shared), I
just skip the first and second
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 05:24:07PM -0800, Paul Yeatman wrote:
> I'm curious what are other peoples' practices when installing a new
> kernel package for a kernel version already installed (and the one you
> are likely already booted to). The new package may be for the same
> kernel version but for
I'm curious what are other peoples' practices when installing a new
kernel package for a kernel version already installed (and the one you
are likely already booted to). The new package may be for the same
kernel version but for a different release(?) of that version as with
the newly released pac
Hi all!
I'm installing a new 2.4.23 kernel on my main server (that I compiled
some time ago), using Marcello's tree, but the same config I used for
the Debian 2.4.22 kernel previously.
The kernel was compiled on my workstation (with make-kpkg) and then
uploaded to the server. When I try to in
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003 13:50:33 -0800 (PST)
"nate" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> doesn't need it unless he's not on x86 but it looks like
> the 2.4.x doesn't use it either. Most of my systems are 2.2.x
> and 2.2.x requires it.
>
> I've always needed bin86 to compile. I just recompiled again to be
> On Mon, 17 Mar 2003 10:00:50 -0800 (PST)
> "nate" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> stuff for building the kernel, since your on x86 I use bin86, make, gcc,
>
> He doesn't need bin86 -- that's the 16-bit assembler.
>
> apt-getting gcc, kernel-package, libncurses5-dev, and
> kernel-source-$KVERSION
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003 10:00:50 -0800 (PST)
"nate" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> stuff for building the kernel, since your on x86 I use bin86, make,
> gcc,
He doesn't need bin86 -- that's the 16-bit assembler.
apt-getting gcc, kernel-package, libncurses5-dev, and
kernel-source-$KVERSION will get all
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003 18:25:05 +0100
Martin Kacerovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > boot=/dev/hda2
> > > install=/boot.boot.b
> [..]
> > It's been a while since I've used lilo. I much prefer grub.
> > But I wonder if the fourth line shouldn't read "boot=/boot/boot.b"?
>
> Absolutely not, 'boot
Brian T said:
>
> I'm doing this because I want to add sound support for my Dell Latitude nm
> 256 sound. First I wanted to recompile the 2.2.20 kernel. I tried
> running "make-kpkg " prior but the error message is "command not found".
> So, I tried to install this command via dselect but ther
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 10:54:53AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Mar 2003 09:25:37 -0500
> "Brian T" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[..]
> > My lilo.conf is:
> >
> > boot=/dev/hda2
> > install=/boot.boot.b
[..]
> It's been a while since I've used lilo. I much prefer grub.
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003 09:25:37 -0500
"Brian T" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I
> tried to install this command via dselect but there was no item named
> "make-kpkg".
The package you need is kernel-package. make-kpkg is the command to use
once the package is installed. Check out newbiedoc's compilin
Am Mon, 2003-03-17 um 15.25 schrieb Brian T:
> Hi,
>
> I am currently using Linux Debian 3.0 and kernel 2.2.20-idepci i686. I
> would like to use kernel 2.4.20.
>
> I'm doing this because I want to add sound support for my Dell Latitude nm
> 256 sound. First I wanted to recompile the 2.2.20 k
Hi,
I am currently using Linux Debian 3.0 and kernel 2.2.20-idepci i686. I
would like to use kernel 2.4.20.
I'm doing this because I want to add sound support for my Dell Latitude nm
256 sound. First I wanted to recompile the 2.2.20 kernel. I tried running
"make-kpkg " prior but the error m
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 02:46:06PM -0500, David Ellis wrote:
> I think you forgot to use the "lilo" command to update activate your
> changes..
That's why it would be nicer to user grub (instead of lilo). You need to
install it once. When you have a new kernel to boot to, you only need to
defi
Hi again, at the end it was not the symlinks but something a bit (more)
silly. The entry initrd=/initrd.img was there but..under the older
kernel. So I just added the line to the new one.
Anyway, thanks everybody for their answers.
cheers
rodrigo
P.D. I do not know (yet) whether or not t
I think you forgot to use the "lilo" command to update activate your
changes..
- David
> you are right, my apologies
>
> the computer is a novatech laptop P4 processor, woody installed with
> kernel 2.2.20 (trying to update to 2.4.18-686),
>
> I have a SiS7012 sound card, SiS900 ethernet card,
you are right, my apologies
the computer is a novatech laptop P4 processor, woody installed with
kernel 2.2.20 (trying to update to 2.4.18-686),
I have a SiS7012 sound card, SiS900 ethernet card, etc; the important
thing (in my view) is that I've got a winmodem from (also) SiS. I
downloaded the
"Rodrigo Agerri (ylbaggar)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> in order to install a new kernel in stable, I did
>
> apt-get install kernel-image-2.4.18-686
>
> I configured /etc/lilo.conf keeping the older kernel (2.2.20) such as:
>
> image=/vmlinuz
> label=linux
> read-only
>
> image=/vmlinuz
Rodrigo Agerri (ylbaggar) wrote:
hi everybody
in order to install a new kernel in stable, I did
apt-get install kernel-image-2.4.18-686
I configured /etc/lilo.conf keeping the older kernel (2.2.20) such as:
image=/vmlinuz
label=linux
read-only
image=/vmlinuz.old
label=kernel-2.2.20
r
On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, nate wrote:
> ylbaggar said:
>
> > what did i forget?
>
>
> Is this a game? what can I win? I can't guess what you forgot because you
> didn't include enough information about your hardware and software
> configurations, and where the kernel paniced and what message it gave y
I'm not sure about the error, but you are also missing an entry in lilo
under
the kernel image, like: initrd=/initrd.img and probably a symlink in /
like initrd.img -> /boot/initrd.your.image
/ernst
On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, Rodrigo Agerri (ylbaggar) wrote:
>
> hi everybody
>
> in order to install a
ylbaggar said:
> what did i forget?
Is this a game? what can I win? I can't guess what you forgot because you
didn't include enough information about your hardware and software
configurations, and where the kernel paniced and what message it gave you
when it did panic.
the list cannot read mind
hi everybody
in order to install a new kernel in stable, I did
apt-get install kernel-image-2.4.18-686
I configured /etc/lilo.conf keeping the older kernel (2.2.20) such as:
image=/vmlinuz
label=linux
read-only
image=/vmlinuz.old
label=kernel-2.2.20
read-only
I then executed lilo an
> "Mark" == Mark L Kahnt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
Mark> I'm hoping that first make is something like "make config", "make
Mark> menuconfig" or "make xconfig", so that you can adjust the kernel
Mark> to the needs of your system, such as specific graphic, network or
Mark> sound cards.
On Tue, 2002-09-10 at 04:15, Manoj Srivastava wrote:
> >>"Mark" == Mark L Kahnt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Mark> What is recommended with Debian, however, is to use make-kpkg after you
> Mark> do the configuring and "make dep" -
>
> That was an excellent post, but as a very very mi
>>"David" == David Pastern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
David> What is the difference between apt getting the kernel-image
David> versus kernel-source?
The former is the compiled kernel image, that can be used for
booting the sytem, complete with modules and all, the latter is the
siu
>>"Mark" == Mark L Kahnt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Mark> What is recommended with Debian, however, is to use make-kpkg after you
Mark> do the configuring and "make dep" -
That was an excellent post, but as a very very minor point --
make-kpkg runs make dep for you, so you don't hav
>>"David" == David Pastern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
David> At what exact point of the process of compiling the new kernel
David> would I do the make-kpkg. After everything else i've done?
Please look at /usr/share/doc/kernel-package/README.gz,
man make-kpkg kernel-pkg.conf kerne
>>"Bob" == Bob Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> 2) will it add one more item inthe lilo for the new kernel and so that
>> In can select the older kernel at boot time, in case I want?
Bob> IIRC (I use grub), the older kernel gets labelled something like
Bob> OldLinux, while the new
what is happening gives the System
Administrator much more power over the machine and its performance -
much better than Microsoft's latest update so that they can take over
your machine whenever they find it convenient to disable non-MS
software.
>
> Dave
>
> -Original Message--
for
advice, much appreciated.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Mark L. Kahnt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 10 September 2002 4:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; David Pastern
Subject: RE: Installing new kernel
On Tue, 2002-09-10 at 02:01, David Pastern wrote:
> Bob,
>
>
e know if i'm doing things wrong. It does seem to have worked,
> and corresponds to what I read in my books!
>
> Dave
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Bob Nielsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, 9 September 2002 3:44 PM
> To: [EM
ge-
From: Bob Nielsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, 9 September 2002 3:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; David Pastern
Subject: Re: Installing new kernel
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 09:54:10AM +0530, J.S.Sahambi wrote:
> Sorry, I meant kernel-image-2.4.19-686 (I think this is the latest!)
>
J.S.Sahambi wrote:
> Sorry, I meant kernel-image-2.4.19-686 (I think this is the latest!)
>
> Currently I have kernel 2.4.18-bf2.4. If I install the new kernel image
> with the command:
>
> apt-get install kernel-image-2.4.19-686 ,
>
There are several kernel-image packages available that ha
On 0, "J.S.Sahambi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Currently I have kernel 2.4.18-bf2.4. If I install the new kernel image
> with the command:
>
> apt-get install kernel-image-2.2.20-udma100-ext3 ,(As I have ext3 file
> systems on my system, I think this is the correct kernel:|)
>
> 1) will i
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 09:54:10AM +0530, J.S.Sahambi wrote:
> Sorry, I meant kernel-image-2.4.19-686 (I think this is the latest!)
>
> Currently I have kernel 2.4.18-bf2.4. If I install the new kernel image
> with the command:
>
> apt-get install kernel-image-2.4.19-686 ,
>
>
> 1) will it
Sorry, I meant kernel-image-2.4.19-686 (I think this is the latest!)
Currently I have kernel 2.4.18-bf2.4. If I install the new kernel image
with the command:
apt-get install kernel-image-2.4.19-686 ,
1) will it install the kernel in a saparate dir and not mess up the dir
of older kernel?
At 2002-09-10T03:30:07Z, "J.S.Sahambi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Currently I have kernel 2.4.18-bf2.4. If I install the new kernel
> image with the command:
>
> apt-get install kernel-image-2.2.20-udma100-ext3
Did you really mean to move from a 2.4 kernel to a 2.2? I'd think you'd be
bet
Currently I have kernel 2.4.18-bf2.4. If I install the new kernel image
with the command:
apt-get install kernel-image-2.2.20-udma100-ext3 ,(As I have ext3 file
systems on my system, I think this is the correct kernel:|)
1) will it install the kernel in a saparate dir and not mess up the di
Hi
I have just done a clean install of potato and then upgraded to
woody. I then tried to install a new kernel, during the install it says
the following:
Setting up kernel-image-2.4.18-586tsc (2.4.18-5) ...
/usr/sbin/mkinitrd: ldd: command not found
/usr/sbin/mkinitrd: ldd: command not fou
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 09:30:17PM -0700, G.LeeJohnson wrote:
> >
> > May I suggest that you forget all that? To me the simpler way would be to
> > get the source for the kernel, set it up according to the Kernel-HOWTO at
> > www.linuxdoc.org, build yourself a kernel, run make-kpkg to make yourself
>
> May I suggest that you forget all that? To me the simpler way would be to
> get the source for the kernel, set it up according to the Kernel-HOWTO at
> www.linuxdoc.org, build yourself a kernel, run make-kpkg to make yourself
> a set of kernel-source,kernel-image, and kernel-doc deb files (they
> How do i get 2.4.5 to install with debian?..i know about compiling
>myself but i'm unsure how to incoorporate those changes with debian
>although i could do it blind-folded in RH..
The easiest way is to use Adrian Bunk's set of packages for a 2.4.x kernel on a
Debian 2.2r3 system. To run kern
On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, G.LeeJohnson wrote:
> hi..
>
> How do i get 2.4.5 to install with debian?..i know about compiling
> myself but i'm unsure how to incoorporate those changes with debian
> although i could do it blind-folded in RH..
>
> It seems that when I installed Progeny it gave me info a
hi..
How do i get 2.4.5 to install with debian?..i know about compiling
myself but i'm unsure how to incoorporate those changes with debian
although i could do it blind-folded in RH..
It seems that when I installed Progeny it gave me info at one of the
install screens saying Progeny comes with
Ken Weingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Sorry for all the questions.
They're part of what debian-user is for, so don't worry about it. :)
>Is there any particular reason why I should installed the kernel
>package rather than just doing it myself from the source from
>www.kernel.org?
Not especia
On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 05:07:37PM -0500, Ken Weingold wrote:
> Sorry for all the questions. Is there any particular reason why I
No other reason then that it makes life easy, no need to think of all
the details and how they fit in the deb-way-of-life. Like where to put
the kernel, update the mod
Sorry for all the questions. Is there any particular reason why I
should installed the kernel package rather than just doing it myself
from the source from www.kernel.org? I want to rebuld the kernel so
it should hopefully fix some stupid problems I am having due to the
default kernel put in by t
Sun, 1 Aug 1999, Stephan Hachinger wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Debian-user
> Sent: Sunday, August 01, 1999 6:34 PM
> Subject: installing new kernel crashed X - Help
>
>
> > I tried to compile
- Original Message -
From: Micha Feigin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian-user
Sent: Sunday, August 01, 1999 6:34 PM
Subject: installing new kernel crashed X - Help
> I tried to compile an install kernel 2.2.10 on a 486dx2.
> It compiled correctly, but when I tried to i
I tried to compile an install kernel 2.2.10 on a 486dx2.
It compiled correctly, but when I tried to install it it wouldn't start
(halted with a message that it was trying to open some module and couldn't
find it, and then that it couldn't mount root file system on 03:01.)
I rebooted with the old ke
62 matches
Mail list logo
