In addition to symlinks to /etc/rc.d/ directories, insserv
adds a ":" line to /etc/init.d/.depend.start file. My
mistake was that I added ":" line to
/etc/init.d/.depend.start file.
regards,
Martin
On 8/9/14, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> On Lu, 04 aug 14, 13:30:54, Martin T wrote:
>>
>> As a next s
Bernhard Frühmesser wrote:
> First the service xdm is now started long before other services (like dhcp,
> clamd, dansguardian...) are started.
> Before the upgrade xdm was the last service that was started which was ok.
Sounds like you are now using the parallel boot whereas before it was
the ser
On Mi, 10 dec 14, 16:19:12, Bernhard Frühmesser wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After upgrading from Sqeeze to Wheezy i have two problems with starting up
> services while booting.
>
> First the service xdm is now started long before other services (like dhcp,
> clamd, dansguardian...) are started.
And why is
Hi,
After upgrading from Sqeeze to Wheezy i have two problems with starting
up services while booting.
First the service xdm is now started long before other services (like
dhcp, clamd, dansguardian...) are started.
Before the upgrade xdm was the last service that was started which was ok.
ed your own question. Currently sysv *is* the least common
denominator.
From an upstream perspective, increased use of systemd, just makes lives
more difficult - once can no longer count on simply including a set of
sysvinit scripts with confidence that they'll just work. At a minimum, they
ha
Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 19/11/14 15:12, Miles Fidelman wrote:
Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 18/11/14 23:14, Miles Fidelman wrote:
Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 18/11/14 15:06, Miles Fidelman wrote:
Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 18/11/14 12:54, Miles Fidelman wrote:
I left out sendmail, but I just che
nit scripts with confidence that they'll just work. At a minimum, they
> have to start worrying about incompatibilities between their init scripts
> and systemd's implementation of sysvinit.
Assuming there are any.
> Beyond that, they have to either
> rely on packagers, or star
iosity, how are you comparing these to the init scripts that
> are generated by making the upstream source?
I was not comparing, I was checking which debian/ folders (aka Debian
packaging) would contain init scripts, which are then installed in the
binary packages as /etc/init.d/package (see dh_
gt;>> one
>>>> to suit the usecase.
>>>> 2. Like sendmail itself there is no "one-size-all" session/timer
>>>> configuration.
>>>> 3. If the user installs from a distro repostitory they get a "default"
>>>> .sessio
o match the distro. (If the distro is going to do the
work why should upstream do it?)
They ship sysvinit scripts, period. Which is
my point.
I suspect the logic you base the point upon is flawed.
./configure
make; make test; make install
Apropos of what??!!
pretty much works for pretty much any major
ce
scripts.
Let's take the inverse view: which of these use the upstream sysvinit
scripts directly ? The answer, as demonstrated below, is: none.
Out of curiosity, how are you comparing these to the init scripts that
are generated by making the upstream source?
At the very least, would not
y they get a "default"
>> .session file to match the distro. (If the distro is going to do the
>> work why should upstream do it?)
>>
>>
>>> They ship sysvinit scripts, period. Which is
>>> my point.
>> I suspect the logic you base the poin
care to
> >elaborate?
> >
>
> It's very simple. I have a bunch of stuff running on my system that I
> compiled from upstream code, including init scripts that work just fine.
> Now I have to worry that some of those scripts are incompatible with
> systemd.
Yo
ot shared across distributions at all.
So, the upstream examples you chose actually demonstrate that these were
not targeting Debian enough for the Debian maintainers to use the
provided init scripts (if these were even provided). (Note, I'm not
claiming Debian will not need to modify t
Show us where Debian is using the file shipped by upstream.
dpkg -l | grep xymon
ii xymon-client 4.3.17-4
amd64client for the Xymon network monitor
17:25:35 weezer:~/src/xymon-4.3.17$ diff /etc/init.d/xymon-client
debian/xymon-
Am 18.11.2014 um 10:07 schrieb Ludovic Meyer :
>
> Show us where Debian is using the file shipped by upstream.
Maybe drbd?
>
> Then, tell me, is Debian wrong to not use them, or
> are the script shipped upstream deficient ?
>
> In fact, you show "they are shipping initscript",
> but tell m
Ludovic Meyer wrote:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 08:54:16PM -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote:
Ludovic Meyer wrote:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 06:34:47PM -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote:
Ludovic Meyer wrote:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 02:56:20PM -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote:
Given all the talk about not being ab
sysvinit scripts, period. Which is
my point.
I suspect the logic you base the point upon is flawed.
./configure
make; make test; make install
pretty much works for pretty much any major server application - which
includes installing init scripts from upstream that just work
packaging adds s
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 08:54:16PM -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> Ludovic Meyer wrote:
> >On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 06:34:47PM -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> >>Ludovic Meyer wrote:
> >>>On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 02:56:20PM -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> >Given all the talk about not being able to i
On 18/11/14 15:06, Miles Fidelman wrote:
Please don't top post - it's not hard to move the mouse.
>
> Scott Ferguson wrote:
>> On 18/11/14 12:54, Miles Fidelman wrote:
>>> I left out sendmail, but I just checked, and guess
>>> what, no systemd service file in upstream).
>> xy?
> Ummm those
Ummm those are NOT systemd scripts shipped by the upstream sendmail
developers. They ship sysvinit scripts, period. Which is my point.
Major upstream application developers do not seem to be jumping on
systemd. If anything, what I'm seeing are "oh sh&t, I guess we should
develop systemd
On 18/11/14 12:54, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> I left out sendmail, but I just checked, and
> guess what, no systemd service file in upstream).
xy?
Did you try Google?
https://www.google.com/search?q=systemd+%2B%22sendmail.service%22&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&&channel=sb
>
> What do they know?
>
>
Ludovic Meyer wrote:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 06:34:47PM -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote:
Ludovic Meyer wrote:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 02:56:20PM -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote:
Given all the talk about not being able to influence upstream, it
occurred to me to actually take a look at which of the maj
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 06:34:47PM -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> Ludovic Meyer wrote:
> >On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 02:56:20PM -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> >>>Given all the talk about not being able to influence upstream, it
> >>>occurred to me to actually take a look at which of the major
> >>>app
Ludovic Meyer wrote:
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 02:56:20PM -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote:
Given all the talk about not being able to influence upstream, it
occurred to me to actually take a look at which of the major
applications I rely on actually come with native systemd service
scripts. I just wen
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 02:56:20PM -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> >Given all the talk about not being able to influence upstream, it
> >occurred to me to actually take a look at which of the major
> >applications I rely on actually come with native systemd service
> >scripts. I just went through th
Given all the talk about not being able to influence upstream, it
occurred to me to actually take a look at which of the major
applications I rely on actually come with native systemd service
scripts. I just went through the documentation, and in some cases, the
source trees, for the following:
On Lu, 17 nov 14, 07:29:00, Marty wrote:
> On 11/17/2014 01:13 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
> >On Du, 16 nov 14, 13:22:54, Marty wrote:
> >>On 11/16/2014 11:50 AM, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> >>
> >>>In the later case, one just has to read:
> >>>http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/Incompatibi
On 11/17/2014 01:13 AM, Andrei POPESCU wrote:
On Du, 16 nov 14, 13:22:54, Marty wrote:
On 11/16/2014 11:50 AM, Miles Fidelman wrote:
>In the later case, one just has to read:
>http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/Incompatibilities/
>to get very, very scared
Each one a bug as per De
On Du, 16 nov 14, 13:22:54, Marty wrote:
> On 11/16/2014 11:50 AM, Miles Fidelman wrote:
>
> >In the later case, one just has to read:
> >http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/Incompatibilities/
> >to get very, very scared
>
> Each one a bug as per Debian policy (sysvinit support). Loo
p.org/wiki/Software/systemd/Incompatibilities/
to get very, very scared
I don't see any item that would matter on a Debian system, care to
elaborate?
It's very simple. I have a bunch of stuff running on my system that I
compiled from upstream code, including init scripts that work jus
Le Sun, 16 Nov 2014 11:50:25 -0500,
Miles Fidelman a écrit :
[...]
> So... with systemd, one has to:
> - rely on packagers to generate systemd service files, and/or,
> - rely on systemd's support for sysvinit scripts, which
>
> In the later case, one just has to read:
> http://www.freedesktop.or
On 11/16/2014 11:50 AM, Miles Fidelman wrote:
In the later case, one just has to read:
http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/Incompatibilities/
to get very, very scared
Each one a bug as per Debian policy (sysvinit support). Looks like we
have our work cut out for us.
Among the
On Du, 16 nov 14, 11:50:25, Miles Fidelman wrote:
>
> So... with systemd, one has to:
> - rely on packagers to generate systemd service files, and/or,
> - rely on systemd's support for sysvinit scripts, which
>
> In the later case, one just has to read:
> http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 11:50:25AM -0500, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> Given all the talk about not being able to influence upstream, it
> occurred to me to actually take a look at which of the major
> applications I rely on actually come with native systemd service
> scripts.
>
> I just went through t
Given all the talk about not being able to influence upstream, it
occurred to me to actually take a look at which of the major
applications I rely on actually come with native systemd service scripts.
I just went through the documentation, and in some cases, the source
trees, for the following
On Mon, 20 Oct 2014, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote:
> I really do NOT want to start a flame war, I know that you guys are tired
> about this "init" subject appearing over and over... But, my turn...:-P
This thread is off-topic for -user. debian-user@lists.debian.org is for
Debian support.
If you want
On Mon, Oct 20, 2014, at 19:34, Martinx - ジェームズ wrote:
> I really do NOT want to start a flame war, I know that you
guys are tired about this "init" subject appearing over and
over...
No, you wanted to add more oil on existing flamewars and you
know it. If you don't want to start the flamewars,
On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 15:34:43 -0200
Martinx - ジェームズ wrote:
>
> But please, guys, DO NOT LOSE "*DEBIAN COMPILATION*"!!
>
> I mean, when I read that infamous guy, Poettering, talking about
> things like this:
>
>
> http://0pointer.net/blog/revisiting-how-we-put-together-linux-systems.html
>
>
Sorry man... English isn't my native language, is hard for me to express
myself in another language... But yes, those sources aren't the best but,
there are more, you know. :-P
Best!
Thiago
On 20 October 2014 15:55, Axel Wagner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Martinx - ジェームズ writes:
> > I really do NOT wan
Keeping `sysvinit-core` in Debian 8 (9, 10...) *at a reliable level* *is a
wise thing to do*. Just in case... (I don't trust RedHat neither the
Corporatocracy).
So! Let the men write their own init scripts powered by `sysvinit-core` for
a long time ahead! Don't throw this away! Also, keep
On Lu, 04 aug 14, 13:30:54, Martin T wrote:
>
> As a next step, I made the /etc/init.d/test-script file executable and
> added a symlink to /etc/rc3.d/("ln -s ../init.d/test-script
> /etc/rc3.d/S23test-script") directory and changed my runlevel from
> 2(default) to 3 with "init 3". However, the te
On Lu, 04 aug 14, 11:37:08, Gary Dale wrote:
>
> OK. On Jessie it is a symbolic link to /bin/systemctl. The difference is
> likely important to provide a standard way to change run levels despite not
> everyone using init. Ditto for insserv which seems to have been created to
> allow upstart and i
On 8/4/14, Gary Dale wrote:
> On 04/08/14 11:04 AM, Martin T wrote:
>
> On 8/4/14, Gary Dale wrote:
>
>> On 04/08/14 06:30 AM, Martin T wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I played around with a LSB init script under Squeeze(init is from
>>> sysvinit package version 2.88dsf-13.1+squeeze1) for learning purpose
On 04/08/14 11:04 AM, Martin T wrote:
On 8/4/14, Gary Dale wrote:
On 04/08/14 06:30 AM, Martin T wrote:
Hi,
I played around with a LSB init script under Squeeze(init is from
sysvinit package version 2.88dsf-13.1+squeeze1) for learning purposes.
My script is following:
# cat /etc/init.d/test
Hi,
by "reloaded the machine" I meant that I executed the "reboot"
command. I did try with telinit, but at least on Squeeze this is just
a symlink to init:
# file /sbin/telinit
/sbin/telinit: symbolic link to `init'
#
regards,
Martin
On 8/4/14, Gary Dale wrote:
> On 04/08/14 06:30 AM, Martin
Hi,
I played around with a LSB init script under Squeeze(init is from
sysvinit package version 2.88dsf-13.1+squeeze1) for learning purposes.
My script is following:
# cat /etc/init.d/test-script
#! /bin/sh
### BEGIN INIT INFO
# Provides: test
# Required-Start:$all
# Required-Stop:
On Fri, 30 Mar 2012 14:28:18 +0530, Prasant J wrote:
> I'm using debian squeeze armel port.
>
> This is a general question on debian init scripts. I have written my
> custom script. When concurrency is set to none everything works fine.
> But for faster boot I want concurrenc
Hi,
I'm using debian squeeze armel port.
This is a general question on debian init scripts. I have written my
custom script. When concurrency is set to none everything works fine.
But for faster boot I want concurrency, so I have set the dependencies
properly and updated using insserv
On 2010-06-09 17:38 +0200, Arthur Machlas wrote:
> So should I just delete my CONCURRENCY addition to the /etc/defaul/rcS
> file and it will return to default, or should I switch it to makefile?
Both will work. I just removed it entirely, since the setting is not
really official (i.e. not mentio
> So should I just delete my CONCURRENCY addition to the /etc/defaul/rcS
> file and it will return to default, or should I switch it to makefile?
Nevermind. I just removed the line and can see in my bootlogs that
runelevel S and 2 both use "makefile-syle concurrent boot"
Cheers,
--
To UNSUBSCR
>On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Sven Joachim wrote:
>
>> On 2010-06-09 16:48 +0200, Arthur Machlas wrote:
>>
>> Then ran:
>> dpkg-reconfigure insserv
>
> This is a no-op in Squeeze, you want to run the "insserv" command so
> that the order of the symlinks in rc?.d is changed to reflect the
> cha
On 2010-06-09 16:48 +0200, Arthur Machlas wrote:
> I changed my lsb header in the custom script (/etc/init.d/phc_vids) to:
> # Require-start: $acpi
>
> Then under /etc/insserv.conf I added the following line:
> $acpi +cpufrequtils +loadcpufreq
>
> Then ran:
> dpkg-reconfigure insserv
This is a no
First, regarding my earlier email, which I cannot reply to directly
(apologies), as it has been downloaded off of gmail, I *think* I've
gotten the ordering to work correctly.
I changed my lsb header in the custom script (/etc/init.d/phc_vids) to:
# Require-start: $acpi
Then under /etc/insserv.con
On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Arthur Machlas
wrote:
> Greetings list,
>
> I have created a simple init script to apply custom vid values to my
> cpus via the phc_intel module, which
>
Sorry about that, I just discovered there is a keyboard shortcut to
send an email in gmail.
To continue, I've
Greetings list,
I have created a simple init script to apply custom vid values to my
cpus via the phc_intel module, which
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian
r the run.
I tried setting up mutual nfs sharing, i.e mount all machines in the cluster
under /remote, that is to have
/remote/machine1
/remote/machine2
...
The problem is that the machines don't come up at the same time so there is a
problem mounting each other from the init scripts.
Is
On Mar 9, 2008, at 8:05 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
On Wednesday 27 February 2008 06:06:37 pm Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 09:41:24PM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
- Forwarded message from Sam Hocevar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
I also would like to spend some Debian money
On Sunday 09 March 2008 05:53:50 pm Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 05:37:38PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > On Thursday 28 February 2008 03:09:48 pm Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> > > I'd be very interested in Debian, with aptitude, etc, with the OpenBSD
> > > kernel. To me, this wo
On Sun, Mar 09, 2008 at 05:37:38PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Thursday 28 February 2008 03:09:48 pm Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> > I'd be very interested in Debian, with aptitude, etc, with the OpenBSD
> > kernel. To me, this would be the best of both worlds.
>
> Debian, being the universal op
On Thursday 28 February 2008 03:09:48 pm Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 10:30:23PM -0800, debian azul wrote:
> > Debian does not need a friendly mascot. That is ridiculous. Debian is
> > well known because it is great work not because its appearance is nice or
> > cool. There are
On Thursday 06 March 2008 03:25:25 pm Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> Or, was there a pig in Toy Story? Does Pixar use Debian on its boxes
> and would they lend us non-exclusive rights to use the image?
Yup, and there was even a Debian version named after him. "Hamm."
--
Paul Johnson
[EMAIL PROTEC
On Wednesday 27 February 2008 08:44:57 pm Hal Vaughan wrote:
> On Wednesday 27 February 2008, Rich Healey wrote:
> ...
>
> > Many of my windows using mates are at least familiar with Tux, even
> > though many have only ever used linux at my place (and then only
> > using firefox to check email, har
On Monday 03 March 2008 03:07:27 am Richard Lyons wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 08:44:14PM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > http://fixxxer.cc/images/mascot/calimero.jpg
> > http://fixxxer.cc/images/mascot/little_pinguin.jpg
>
> Excellent for breaking into the primary school market!
On Tuesday 04 March 2008 09:08:13 am Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 11:48:18PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> > It's very disturbing that you know so much lolcode.
>
> He probably wrote the debian-installer.
>
> It lol when it sees my old boxes.
>
> "Whahaha! you're still usin
On Saturday 01 March 2008 11:44:02 pm Chris Bannister wrote:
> http://www.rastageeks.org/~toots/debian/bisounours-debian.jpg
No me gusta!
--
Paul Johnson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Wednesday 27 February 2008 06:06:37 pm Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 09:41:24PM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > - Forwarded message from Sam Hocevar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
> >
> >I also would like to spend some Debian money on a contest, similar to
> > the FreeBSD
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 12:07:27PM +0100, Richard Lyons wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 08:44:14PM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
>
> [...]
> >
> > http://fixxxer.cc/images/mascot/calimero.jpg
> > http://fixxxer.cc/images/mascot/little_pinguin.jpg
>
> Excellent for breaking into the primary scho
Marcelo Chiapparini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, 2008-03-06 at 04:38 +0100, s. keeling wrote:
> >
> > Killjoy. You're right of course, but the ammonite has its charms.
>
> But due to the ammonite be an extincted mascot, I think it reinforces
> the general believe out there that debian stabl
On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 09:04:58AM +0200, Dotan Cohen wrote:
> On 04/03/2008, Douglas A. Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > watts, with 32MB ram, at a frequency in the FM band?
>
> Your CPU runs at a frequency in the FM band? That's the funniest thing
> I've ever heard! I am going to recycle tha
On Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 04:38:59AM +0100, s. keeling wrote:
> debian azul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > I think that debian logo is perfect for debian project. Debian
> > doesn't need a mascot. I think that is ridiculos
>
> Killjoy. You're right of course, but the ammonite has its charms.
> It'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dotan Cohen wrote:
> On 04/03/2008, Douglas A. Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> watts, with 32MB ram, at a frequency in the FM band?
>
> Your CPU runs at a frequency in the FM band? That's the funniest thing
> I've ever heard! I am going to recycle
s. keeling wrote:
Hal Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Thursday 28 February 2008, Rich Healey wrote:
Hal Vaughan wrote:
On Wednesday 27 February 2008, Rich Healey wrote:
Debian could use an image revamp, last night i was messing with a
There is a revamped i
On Thu, 2008-03-06 at 04:38 +0100, s. keeling wrote:
> debian azul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > I think that debian logo is perfect for debian project. Debian
> > doesn't need a mascot. I think that is ridiculos
>
> Killjoy. You're right of course, but the ammonite has its charms.
> It's not l
On 04/03/2008, Douglas A. Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> watts, with 32MB ram, at a frequency in the FM band?
Your CPU runs at a frequency in the FM band? That's the funniest thing
I've ever heard! I am going to recycle that joke to death!
Dotan Cohen
http://what-is-what.com
http://gibberish
debian azul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I think that debian logo is perfect for debian project. Debian
> doesn't need a mascot. I think that is ridiculos
Killjoy. You're right of course, but the ammonite has its charms.
It's not like it's a care bear or Tux.
I preferred the Arctic Tern (?) that
I think that debian logo is perfect for debian project. Debian doesn't need
a mascot. I think that is ridiculos
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 11:48:18PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On 03/03/08 23:32, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
...
> >
> >
> > HAI
> >
> > CAN HAZ DOODZ?
> >
> > I HAZ A VAR
> >
> > TELLAT DOODZ "aptitude search lol"
> > GIMME DOODZ IN TEH VAR
> >
> > IZ VAR MT?
> >NOWAI
> > VISIBLE "
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 11:48:18PM -0600, Ron Johnson wrote:
> It's very disturbing that you know so much lolcode.
He probably wrote the debian-installer.
It lol when it sees my old boxes.
"Whahaha! you're still using a box that has no fan, uses 20
watts, with 32MB ram, at a fr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03/03/08 23:32, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 05:12:24AM +0100, s. keeling wrote:
>> Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 07:12:48PM +0100, Florian Kulzer wrote:
I ARE STABLE CAT... TH
On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 05:12:24AM +0100, s. keeling wrote:
> Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 07:12:48PM +0100, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> > >
> > > I ARE STABLE CAT... THIS IS STABLE DISTRIBUSHON.
> > >
> > > I'M ON UR SERVER, RUNNING UR DEBIAN
> >
> > we co
Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 07:12:48PM +0100, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 09:21:41 -0800, David Fox wrote:
> > > On 3/1/08, Chris Bannister wrote:
> > > >
> > > > http://www.rastageeks.org/~toots/debian/bisounours-debian.jpg
> > > >
>
On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 12:47:01 -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 07:12:48PM +0100, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 09:21:41 -0800, David Fox wrote:
> > > On 3/1/08, Chris Bannister wrote:
> > > >
> > > > http://www.rastageeks.org/~toots/debian/bisouno
On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 08:44:14PM +1300, Chris Bannister wrote:
[...]
>
> http://fixxxer.cc/images/mascot/calimero.jpg
> http://fixxxer.cc/images/mascot/little_pinguin.jpg
Excellent for breaking into the primary school market!
richard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a su
On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 07:12:48PM +0100, Florian Kulzer wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 09:21:41 -0800, David Fox wrote:
> > On 3/1/08, Chris Bannister wrote:
> > >
> > > http://www.rastageeks.org/~toots/debian/bisounours-debian.jpg
> > >
> >
> > no no care bears :)
>
> What about lolcats?
>
>
On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 09:21:41 -0800, David Fox wrote:
> On 3/1/08, Chris Bannister wrote:
> >
> > http://www.rastageeks.org/~toots/debian/bisounours-debian.jpg
> >
>
> no no care bears :)
What about lolcats?
I ARE STABLE CAT... THIS IS STABLE DISTRIBUSHON.
I'M ON UR SERVER, RUNNING UR DEBIAN
On 3/1/08, Chris Bannister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> http://www.rastageeks.org/~toots/debian/bisounours-debian.jpg
>
no no care bears :)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 06:14:22PM -0800, Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 09:41:24PM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > This message was posted by Sam Hocevar (current Debian Project Leader)
> ...
> >
> >I also would like to spend some Debian money on a contest, similar t
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 02:26:26AM +, Peter Tynan wrote:
> On 28/02/2008, Andrew Sackville-West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 09:41:24PM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > > This message was posted by Sam Hocevar (current Debian Project Leader)
> >
> > ...
> >
> > >
> >
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 09:55:08AM +, Nuno Magalhães wrote:
> "I love the cream swirling into the coffee graphic that was a
> bootsplash at some point. Don't know if it's still around, but it sure
> captures my image of debian."
>
> If it doesn't even remotely hint of Java i'll vote for that.
Andrew Henry wrote this on Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 10:00:15PM +0100. My
reply is below.
> I've always thought it was quite a fitting icon for a free software
> distro, but I suppose it means different things to different people.
The light blue on blue background splash reminds me of a Tidybowl
comm
Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> The Debian Swirl reminds me of some kind of worm or shellfish.
>
> The Debian HookWorm?
> The Debian RingWorm? Digs into your Sole (Soul)? Lord of the RingWorm?
> The Debian Tapeworm? Makes you hungry for more!
>
> The Debian Krill? (Eaten by Puffy?)
>
> The Debian Swi
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008 11:00:15 +0100, Nuno Magalhães wrote:
> "I love the cream swirling into the coffee graphic that was a
> bootsplash at some point. Don't know if it's still around, but it sure
> captures my image of debian."
>
> If it doesn't even remotely hint of Java i'll vote for that.
I mad
"I love the cream swirling into the coffee graphic that was a
bootsplash at some point. Don't know if it's still around, but it sure
captures my image of debian."
If it doesn't even remotely hint of Java i'll vote for that.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsub
s. keeling wrote this on Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 03:03:40AM +0100. My
reply is below.
> There was an ancient, giant snail sort of thing (whose name escapes
> me) which spent it's life floating in the ocean wherever the
> currwent took it. Some fossils are a few feet across.
Ah, yes, the ammonites:
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 06:09:48PM -0500, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> Next time I have a spare box, I'll work on having an OpenBSD main system
> with Debian in a chroot
once I tried it with FreeBSD 4.x
chroot /debian/
gave a nice bash prompt, but anything needing to access /dev/ or /proc/
had seri
Douglas A. Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I'd be very interested in Debian, with aptitude, etc, with the OpenBSD
> kernel. To me, this would be the best of both worlds.
http://wiki.debian.org/Debian_GNU/kFreeBSD?highlight=%28freebsd%29
--
Any technology distinguishable from magic is insu
Hal Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thursday 28 February 2008, Rich Healey wrote:
> > Hal Vaughan wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 27 February 2008, Rich Healey wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Debian could use an image revamp, last night i was messing with a
> > >
> > > There is a revamped image with a new logo
On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 09:06:37PM -0500, Douglas A. Tutty wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 09:41:24PM +0200, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > - Forwarded message from Sam Hocevar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
>
> >I also would like to spend some Debian money on a contest, similar to
> > the FreeBSD
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 03:03:40AM +0100, s. keeling wrote:
> Douglas A. Tutty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Can't call it the Debian Shrimp since its nees so much memory...
>
> Bite your tongue:
>
> (0) phreaque /home/keeling_ free
> total used free sharedbuffers
1 - 100 of 196 matches
Mail list logo
