--- Rick Friedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Simply put... being the relative newbie that I am, is there an
> advantage to
> having the xinetd package rather than netkit-inetd? Currently, I have
>
> netkit-inetd installed. Would I be better off removing it and
> installing
> xinetd?
>
> An
Rick Friedman wrote:
> Simply put... being the relative newbie that I am, is there an advantage to
> having the xinetd package rather than netkit-inetd? Currently, I have
> netkit-inetd installed. Would I be better off removing it and installing
> xinetd?
That depends solely on your needs. "a
Simply put... being the relative newbie that I am, is there an advantage to
having the xinetd package rather than netkit-inetd? Currently, I have
netkit-inetd installed. Would I be better off removing it and installing
xinetd?
Any insight is greatly appreciated.
Rick
--
Rick's Law: What can
> Does your /etc/init.d/xinetd not have the following?
> You shouldn't have to modify it at all; just use
> /etc/init.d/xinetd reload
hmm seems to work. i coulda sworn ive tried it several
times in the past and it did not work
thanks
nate
* nate ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [011130 12:23]:
>
>
> > I haven't used xinetd, but just read (1) that it'll reread
> > its config files from a USR2 signal. Does that not work, or
> > perhaps is it not sufficient?
>
> woah. yeah that worked :) thanks!
>
> in most other programs ive used -12 always h
> I haven't used xinetd, but just read (1) that it'll reread
> its config files from a USR2 signal. Does that not work, or
> perhaps is it not sufficient?
woah. yeah that worked :) thanks!
in most other programs ive used -12 always has the program
exit .most useful for netscape..
cool! no
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 03:20:38PM -0800, nate wrote:
>
> in my experience .
>
> pros to xinetd:
> ...
> cons:
> - any change in xinetd requires a RESTART. kill -HUP won't do it. and
> this can cause problems if you have sockets in use(e.g. you run a mail
> server). sometimes ive had to shut
> From reading about xinetd lately, I thought I'd like to try using
> it instead of the traditional inetd.
>
in my experience .
pros to xinetd:
- easy to have a service bind to a single interface(like localhost)
- faster and more robust then inetd
- has fine grain access controls for turning
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 12:57:19PM -0800, Craig Dickson wrote:
| From reading about xinetd lately, I thought I'd like to try using it
| instead of the traditional inetd.
|
| However, I find that the netbase package, on which almost all networking
| software seems to depend, even if only indirectly
>From reading about xinetd lately, I thought I'd like to try using it
instead of the traditional inetd.
However, I find that the netbase package, on which almost all networking
software seems to depend, even if only indirectly, depends on
netkit-inetd. So it seems to be impossible to remove inetd
10 matches
Mail list logo
