On 01/28/2012 06:04 AM, Scott Ferguson wrote:
On 28/01/12 01:41, Harry Putnam wrote:
Scott Ferguson writes:
I use KDE (on Squeeze) and Pulse rarely uses more than 2% even when
networked to multiple boxen.
Interesting, so likely local config problems.
Not that I'd call 5-8% CPU "chugging"
* Harry Putnam schrieb:
> I want to get rid of pulseaudio. I almost never even use sound in
> linux and I see it always chugging away at 5-8 % cpu. That seems a
> bit extreme some how.
Can you measure how much load pulseaudio itself does ?
(in idle vs. active).
I'm really curious about those
Elimar Riesebieter writes:
>> Running wheezy - kde plasma desktop
>>
>> I want to get rid of pulseaudio.
>
> I've found [0] very useful
>
> [0] http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1381284
Great thread, thanks.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subj
* Harry Putnam [120127 00:50 -0500]:
>
> Running wheezy - kde plasma desktop
>
> I want to get rid of pulseaudio.
I've found [0] very useful
[0] http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1381284
Elimar
--
On the keyboard of life you have always
to keep a finger at the escape key;-)
--
On 28/01/12 01:41, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Scott Ferguson writes:
>
>> I use KDE (on Squeeze) and Pulse rarely uses more than 2% even when
>> networked to multiple boxen.
>
> Interesting, so likely local config problems.
>
>> Not that I'd call 5-8% CPU "chugging" anyway (chugging means the CPU is
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 09:50, Harry Putnam wrote:
>
> Thanks for the tips. The ouput you suggest is very misleading. I
> would not have surmised from the description it was totally
> non-essential.
>
> Both the first and last lines really do seem to indicate otherwise.
> Its first described as
> $ apt-cache show gnome-core
>
> gnome-core is really only a meta package depending upon the stuff
> ‘central to gnome’. Removing the meta package will not remove
> anything else, unless you use, for example, apt-get autoremove.
>
> It might therefore be helpful to check the dependencies of gnome-
On Fri, 2012-01-27 at 21:29 +1100, Scott Ferguson wrote:
> On 27/01/12 20:48, Miles Bader wrote:
> > Harry Putnam writes:
> >> Running wheezy - kde plasma desktop
> >>
> >> I want to get rid of pulseaudio. I almost never even use sound in
> >> linux and I see it always chugging away at 5-8 % cpu.
On Fri, 2012-01-27 at 18:48 +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> Harry Putnam writes:
> > Running wheezy - kde plasma desktop
> >
> > I want to get rid of pulseaudio. I almost never even use sound in
> > linux and I see it always chugging away at 5-8 % cpu. That seems a
> > bit extreme some how.
>
> It
Harry Putnam wrote:
>Claudius Hubig writes:
>
>>>Things like uninstalling gnome-core. Isn't that a bit dramatic just
>>>to get rid of pulseaudio?
>>>
>>> Remove the following packages
>>> 1) gnome-accessibility
>>>
>>> 2) gnome-co
Scott Ferguson writes:
> I use KDE (on Squeeze) and Pulse rarely uses more than 2% even when
> networked to multiple boxen.
Interesting, so likely local config problems.
> Not that I'd call 5-8% CPU "chugging" anyway (chugging means the CPU is
> at close to 100%).
I never heard that... In fact
Claudius Hubig writes:
>>Things like uninstalling gnome-core. Isn't that a bit dramatic just
>>to get rid of pulseaudio?
>>
>> Remove the following packages
>> 1) gnome-accessibility
>>
>> 2) gnome-core
Harry Putnam wrote:
>
>Running wheezy - kde plasma desktop
>
>I want to get rid of pulseaudio. I almost never even use sound in
>linux and I see it always chugging away at 5-8 % cpu. That seems a
>bit extreme some how.
>
>But anyway I don't need it.
>
>aptitude remove pulseaudio
>
>Offers what a
On 27/01/12 20:48, Miles Bader wrote:
> Harry Putnam writes:
>> Running wheezy - kde plasma desktop
>>
>> I want to get rid of pulseaudio. I almost never even use sound in
>> linux and I see it always chugging away at 5-8 % cpu. That seems a
>> bit extreme some how.
>
> It seems worth reporting
Harry Putnam writes:
> Running wheezy - kde plasma desktop
>
> I want to get rid of pulseaudio. I almost never even use sound in
> linux and I see it always chugging away at 5-8 % cpu. That seems a
> bit extreme some how.
It seems worth reporting a bug if it's really consuming that much CPU on
On my machine, I built a dummy package called something like
pulseaudio-bogus as an empty package to simply fill the requirement. I
used equivs to do this:
apt-get install equivs
Then create a control file called, say, pulseaudio.ctl:
Section: web
Package: pulseaudio-bogus
Provides: pulseaudio
Did anybody already recommend to install a dummy package? I switched to
Arch Linux, but I had Debian testing with GNOME3 and Xfce and everything
was ok, when I replaced libcanberra-pulse and pulseaudio by dummy
packages. I suspect only replacing pulseaudio should be all that's
needed, can't remembe
Good time of the day, Harry.
You worte:
>
>Running wheezy - kde plasma desktop
>
>I want to get rid of pulseaudio. I almost never even use sound in
>linux and I see it always chugging away at 5-8 % cpu. That seems a
>bit extreme some how.
>
>But anyway I don't need it.
>
>aptitude remove pulse
Running wheezy - kde plasma desktop
I want to get rid of pulseaudio. I almost never even use sound in
linux and I see it always chugging away at 5-8 % cpu. That seems a
bit extreme some how.
But anyway I don't need it.
aptitude remove pulseaudio
Offers what appear to be pretty ridiculous sol
19 matches
Mail list logo
