Thank you very much for reply.
Your solution my solve the problem of compiling kernel.
But in my athlon box, i find i can't successfully compile any software
form the source.
So i just think is there any common rule to solve this problem?
Thank you very much for reply.
Sarunas wrote:
-BEGIN P
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lian Liming wrote:
| Hi all,
| I have a Athlon XP 1400 box. And after installing Debian, i find i
| can never successfully compile the new kernel, there are always
| "internal compile error" reported by gcc.
I believe I had the same problem. To suc
Hi all,
I have a Athlon XP 1400 box. And after installing Debian, i find i
can never successfully compile the new kernel, there are always
"internal compile error" reported by gcc.
Following is the ouput from "gcc -v":
On Sat, Dec 20, 2003 at 09:19:19AM -0500, michelle wrote:
> Colin Watson wrote:
> > Remember that you need to link with -lm in order to call mathematical
> > functions like sqrt().
>
> Thanks, that's it.
> After re-running, the fprintf went away as well. (That must have been
> linker garbage due
Colin Watson wrote:
>
> Remember that you need to link with -lm in order to call mathematical
> functions like sqrt().
>
Thanks, that's it.
After re-running, the fprintf went away as well. (That must have been
linker garbage due to 100 previous errors.)
I'm down to one error now. The linker c
On Sat, Dec 20, 2003 at 06:39:42AM -0500, michelle said
> and my marbles, I think.
>
> I can still compile "hello world", but I'm getting link errors if I call
> math or file functions (basic stuff like sqrt, fprintf). They've been
> available so long through the default library path that I don'
On Sat, Dec 20, 2003 at 06:39:42AM -0500, michelle wrote:
> I can still compile "hello world", but I'm getting link errors if I call
> math or file functions (basic stuff like sqrt, fprintf). They've been
> available so long through the default library path that I don't know where
> to find them
and my marbles, I think.
I can still compile "hello world", but I'm getting link errors if I call
math or file functions (basic stuff like sqrt, fprintf). They've been
available so long through the default library path that I don't know where
to find them. How do I restore this?
How embarrassi
On Fri, Nov 14, 2003 at 03:31:13PM -0600, Lucas Bergman said
> "James W. Thompson, II" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I am trying to build the mono runtime environment and get the
> > message that the C compiler can't create executables...I have
> > attached the configuration log file in case t
"James W. Thompson, II" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am trying to build the mono runtime environment and get the
> message that the C compiler can't create executables...I have
> attached the configuration log file in case that will help any one
> in figuring out what may be going amiss...
>
>
I am trying to build the mono runtime environment and get the message
that the C compiler can't create executables...I have attached the
configuration log file in case that will help any one in figuring out
what may be going amiss...
-James
config.log
Description: Binary data
> >But now I've downloaded some source code which I'm trying to compile, when
> >trying to compile it became clear to me that something was defenately
> >wrong: I got the error that gcc couldn't write any executables...
>
> Usually this problem is due to the binutils package not being installed.
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ron Rademaker) wrote:
>I got a problem with gcc I don't understand and I don't know how it got
>there. I'm using Slink with 2.2.14 kernel. Whenever I try to compile a
>kernel... there's an error, I can't recall which one, I just gave up
>compiling a new kernel and continued with
nobody can really help unless you post exactly what error(s) you are
recieving..it could be one of a million differnet things..
nate
On Tue, 29 Feb 2000, Ron Rademaker wrote:
ron >I got a problem with gcc I don't understand and I don't know how it got
ron >there. I'm using Slink with 2.2.14 kern
I got a problem with gcc I don't understand and I don't know how it got
there. I'm using Slink with 2.2.14 kernel. Whenever I try to compile a
kernel... there's an error, I can't recall which one, I just gave up
compiling a new kernel and continued with this one, worked ok.
But now I've downloaded
Thanks for the quick reply!
I guess this means that dselect didn't mark the new version of the libg++
for installation. I assume that I should select the latest version
libg++2.8.2-glibc2.1-2.91.66-2.deb and that should allow gcc to install
correctly.
Do I need to remove the old version first, o
On Thu, Jul 15, 1999 at 09:30:12AM -0700, Doug Thistlethwaite wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I upgraded to potato a few days ago (I know, I should have used
> apt-get!) and I have a conflict with gcc.
>
> I get an error during configuration that says something about
> gcc-2.91.66-2.deb process ending with a
Hello,
I upgraded to potato a few days ago (I know, I should have used
apt-get!) and I have a conflict with gcc.
I get an error during configuration that says something about
gcc-2.91.66-2.deb process ending with an error because of a conflict
with /usr/bin/genclass which is also a part of libg++
> My hamm system crashed and burned yesterday
> the problem was related to an accidently installe dpackage not
> unmounting filesystems properly on reboot
> in any case
> today I re-installed. I installed bo then I upgraded to hamm
> via autoup.sh and the CD I burned on 3-4-98
> then of c
My hamm system crashed and burned yesterday
the problem was related to an accidently installe dpackage not
unmounting filesystems properly on reboot
in any case
today I re-installed. I installed bo then I upgraded to hamm
via autoup.sh and the CD I burned on 3-4-98
then of course dselect an
Thanks alot! That's probably it... I'll have to get offline now in order to
test this. BYE!
Philippe Troin wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Oct 1997 20:23:19 EDT Shaul Peleg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> > Can anyone tell me why I can't run the executable (if it is that!) that
> > gcc compiles? Is there some
On Mon, 20 Oct 1997 20:23:19 EDT Shaul Peleg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Can anyone tell me why I can't run the executable (if it is that!) that
> gcc compiles? Is there some kind of setup required? I am compiling in my
> home directory and another file, without the suffix is made but can't be
>
Can anyone tell me why I can't run the executable (if it is that!) that
gcc compiles? Is there some kind of setup required? I am compiling in my
home directory and another file, without the suffix is made but can't be
run! Thanks all!
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "uns
Hi,
Hmmm. Well, do you have the correct version of cpp installed?
If things look good, try purging and re-installing both cpp and gcc;
paying attention to installation errors. (I do not understand what
went wrong here).
manoj
--
One must be either the anvil or the hammer. --
24 matches
Mail list logo
