Re: dpkg wants to remove /usr/local/lib !!!

2000-02-05 Thread Pollywog
On 05-Feb-2000 Eric G . Miller wrote: > > Well, perhaps there's an error. However, I have some empty dirs under > /usr/local/lib/ghostscript after the upgrade. Hmm. I noticed the same thing after I ran 'apt-get upgrade' today. I don't know if I have empty directories yet. -- Andrew

Re: dpkg wants to remove /usr/local/lib !!!

2000-02-05 Thread Eric G . Miller
On Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 08:09:18PM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote: > On Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 07:04:11PM -0800, Eric G . Miller wrote: > > Just did a dist-upgrade and I saw this: > > > > Preparing to replace gs 5.10-7 (using .../archives/gs_5.10-8_i386.deb) > > ... > > Unpacking replacement gs ... > > d

Re: dpkg wants to remove /usr/local/lib !!!

2000-02-05 Thread Ethan Benson
On Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 07:04:11PM -0800, Eric G . Miller wrote: > Just did a dist-upgrade and I saw this: > > Preparing to replace gs 5.10-7 (using .../archives/gs_5.10-8_i386.deb) > ... > Unpacking replacement gs ... > dpkg: warning - unable to delete old file `/usr/local/lib': Directory > not e

dpkg wants to remove /usr/local/lib !!!

2000-02-05 Thread Eric G . Miller
Just did a dist-upgrade and I saw this: Preparing to replace gs 5.10-7 (using .../archives/gs_5.10-8_i386.deb) ... Unpacking replacement gs ... dpkg: warning - unable to delete old file `/usr/local/lib': Directory not empty Why on Earth would it be messing with anything under /usr/local? Is a bu