On Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 08:09:18PM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote: > On Fri, Feb 04, 2000 at 07:04:11PM -0800, Eric G . Miller wrote: > > Just did a dist-upgrade and I saw this: > > > > Preparing to replace gs 5.10-7 (using .../archives/gs_5.10-8_i386.deb) > > ... > > Unpacking replacement gs ... > > dpkg: warning - unable to delete old file `/usr/local/lib': Directory > > not empty > > > > > > Why on Earth would it be messing with anything under /usr/local? Is a > > bug report warranted? > > because the previous version violated policy by installing > /usr/local/lib/ghostscript directories, the new version fixes that and > was removing directories it improperly added. > > however I don't think its supposed to remove /usr/local/lib since that > is created by base-files when the system is installed.
Well, perhaps there's an error. However, I have some empty dirs under /usr/local/lib/ghostscript after the upgrade. Hmm. -- +----------------------------------------------------+ | Eric G. Miller egm2@jps.net | | GnuPG public key: http://www.jps.net/egm2/gpg.asc | +----------------------------------------------------+
