[Please Cc me on replies.]
Dear Debian folks,
In the Eduroam Wi-Fi network of the TU Chemnitz (X-WiN, Cisco CW9164i,
CW9166i, C9124AXE-E) I noticed too low download speeds from Debian
archive mirrors. Using a cable full adapter speed is achieved, so it’s
not some bottleneck in the peering
On Mar 31, 2025, Paul Menzel wrote:
> [Please Cc me on replies.]
>
> Dear Debian folks,
>
>
> In the Eduroam Wi-Fi network of the TU Chemnitz (X-WiN, Cisco CW9164i,
> CW9166i, C9124AXE-E) I noticed too low download speeds from Debian archive
> mirrors. Using a cab
On 2024-12-24, Andy Smith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Dec 25, 2024 at 12:51:57AM +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
>> The persistence of the person, in refusing to subscribe to, and post the
>> query to, the Ubuntu users list, make me think that the person is simply
>> trolling this list, and, that the person
On Tuesday, 11-02-2025 at 13:20 Peter Barnes wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Newbie here. I have a DVD Debian 11.6 Bullseye 64bit and installed it
I usually take "newbie" to mean "I am new to Debian", so I would ask did you
know the current production of Debian was Bookworm.? I was curious why yo
On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 12:42 AM Peter Barnes wrote:
>
> Newbie here. I have a DVD Debian 11.6 Bullseye 64bit and installed it
> successfully on my PC. I have downloaded later versions of Debian and when I
> go to install nothing happens. Am I missing a step? Is it possible for you to
> give me
On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 13:20:13 +1100
Peter Barnes wrote:
> Newbie here. I have a DVD Debian 11.6 Bullseye 64bit and installed it
> successfully on my PC. I have downloaded later versions of Debian and
> when I go to install nothing happens.
Do you want to do a brand new installation, wiping your
Peter Barnes wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Newbie here. I have a DVD Debian 11.6 Bullseye 64bit and installed it
> successfully on my PC. I have downloaded later versions of Debian and when I
> go to install nothing happens. Am I missing a step? Is it possible for you
> to give me step by step instru
Hi everyone,
Newbie here. I have a DVD Debian 11.6 Bullseye 64bit and installed it
successfully on my PC. I have downloaded later versions of Debian and
when I go to install nothing happens. Am I missing a step? Is it
possible for you to give me step by step instructions? Would greatly
apprec
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 25, 2024 at 12:51:57AM +0800, Bret Busby wrote:
> The persistence of the person, in refusing to subscribe to, and post the
> query to, the Ubuntu users list, make me think that the person is simply
> trolling this list, and, that the person should be moderated on this list,
> for p
On 24/12/24 23:45, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
[Reply-to set to debian-user - please subscribe and reply on-list. That way
anyone else can benefit from the reply. Copy direct in case you are not
already subscribed.]
On Tue, Dec 24, 2024 at 09:00:14AM +0100, koffie wrote:
Hello Andy
thanks for you
t works I can try to restore the system partition
> on Windows.
>
See above which might help.
> Ok. Merry Christmas now.
>
Glad Jul
Andy Cater
(amaca...@debian.org)
> Koffie
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Forwarded Messa
Thanks for the reply.
Andy has been addressed to a...@strugglers.net
Koffie
Forwarded Message
Subject: Re: Fwd: Ubuntu 24.10 failing download [Re: fail message
dirmanager]
Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2024 14:40:52 +
From: Andy Smith
Reply-To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
To
Hi koffie,
I'm unsure which Andy you are reply to - me (Andy Smith) or Andy Cater.
😀
This is going to be my last reply as I/we cannot help you with Ubuntu or
snaps.
Some of your responses are a little objectionable but I'm going to
consider that as being due to a language barrier and not pick up
On 12/24/24 09:00, koffie wrote:
I have to find a solution to be able to boot from USB to
start my Ubuntu. If that works I can try to restore the system partition
on Windows.
Looks like you are in a lot of trouble, the only thing I can suggest
would be to reinstall Windows and use WSL to have
t works I can try to restore the system partition
on Windows.
Ok. Merry Christmas now.
Koffie
Forwarded Message
Subject: Re: Ubuntu 24.10 failing download [Re: fail message dirmanager]
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2024 20:26:18 +
From: Andy Smith
Reply-To: debian-user@lists.d
untu list or forum.
>
> > It is not possible to download an iso file.
> > It takes hours to get it but it doesn't boot
> > The sha is fail permanently.
> >
>
> Where are you - where are you downloading from - which mirror or site?
> Try:
>
> http://cdima
On Sun, Dec 22, 2024 at 08:38:24PM +0100, koffie wrote:
> Ubuntu / Oracular
> Hello,
>
Hi koffie,
This is a Debian list: Ubuntu support is off-topic here but
you could try an Ubuntu list or forum.
> It is not possible to download an iso file.
> It takes hours to get it but
age. Use them! https://www.debian.org/CD/verify
>
> On 25.08.2024 16:55, Jayram Gaonkar wrote:
> >
> > Dear Debian Team,
> >
> > I am writing to *request a reliable download link for the Debian 10
> > ISO* file. We have a project that specifically requires t
https://cdimage.debian.org/mirror/cdimage/archive/10.13.0/amd64/iso-cd/
On 25.08.2024 16:55, Jayram Gaonkar wrote:
Dear Debian Team,
I am writing to *request a reliable download link for the Debian 10
ISO* file. We have a project that specifically requires this version,
and I have
On Sun, Aug 25, 2024 at 08:25:45PM +0530, Jayram Gaonkar wrote:
> Dear Debian Team,
>
> I am writing to *request a reliable download link for the Debian 10 ISO*
> file. We have a project that specifically requires this version, and I have
> encountered difficulties finding a wo
On Sun, Aug 25, 2024 at 08:25:45PM +0530, Jayram Gaonkar wrote:
> Could you please provide me with a direct and reliable link to download the
> full Debian 10 ISO file?
You don't say which architecture you're looking for, or which particular
flavour of iso, but you might s
Dear Debian Team,
I am writing to *request a reliable download link for the Debian 10 ISO*
file. We have a project that specifically requires this version, and I have
encountered difficulties finding a working installer. The links I have
found so far either lead to incomplete DVD images or result
redirects to:
https://mirror.accum.se/
If I download the netinstall CD from https://mirror.accum.se/ it redirects to:
https://gemmei.ftp.acc.umu.se/debian-cd/12.6.0/amd64/iso-cd/debian-12.6.0-amd64-netinst.iso
George.
On Thursday, 22-08-2024 at 09:16 Juan R.D. Silva wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
Hi folks,
I do not know the reason but for about 3 hours I could access debian.org
website and browse it up to this page
https://www.debian.org/CD/http-ftp/#stable but no further. When tried to
open amd64 link to download dvd, I get "the site cannot be open" or
something similar
. I kept trying while writing and get
through. The first attempt to download was as described above but the
second gave my my ISO. I don't think my ISP has to do anything with it.
Well, I've got my ISO. Thanks
On 2024-08-21 3:49 p.m., Andy Smith wrote:
Hello,
On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at
Juan R.D. Silva composed on 2024-08-21 15:46 (UTC-0400):
> I am trying to download debian-bookwarm-12.6.0.iso and it looks like all
> servers and mirrors are down. What's happening?
cdimage.debian.org won't load here either. Try:
https://mirrors.edge.kernel.org/debian-cd/12.6.
On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 03:46:40PM -0400, Juan R.D. Silva wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to download debian-bookwarm-12.6.0.iso and it looks like all
> servers and mirrors are down. What's happening?
>
> Thanks
>
Hi Juan,
Some hosting may be down: I don't know
Hello,
On Wed, Aug 21, 2024 at 03:46:40PM -0400, Juan R.D. Silva wrote:
> I am trying to download debian-bookwarm-12.6.0.iso and it looks like all
> servers and mirrors are down. What's happening?
It works for me. Time for you to ask your Internet service provider
or local network adm
Hi,
I am trying to download debian-bookwarm-12.6.0.iso and it looks like all
servers and mirrors are down. What's happening?
Thanks
On 10/9/23 05:07, Dmitry wrote:
Hi, Brad.
The issue with a broken download link was in browser cache. It preserved
link
to previous 12.1 version in html. After force update by F5 the issue was
resolved.
P.S. It is so uncommon when robust technologies with low resource
consumption
are used
On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 09:56:43PM +0700, Dima Estudiante wrote:
> > Tastes can be so different :)
>
> Looks like our tastes quite the same.
> - Plain HTML with Caching is a robust but now days rare used.
> - SPA widely used, but with high resource consumption.
Glad I'm not alone :)
Cheers
--
t
On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 07:39:44AM -0700, Mike Castle wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 6:11 AM wrote:
>
> > Gah, no. As a user I hate those with all my guts. Page "state" is
> > distributed in some intransparent way across client and server and
> > there is no way to refer to "something" via an UR
> Tastes can be so different :)
Looks like our tastes quite the same.
- Plain HTML with Caching is a robust but now days rare used.
- SPA widely used, but with high resource consumption.
On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 6:11 AM wrote:
> Gah, no. As a user I hate those with all my guts. Page "state" is
> distributed in some intransparent way across client and server and
> there is no way to refer to "something" via an URL.
Many modern SPAs track state via URL, so they can be referenced. A
On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 07:07:09PM +0700, Dmitry wrote:
[...]
> P.S. It is so uncommon when robust technologies with low resource consumption
> are used, with SinglePageApplications no need to press F5, full data set
> downloaded per each request.
Gah, no. As a user I hate those with all my guts
Hi, Brad.
The issue with a broken download link was in browser cache. It preserved link
to previous 12.1 version in html. After force update by F5 the issue was
resolved.
P.S. It is so uncommon when robust technologies with low resource consumption
are used, with SinglePageApplications no need
On Sun, 8 Oct 2023 21:20:04 +0700
Dmitry wrote:
Hello Dmitry,
>https://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/current/amd64/iso-cd/debian-12.1.0-amd64-netinst.iso
Appears to have been updated/corrected. Now works, d/l'ing Debian 12.2
after recent point release.
Transitional error, I suspect - Debian is
Hi!
At the main page https://www.debian.org/, the Download link with Debian
logo at the right part of the page is broken.
https://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/current/amd64/iso-cd/debian-12.1.0-amd64-netinst.iso
Leads to "Not Found". The requested URL was not found on this serve
On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 08:14:52PM +, Edwar Saliba Junior wrote:
> Hello!
> I'm looking for Debian version 11.7 on the official website, but I didn't
> find any link to download this one.
> Could you tell me the correct URL to download please?
>
You could try:
h
On 6/28/23, Edwar Saliba Junior wrote:
> Hello!
> I'm looking for Debian version 11.7 on the official website, but I didn't
> find any link to download this one.
> Could you tell me the correct URL to download please?
Hi!, I hope this two, in order, could be what you'
Hello!
I'm looking for Debian version 11.7 on the official website, but I didn't find
any link to download this one.
Could you tell me the correct URL to download please?
In advance, thank you very much!
Edwar Saliba Júnior
On Mon 12 Jun 2023 at 19:26:41 (-0400), The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2023-06-12 at 18:55, David Wright wrote:
> > On Sun 11 Jun 2023 at 19:18:15 (-0400), The Wanderer wrote:
> >> On 2023-06-11 at 17:36, David Wright wrote:
>
> >>> There are several sources:
> >
> > [ snipped the back and forth ]
> >
David Wright wrote:
...
> That's just plain wrong. What was added to bookworm,
> the current stable release, on Release Day was a an
> official number (12 in this instance). Please stop
> trying to sow confusion about codenames.
ok.
songbird
David Wright wrote:
> songbird wrote:
...
> I can't understand that paragraph. Too many "this", "that"
> and "it"s to know what refers to what.
haha, that's ok, just let it go.
>> release notes may not be written and some cases may
>> even be forgotten about.
>
> Which release doesn't have a
> Using "stable" in your sources.list is idiotic, and you should not do
> it. Ever.
I guess I'm an idiot, then.
I find it quite convenient because it says exactly what I want: I want
those machines to run Debian stable, whichever version that "stable"
happens to be at any particular time.
AFAIK
On 2023-06-12 at 18:55, David Wright wrote:
> On Sun 11 Jun 2023 at 19:18:15 (-0400), The Wanderer wrote:
>
>> On 2023-06-11 at 17:36, David Wright wrote:
>>> There are several sources:
>
> [ snipped the back and forth ]
>
> I'm sorry, but I just can't take seriously your not being acquainted
On Sun 11 Jun 2023 at 19:23:02 (-0400), songbird wrote:
> David Wright wrote:
> > songbird wrote:
> ...
> >> except that is a misconception for those who are running
> >> testing. we're not upgrading to a new release.
> >
> > I don't understand. Suite testing was codenamed bookworm until today,
On Sun 11 Jun 2023 at 09:46:49 (-0400), The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2023-06-11 at 09:34, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 09:20:41AM -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
> >> On 2023-06-11 at 09:02, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>
> >>> Using "stable" in your sources.list is idiotic, and you should
> >>
On Sun 11 Jun 2023 at 19:18:15 (-0400), The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2023-06-11 at 17:36, David Wright wrote:
> > On Sun 11 Jun 2023 at 09:32:04 (-0400), The Wanderer wrote:
> >> On 2023-06-11 at 09:05, David Wright wrote:
>
> >>> It would seem very simple, the first time this happens, to
> >>> config
ve, and most people don't have twin
installations as you and I do. You also have years of Debian
experience, and a degree in computing, I believe. Probably
a good candidate for running testing.
> can you point me to any official statement from the
> project as a whole which says that
On Sun, 2023-06-11 at 15:24 -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 2:12 AM Tixy wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 2023-06-10 at 23:55 -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> > > Debian's wiki says to use apt-get:
> > > https://wiki.debian.org/DebianUpgrade. Also see
> > > https://www.debian.org/doc/m
David Wright wrote:
> songbird wrote:
...
>> except that is a misconception for those who are running
>> testing. we're not upgrading to a new release.
>
> I don't understand. Suite testing was codenamed bookworm until today,
> and now testing is codenamed trixie. Why is that not a new release?
ade or mysterious software controlled
by someone else running to mess with my machine (as i do
not run auto updates).
can you point me to any official statement from the
project as a whole which says that testing is released
and there are official images for people to download?
i know of d
On 2023-06-11 at 17:36, David Wright wrote:
> On Sun 11 Jun 2023 at 09:32:04 (-0400), The Wanderer wrote:
>
>> On 2023-06-11 at 09:05, David Wright wrote:
>>> It would seem very simple, the first time this happens, to
>>> configure this in APT. I typed man apt-get (my preferred
>>> method),
On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 10:37:45PM +0100, David Wright wrote:
> On Sun 11 Jun 2023 at 05:58:50 (-0400), songbird wrote:
> > Tixy wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2023-06-10 at 23:55 -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> > >> Debian's wiki says to use apt-get:
> > >> https://wiki.debian.org/DebianUpgrade. Also see
> >
On Sun 11 Jun 2023 at 05:58:50 (-0400), songbird wrote:
> Tixy wrote:
> > On Sat, 2023-06-10 at 23:55 -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> >> Debian's wiki says to use apt-get:
> >> https://wiki.debian.org/DebianUpgrade. Also see
> >> https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-faq/uptodate.html .
> >>
>
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 02:01:34PM -0400, Default User wrote:
> https://wiki.debian.org/DebianUpgrade could use a tune-up, particularly
> the part about editing /etc/apt/sources.list, which IMHO could be
> worded a little more clearly.
It is a wiki, so you can do that.
If you can articulat
On Sun 11 Jun 2023 at 09:32:04 (-0400), The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2023-06-11 at 09:05, David Wright wrote:
> > On Sun 11 Jun 2023 at 08:12:49 (-0400), The Wanderer wrote:
> >> On 2023-06-11 at 07:50, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
>
> >>> If you track "testing" (something which has been deprecated for
>
On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 3:35 PM Brian wrote:
>
> On Sun 11 Jun 2023 at 15:24:16 -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 2:12 AM Tixy wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, 2023-06-10 at 23:55 -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> > > > Debian's wiki says to use apt-get:
> > > > https://wiki.debia
On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 03:24:16PM -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 2:12 AM Tixy wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 2023-06-10 at 23:55 -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> > > Debian's wiki says to use apt-get:
> > > https://wiki.debian.org/DebianUpgrade. Also see
> > > https://www.debian.org
On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 2:12 AM Tixy wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2023-06-10 at 23:55 -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> > Debian's wiki says to use apt-get:
> > https://wiki.debian.org/DebianUpgrade. Also see
> > https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-faq/uptodate.html .
> >
> > Maybe it's time for a comple
On Sun, 2023-06-11 at 07:11 +0100, Tixy wrote:
> On Sat, 2023-06-10 at 23:55 -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> > Debian's wiki says to use apt-get:
> > https://wiki.debian.org/DebianUpgrade. Also see
> > https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-faq/uptodate.html .
> >
> > Maybe it's time for a compl
Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 08:12:49AM -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
>> The same thing applies to those who track 'stable' by that name. Using
>> the symbolic names for the releases, rather than the actual codenames,
>> *is semantically different* and the tools *should treat it diff
On 2023-06-11 at 09:34, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 09:20:41AM -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
>
>> On 2023-06-11 at 09:02, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>>> Using "stable" in your sources.list is idiotic, and you should
>>> not do it. Ever.
>>>
>>> This is not a "use at your own risk" sc
On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 09:20:41AM -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2023-06-11 at 09:02, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 08:12:49AM -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
> >
> >> The same thing applies to those who track 'stable' by that name.
> >> Using the symbolic names for the releases
On 2023-06-11 at 09:05, David Wright wrote:
> On Sun 11 Jun 2023 at 08:12:49 (-0400), The Wanderer wrote:
>
>> On 2023-06-11 at 07:50, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
>>> If you track "testing" (something which has been deprecated for
>>> a while)
>>
>> What? Since when? This is the first I remember h
On 2023-06-11 at 09:02, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 08:12:49AM -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
>
>> The same thing applies to those who track 'stable' by that name.
>> Using the symbolic names for the releases, rather than the actual
>> codenames, *is semantically different* and the
On Sun 11 Jun 2023 at 08:12:49 (-0400), The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2023-06-11 at 07:50, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 05:58:50AM -0400, songbird wrote:
> >> Tixy wrote:
>
> >>> Or maybe the wiki page should be deleted, or just say go RTFM,
> >>> i.e. read the release notes for
The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2023-06-11 at 07:50, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
...
>> If you track "testing" (something which has been deprecated for a
>> while)
>
> What? Since when? This is the first I remember having heard of this.
ditto...
> Certainly the "continuously usable testing" thing seems
On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 08:12:49AM -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
> The same thing applies to those who track 'stable' by that name. Using
> the symbolic names for the releases, rather than the actual codenames,
> *is semantically different* and the tools *should treat it differently*.
Using "stable"
> > On Sat, Jun 10, 2023 at 06:52:59PM -0400, songbird wrote:
> > > =
> > > # apt-get update
> > [...]
> > > Reading package lists... Done
> > > E: Repository 'http://deb.debian.org/debian-debug testing-debug
> > > InRelease' changed its 'Codename' value from 'bookworm-debug' to
> > > 'trix
On 2023-06-11 at 07:50, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 05:58:50AM -0400, songbird wrote:
>
>> Tixy wrote:
>>> Or maybe the wiki page should be deleted, or just say go RTFM,
>>> i.e. read the release notes for the release you want to upgrade
>>> to.
>>
>> except that is a mis
On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 05:58:50AM -0400, songbird wrote:
> Tixy wrote:
> > On Sat, 2023-06-10 at 23:55 -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> >> Debian's wiki says to use apt-get:
> >> https://wiki.debian.org/DebianUpgrade. Also see
> >> https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-faq/uptodate.html .
> >>
Tixy wrote:
> On Sat, 2023-06-10 at 23:55 -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
>> Debian's wiki says to use apt-get:
>> https://wiki.debian.org/DebianUpgrade. Also see
>> https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-faq/uptodate.html .
>>
>> Maybe it's time for a complete refresh of those documents.
>
> Or m
Jeffrey Walton writes:
> On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 2:12 AM Tixy wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, 2023-06-10 at 23:55 -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
>> > Debian's wiki says to use apt-get:
>> > https://wiki.debian.org/DebianUpgrade. Also see
>> > https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-faq/uptodate.html .
>> >
On Sun, Jun 11, 2023 at 2:12 AM Tixy wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2023-06-10 at 23:55 -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> > Debian's wiki says to use apt-get:
> > https://wiki.debian.org/DebianUpgrade. Also see
> > https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-faq/uptodate.html .
> >
> > Maybe it's time for a comple
On Sat, 2023-06-10 at 23:55 -0400, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> Debian's wiki says to use apt-get:
> https://wiki.debian.org/DebianUpgrade. Also see
> https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-faq/uptodate.html .
>
> Maybe it's time for a complete refresh of those documents.
Or maybe the wiki page sho
On Sat, Jun 10, 2023 at 8:13 PM Greg Wooledge wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jun 10, 2023 at 06:52:59PM -0400, songbird wrote:
> > =
> > # apt-get update
> [...]
> > Reading package lists... Done
> > E: Repository 'http://deb.debian.org/debian-debug testing-debug InRelease'
> > changed its 'Codename' val
On Sat, 10 Jun 2023, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Sat, Jun 10, 2023 at 06:52:59PM -0400, songbird wrote:
=
# apt-get update
[...]
Reading package lists... Done
E: Repository 'http://deb.debian.org/debian-debug testing-debug InRelease'
changed its 'Codename' value from 'bookworm-debug' to 'tri
Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 10, 2023 at 06:52:59PM -0400, songbird wrote:
>> =
>> # apt-get update
> [...]
>> Reading package lists... Done
>> E: Repository 'http://deb.debian.org/debian-debug testing-debug InRelease'
>> changed its 'Codename' value from 'bookworm-debug' to 'trixie-debu
On Sat, Jun 10, 2023 at 06:52:59PM -0400, songbird wrote:
> =
> # apt-get update
[...]
> Reading package lists... Done
> E: Repository 'http://deb.debian.org/debian-debug testing-debug InRelease'
> changed its 'Codename' value from 'bookworm-debug' to 'trixie-debug'
> N: This must be accepted
On Sat, Jun 10, 2023 at 06:52:59PM -0400, songbird wrote:
> David Christensen wrote:
> > debian-user:
> >
> > $ date
> > Sat Jun 10 14:50:40 PDT 2023
> >
> >
> > The "Download" link on the Debian home page is currently broken:
> >
>
David Christensen wrote:
> debian-user:
>
> $ date
> Sat Jun 10 14:50:40 PDT 2023
>
>
> The "Download" link on the Debian home page is currently broken:
>
> https://www.debian.org/
>
> -> Download
...
there are also other artifacts happening wh
Peter Ehlert wrote:
...
> have a little patience
> https://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?p=773925#p773925
:) i have that. :) thanks for the link...
songbird
On 6/10/23 14:51, David Christensen wrote:
debian-user:
$ date
Sat Jun 10 14:50:40 PDT 2023
The "Download" link on the Debian home page is currently broken:
https://www.debian.org/
-> Download
https://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/current/amd64/iso-cd/debian-11.7.0-amd6
On Sat, Jun 10, 2023 at 02:51:00PM -0700, David Christensen wrote:
> debian-user:
>
> $ date
> Sat Jun 10 14:50:40 PDT 2023
>
>
> The "Download" link on the Debian home page is currently broken:
>
> https://www.debian.org/
>
> -> Download
>
debian-user:
$ date
Sat Jun 10 14:50:40 PDT 2023
The "Download" link on the Debian home page is currently broken:
https://www.debian.org/
-> Download
https://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/current/amd64/iso-cd/debian-11.7.0-amd64-netinst.iso
404 Not Found
Not Found
The requ
On 15.05.2023 15:19, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2023-05-15 10:25:45 +0500, Alexander V. Makartsev wrote:
I see. That explains why I can request source package
"golang-github-xenolf-lego/testing" directly and get the right one.
So, in my case, I won't be able to reliably get a source package(-s)
On 2023-05-15 10:25:45 +0500, Alexander V. Makartsev wrote:
> On 15.05.2023 05:43, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > But my point is that your database is obsolete, because if you ask
> > the version from testing, apt thinks that it is 3.2.0-3.1, while it
> > should be 4.9.1-1. You need to fix that.
> Wha
On 15.05.2023 05:43, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2023-05-14 14:17:05 +0500, Alexander V. Makartsev wrote:
[...]
I think you haven't noticed that I requested for "4.9.1-1" version from
"testing" specifically,
You can't. You can either request some given version, e.g. 4.9.1-1
(but this will work on
On 2023-05-14 14:17:05 +0500, Alexander V. Makartsev wrote:
> On 14.05.2023 10:06, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > On 2023-05-14 00:15:39 +0500, Alexander V. Makartsev wrote:
> > > Hello, fellow Debian users.
> > >
> > > When I need to build a backport of a package, I sometimes find it
> > > difficult
On Sun, May 14, 2023 at 02:17:05PM +0500, Alexander V. Makartsev wrote:
> hence why the command was "$ apt source lego/testing" not just "$ apt source
> lego".
> There is no reason for building a backport package for "stable" using a
> source package from "stable"...
If you're trying to build a ba
On 14.05.2023 10:06, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2023-05-14 00:15:39 +0500, Alexander V. Makartsev wrote:
Hello, fellow Debian users.
When I need to build a backport of a package, I sometimes find it difficult
to obtain actual source package(-s) from Debian repos using console.
Following advice f
On 2023-05-14 00:15:39 +0500, Alexander V. Makartsev wrote:
> Hello, fellow Debian users.
>
> When I need to build a backport of a package, I sometimes find it difficult
> to obtain actual source package(-s) from Debian repos using console.
> Following advice from a wiki page [1], after "apt updat
for a "lego" package and is there a way to solve this
once and for all?
I know I can go to a packages website [2] and manually download ".dsc"
file and feed it to "dget" utility, or download source files directly
from said website, but there has to be a better way.
ote:
> Debian.org/download does not work. Not a single link works. All it says is
> “unable to connect”. I get this issue on every browser I use
Do you have http testing tools like curl by your hands? It would be useful to
take a look at what they say.
Is Debian.org/download ok on your en
Works for me too here in Sweden with Telia as an ISP
On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 10:42 AM Corentin Bardet
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > Debian.org/download does not work. Not a single link works. All it says
> is “unable to connect”. I get this issue on every browser I use
>
> Debian do
Hi,
> Debian.org/download does not work. Not a single link works. All it says is
> “unable to connect”. I get this issue on every browser I use
Debian download page does work here from France.
Kevin Price , le 12 sept 2022 :
> Your IPv4 address 17.58.6.50 is allocated to Apple Inc.
Am 12.09.22 um 01:09 schrieb Tom Zarcone:
> Debian.org/download does not work. Not a single link works.
So double-check https://www.debian.org/download again.
All it says is “unable to connect”. I get this issue on every browser I use
Do you happen to be in a country whose government restri
On 2022-09-11 at 19:09, Tom Zarcone wrote:
> Debian.org/download does not work. Not a single link works. All it
> says is “unable to connect”. I get this issue on every browser I use
Works flawlessly for me, with all of Firefox, w3m, and wget.
(https://debian.org/download redirects to
1 - 100 of 2009 matches
Mail list logo
