Le 29/07/2019 à 13:08, Pascal Hambourg a écrit :
Prefix delegation is a DHCPv6 feature. The kernel does managed it.
Oops ! I meant "the kernel does NOT manage it".
Le 29/07/2019 à 11:07, Harald Dunkel a écrit :
question about IPv6 support in sid: Whose job is it to bother
about the IPv6 addresses dynamically bound to eth0?
It depends what dynamic configuration method is used.
SLAAC (using router advertisements) is in kernelspace. However some
informatio
the kernel sees the prefix delegation on eth0, sets the
> old IPv6 address to "deprecated" and registers the new one. How
> comes that avahi daemon and dhcpcd and possibly others interfere?
I won't say anything about the avahi (don't see the need to install it),
but I'
Hi folks,
question about IPv6 support in sid: Whose job is it to bother
about the IPv6 addresses dynamically bound to eth0?
AFAIU the kernel sees the prefix delegation on eth0, sets the
old IPv6 address to "deprecated" and registers the new one. How
comes that avahi daemon and
supersonicsnow a écrit :
>
> *I expect that dhcpcd should not be involved at all with**my STATIC
> wlan0, is that correct?*
IIUC, not any more if you have dhcpcd5 (the only version available in
the current stable Jessie). It is an autonomous daemon which detects
when an interface
supersonicsnow wrote:
> *I expect that dhcpcd should not be involved at all with**my STATIC
> wlan0, is that correct?*
> 1. Can you please confirm this behavior is a bug.
> 2. Do you know what package is responsible for the faulty behavior? My
> best guess would be: ifupdown?
you
ccessfully, but now
resolv.conf file is polluted with junk created by dhcpcd*
_$ resolvconf -l_
# resolv.conf from wlan0
# Generated by dhcpcd from wlan0
nameserver 192.168.0.1
# resolv.conf from wlan0:ra
# Generated by dhcpcd from wlan0:ra
nameserver fe80::1%wlan0
# resolv.conf from wlan0.inet
#
is not obtained at all or connection is
> established only for a very short time.
>
> I was able to fix it by uninstalling the dhcp3-client package. In this case
> the dhcpcd is used for obtaining IP, which works flawlessly.
>
> Unfortunately dhcp3-client is suggested by differ
other network, the IP is not obtained at all or connection is
> established only for a very short time.
>
> I was able to fix it by uninstalling the dhcp3-client package. In this case
> the dhcpcd is used for obtaining IP, which works flawlessly.
>
> Unfortunately dhcp3-client is s
>
> Is there any way to assign dhcpcd higher priority than dhclient3 when my
> system is going to obtain IP?
hello.
there is a configuration file /etc/dhcp3/dhclient.conf
you can try any options which will help disable dhclient
or give priority to dhcpd. Also do man dhclient.conf fo
established only for a very short time.
I was able to fix it by uninstalling the dhcp3-client package. In this case
the dhcpcd is used for obtaining IP, which works flawlessly.
Unfortunately dhcp3-client is suggested by different packages, so when I
update my system it often gets reinstalled
kj writes:
> Either ways vim.tiny to me is as frustrating as nvi, It's the first
> thing I remove after an install and replace with vim.basic
No need to remove vim-tiny. Whatever vi clone you have most recently
installed will be linked to /usr/bin/vi (you can change the link with
the update-alter
In <4a82e547.3050...@koffiejunkie.za.net>, kj wrote:
>Anyway, my post was not meant to be a debate about vi - just an example
>of something I'd like more information on.
Smaller, fewer dependencies. Both factors make the basic install faster and
make replacing the default take less time for user
Teemu Likonen wrote:
I don't know about your system but Vim has been the default since Debian
Etch.
Since I don't have it on my system anymore, I couldn't check :) John
Hasler corrected me: vim.tiny, not nvi. Either ways vim.tiny to me is
as frustrating as nvi, It's the first thing I remove
On 2009-08-12 13:11 (+0100), kj wrote:
> I don't know and there are many other choices I wonder about. It would
> be nice if there was a page somewhere discussing the choices of
> default packages, and reasons thereof. For example, why old vi (nvi?)
> over vim.
I don't know about your system but V
kj wrote:
> I don't know and there are many other choices I wonder about. It
> would be nice if there was a page somewhere discussing the choices of
> default packages, and reasons thereof. For example, why old vi (nvi?)
> over vim.
In Sid vim-tiny is "Priority: important" which I assume is what
kj wrote:
I don't know and there are many other choices I wonder about. It would
be nice if there was a page somewhere discussing the choices of default
packages, and reasons thereof. For example, why old vi (nvi?) over vim.
--kj
Agree.. the vi-vim gizzy would go on forever however.. lol
I don't know and there are many other choices I wonder about. It would
be nice if there was a page somewhere discussing the choices of default
packages, and reasons thereof. For example, why old vi (nvi?) over vim.
--kj
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Oli D wrote:
> In short, I'm wondering why dhclient is still the default considering this
> bug/caveat and possibly if it possible to use dhcpcd as the default DHCP
> client
> on a Debian [Lenny] machine?
Just install dhcpcd (an
Hi,
As the title says, is there any reason why Debian uses dhclient as its default
DHCP client rather than dhcpcd? Are there any issue with dhcpcd I'm unaware of?
I'd really like to know, because as of now I'm having troubles with dhclient as
it refuses to register its hostname to
I had the same problem. I have added eth0 to the line auto
in /etc/network/interfaces and it worked for me:
auto lo eth0
Tonny
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Clive Menzies ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> dhcp3-client is the default client these days
>
> Might be worth a try
>
Many thanks Clive. I just installed this and rebooted with a
successful internet connection. That is good news anyway, though it
may be a one time only thing. Still, it is
On (02/11/06 09:42), cothrige wrote:
> Nope, I was wrong. I replaced dhcpcd with dhcp-client but nothing
> actually changed. I still have about half of my boots coming up with
> no internet connection. And with nothing at all coming up during boot
> or in dmesg I cannot begin t
* cothrige ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> This is very strange and confusing, but I think I may have it worked
> out now.
Nope, I was wrong. I replaced dhcpcd with dhcp-client but nothing
actually changed. I still have about half of my boots coming up with
no internet connection.
no ethernet connection is probably that it fails if it can't find a
> live network interface.
This is very strange and confusing, but I think I may have it worked
out now. Dhcpcd is listed via apt-cache as "DHCP client for
automatically configuring IPv4 networking" and that doe
On Oct 31, 2006, at 10:44 PM, cothrige wrote:
Recently, and I am guessing during an 'aptitude upgrade', dhcpcd was
uninstalled. At the next boot I had no internet connection, and could
not reinstall dhcpcd without one. I had to download the deb package
on another computer and th
Recently, and I am guessing during an 'aptitude upgrade', dhcpcd was
uninstalled. At the next boot I had no internet connection, and could
not reinstall dhcpcd without one. I had to download the deb package
on another computer and then copy it over via floppy to run dpkg -i.
I mention
Well, i've been at this off and on today. Not much dice
to recap, I'm trying to use dhcp-client-identifier on a live cd
(eventually) so I can additional settings when they boot (without
affecting their normal setup while not on the livecd).
If someone else has invented this wheel, let me kn
I think I've found a lead to answer my question.
http://lists.netisland.net/archives/plug/plug-2005-02/msg00210.html
I'll have to try, and follow up later.
Chow.
I'd like to roll my own livecd (anything debian proper, or debian like
will do). The one piece of my puzzle I'm still puzzled about is
allowing the cd to make a dhcp request I can distinguish as coming
from the livecd. Based on that, I'd also like to offer an init script
(gpg signature thereof m
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 11:35:56 +0100, Anton Piatek wrote:
> What other programs cause similar behaviour? (like zeroconf)
> I been wrestling with my wireless card and it keeps dropping my
> connection after a while. i thought it was my driver, but it is probably
> something like zeroconf (and I wi
listing that gives it away as running
zeroconf?
Anton
Andrew Sackville-West wrote:
>On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 06:37:56PM -0700, Jan Scheffczyk wrote:
>
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>I am running debian unstable and just upgraded the system.
>>I use dhcpcd (2.0.3) as DHCP client, w
you probably have isntalled the zeroconf package. If you don't need
it, you can purge it and thatll probably solve your issue.
It did :-
Thanks so much,
Jan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 06:37:56PM -0700, Jan Scheffczyk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am running debian unstable and just upgraded the system.
> I use dhcpcd (2.0.3) as DHCP client, which worked fine until the update.
>
> So, now I dhcpcd gets everything from the DHCP server but see
Hi,
I am running debian unstable and just upgraded the system.
I use dhcpcd (2.0.3) as DHCP client, which worked fine until the update.
So, now I dhcpcd gets everything from the DHCP server but seems to
forget it almost immediately (it then falls back to some IPv4 link-local
address).
Here
did you once live in apple valley?
Start your day with Yahoo! - make it your home page
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PR
(no description
> available)
> rc dhcp3-client 3.0.1-2 DHCP Client
> ii dhcp3-common 3.0.1-2 Common files
> used by all the dhcp3* packages
> ii dhcpcd1.3.22pl4-21sarge1DHCP client
3.0.1-2 Common files
used by all the dhcp3* packages
ii dhcpcd1.3.22pl4-21sarge1DHCP client for
automatically configuring IPv4 networking.
un dhcpcd-sv (no description
available)
ns:~#
What does rc mean in the lin
s for our suggestion.
Reaz
-Original Message-
From: Shyamal Prasad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 10:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: dhcpcd
"Reaz" == Reaz Baksh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Reaz> Hello I am using dhcp
I finally got it working by installing dhcp using apt-get then modifying
the /etc/init.d/dhcp file. I using dhcpcd, the client, and it don't
install any dhcpcd or dhcp file in the /etc/init.d directory. After
renaming all the rc*.d files and have them link to the new
/ect/init.d/dhcpcd f
"Reaz" == Reaz Baksh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Reaz> Hello I am using dhcpcd for my dhcp client. How and what do
Reaz> I set so that the command: 'dhcpcd -d eth1' is run on start
Reaz> up.
Reaz> Thanks for any help
The best
t task I guess I'll have to manually start it after each
> reboot. Is there an automated way to do this?
>
> Reaz
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2003 1:31 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:
ter each
reboot. Is there an automated way to do this?
Reaz
-Original Message-
From: Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2003 1:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: dhcpcd
Edit /etc/init.d/dhcp and you'll find a line that triggers it to start
at boot and a
Reaz Baksh, 2003-Jan-04 01:08 -0500:
> Hello
> I am using dhcpcd for my dhcp client. How and what do I set so that the
> command:
> 'dhcpcd -d eth1' is run on start up.
>
> Thanks for any help
Edit /etc/init.d/dhcp and you'll find a line that triggers it to star
Hello
I am using dhcpcd for my dhcp client. How and what do I set so that the
command:
'dhcpcd -d eth1' is run on start up.
Thanks for any help
Reaz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 01:58:32PM -0800, Expert User wrote:
> When the dhcpclient used to be dhcpcd, there was a way to run some
> script after the dhcp has run by putting a script in /etc/dhcpc/dhcpcd-eth0.exe.
>
> Now that I have dhclient, how do I achieve the same result?
>
&
On Thu 19 Dec 2002 00:32:32 +0100 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I use ddts (http://www.ddts.org/) and there's a debian package
> that polls the central server every minute and update the ip
> when it polls.
I'm using dyndns.org, and they'd block the service to me if I did that.
That's probably the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Expert User) wrote:
>When the dhcpclient used to be dhcpcd, there was a way to run some
>script after the dhcp has run by putting a script in /etc/dhcpc/dhcpcd-eth0.exe.
>
>Now that I have dhclient, how do I achi
When the dhcpclient used to be dhcpcd, there was a way to run some
script after the dhcp has run by putting a script in /etc/dhcpc/dhcpcd-eth0.exe.
Now that I have dhclient, how do I achieve the same result?
I learned from the man page that there is /etc/dhclient-exit-hooks
script I can create
On Wed, 19 Jun 2002 17:22:13 -0400, Andrew Biggadike wrote:
>I am running Woody and kernel 2.4.18 and installed dhcpcd from potato
>(because it was recommended). I am properly pulling an IP from my DHCP
>server, which is nice, but now I cannot use an entry in /etc/hosts to
>map
I am running Woody and kernel 2.4.18 and installed dhcpcd from potato
(because it was recommended). I am properly pulling an IP from my DHCP
server, which is nice, but now I cannot use an entry in /etc/hosts to
map my IP to my hostname (since it's no longer static). When I try to
pi
Cameron Kerr wrote:
> Hello, can anyone tell me why there is no longer any packages for dhcpcd
> in testing or unstable. I'd rather not use pump, since I've heard that it
> has problems with multiple interfaces. dhcpcd is in stable, and is what I
> have been using.
Secur
On Sun, 10 Feb 2002, Cameron Kerr wrote:
> Hello, can anyone tell me why there is no longer any packages for dhcpcd
> in testing or unstable. I'd rather not use pump, since I've heard that it
> has problems with multiple interfaces. dhcpcd is in stable, and is what
Hello, can anyone tell me why there is no longer any packages for dhcpcd
in testing or unstable. I'd rather not use pump, since I've heard that it
has problems with multiple interfaces. dhcpcd is in stable, and is what I
have been using.
Cameron Kerr
--
[EMAIL PROTE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 19 January 2002 6:10 pm, Asura wrote:
> I just upgraded my dhcpcd daemon. Each time I reboot my server, the
> daemon doesn't automatically load (even though is says it does).
Have you set this in /etc/init.d/dhcp
# Set run_dh
I just upgraded my dhcpcd daemon. Each time I reboot my server, the
daemon doesn't automatically load (even though is says it does).
Any ideas on how I can fix this?
---
Asura
Owner of Dark Forest Mud
darkforest.uwyo.edu 4000
7;t really
been interested enough to look up any statistics or benchmarks.
- James
-Original Message-
From: Michael Patterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2001 11:51 AM
To: Raghavendra Bhat
Cc: Debian List
Subject: RE: DHCP and Adelphia Cablemodem (dhcpcd)
[Snippe
[Snipped suggestion to compile in CONFIG_FILTER]
This worked. It worked really well. DHCP now appears to work with one minor
problem--
It appears that the DNS isn't being caught by the DHCP-Client. My
resolv.conf is left with nothing but "search" in it-- and this appears to be
causing some proble
[Thu, Nov 01, 2001 at 09:06:15AM -0700] Michael Patterson :
> The cablemodem setup still isn't working
Are you using dhcpcd on a 'Potato' box ? Can you purge the dhcpcd
package and instead, install dhcp-client ?
> seems to have something to do with dhcpcd
dhcpcd
odconf so it will be properly
> initialized at boot time. Once you consistantly get eth0 listed on an
> "ifconfig", then you can fine-tune the dhcpcd paramenters for your
> setup.
>
> When everthing is working properly, the "ifconfig" command should show
> your ass
being recognized during bootup, you should add the
appropriate "driver" module via using modconf so it will be properly
initialized at boot time. Once you consistantly get eth0 listed on an
"ifconfig", then you can fine-tune the dhcpcd paramenters for your
setup.
When everthi
x27;t work. So I
> removed that package and tried dhcpcd, which I actually had documents for.
> That didn't work either.
>
>
> Here's the information I have. It's somewhat sparse, but it's all that I
> could find. (information seperated by )
>
> -
So I wrote down the information, moved the cable modem over to my
> debian box, and set it up.
>
> It worked for about 2 hours. Presumably, the DHCP server switched my
> information on me.
>
> So I installed the dhcp-client package and set it up. Didn't work. So I
> removed that
On approximately Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 09:50:27AM -0700, Michael Patterson wrote:
>
> Yesterday I finally got my cable modem (Adelphia). Hooked it up to windows,
> and it worked wonderfully. I was told that, in general, Adelphia doesn't
> change the IP information, and it would be safe to copy it t
to my
debian box, and set it up.
It worked for about 2 hours. Presumably, the DHCP server switched my
information on me.
So I installed the dhcp-client package and set it up. Didn't work. So I
removed that package and tried dhcpcd, which I actually had documents for.
That didn't work eithe
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 08:52:39AM +0100, Roger Lipscombe wrote:
| I've given up using pump -- it doesn't work properly with my cable modem
| provider, and switched to dhcpcd. I'm having problems stopping it from
| replacing my /etc/resolv.conf file (I'm using a local nameserv
I've given up using pump -- it doesn't work properly with my cable modem
provider, and switched to dhcpcd. I'm having problems stopping it from
replacing my /etc/resolv.conf file (I'm using a local nameserver).
Now, because dhcpcd is started from ifup, rather than from the
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 01:53:07PM -0500, Robert Matijasec uttered:
> 56 data byes
> neighbour table overflow
> ping:sendto: No buffer space available
> ping:wrote 24.217.12.166 64 chars ret=-1
> neighbour table overflow
> etc, etc ...
>
Put 'auto lo' on a line by itself in /etc/network/interfaces
On Fri, Jun 29, 2001 at 01:53:07PM -0500, Robert Matijasec wrote:
> kernal is 2.2
>
> I used to be able to ping lo and it worked fine, now I
> get:
>
> ping: sendto: Operation not permitted
> ping:wrote erdos 64 chars, ret=-1
> etc, etc ...
Did you do anything involving firewalling rules? Perha
y for busting in on the tread
Yours,
Nico de Haer
- Original Message -
From: Robert Matijasec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Andrew Agno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Debian. Org
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2001 8:53 PM
Subject: RE: internet w/ dhcpcd
>
>
>
>
Well here is some info that you might be inerested in:
Note that the way I set this up is by following the
mini-dhcpcd howto. It claimed Debian would configure
everything out of dpkg, so maybe I had somethin messed
up earlier, I never configured the computer for inet
use on install, but I don
Jimmy Richards writes:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 06:27:25PM -0700, Andrew Agno wrote:
> > Robert Matijasec writes:
> I could be wrong about this, but I think dhcpcd only works with
> 2.0.x and 2.4.x kernels. Are you using a 2.4.x kernel? If so you may
> need to use pump
rovider.
>
> Can you ping your ethernet card? How about your gateway? What does
> % route -n
> tell you?
>
> > pump came w/Debian install, but after putting on
> > dhcpcd I assumed it would have been neatly removed.
>
> You can always check to see
oute -n
tell you?
> pump came w/Debian install, but after putting on
> dhcpcd I assumed it would have been neatly removed.
You can always check to see if pump is still there, using dselect or
dpkg.
Andrew.
I just installed the dhcpcd package on my i386 and
everything seems fine right up to the point where I
want to test the connection.
I type: telnet ritix.slu.edu
I get: Host name lookup failure
I type: telnet 165.134.123.3
I get: Trying 165.134.123.3...
and it keeps trying until it times
Hey
Has anyone figured out how to get dhcpcd to work
with a 3c509b NIC?
At first I thought that it was just me, but then I
searched on google, and learn that this card does have a slight
problem.
I've looked all over google and some various search
sites, and everything posted do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
the man page for dhcpcd says that by default dhcpcd will "NOT" set the
hostname of the host to the hostname option received from the DHCP server.
To override this (i.e., and force the hostname to be changed), use the -H
option.
i'
I'm running 2.2.12 with a kingston pci card using the tulip
module. It states that the eth0 is in promiscuous mode? What does
that mean? Also i just installed dhcpcd from a tarbel but the files don't
seem to be where all the how-to's say they should? The card is
I've been playing with this, and conferring with Andrei off list.
I was used to static entries in /etc/init.d/network...when @Home switched my
subnet to completely dynamic I had no choice but to install the DHCPCD
package.
>From the command line as root..."dhcpcd -h crxx-x
On Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 06:51:55PM -0600, Andrei Ivanov wrote:
> Just call it 'dhcpcd -h foo' if hostname is foo.
> Andrei
Or if it's a client id that's necessary, dhcpcd's -I argument is used for
that.
Mike
--
Michael P. Soulier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Just call it 'dhcpcd -h foo' if hostname is foo.
Andrei
--
First there was Explorer...
Then came Expedition.
This summer
Coming to a street near you..
Ford Ex
The subject says it allI've been static for years, and now @home has
gone and changed things...I'm back up after 4 days of hell trying to figure
out what happened, but now am wondering where to tell dhcpcd what my
hostname is Can anyone shed some light?
Rich
h0
> > at boot time. pump is already installed, but it doesn't seem to be doing
> > anything. I tried installing dhcpcd, but it conflicted with pump. Any
> > ideas? Thanks!
>
> Um, remove pump and install dhcpcd?
Pump should work fine after you edit /etc/net
em to be doing
> anything. I tried installing dhcpcd, but it conflicted with pump. Any
> ideas? Thanks!
Um, remove pump and install dhcpcd?
Have you tried running pump manually (as root)? Have you checked
daemon.log for its message to see whether it's failing and if so,
why?
--
Carl
I finally found the right kernel options for my ethernet card, so now the
kernel recognizes it, but I need to setup dhcp support to configure eth0
at boot time. pump is already installed, but it doesn't seem to be doing
anything. I tried installing dhcpcd, but it conflicted with pump.
hi-
i'm working on switching from static ip addresses to dynamic using dhcp on
my massive private network (all 3 machines are currently arranged around my
chair ). i've gotten what should be a working server daemon running
on the relevant machine, but when i try to load the dhc
On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 11:57:11AM -0400, Andrew Whitlock wrote:
> Problem: dhcpcd wouldn't run with config files, only when configured on
> command line
>
> Solution: the format given in the example config file in /etc/dhcpc seems to
> either be incorrect or, at least, it doe
Problem: dhcpcd wouldn't run with config files, only when configured on
command line
Solution: the format given in the example config file in /etc/dhcpc seems to
either be incorrect or, at least, it doesn't work for my ISP (@home). The
format _given_ is as follows:
OPTIONS=
Well, I guess I _could_ use a shell script to start it, but it bothers me
that it used to work yet suddenly does not. The config files sure seem to
be written correctly. I have installed other packages since dhcpcd that
mess with network things, such as ssh and oidentd, but I don't see how
ycle the cable ethernet bridge and then use dhcpcd -h
> hostname
>
> I just put
> dhcpcd -h cr- &
> in rc.local and all is fine. Doesn't debian use pump though?
I think by default pump is used, but you can install any one of, to my
knowledge, three DHCP clients.
Gary
I have no problems with [EMAIL PROTECTED] service and my DHCP service, albiet,
I use
the command line -h not config files. I've never had a problem at all except
for when the power goes out, then I have to power cycle the cable ethernet
bridge and then use dhcpcd -h hostname
I just put
d
n file for the
> equivalent.
But he's adding one, via his config files, no? I'm using dhcpcd and the
config files, and with rogers it often takes me multiple tries to finally get
an IP address. They really suck.
Mike
--
Michael P. Soulier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"...the wor
> >Oct 11 00:08:36 isharagi dhcpcd[188]: timed out waiting for a valid DHCP
> >server response
>
> It gets the address instantly if I start it as follows:
>
> >isharagi:/# dhcpcd -h (hostname)
>
> Whereas just typing "dhcpcd" causes it to pause for a long
I have a box that provides network services to some other computers that is
running Potato. It accesses the internet via cable modem, using dhcpcd to
get its IP address. The problem I'm having is that it won't work unless I
run it with configuration options on the command line, altho
Brendan J Simon wrote:
> Our company has a Win2000 Domain server which has DNS and DHCP
> services. I have installed dhcpcd on our Debian Linux machines
> (PowerMac G4, PowerBook Pismo and a P133 machine) and they obtain the IP
> address and gateway from the Win2000 server without
Our company has a Win2000 Domain server which has DNS and DHCP
services. I have installed dhcpcd on our Debian Linux machines
(PowerMac G4, PowerBook Pismo and a P133 machine) and they obtain the IP
address and gateway from the Win2000 server without any problems. The
problem I have is that the
"Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > Why was pump made the default DHCP client ? I have been unable to get
> > pump working with my @Home setup. dhcp-client, however, works very
> > well.
> >
>
> dunno, apparently it was small or something. Plus if it worked for Red Hat
Ju
>
> Why was pump made the default DHCP client ? I have been unable to get
> pump working with my @Home setup. dhcp-client, however, works very
> well.
>
dunno, apparently it was small or something. Plus if it worked for Red Hat
..
> -Original Message-
> From: Bryan K. Walton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2000 6:23 PM
> To: Debian-User Mailing List
> Subject: pump replacing dhcpcd?
>
>
> When I go to the debian web site and look up info on the pump
> package,
On 13-Sep-2000 Bryan K. Walton wrote:
> When I go to the debian web site and look up info on the pump package, one of
> the things that the page tells me is:
>
> "This is the DHCP/BOOTP client written by RedHat. This replaces the dhcpcd
> package."
>
> I take this
1 - 100 of 226 matches
Mail list logo