Re: [OT] Installing Damn Small Linux on a USB key

2006-06-11 Thread George Hein
After viewing instructions for DSL and RIP (RecoveryIsPossible) I installed RIP onto a USB-hardisk on a FAT partition. It took two or three attempts to do it. The RIP instructions may or may not be useful for you. Initially I tried to boot a full Debian and full Suse as well from there and

RE: [OT] Installing Damn Small Linux on a USB key

2006-06-10 Thread David Christensen
Kent West: > I think it may have something to do with the brand of USB key. Googling, here are some interesting links: http://www.usbflashdrive.org/usbfd_faq.html#bootable http://www.oreillynet.com/digitalmedia/blog/2004/10/utility_to_make_usb_ flash_driv.html http://h18000.www1.hp.com/support/

Re: [OT] Installing Damn Small Linux on a USB key

2006-06-10 Thread Kent West
Paolo Pantaleo wrote: sorry for the OT, but I know there on this list there are smart people, and I hope I will get an aswere. I want to put DSL on my USB key, so I downloaded the iso image and i copied it to the USB with dd, but it doesn't seems to work [well it could be fault of my BIOS, unabl

[OT] Installing Damn Small Linux on a USB key

2006-06-10 Thread Paolo Pantaleo
Hi, sorry for the OT, but I know there on this list there are smart people, and I hope I will get an aswere. I want to put DSL on my USB key, so I downloaded the iso image and i copied it to the USB with dd, but it doesn't seems to work [well it could be fault of my BIOS, unable to boot from USB

Re: Damn! Updated system and grub is changed ???????

2005-06-17 Thread Matthias Kaeppler
debian wrote: How is this possible ??? Did the debian upgrade this ? How can i change this back ? This sucks! It's probably because you have a stock kernel installed and the package upgrade for the new kernel has overwritten your /boot/grub/menu.lst. The same happened to me, too, on my note

Re: Damn! Updated system and grub is changed ???????

2005-06-17 Thread Greg Folkert
On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 16:18 +0300, Valmar wrote: > If your menu.lst is gone then fastest way is to > take /usr/share/doc/grub/examples/menu.lst and modify it a bit. > Don't even do that. If you can at least BOOT your system (by manually using grub in interactive mode), once booted, rename you cur

Damn! Updated system and grub is changed ???????

2005-06-17 Thread Philippe Dhont (Sea-ro)
Title: Damn! Updated system and grub is changed ??? Hi, I upgrade my debian and i do a reboot and i see in my startup screen that my grub configurations are GONE!!! How is this possible ???  Did the debian upgrade this ? How can i change this back ? This sucks!

Re: Damn! Updated system and grub is changed ???????

2005-06-17 Thread Valmar
If your menu.lst is gone then fastest way is to take /usr/share/doc/grub/examples/menu.lst and modify it a bit.On 17/06/05, Guillaume TESSIER < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:debian wrote:>>> Hi, >> I upgrade my debian and i do a reboot and i see in my startup screen> that my grub configurations are GONE

Re: Damn! Updated system and grub is changed ???????

2005-06-17 Thread Guillaume TESSIER
debian wrote: Hi, I upgrade my debian and i do a reboot and i see in my startup screen that my grub configurations are GONE!!! How is this possible ??? Did the debian upgrade this ? How can i change this back ? This sucks! of course, there is a solution. 1- You should boot on a linux in

Damn! Updated system and grub is changed ???????

2005-06-17 Thread debian
Title: Damn! Updated system and grub is changed ??? Hi, I upgrade my debian and i do a reboot and i see in my startup screen that my grub configurations are GONE!!! How is this possible ???  Did the debian upgrade this ? How can i change this back ? This sucks!

Re: OT [SOLVED] Who owns the damn Bible

2004-12-16 Thread Kent West
William Ballard wrote: It's interesting why this version of the Bible isn't distributed in Debian and Freeware software. I agree. I'm glad to know why the [N]RSV is not available. Thanks for the research. (And that milena link was just ... disturbing.) -- Kent -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA

Re: OT [SOLVED] Who owns the damn Bible

2004-12-16 Thread William Ballard
On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 04:37:52AM -0500, Chris Metzler wrote: > *plonk* *plonk* right back atcha. I put OT in the subject. Stop grandstanding. I'm done anyway. It's interesting why this version of the Bible isn't distributed in Debian and Freeware software. Don't be a dick. -- To UNSUBSCR

Re: OT [SOLVED] Who owns the damn Bible

2004-12-16 Thread Chris Metzler
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 03:21:30 -0500 William Ballard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 02:43:34AM -0500, William Ballard wrote: > > but apparently Mr. "I Love Windows, Porn, and the Bible" Zaine is the Enough. This is worse than the spam. *plonk* -- Chris Metzler

OT [SOLVED] Who owns the damn Bible

2004-12-16 Thread William Ballard
On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 02:43:34AM -0500, William Ballard wrote: > but apparently Mr. "I Love Windows, Porn, and the Bible" Zaine is the > only person who has the Oxford commentaries (the stuff at the start of > each Book of the Bible). The National Coalition of Churches, USA (the folks that bro

damn!

2004-04-09 Thread mw97
hi its me i've found a shity virus on my pc. check your pc, too! follow the steps in this article. bye Norton AntiVirus Deleted1.txt Description: plain/text

damn!

2004-04-09 Thread contact
hi its me i've found a shity virus on my pc. check your pc, too! follow the steps in this article. bye Norton AntiVirus Deleted1.txt Description: plain/text

Re: damn gdm2 greeter - can't login :(((

2002-10-03 Thread Roman Joost
I found the solution. My Session files were incorrect and i've to fix the session files. Thanks for your ideas! Roman -- www: http://www.romanofski.de email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: damn gdm2 greeter - can't login :(((

2002-10-02 Thread Ramin Motakef
Roman Joost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I tried the debug option, but can't find any error output. Then i tried to > comment out the pam limits line in /etc/pam.d/gdm2, but it won't work, too. I > tried a complete other session, but can't login anymore. Don't know where the > problem can be :((

Re: damn gdm2 greeter - can't login :(((

2002-10-02 Thread Roman Joost
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 10:40:18AM +0100, Peter Whysall wrote: > I do NOT know how much this compromises the security of your system. I'm > no PAM expert. > > Can someone with PAM-fu help us out here? > > Do I need to file bugs against PAM (specifically, libpam-modules which owns the >pam_limi

Re: damn gdm2 greeter - can't login :(((

2002-10-02 Thread Peter Whysall
on Wed, Oct 02, 2002, Roman Joost ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I don't know what i did wrong, but i can't login no more. Not with a user > account and not with root. If i login the xsession-error file tells me nothing, > because there no errors. > > Anyone the same problem and know what i

Re: damn gdm2 greeter - can't login :(((

2002-10-02 Thread Ramin Motakef
Roman Joost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I don't know what i did wrong, but i can't login no more. Not with a user > account and not with root. If i login the xsession-error file tells me nothing, > because there no errors. > > Anyone the same problem and know what i can do to fix it? I

damn gdm2 greeter - can't login :(((

2002-10-02 Thread Roman Joost
I don't know what i did wrong, but i can't login no more. Not with a user account and not with root. If i login the xsession-error file tells me nothing, because there no errors. Anyone the same problem and know what i can do to fix it? I looked in /var/log/auth.log and can't find an err

Re: Damn Outlook HTML

2002-04-04 Thread Ron Johnson
On Thu, 2002-04-04 at 15:30, Costa, Todd (DMH) wrote: > Hi Debian-Users, > > I am stuck on how I can manually start-stop-restart a daemon from > the command line. I have a daemon that gets flaky and the only way I can get > it back running again is to restart the entire system. I really don'

Re: Damn Outlook HTML

2002-04-04 Thread Gary Hennigan
"Costa, Todd (DMH)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >     I am stuck on how I can manually start-stop-restart a daemon from the > command line. I have a daemon that gets flaky and the only way I can get it > back running again is to restart the entire system. I really don't want to do > this so I t

Damn Outlook HTML

2002-04-04 Thread Costa, Todd \(DMH\)
Title: Damn Outlook HTML Hi Debian-Users,     I am stuck on how I can manually start-stop-restart a daemon from the command line. I have a daemon that gets flaky and the only way I can get it back running again is to restart the entire system. I really don't want to do this so I

Re: damn, damn, damn installation!!

2001-12-24 Thread Karsten M. Self
on Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 11:24:22PM -0500, Luiz Afonso B de Campos ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Dear Sirs > > > > I had nearly installed GNU Linux Debian 2.2 potato version when in the > step of installation "Install Operating System Kernel and Modules" the > machine did stopped when I typing in

damn, damn, damn installation!!

2001-12-22 Thread Luiz Afonso B de Campos
Dear Sirs I had nearly installed GNU Linux Debian 2.2 potato version when in the step of installation "Install Operating System Kernel and Modules" the machine did stopped when I typing in "/instmnt/dists/potato/main/disks-i386/2.2.16.2000-07-14/images-1.44/udma66" . The fact is that

Re: rfc-ignorant.org (WAS Re: damn. so much for MAPS)

2001-07-16 Thread Martin F. Krafft
also sprach Jeremy Zawodny (on Fri, 13 Jul 2001 06:56:01PM -0700): > I already responded privately to offer some DNS and bandwidth help. so did many others. i am currently totally swamped with work, but freerbl.org is registered, and there is not too much that needs to be done. we are always happy

Re: damn. so much for MAPS

2001-07-16 Thread Martin F. Krafft
also sprach Craig Sanders (on Sat, 14 Jul 2001 11:34:19AM +1000): > MAPS was a good idea when it started, but its inertia has damaged the > fight against spam for at least two years. > > in the long run, we'll be better off because alternatives will spring up > which aren't as sluggish and unrespo

rfc-ignorant.org (WAS Re: damn. so much for MAPS)

2001-07-13 Thread Jeremy Zawodny
On Fri, Jul 13, 2001 at 11:53:55PM +0200, Martin F. Krafft wrote: > > at first, i am looking for other interested parties with the > capacities to help out. then, maybe we can find some true believing > company that will help us towards replacing MAPS. it's got to stay > free, after all... I alre

Re: damn. so much for MAPS

2001-07-13 Thread Craig Sanders
On Fri, Jul 13, 2001 at 11:53:55PM +0200, Martin F. Krafft wrote: > http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/07/13/0513251 > > i have already started setting up my own RBL domain at > rbl.madduck.net. the resources are *not* enough to host for hundreds, > [...] > > thoughts, ideas? i've been follow

Re: damn. so much for MAPS

2001-07-13 Thread Martin F. Krafft
also sprach Jason Thomas (on Sat, 14 Jul 2001 10:06:48AM +1000): > make is so other can automatically mirror it easily, that would probably > take the load off of your resources. well, sure thing, but if such a project starts (freerbl.org btw), then we would still want it to be centralized so that

Re: damn. so much for MAPS

2001-07-13 Thread Jason Thomas
make is so other can automatically mirror it easily, that would probably take the load off of your resources. On Fri, Jul 13, 2001 at 11:53:55PM +0200, Martin F. Krafft wrote: > http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/07/13/0513251 > > i have already started setting up my own RBL domain at > rbl.ma

damn. so much for MAPS

2001-07-13 Thread Martin F. Krafft
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/07/13/0513251 i have already started setting up my own RBL domain at rbl.madduck.net. the resources are *not* enough to host for hundreds, but in the light of MAPS being sucked into capitalism, i'd be interested in starting a separate project. you know, CDDB v

Re: That damn spammer!

2001-03-18 Thread hogan
> The fact that it crashes pine and outlook, IMHO, means, that those > programs are buggy. A mail program shouldn't crash just because it > receives garbage that is meant to resemble an E-Mail. Turns out it only crashed pine, not outlook express.. > hogan> Looks like a very obvious spammer fr

Re: That damn spammer!

2001-03-18 Thread Brian May
> "hogan" == hogan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: hogan> Exported it without viewing from pine, zipped it, emailed hogan> it to my work machine and examined it in a text editor.. hogan> This email appears to be MIME/Base64 encoded.. and crashes hogan> both pine and Outlook Expre

Re: That damn spammer!

2001-03-18 Thread Nate Amsden
hogan wrote: > > Exported it without viewing from pine, zipped it, emailed it to my work > machine and examined it in a text editor.. > > This email appears to be MIME/Base64 encoded.. and crashes both pine and > Outlook Express.. loaded ok in netscape 4.76 . nate -- ::: ICQ: 75132336

That damn spammer!

2001-03-18 Thread hogan
Exported it without viewing from pine, zipped it, emailed it to my work machine and examined it in a text editor.. This email appears to be MIME/Base64 encoded.. and crashes both pine and Outlook Express.. Looks like a very obvious spammer from the headers "X-AD2000-" Received: from murphy.debia

Re: The shithead damn it thingy - please cool down people

2000-12-10 Thread Markus Lechner
On Sun, 10 Dec 2000 Chris Gray wrote: > Maybe you could give me some Message-IDs? > Sorry, already deleted them after reading. Fetched mails last day, searched them for kroeger, found the following subjects, read them (this threads were started by kroeger [2], at least the mails i had in my inbox

Re: The shithead damn it thingy - please cool down people

2000-12-10 Thread Peter Jay Salzman
On Thu 10 Dec 98, 10:55 AM, Mac said... (snip) > BTW, if he would be such an ignorant person why isn't he flaming your replies > and starting a real flame war? Looks like he is polite and mature enough to > be a Ph.D. and to not behave this premature way. i am nearing a phd in theoretical phys

Re: The shithead damn it thingy - please cool down people

2000-12-10 Thread Chris Gray
> Mac writes: m> I just searched for other mails from [EMAIL PROTECTED] and i only m> found polite questions AND answers concerning debian. This man m> appears to be a victim. (My password was sniffed some years ago m> and it was quite a disaster for me - someone started reall

The shithead damn it thingy - please cool down people

2000-12-10 Thread Mac
I just searched for other mails from [EMAIL PROTECTED] and i only found polite questions AND answers concerning debian. This man appears to be a victim. (My password was sniffed some years ago and it was quite a disaster for me - someone started really REALLY bad nazi crap with my identity - not

Re: This list is rudderless, damn it, damn it, damn it

2000-12-09 Thread Brad
On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 04:55:27PM +0100, Kerstin Hoef-Emden wrote: > > Somehow it looks to me that this footer must be either a > joke or he started some kind of behavioural experiment with us. If so, i do believe that's unethical. Besides, it has damaged both his and his institution's reputati

Re: This list is rudderless, damn it, damn it, damn it

2000-12-09 Thread John Galt
> > Is this a joke ? > > > > > > > > - Davide > > > > > > -- > no , it's just another stupid Ph.d > Piled higher and deeper? -- Pardon me, but you have obviously mistaken me for someone who gives a damn. email [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: This list is rudderless, damn it, damn it, damn it

2000-12-09 Thread the_kuzie
Quoting Davide Libenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > James K. Kroger, Ph.D. > > Center for the Study of Brain, Mind, and Behavior > ^^^ > > > Is this a joke ? > > > > - Davide > > > -- no , it's just another stupid Ph.d -- +--

Re: This list is rudderless, damn it, damn it, damn it

2000-12-09 Thread Kerstin Hoef-Emden
Hi, On Fri, 8 Dec 2000, Christopher W. Aiken wrote: > For someone who is educated with a Ph.D. you apparently can't read > or follow directions. You have posted several emails to this list > -|_ > -|James K. Kroger, Ph.D. > -|Center for t

Re: This list is rudderless, damn it, damn it, damn it

2000-12-09 Thread Antonio Rodriguez
This guy even works in the Center for Study of the Brain, Mind and Behavior!!! You can imagine what the heck they do there I agree that someone must have subscribed him to this list. Jim Kroger wrote: > > Unsubscribe me already! I've sent the right mail to the right place > multiple t

Re: This list is rudderless, damn it, damn it, damn it

2000-12-09 Thread Jonathan D. Proulx
Heck, unsubscription is too easy! I was unsubscribed accidently while responding to one of your earlier messages, seems the you don't even need to mail debian-user-request, debian-user will happily unsubscribe you and confim it too even if you munge the subject line a bit while forwarding the mes

Re: This list is rudderless, damn it, damn it, damn it

2000-12-09 Thread Phil Brutsche
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far way, someone said... > Henrique M Holschuh wrote: > > > .forward somewhere else? That would mean you're not even subscribed to this > > list (someone else whom dislikes you is automatically forwarding crap to > >

Re: This list is rudderless, damn it, damn it, damn it

2000-12-08 Thread Nate Amsden
Henrique M Holschuh wrote: > .forward somewhere else? That would mean you're not even subscribed to this > list (someone else whom dislikes you is automatically forwarding crap to > your account). Check the Received: readers. sounds like a good idea ..hmm just need to setup an alias in sendmail..

Re: This list is rudderless, damn it, damn it, damn it

2000-12-08 Thread John Carline
Jim Kroger wrote: > Unsubscribe me already! I've sent the right mail to the right place > multiple times, sent mail to the guy at the bottom who says send me > mail if you have a problem, and now several days later > > I'M STILL NOT UNSUBSCRIBED TO THIS STINKING LIST ! > > WHAT A LOSER !!! > _

Re: This list is rudderless, damn it, damn it, damn it

2000-12-08 Thread Bob Brown
Glad I didn't knock rings with him... Jim Kroger wrote: > > Unsubscribe me already! I've sent the right mail to the right place > multiple times, sent mail to the guy at the bottom who says send me > mail if you have a problem, and now several days later > > I'M STILL NOT UNSUBSCRIBED TO THIS STI

Re: This list is rudderless, damn it, damn it, damn it

2000-12-08 Thread Eric G . Miller
vior like this, you've got to be kidding! BTW, *nobody* on this list can do a damn thing to get you unsubscribed. It is unmoderated. But, you'll probably make it into a few killfiles. You have to respond to the confirmation message too. -- Eric G. Miller

Re: This list is rudderless, damn it, damn it, damn it

2000-12-08 Thread Davide Libenzi
> James K. Kroger, Ph.D. > Center for the Study of Brain, Mind, and Behavior ^^^ Is this a joke ? - Davide

Re: This list is rudderless, damn it, damn it, damn it

2000-12-08 Thread Christopher W. Aiken
For someone who is educated with a Ph.D. you apparently can't read or follow directions. You have posted several emails to this list asking to unsubscribe. The directions at the end of each email tell you to send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the SUBJECT line reading: unsubscribe. Not the

Re: This list is rudderless, damn it, damn it, damn it

2000-12-08 Thread Henrique M Holschuh
BED TO THIS STINKING LIST ! > > WHAT A LOSER !!! 1. The listmasters for @lists.debian.org do voluntary work. Calling them losers won't help (and no, I am not a listmaster and I can't force-unsubscribe you). 2. Killfile us, and you'll not have to wait until you're subscrib

This list is rudderless, damn it, damn it, damn it

2000-12-08 Thread Jim Kroger
Unsubscribe me already! I've sent the right mail to the right place multiple times, sent mail to the guy at the bottom who says send me mail if you have a problem, and now several days later I'M STILL NOT UNSUBSCRIBED TO THIS STINKING LIST ! WHAT A LOSER !!! ___

Re: damn! I screwed up

2000-02-01 Thread Nathan E Norman
: >I don't think there is a "default" server. It all depends on the video : >card you have. However, I assume you have Hobson's Choice, because : >dists/stable/main/binary-m68k/x11/xserver-fbdev_3.3.2.3a-11.deb : >appears to be only xserver in slink/m68k. : When the installer asked me for the name

Re: damn! I screwed up

2000-02-01 Thread David Wright
Quoting dkphoto ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > >I think you need to reinterpret the semantics of "The first line of > >that file is the Xserver that is used". In other words, if you screw > >up the response to the question, you can just edit that file instead: > >that's just what the post-installation scri

Re: damn! I screwed up

2000-02-01 Thread dkphoto
>I think you need to reinterpret the semantics of "The first line of >that file is the Xserver that is used". In other words, if you screw >up the response to the question, you can just edit that file instead: >that's just what the post-installation script does. That's what I am trying to do; edit

Re: damn! I screwed up

2000-02-01 Thread David Wright
Quoting dkphoto ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > >Look in your /etc/X11 directory for a file called Xserver. The first line > >of that file is the Xserver that is used. > > No it isn't. I didn't set it remember! It says NONE. What I need is the > name of the default Xserver. Does anyone know it? I think

Re: damn! I screwed up

2000-02-01 Thread Eric G . Miller
On Tue, Feb 01, 2000 at 12:10:13AM -0700, dkphoto wrote: > >Look in your /etc/X11 directory for a file called Xserver. The first line > >of that file is the Xserver that is used. > > No it isn't. I didn't set it remember! It says NONE. What I need is the > name of the default Xserver. Does anyon

Re: damn! I screwed up

2000-02-01 Thread dkphoto
>Look in your /etc/X11 directory for a file called Xserver. The first line >of that file is the Xserver that is used. No it isn't. I didn't set it remember! It says NONE. What I need is the name of the default Xserver. Does anyone know it? > Change that to whatever you >want it to be. Or, yo

Re: damn! I screwed up

2000-02-01 Thread Robert Rati
Look in your /etc/X11 directory for a file called Xserver. The first line of that file is the Xserver that is used. Change that to whatever you want it to be. Or, you can just use XF86Setup and select your video card from the list and it will automatically make the needed changes.

damn! I screwed up

2000-02-01 Thread dkphoto
I answered no, when I should have said yes, when dselect asked me if I wanted ? as my default xserver. How can I fix this? David Kachel

RE: damn glib

1999-08-06 Thread Allan Neal
On Fri, 6 Aug 1999, Pollywog wrote: > > On 06-Aug-99 wonko wrote: > > i installed glib1.2.3 but gtk+ says cannot find glib1.2.3 anyway what do > > i do? > > Make sure it is really installed: > > $ dpkg -l | grep glib > > Did you install it from source or a deb package? > > -- > Andrew > > >

RE: damn glib

1999-08-06 Thread Pollywog
On 06-Aug-99 wonko wrote: > i installed glib1.2.3 but gtk+ says cannot find glib1.2.3 anyway what do > i do? Make sure it is really installed: $ dpkg -l | grep glib Did you install it from source or a deb package? -- Andrew

damn glib

1999-08-06 Thread wonko
i installed glib1.2.3 but gtk+ says cannot find glib1.2.3 anyway what do i do?

Re: DAMN the reply button

1998-11-14 Thread H. Peter Anvin
> > We still use the MAC address (mostly because it's the only numbered > component we *know* will be present), but it's definitely forgeable. It's > just that our usual customer wouldn't know how to do it. (Plus, I'm not > sure they'd even want to, in significant numbers. They might want mo

Re: DAMN the reply button

1998-11-14 Thread Kai Henningsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (H. Peter Anvin) wrote on 13.11.98 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Using the Ethernet address makes some amount of sense: although you > can set the Ethernet address if you want, it will really screw up your > network if you have the same address for more than one host, which is > usu

Re: DAMN the reply button

1998-11-14 Thread H. Peter Anvin
> > Then they wrote VM. > > Which has a command to set that serial number to anything you like. > > And yes, I've seen it used for software that looked at the serial number > for license purposes. > > I don't think it's worth it. It's far too easy to break. It's fake > security. > > MfG Ka

Re: DAMN the reply button

1998-11-14 Thread Kai Henningsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (BadlandZ) wrote on 11.11.98 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > (IMHO, maybe CPU, but BIOS for the sake of discussion). LINUX should > read (and not "soft" read) a serial number out of the BIOS, and not hold > it in software to be hacked. BIOS manufacture might be easier to Remember,

DAMN the reply button (two beers later)

1998-11-12 Thread BadlandZ
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > (IMHO, maybe CPU, but BIOS for the sake of discussion). LINUX should > > read (and not "soft" read) a serial number out of the BIOS, and not hold > > it in software to be hacked. BIOS manufacture might be easier to > > Any scheme like this can be hacked. Especiall

Re: DAMN the reply button

1998-11-12 Thread mattdm
> (IMHO, maybe CPU, but BIOS for the sake of discussion). LINUX should > read (and not "soft" read) a serial number out of the BIOS, and not hold > it in software to be hacked. BIOS manufacture might be easier to Any scheme like this can be hacked. Especially -- but certainly not limited to -- w

DAMN the reply button

1998-11-12 Thread BadlandZ
I guess I am use to BeroList. ;-) Anyhow I will try not to do it again...--- Begin Message --- Alan Cox wrote: OK, you got me on the previous. I'll look into it more, and take your word for it now. > > therefore if: Linux/hardware allowed Serial number on hardware, > > accessable in OS then: IS

Re: Linux is damn robust !

1998-03-25 Thread Timothy Miller
Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I just had my system reporting the following load: > > 6:35pm up 2:22, 4 users, load average: 23.37, 77.76, 47.23 > > How many commercial Unices would have supported that, without anything > crashing (syslogd still here - nothing in the logs) ?

Linux is damn robust !

1998-03-25 Thread Yann Dirson
I just had my system reporting the following load: 6:35pm up 2:22, 4 users, load average: 23.37, 77.76, 47.23 How many commercial Unices would have supported that, without anything crashing (syslogd still here - nothing in the logs) ? For the record, it was an unwanted recursive make, int

Re: damn identity crisis

1997-11-29 Thread Fred Leeflang
On Fri, 28 Nov 1997, Bob Nielsen wrote: > On Fri, 28 Nov 1997, Paul Miller wrote: > > > A few weeks ago about three nice people from the Debian-user list helped > > me out with setting up & fixing my DNS server, which I am very thankful. > > Unfortunately I am now having problems with IRC which

Re: damn identity crisis

1997-11-28 Thread Bob Nielsen
On Fri, 28 Nov 1997, Paul Miller wrote: > A few weeks ago about three nice people from the Debian-user list helped > me out with setting up & fixing my DNS server, which I am very thankful. > Unfortunately I am now having problems with IRC which may or may not be > related. > > When I try to con

Re: damn identity crisis

1997-11-28 Thread Tommy Lakofski
wrote: > From: Paul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Debian User , > Linux Net > Date: Fri, 28 Nov 1997 10:34:07 -0500 (EST) > Subject: damn identity crisis > > A few weeks ago about three nice people from the Debian-user list helped > me out with setting u

damn identity crisis

1997-11-28 Thread Paul Miller
A few weeks ago about three nice people from the Debian-user list helped me out with setting up & fixing my DNS server, which I am very thankful. Unfortunately I am now having problems with IRC which may or may not be related. When I try to connect to an IRC server, I get 'no authorization' error

Re: Connection refused. Damn.

1997-09-06 Thread Scott Hanson
local.debian-user Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.4.37/XEmacs 19.15 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Heiko Heijenga) writes: > Howdy, > > I've recently installed debian on my computer (1) and connected it > with another computer (2) (also debian) in the house with > ethernet. But when I try to tel

Re: Connection refused. Damn.

1997-09-06 Thread Jean Pierre LeJacq
On Sat, 6 Sep 1997, Heiko Heijenga wrote: > I've recently installed debian on my computer (1) and connected it with > another > computer (2) (also debian) in the house with ethernet. But when I try to > telnet > from 1 to 2, I get the message: Connection refused. The other way (2 to 1) > works f

Connection refused. Damn.

1997-09-06 Thread Heiko Heijenga
Howdy, I've recently installed debian on my computer (1) and connected it with another computer (2) (also debian) in the house with ethernet. But when I try to telnet from 1 to 2, I get the message: Connection refused. The other way (2 to 1) works fine. What have I done wrong? btw. 2 is gateway

Re: damn network cards

1996-12-18 Thread Tim Sailer
In your email to me, Pete Templin, you wrote: > > > Alright, > > I'm getting nowhere but poorer and more frustrated everyday. The > DEC netcard which came with my P133 wasn't supported. The Intel I bought > wasn't supported. The 3c905 which I bought requires compiling a custom > kernel,

damn network cards

1996-12-17 Thread Pete Templin
Alright, I'm getting nowhere but poorer and more frustrated everyday. The DEC netcard which came with my P133 wasn't supported. The Intel I bought wasn't supported. The 3c905 which I bought requires compiling a custom kernel, but I got compile errors, no kernel, and no help from this l