On Sat, 2003-06-21 at 17:53, Marino Fernandez wrote:
> On Saturday 21 June 2003 03:26 am, Marino Fernandez wrote:
[Adventures with DRI and Custom kernel elided ]
> > Any ideas. Thank you.
>
> I just needed to reboot... JUST LIKE IN WINDOWS!!!
Actually, you don't. I'm sorry that I didn't see you
On Saturday 21 June 2003 03:26 am, Marino Fernandez wrote:
> I have debian testing/unstable, gcc 3.2, kernel 2.4.20-xfs from knoppix. 3D
> support works fine (Intel830M).
>
> I compiled a 2.4.21 kernel and noticed no 3D suport; then I compiled a
> 2.4.20 (no xfs patch) and the same problem.. I used
I have debian testing/unstable, gcc 3.2, kernel 2.4.20-xfs from knoppix. 3D
support works fine (Intel830M).
I compiled a 2.4.21 kernel and noticed no 3D suport; then I compiled a 2.4.20
(no xfs patch) and the same problem.. I used exactly the same .config file
used for the first kernel in both
also sprach Vineet Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.10.21.2226 +0200]:
> You should be able to just chown it with no ill effects.
Right, but that's going to break on the next upgrade, and the other
users can't use it then either...
--
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' :pro
On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 08:42:31PM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> yes, that in combination with a rcfile listing the combinations allows
> me to do
> kcompile 2.4.19 albatros
>
> but the script is a *bad* hack, and i think there's a lot that i am
> doing wrong.
>
> i'd like to hear from the ad
> Maybe I am not quite clear on the modules and patches thing.
>
> I want to go ahead and produce kernel-image and kernel-headers with
> a selection of the installed kernel-patch and *-modules packages.
>
> Say I have kernel-patch-freeswan, kernel-patch-2.4-grsecurity,
> kernel-patch-vlan, and ke
also sprach Tom Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.10.21.1343 +0200]:
> It's hardly a lot to type in, and surely you don't do kernel compiles
> *that* often... (if you do, why? It seems to indicate a curiosity
> that could be better directed...)
i operate 57 machines each with their own kernel. some
* martin f krafft ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [021021 12:31]:
> in the meantime, maybe someone can tell me what to do about the
> /usr/src/modules and /usr/src/kernel-patches trees, which are owned
> by root. the last time i built a kernel as root must have been like
> 1876 or so... and at least kernel-pat
also sprach Simon Law <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.10.21.2116 +0200]:
> You might want to look at the kernellab package, which appears
> to do what you want.
it can't do modules, patches and version yet, so effectively, it is
only a centralized repository for configs. i have that part working.
also sprach Michael West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.10.21.2005 +0200]:
> the `make-kpkg --added-patches` option allows you to specify which
> patches to apply for a specific kernel build.
right. but the modules aren't so easily handled.
> What kind of interface are you looking for? Something li
Thanks all. After what was probably too long a prep period, I'm
successfully running a customized version of 2.4.8. Giant fun!
Best,
Glenn
++
http://www.burningclown.com
"Everyone's Portal to Nothing At All"
++
On Sun, Aug 26, 2001 at 07:45:02PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> All,
>
> I'm trying to compile what is essentially a custom kernel (2.4.8);
> however, the only thing I'm -certain- I want to customize is module
> version support ... I need this to be disabled (I'm working through the
> 2nd
All,
I'm trying to compile what is essentially a custom kernel (2.4.8);
however, the only thing I'm -certain- I want to customize is module
version support ... I need this to be disabled (I'm working through the
2nd ed. of O'Reilly's "Device Drivers" book).
After prepping to assure that I'm not
13 matches
Mail list logo